Moms make case for gun control

Moms make case for gun control

There are 9248 comments on the usatoday.com story from Mar 16, 2013, titled Moms make case for gun control. In it, usatoday.com reports that:

Peg Paulson had never beaten a path through the halls of Congress before or met a U.S. senator's staffer or advocated for a controversial issue.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at usatoday.com.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#5050 Jul 25, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
That's because they have no argument. When presented with the truth, the facts and proper sources..
You mean like the constant references to the Supreme Court and the exact and complete quotations from the lead justices in the cases?

Oh, that's right... we are the ones who with the exact and complete quotations and references...

And you are the one who takes two words out of the Second Amendment and insist that you have a better interpretation that the Supreme Court.

PS: If you don't like being called for using more than one alias, don't use more than one alias.

Wipe your chin, Mooch.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#5051 Jul 25, 2013
justhefacts wrote:
If tomorrow we replaced ALL LIBERIALS with Conservatives
Taxpayers would not be able to pay for the food stamps and welfare.

Funny for all the whining and crying: it seems that conservatives cannot get their agenda through because they keep losing elections.

Best of luck, 2016. Maybe tea baggers will leave the party by then?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#5052 Jul 25, 2013
Storm Warning wrote:
<quoted text> Really ? ok explain to me the monster responsible for murdering the kids at a religious compound in Waco texas
Why are you so fond of pedophiles?

George Zimmerman, David Koresh...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#5053 Jul 25, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. It's only deflection to detract from their being wrong.
You told us the state of Louisiana had the largest population of blacks in the US.

I proved you wrong and you deflected.

You then insisted you meant to say had it had the largest per capita population of blacks.

I proved that wrong and you deflected.

You insisted that you based your "FACTS" on old numbers.

I proved you lied: there are no old numbers.

And you cried that other people deflect from facts...

HAHAHAHAHAAHAH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#5054 Jul 25, 2013
justhefacts wrote:
94% of Blacks voted for Obama
94 percent of Conservatives voted for the draft dodger Romney.

Who won?

How much longer are you going to play "what if" the GOP wasn't the party wasn't the party of racists?

Election was over 10 months ago.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#5055 Jul 25, 2013
justhefacts wrote:
What if I told you that tomorrow if we got rid of ALL gun shop in the U.S. you think Murders would go down, NEVER!!!!!
You keep thinking someone is going to pay attention to what you throw out pretending they are facts though they are your opinions and rather stupid opinions.

Guns make murders easy.

Just ask George Zimmerman.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#5056 Jul 25, 2013
justhefacts wrote:
Puerto Rico is part of the U.S. and U.S. citizens.
Puerto Rico is not, however, a state.

Apples and tangerines.

“gun control takes two hands”

Since: Mar 13

outdoors

#5057 Jul 25, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep thinking someone is going to pay attention to what you throw out pretending they are facts though they are your opinions and rather stupid opinions.
Guns make murders easy.
Just ask George Zimmerman.
Sooo how do you make collecting welfare so easy?
Angered American

Rochester, MN

#5058 Jul 25, 2013
huntcoyotes wrote:
<quoted text>Sooo how do you make collecting welfare so easy?
Good one!!!

“gun control takes two hands”

Since: Mar 13

outdoors

#5060 Jul 26, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Puerto Rico is not, however, a state.
Apples and tangerines.
Yeah, we know that, freeloader. Are you demonstrating something you learned during your 9 years of high school?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#5061 Jul 26, 2013
huntcoyotes wrote:
<quoted text>Sooo how do you make collecting welfare so easy?
In order to feed the single mothers and children who need it, we have parasites like you who would rather collect welfare than work.

It's a cost we-the people who pay taxes- must bear.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#5062 Jul 26, 2013
huntcoyotes wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah, we know that, freeloader. Are you demonstrating something you learned during your 9 years of high school?
I'm not the dumbazz that pretended Puerto Rico was a state.

I'm not the one who is living off mom trying for five years to get a GED.

Time to move on, Sonny.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#5063 Jul 26, 2013
"George Zimmerman got away with murder, but you can't get away from God. And at the end of the day, he's going to have a lot of questions and answers he has to deal with,[But] the law couldn't prove it."

Juror B29
spocko

Oakland, CA

#5064 Jul 26, 2013
Here is the actual provision (jury instruction) read to Florida juries prior to the legislature's enactment of Stand Your Ground.

"The defendant cannot justify the use of force likely to cause death or great bodily harm unless he used every reasonable means within his power and consistent with his own safety to avoid the danger before resorting to that force. The fact that the defendant was wrongfully attacked cannot justify his use of force likely to cause death or great bodily harm if by retreating he could have avoided the need to use that force."

The same provision after SYG enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2005 changed to:

“A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.”

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#5066 Jul 26, 2013
spocko wrote:
Here is the actual provision (jury instruction) read to Florida juries prior to the legislature's enactment of Stand Your Ground.
"The defendant cannot justify the use of force likely to cause death or great bodily harm unless he used every reasonable means within his power and consistent with his own safety to avoid the danger before resorting to that force. The fact that the defendant was wrongfully attacked cannot justify his use of force likely to cause death or great bodily harm if by retreating he could have avoided the need to use that force."
The same provision after SYG enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2005 changed to:
“A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.”
What is your point? We know that SYG enacted protection to the victim. It was a move in the right direction. It should make criminals worry about their safety when attacking innocent people. Which it does, thus all the criminals wanting it repealed now.

“BILLARY 2016 ”

Since: Aug 07

Location hidden

#5067 Jul 26, 2013
FALCONER wrote:
Knock, Knock-
Who's there?
Not treyvon.
:)
Know why George rescued the family
in the overturned SUV? He could smell
Chick-fil-A coming from it....and they
weren't black.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#5068 Jul 26, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
What is your point? We know that SYG enacted protection to the victim.
Gun gnutter legislation that protected drug dealers more so than private citizens walking down the street.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#5069 Jul 26, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
It should make criminals worry about their safety when attacking innocent people.
It was created to cover vigilantes who insisted they should have the right to chase someone they thought was breaking the law, provoke a confrontation, and then use deadly force without retribution.

The pedophile here got away with murder. He won't be the first or the last.
Angered American

Rochester, MN

#5070 Jul 26, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Gun gnutter legislation that protected drug dealers more so than private citizens walking down the street.
Wouldnt you know more about that then anyone?

since you were "for real" shot by a drug dealer!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#5071 Jul 26, 2013
Angered American wrote:
<quoted text>
Wouldnt you know more about that then anyone?
since you were "for real" shot by a drug dealer!
Anything you... or your list of aliases... say, shug.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Trump's repeated claim that he won a 'landslide... 2 min Grumpy 5,850
News Trump to meet with Congressional Black Caucus a... 3 min Forest 3
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min Dudley 1,496,790
News Why voters want Trump is a question deserving s... 10 min Forest 362
News Trump supporters cheer his combative stance wit... 16 min RushFan666 168
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 17 min District 1 237,279
News Being conservative is not being racist 23 min huntcoyotes 515
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... (May '16) 1 hr josh 20,880
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 3 hr Agents of Corruption 412,570
News Pence: US will hold Russia accountable, stands ... 7 hr swampmudd 76
More from around the web