Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks ...

Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media

There are 66318 comments on the Wall Street Journal story from Mar 22, 2012, titled Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media. In it, Wall Street Journal reports that:

Social media has put the spotlight on the story Trayvon Martin , an unarmed African-American teenager who was shot to death last month by a neighborhood watch captain in Florida.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Wall Street Journal.

Slappy

Chicago, IL

#61819 Jun 21, 2013
Patriot wrote:
They say there is a black janitor there that cleans the courthouse. Hes 73 old everyone is so proud of him. That's the closest this jury will be to any blacks. Fortunately.
Proud of him???...Why???...cause he scrubs toilets and mops the sh!thouse floor?...It's a dirty job but someone's got to do it.....nothing to be proud of,...unless you're a sewer worker...lol.
Slappy

Chicago, IL

#61820 Jun 21, 2013
RuffnReddy wrote:
<quoted text>Wouldn't the person being pummeled be busy saying ouch-ouch-ouch?
That would be like the person getting head say,...gluck gluck gluck.....where do you numbnuts come from anyway?......you posting from the nut house?.....moron!
rick

Secaucus, NJ

#61821 Jun 21, 2013
I think he foRgot to take his meds, o wait, here comes the nuRse.
Unity

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#61822 Jun 21, 2013
No way that the state can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that George confronted Trayvon.

What is the states strongest argument..

YEAH from Hawaii will say the dead body.. What a tool
Slappy

Chicago, IL

#61824 Jun 21, 2013
rick wrote:
I think he foRgot to take his meds, o wait, here comes the nuRse.
...must be the head nurse,...eh?
Pompano Jack

Niceville, FL

#61825 Jun 21, 2013
Unity wrote:
No way that the state can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that George confronted Trayvon.
What is the states strongest argument..
YEAH from Hawaii will say the dead body.. What a tool
Well, "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" is how they say it, and I'd agree....but in practice, you could probably change that to "convince the jury", because thats all they really have to do. I thought the jury choice was troubling. Both sides have all the evidence, right? Both sides know the law. So both sides probably have a pretty good idea of where this could likely (not for sure), but likely, end up. My guess is the Judge and the State know as well. And IF you think that Zimmerman walks, wouldn't you want at least a racially balanced jury with some blacks on it? I mean seriously, would you really want to walk unnecessarily into another OJ riot (all white jury frees Zimmerman) thing? But the same thing kind of works the other way too, IF you think Zimmerman gets convicted of something (all black jury convicts Zimmerman), wouldn't you want at least a balanced jury with some whites on it? And man, its like they over did it, even kicked in a hispanic for good measure. Just based on jury selection and a healthy dose of paranoia on my part, I'd say its not a good sign for the defense.
Slappy

Chicago, IL

#61826 Jun 21, 2013
Pompano Jack wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" is how they say it, and I'd agree....but in practice, you could probably change that to "convince the jury", because thats all they really have to do. I thought the jury choice was troubling. Both sides have all the evidence, right? Both sides know the law. So both sides probably have a pretty good idea of where this could likely (not for sure), but likely, end up. My guess is the Judge and the State know as well. And IF you think that Zimmerman walks, wouldn't you want at least a racially balanced jury with some blacks on it? I mean seriously, would you really want to walk unnecessarily into another OJ riot (all white jury frees Zimmerman) thing? But the same thing kind of works the other way too, IF you think Zimmerman gets convicted of something (all black jury convicts Zimmerman), wouldn't you want at least a balanced jury with some whites on it? And man, its like they over did it, even kicked in a hispanic for good measure. Just based on jury selection and a healthy dose of paranoia on my part, I'd say its not a good sign for the defense.
6 blacks = guilty

6 whites = not guilty

3 blacks and 3 whites = hung jury.

Like you said,...this ain't Los Angeles...You got nothing to worry about,....Zim walks!...Sanford burns,...So what?...better for one innocent man to be set free and a whole town burn than to see one innocent man go to prison.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#61827 Jun 21, 2013
interesting wrote:
<quoted text>WOW..THANK YOU
You're Welcome :)

The Treehouse is a VERY good site for any news that pertains to this admin and George Zimmerman ...
Very "trusted" ...!!!

Bumper Sticker Of The Day ...
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/

Great news there today :)
Pompano Jack

Niceville, FL

#61828 Jun 21, 2013
I'd just add....jury selection is of course, not random. But even so, given the demographics, whats the probablility of no white men, and no blacks at all? Would the government, in a case with national, even presidential, visibility really seat a 100% non-black jury if they felt strongly that Zimmerman would get off with nothing at all? Yeah, I wish the answer was yes, that race played no part.....but is that likely in today's political environment?
Patriot

Puerto Escondido, Mexico

#61830 Jun 21, 2013
Pompano Jack wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" is how they say it, and I'd agree....but in practice, you could probably change that to "convince the jury", because thats all they really have to do. I thought the jury choice was troubling. Both sides have all the evidence, right? Both sides know the law. So both sides probably have a pretty good idea of where this could likely (not for sure), but likely, end up. My guess is the Judge and the State know as well. And IF you think that Zimmerman walks, wouldn't you want at least a racially balanced jury with some blacks on it? I mean seriously, would you really want to walk unnecessarily into another OJ riot (all white jury frees Zimmerman) thing? But the same thing kind of works the other way too, IF you think Zimmerman gets convicted of something (all black jury convicts Zimmerman), wouldn't you want at least a balanced jury with some whites on it? And man, its like they over did it, even kicked in a hispanic for good measure. Just based on jury selection and a healthy dose of paranoia on my part, I'd say its not a good sign for the defense.
No Jack George wants a FAIR and IMPARTIAL jury first of all and if that is possible without blacks so be it. I don't think anybody necessarily NEEDS a few blacks for ANYTHING.(Pleas note the caps too!) One racist black could taint the pool of jurors and persuade the jury that they must avenge the death of the thug. In this situation would you want a few blacks sprinkled in to satisfy the already racist mood of those highly controversial people or would you want your freedom that George really deserves. Im putting myself in his position and can easily say 5 white women and a Hispanic woman beats the hell out of a public relations stunt to appease the Afrikan "American" community! The hell with coddling those troublemakers a damn day longer. Let justice prevail!
Patriot

Puerto Escondido, Mexico

#61831 Jun 21, 2013
George wants to be judged by his peers. That would hardly be possible if they were black! Theres not an IMPARTIAL black in the County that could be seated on that jury anyway. Not a single ONE!
Let the show begin. Innocent till PROVEN guilty. And what that means is George will almost have to admit he did not fear for his life.
Spike

Akron, OH

#61832 Jun 21, 2013
OOOOOH Nooooo! The darkies are upset "again"?
Truth

Rome, GA

#61833 Jun 21, 2013
Judge ruled today that the Prosecution can not use the race card in court. That's about all they had. They should just do the right thing now and dismiss all charges. The political witch hunt should end.
Pompano Jack

Niceville, FL

#61834 Jun 21, 2013
Patriot wrote:
<quoted text> No Jack George wants a FAIR and IMPARTIAL jury first of all and if that is possible without blacks so be it. I don't think anybody necessarily NEEDS a few blacks for ANYTHING.(Pleas note the caps too!) One racist black could taint the pool of jurors and persuade the jury that they must avenge the death of the thug. In this situation would you want a few blacks sprinkled in to satisfy the already racist mood of those highly controversial people or would you want your freedom that George really deserves. Im putting myself in his position and can easily say 5 white women and a Hispanic woman beats the hell out of a public relations stunt to appease the Afrikan "American" community! The hell with coddling those troublemakers a damn day longer. Let justice prevail!
Well, let justice prevail is about the very best thing anyone could say. My problem, again with a dose of paranoia, is that this jury couldn't happen by accident.....its a million to one shot, like winning the lottery. IMO, this jury was constructed, and if so, why? At this point in our nation's history, please cut me some slack if I suggest I don't trust the government, especially if the feds are involved in any way. So, under what circumstances would the government (the current government) prefer a jury that has no blacks on it?

“always”

Since: May 12

Ticklaw

#61837 Jun 21, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
You're Welcome :)
The Treehouse is a VERY good site for any news that pertains to this admin and George Zimmerman ...
Very "trusted" ...!!!
Bumper Sticker Of The Day ...
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/
Great news there today :)
It's a blog dumazz, where the jergoff known as sundance cracker simply makes stuff up as a way to earn a few bucks off of racist scumbag morons like you. It's like world nut daily, jbs.org and all the other sites where turds like you go for your daily stink.
Patriot

Puerto Escondido, Mexico

#61838 Jun 21, 2013
A big bucket could get at least a dozen plugged. Wouldn't be bad investment either.
Pompano Jack

Niceville, FL

#61840 Jun 21, 2013
Patriot wrote:
A big bucket could get at least a dozen plugged. Wouldn't be bad investment either.
I read about the chicken thing....first it was cars, then sports jackets, then basketball shoes, now....a piece of chicken. There is a culture within the black community that has clearly unraveled to a point of insane savagery. Having said that, I still do not believe there's a fixed racial component of scientific significance. Rather that point out people like Dr. Ben Carson, or Condollezza Rice, or Colin Powell, or Allen West, or any other celebrities, I'll just say that I served 20 years in the Air Force, and worked with hundreds of black men and women and they were some of the finest Americans you could imagine, and I mean some flag waving mainiacs (just like me). I trusted them with my career, and if a few cases, even my life, and I was never let down, not once. I hate whats become of the culture...you can thank liberals and democrats for that.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#61841 Jun 21, 2013
Slappy wrote:
<quoted text>
...and you lie like a rug,....just because your Polynesian anscestors paddled across the open water to the Islands doesn't mean that your big fat ass can do it too.
...your ancestors were very athletic,...but not in the fat ass kind of way that you Sumo's have adopted.,,,really now!!!...lose some weight!...then STFU!
Well gee son... I guess you'd be telling the truth if you could prove your point.

But alas, you're a liar....

... so you can't!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#61842 Jun 21, 2013
Slappy wrote:
<quoted text>
..running from the law holed up on a remote chain of volcanic Islands is not the same as running a marthon, numbnut!
...hiking on a nature trail is not the same as hiking over to the can to sh!t every time you eat, fat ass!
...lol...and paddling to the Islands is not the same as waddling over to the kitchen for your hourly feast....
GFY!....and your fat ass son!
I know son.

So are you still one step ahead of the law?
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#61843 Jun 21, 2013
Truth wrote:
Judge ruled today that the Prosecution can not use the race card in court. That's about all they had. They should just do the right thing now and dismiss all charges. The political witch hunt should end.
What? You must be watching another trial son.

I don't recall anything about a 'race card.'

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Grey Ghostmoron 1,403,421
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 2 min Sharrp Shooter 391,111
News Could NATO be the next alliance to unravel? 3 min Trumping On 47
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 3 min DanFromSmithville 201,174
News Democrats will meet in a city of great economic... 3 min BabyDoll 1
News Trump bounces into the lead 4 min gwww 4
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 7 min HILLARY 2016 232,870
News Hillary Clinton picks Tim Kaine as vice preside... 42 min spud 201
News Despite her many roles, Hillary Clinton still h... 54 min Nine Ball 167
More from around the web