Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks ...

Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media

There are 66307 comments on the Wall Street Journal story from Mar 22, 2012, titled Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media. In it, Wall Street Journal reports that:

Social media has put the spotlight on the story Trayvon Martin , an unarmed African-American teenager who was shot to death last month by a neighborhood watch captain in Florida.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Wall Street Journal.

Yeah

Mililani, HI

#44907 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again.........
That guy shot someone in the back running away
Big difference
lol! Son, you're so into lying you really can't tell the truth anymore, can you?

"...Prosecutors called Rodriguez the aggressor and said he could have walked away from the confrontation safely before the shooting. Rodriguez's attorneys argued he was defending himself when one of the men lunged at him and he had less than two seconds to respond...."

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#44908 Dec 25, 2012
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! If that's the advice your attorney gave you, I suggest you change attorney's son!
Ya might want to read the law

A jury can't make up new charges

Most murder cases there are many charges so at least one will stick
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#44909 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
The injuries to the back of his head showed more than three blows
That does not happen falling or running into a tree
lol! How would you know son?

Not even his doctor does.

Amazing what you can make up when you're so deperate!

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#44910 Dec 25, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>Thug Zimmerman did NOT tell the 911 operator that he identified himself to Trayvon.

No matter how you slice and dice it, you cannot get around that. EVER.
Listen to the tapes

Not the altered NBC version
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#44911 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
He shot someone in the back that was running away
Big difference unless you are a liberal
lol! Son, there wouldn't be a need for a trial if that were the case.

Why do you insist on proving your stupidity?
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#44912 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Ya might want to read the law
A jury can't make up new charges
Most murder cases there are many charges so at least one will stick
Why don't you show me the law you're referring to son?

After all, you're the one who keeps making these things up as you go along.

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44913 Dec 25, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>I see that K-Mart crystal ball is working overtime for you. I disagree. This is all politics and was from the start. It's part of the Obama division his minions came up with. Seemed to have worked to.
It is you who has the crystal ball.

So, the Obama "minions" had gun-toting, drug-induced, woman-beating, Liar Thug Zimmerman sitting in his truck with a loaded gun on the night of February 26th?

They then had him profile and stalk a child who was minding his own business?

They then had him murder the child?

They then had an inept and incompetent police department do a corrupt investigation?

They then had an immoral State Attorney refuse to press charges?

They then had Thug Zimmerman to mislead the court and remain silent while his wife lie to the court?

They then had Thug Zimmerman pay off all his outstanding bills with blood money he begged for to use to defend himself?

Who are these puppet-master minions? We sure could have used them during Shrub II's presidency!

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44914 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>Tell us how someone that attacks another person is a victim???
Right, Thug Zimmerman is not a victim.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#44915 Dec 25, 2012
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Son, there wouldn't be a need for a trial if that were the case.

Why do you insist on proving your stupidity?
Really

What are you talking about???

No trial???

The guy shot someone in the back at a distance

One of the hardest justifiable homicide defense is shooting someone from a distance that did not have a gun

But as soon as someone punches you or try's to punch you the deadly force against a unarmed attacker has been ruled justifiable many times

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44916 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>What facts???

We have the 911 tape and two witnesses plus physical evidence

Zim has injuries that are consistent to the attack he described

The gun was point blank range when fired

The witness heard the shot when they were on the ground

Zim had every right in the world to ask the punk questions and to follow him

The punk had zero right to be in the private property

The punk good have went home but made a fatal mistake and attacked Zim
You have no witness that says Trayvon initiated an attack on Thug Zimmerman. NONE.

Thug Zimmerman has injuries consistent with being defended against from someone who feared for his life.

Thug Zimmerman did, indeed, kill the kid with a shot heard by many and caught on 911.

The Thug can ask anything he wants (including for clean sheets and a razor).

Trayvon had every right to be where he was, YES!

Thug Zimmerman should have listened to 911 but made a fatal mistake and killed the child...murdered the child according to me and the state of Florida.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#44917 Dec 25, 2012
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Why don't you show me the law you're referring to son?

After all, you're the one who keeps making these things up as you go along.
Use of deadly force in layman's language
Note it many times is decided by a court
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...

It is done in the jury instructions
The list of charges they can or can not find the suspect guilty of

It is called pattern jury instructions

Some case if the defense attorney asks for it a judge can tell a jury they can chose a lesser charge
But both sides must agree

This might show it

https://www.google.com/search...

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44918 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>Correct

A jury can only find a person guilty or not guilty of the charges he was charged of
The blind following the blind.

You, too, are unfamiliar with the laws of the state of Florida and criminal procedures in the state of Florida.

It is best to keep your mouth closed on matters you know nothing about.

It's Christmas.

If you leave it there, I won't continue to ridicule you on your ignorance of Florida law and criminal procedures.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#44919 Dec 25, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>Right, Thug Zimmerman is not a victim.
The black punk had injuries to his knuckles from striking something

Zim did not

Zim had multiple strikes to the back of his head from something like the edge of the concrete

That in itself proves the dead punk was the attacker

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44920 Dec 25, 2012
Makes sense wrote:
Hey the Stand Your Ground ALEC crowd and the NRA want vigilantes to guard our schools. I can't imagine anything wrong with that.(Eyes rolled.)

All the little kids wearing hoodies are DOA.

African American kids wearing hoodies won't make it past the sidewalk of the school entrance.

The NRA says all we need are some volunteers to secure our schools, just like the kind of kook that gunned down unarmed Trayvon Martin.
God help us!

God help us all!

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44921 Dec 25, 2012
Makes sense wrote:
Only 5% of the NRA are hunters!!

The rest are paranoid schizophrenics with little pricks addicted to the rush of holding a powerful tool.
Wow! I thought only .000001% of them were hunters.

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44922 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>Now law against following someone

The punk entered private property

The punk attacked and no he is dead

If more people did the same these punks would think twice
C'mon man.

I done told you it's Christmas.

Stop talking about killing people!

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#44923 Dec 25, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>You have no witness that says Trayvon initiated an attack on Thug Zimmerman. NONE.

Thug Zimmerman has injuries consistent with being defended against from someone who feared for his life.

Thug Zimmerman did, indeed, kill the kid with a shot heard by many and caught on 911.

The Thug can ask anything he wants (including for clean sheets and a razor).

Trayvon had every right to be where he was, YES!

Thug Zimmerman should have listened to 911 but made a fatal mistake and killed the child...murdered the child according to me and the state of Florida.
Zim is a witness and can testify to that and already did give statements so you are wrong again

Some one fearing for their life runs
They don't jump on top of someone and bang their head on the ground specially if they know the person is armed
If Zim had his gun drawn the punk would not be banging his head on the ground

Yes and the witnesses say the two were on the ground when the shot occurred

Only Zim had grass stains on his back and injuries to the back of his head

The dead perp had grass stains on his knees and elbows only

Wrong again
The punk was trespassing on private property
And there is no law against Zim following him or carrying the gun or shooting him after he attacked him

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44924 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>Read the law

If you feel threatened of death or bodily harm you may use deadly force

They don't have to have a weapon
Once more...

You cannot shoot unarmed innocent people.

What's so hard to understand about that?

How can you feel threatened of death or bodily harm from an unarmed innocent person? Do you know the definition of "innocent"?

You need help.

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44925 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>No law says that Zim could not have the gun

No law says that Zim could not follow the punk

There is laws against entering private property and attacking someone

And the punk paid for his crime
There are laws against murder.

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44926 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>No law against Zim having the weapon

No law against following the punk that did not answer a question
There's no need to answer any questions from gun-toting, drug-induced, woman-beating Thug Zimmerman.

Heck, he didn't even identify himself to Trayvon. I wouldn't answer that bastard's questions either!

Heck, he can't even answer questions without misleading a judge.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min Reality Check 1,534,360
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 8 min Jay 269,715
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 17 min Drumpf Disaster 2,203
News In U.S. presidential first, Trump prays at Jeru... 24 min UidiotRaceUMAKEWO... 43
News Russians increasingly indifferent to Trump, US ... 27 min C Kersey 2
News James Comey fired as FBI director 30 min Quirky 2,335
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 34 min UidiotRaceUMAKEWO... 314,304
News White House rebuts Washington Post report of Tr... 46 min Republican Blunder 638
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr LOL 240,800
More from around the web