Global warming 'undeniable,' scientis...

Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

There are 35576 comments on the TwinCities.com story from Jul 29, 2010, titled Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say. In it, TwinCities.com reports that:

Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming, one day after President Barack Obama renewed his call for climate legislation.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TwinCities.com.

Kyle

Columbia City, IN

#28647 Aug 4, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's a brief analyis:
100% bare assertions without any supporting argument whatsoever, including many dismissals of the science as a (laughably improbable) conspiracy theory.
0% scientific arguments; not one data point; not so much as a passing reference to a single argument for why a single finding of climate science is correct.
The difference, dummy, is that I have posted much science in the past, as have others here, but most importantly, climate scientists have published the peer reviewed science.

I am perfectly capable of supporting - with real science - every claim that I make, though denier scum are seldom worth the effort; they just fling poo and continue to deny.

The key point, DUMMY, is that denier scum posts what they consider to be solid argument against the science and IT'S PURE VAPOR! There was literally NOTHING there. Nothing!
Angered American

Rochester, MN

#28648 Aug 4, 2013
Phoenix Az temp June 1913 108
Phoenix AZ temp June 2013 107

I certainly do not see any change.

Global Warming is only an agenda by the Far Left Socialists.

Its all about Tax & Regulate The people, Control the People, That isnt for the good of the people, However Liberals see it different...They know whats best for YOU!!!

Millions arent buying the Agenda... and please dont its all Liberal Indoctrination
SpaceBlues

United States

#28650 Aug 4, 2013
Angered American wrote:
Phoenix Az temp June 1913 108
Phoenix AZ temp June 2013 107
I certainly do not see any change.
..
Climate Highlights — June
• The June average temperature for the contiguous U.S. was 70.4°F, 2.0°F above the 20th century average, and ranked as the 15th warmest such month on record.
• The western U.S. was warmer than average. California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Arizona, and New Mexico each had a top 10 warm June. Warmer-than-average conditions were also present for the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast. Near-average temperatures stretched from the Northern Plains, through the Midwest, and into the Southeast.
• Alaska was much warmer than average during June, with a statewide temperature 4.0°F above the 1971-2000 average and the third-warmest June in its 96-year period of record. A heat wave during the third week of the month brought temperatures in excess of 90°F to parts of the state, breaking daily record high temperatures at many locations.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/2013/6

<you are wrong, jim>
EXPERT

United States

#28652 Aug 4, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>hahaha do you want notebooks?
Better records are geological, biological, planetary, archeological, etc. Have you heard of tree rings or ice records?
Just because you don't know...
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/05/07/1...
http://www.skepticalscience.com/ice-age-predi...
He referred to "Historical" records scooter, try to keep up, ok pumpkin?
EXPERT

United States

#28653 Aug 4, 2013
Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>
Really now, fnugget? Just how far back do you think they go?
And why do you think that?
(This should be fun)
I know you must have special needs and may be required to wear a helmet, but try to focus.

You made the claim that there are "Historical records" that date back 800,000 yrs, I called BS!

In fact, just present 1 single "Historical record" dating later than 100,000 yrs...
Angered American

Rochester, MN

#28654 Aug 4, 2013
EXPERT

United States

#28655 Aug 4, 2013
Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>
I am perfectly capable of supporting - with real science - every claim that I make,
OK, snack shack, show us the fiber of your fabric...

You made the claim that there are "Historical records" that date back 800,000 yrs, I called BS!

In fact, just present 1 single "Historical record" dating later than 100,000 yrs...
SpaceBlues

United States

#28656 Aug 4, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text>
He referred to "Historical" records scooter, try to keep up, ok pumpkin?
Thanks for your post. NOT!

Learn from my post. Otherwise explain to the world what the other poster was communicating.
The Integral

Hilo, HI

#28658 Aug 4, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text>
I know you must have special needs and may be required to wear a helmet, but try to focus.
You made the claim that there are "Historical records" that date back 800,000 yrs, I called BS!
In fact, just present 1 single "Historical record" dating later than 100,000 yrs...
Perhaps you should change your moniker, since you are no expert.

Please read the following article and get back to me with your response:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v429/n69...

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#28660 Aug 4, 2013
Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, let's dance, simpleton. My position is that your infantile false dichotomy makes you an EXPERT in making sophomoric, fallacious arguments. You may be that stupid but I'm certainly not.
yea....you really are very stupid. but that's okay, you were probably bounced on your head as an infant.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#28661 Aug 4, 2013
climate always changes. all people with an education agree about that. stop doctoring 'evidence' if the facts are on your side alarmists. oh, that's right, you have to lie.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#28662 Aug 4, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>
Learn from my post.
that's parallels with getting blood out of a rock...
Angered American

Rochester, MN

#28663 Aug 4, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
climate always changes. all people with an education agree about that. stop doctoring 'evidence' if the facts are on your side alarmists. oh, that's right, you have to lie.
seems they have to lie because their so called fact are rubbish
Angered American

Rochester, MN

#28664 Aug 4, 2013
Obama’s climate change plan masks hidden agenda
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/06/28/oba...
EXPERT

United States

#28665 Aug 4, 2013
The Integral wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you should change your moniker, since you are no expert.
Please read the following article and get back to me with your response:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v429/n69...
Let me know when you are old enough to present your own argument rather on hiding behind links to avoid any accountable position.

bye-bye now
The Integral

Hilo, HI

#28666 Aug 4, 2013
Angered American wrote:
<quoted text>
seems they have to lie because their so called fact are rubbish
You are most assuredly a denier.

One of the most popular claims made against climate science is that there has been "no global warming since 1998," or even that there has been a pattern of "global cooling" since that year. Denialists who have made this argument include Tim Ball, Nigel Lawson, Fred Singer and Christopher Monckton. The origins of this argument are unclear; perhaps it might have originated in an article by Bob Carter which appeared the Daily Telegraph in 2006.[35]

This argument fails for several reasons: it only takes into account surface temperatures, and does not deal with oceanic temperatures; it fails to do any sort of trend analysis, and it does not take into account cyclical oscillations or variation. Most importantly, it is one of the finest examples of cherry picking. Classic climate denialism demands that average global temperature measurements must be taken from the peak of the hottest year and measured to the point trough of the coolest year. If the denialists ever picked years either side of 1998 as their start point, the argument would sink faster than the Titanic. This is because globally, 1998 was a record breaking hot year due to a very strong El Nino.[36][37]

Nobody has to lie. The facts are the facts.
Angered American

Rochester, MN

#28667 Aug 4, 2013
Christie denies Sandy link to climate change: It’s ‘liberal public radio’ agenda
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/21/christi...
SpaceBlues

United States

#28668 Aug 4, 2013
There is a severe case of denier rash. The rash is rendering their posts trashy.

Good grief.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#28669 Aug 4, 2013
The Integral wrote:
<quoted text>
You are most assuredly a denier.
One of the most popular claims made against climate science is that there has been "no global warming since 1998," or even that there has been a pattern of "global cooling" since that year. Denialists who have made this argument include Tim Ball, Nigel Lawson, Fred Singer and Christopher Monckton. The origins of this argument are unclear; perhaps it might have originated in an article by Bob Carter which appeared the Daily Telegraph in 2006.[35]
This argument fails for several reasons: it only takes into account surface temperatures, and does not deal with oceanic temperatures; it fails to do any sort of trend analysis, and it does not take into account cyclical oscillations or variation. Most importantly, it is one of the finest examples of cherry picking. Classic climate denialism demands that average global temperature measurements must be taken from the peak of the hottest year and measured to the point trough of the coolest year. If the denialists ever picked years either side of 1998 as their start point, the argument would sink faster than the Titanic. This is because globally, 1998 was a record breaking hot year due to a very strong El Nino.[36][37]
Nobody has to lie. The facts are the facts.
hurricane season should be very usual this year and probably subdued due to eastern atlantic cooling. what say you?

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#28670 Aug 4, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
There is a severe case of denier rash. The rash is rendering their posts trashy.
Good grief.
did you say rash? come scratch and sniff this, you lying self righteous eco-pshychotic. translation.....you're just a left wing idiot who really has no grasp of climate science. period!! how's your itch now, darlin'?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Denny CranesPlace 1,419,827
News Republicans outraged over reported delay of Cli... 1 min Go Blue Forever 34
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 1 min here 16,033
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... 9 min abc 7,931
News Clinton blames Republican leaders for a 'paraly... 9 min swampmudd 1,580
News How the $15 minimum wage could become a new div... (Jun '15) 11 min Wall Failure 783
News he Did it Again Anthony Weiner embroiled in new... 17 min Anthony s Mohel 2
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 26 min Frankendrumpf 239,765
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 1 hr Coffee Party 393,362
News News 14 Mins Ago Trump rebukes racism claims as... 3 hr Go Blue Forever 116
More from around the web