It's the Guns, Stupid

Apr 20, 2007 Full story: Truthdig 103,368

“And that's the end of the issue”

Why do we have the same futile argument every time there is a mass killing? Advocates of gun control try to open a discussion about whether more reasonable weapons statutes might reduce the number of violent ... via Truthdig

Full Story
Dr Freud

UK

#97610 Jan 21, 2013
Spocko wrote:
<quoted text>
Blah, blah, blah, blah you are a sorry retarded parrot ...
You didn't even both to address his points. Why not?
Dr Freud

UK

#97611 Jan 21, 2013
AnnAgain wrote:
Obama will become the Democrats' Reagan. The narrative writes itself. He will emerge as an iconic figure who struggled through a recession cleaning up the Bush mess and a terrorized world, reshaping the economy within it, passing universal health care, strafing the ranks of Al Qaeda, presiding over a civil-rights revolution, and surely will be enjoying the fruits of the recovery.
Ya. He cries crocodile tears for the undead children of Sandy Hook, but has NO TEARS AT ALL for ALL of the CHILDREN his DRONES have MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD!
Oh, and by the way: Precisely WHAT is 'universal health care?'
WHO provides that, and HOW MUCH DOES IT COST?
Are doctors and nurses to be FORCED to provide that care, and WHO pays them for BEING FORCED to provide services AGAINST THEIR WILL?
Brit Expat

Lunel, France

#97612 Jan 21, 2013
Dr Freud wrote:
<quoted text>
Many Brits see YOU in the VERY SAME light as you cast upon the Americans.
Ahhh Is that a fact? Are you an Englishman? With some pedigree, or a resident of Britain? There is a difference!
Dr Freud

UK

#97613 Jan 21, 2013
Brit Expat wrote:
<quoted text>
Ahhh Is that a fact? Are you an Englishman? With some pedigree, or a resident of Britain? There is a difference!
"Are you an Englishman?"

I find THAT question to be rather revealing, inasmuch as there are FOUR distinct nations in the U.K.:
[1] The Welsh
[2] The English
[3] The Scots
[4] The Northern Irish
Anyone, and I mean ANYONE in the isles who speaks ONLY of the English, is either an EXTREME racist, or a poseur.
Only YOU know for sure!
AnnAgain

Oakland, CA

#97614 Jan 21, 2013
Dr Freud wrote:
<quoted text>
Ya. He cries crocodile tears for the undead children of Sandy Hook, but has NO TEARS AT ALL for ALL of the CHILDREN his DRONES have MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD!
Oh, and by the way: Precisely WHAT is 'universal health care?'
WHO provides that, and HOW MUCH DOES IT COST?
Are doctors and nurses to be FORCED to provide that care, and WHO pays them for BEING FORCED to provide services AGAINST THEIR WILL?
LOL ... sour grapes!!
Dr Freud

UK

#97615 Jan 21, 2013
AnnAgain wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL ... sour grapes!!
Ya. He cries crocodile tears for the undead children of Sandy Hook, but has NO TEARS AT ALL for ALL of the CHILDREN his DRONES have MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD!
Oh, and by the way: Precisely WHAT is 'universal health care?'
WHO provides that, and HOW MUCH DOES IT COST?
Are doctors and nurses to be FORCED to provide that care, and WHO pays them for BEING FORCED to provide services AGAINST THEIR WILL?

“" BITE ME "”

Since: Dec 10

Olney township

#97617 Jan 21, 2013
Dr Freud wrote:
<quoted text>
"he tried to compromise too much with people of bad faith."
You mean, he —himself of bad faith— attempted to compromise on the principles of the American republic.
The People of the "American Republic", as you've put it.

Endorsed his first term...

By electing him to a second.

Overwhelmingly.
Brit Expat

Lunel, France

#97619 Jan 21, 2013
Dr Freud wrote:
<quoted text>
"Are you an Englishman?"
I find THAT question to be rather revealing, inasmuch as there are FOUR distinct nations in the U.K.:
[1] The Welsh
[2] The English
[3] The Scots
[4] The Northern Irish
Anyone, and I mean ANYONE in the isles who speaks ONLY of the English, is either an EXTREME racist, or a poseur.
Only YOU know for sure!
Hee hee. I know for sure!

Just for starters:-

There was a young man from Wales

Who lived on all shit and snails

When he coul'dnt get these

he lived on the cheese

that he scrapped from his knob with his nails.

Who said? I'm not British? F-ck that an English pig. LOL
Guppy

Englewood, FL

#97620 Jan 21, 2013
look wrote:
<quoted text>Why aren't men and women that own guns good people???What are they in your eyes???You do realize men and women with guns fight everyday for our freedom and security...People with guns win wars and save lives everyday around the world, do you think the Syrian rebels should lay down their guns??? I know a ton of good people that own guns, what do you own besides a cat???
Cat? I own THREE cats.

Why aren't men and women that own guns good people? They are weird people. Backwards.

Our freedom and security? Running around Afghanistan etc. and killing people randomly does what for our freedom and security? They shoot us, we shoot them, and then someone decides it's over, and everyone goes home. Total waste of life.

Because I don't own a gun means I don't own anything? I don't know what you mean?
Dr Freud

UK

#97621 Jan 21, 2013
Empathica wrote:
<quoted text>
The People of the "American Republic", as you've put it.
Endorsed his first term...
By electing him to a second.
Overwhelmingly.
And voting machines are absolutely never able to be hacked, right?

Since: Dec 10

Brisbane, Australia

#97623 Jan 21, 2013
Things We Learned About Howard's War On Guns

Aussie gun owners were more receptive because they were getting a little somethin' somethin' in return. A similar approach in the US would put a massive strain on their economy.
To make this plan work, there had to be a federally financed gun buyback scheme. Ultimately, the cost of the buyback was met by a special one-off tax imposed on all Australians. This required new legislation and was widely accepted across the political spectrum. Almost 700,000 guns were bought back and destroyed — the equivalent of 40 million guns in the United States.

What a surprise. Racists and bigots like guns.
The leaders of the National Party, as well as the premier of Queensland, courageously supported my government’s decision, despite the electoral pain it caused them. Within a year, a new populist and conservative political party, the One Nation Party, emerged and took many votes from our coalition in subsequent state and federal elections; one of its key policies was the reversal of the gun laws.

Your "It's because of societies moral decay" argument is null and void you redneck yokel. Guns kill people.
The fundamental problem was the ready availability of high-powered weapons, which enabled people to convert their murderous impulses into mass killing. Certainly, shortcomings in treating mental illness and the harmful influence of violent video games and movies may have played a role. But nothing trumps easy access to a gun. It is easier to kill 10 people with a gun than with a knife.

While his lack of sporting prowess and dorky demeanor suggested otherwise, Howard must have had a pretty mean "Don't fuck with me or I'll end you!" side to him behind closed doors.
For a time, it seemed that certain states might refuse to enact the ban. But I made clear that my government was willing to hold a nationwide referendum to alter the Australian Constitution and give the federal government constitutional power over guns. Such a referendum would have been expensive and divisive, but it would have passed. And all state governments knew this.

This was the Howard Government's greatest achievement and will benefit Australians for generations to come.
In the end, we won the battle to change gun laws because there was majority support across Australia for banning certain weapons. And today, there is a wide consensus that our 1996 reforms not only reduced the gun-related homicide rate, but also the suicide rate. The Australian Institute of Criminology found that gun-related murders and suicides fell sharply after 1996. The American Journal of Law and Economics found that our gun buyback scheme cut firearm suicides by 74 percent. In the 18 years before the 1996 reforms, Australia suffered 13 gun massacres — each with more than four victims — causing a total of 102 deaths. There has not been a single massacre in that category since 1996.

A: This is how true governments show courage, strength and leadership when they are serious about protecting it's citizens in the face of adversity in a sane country, and it works!
Dr Freud

UK

#97624 Jan 21, 2013
Brit Expat wrote:
<quoted text>
Hee hee. I know for sure!
Just for starters:-
There was a young man from Wales
Who lived on all shit and snails
When he coul'dnt get these
he lived on the cheese
that he scrapped from his knob with his nails.
Who said? I'm not British? F-ck that an English pig. LOL
There was once a self-proclaimed British Expat,
Who was enamored of declaring both this, and that,
But upon closer inspection of his declarations,
It was found that he engaged in deceits, and deceptions,
Being nothing more than a whole reeking load of bull scat!
Brit Expat

Lunel, France

#97625 Jan 21, 2013
Dr Freud wrote:
<quoted text>
There was once a self-proclaimed British Expat,
Who was enamored of declaring both this, and that,
But upon closer inspection of his declarations,
It was found that he engaged in deceits, and deceptions,
Being nothing more than a whole reeking load of bull scat!
Ok. Not that blill tho. as limiricks go. lol.

There was a young girl from Australia

Who's thing was as big as a dalia

At three pence a smell she did quite well

But! sixpence a lick was a failure

“" BITE ME "”

Since: Dec 10

Olney township

#97626 Jan 21, 2013
Dr Freud wrote:
<quoted text>
And voting machines are absolutely never able to be hacked, right?
lol

Voting machines?

Listen up cupcake...

The American People, overwhelmingly re elected this President despite,

Horrendously planned and subversively carried out attempts at voter suppression in several states. Perpetrated by overly zealous conservative thargs...

Like you

Since: Dec 10

Brisbane, Australia

#97627 Jan 21, 2013
Tougher laws, gun buyback on target
Date January 15, 2013
Since the 1997 gun buyback, your chance of being a victim of gun violence has more than halved. Yet as Monday's Herald pointed out, the number of guns in Australia has increased by nearly one-fifth over the same period. What's going on?
The simplest answer is that the population is a fifth larger than it was in 1997. In reality, Australia has about as many guns per person as we did after the gun buyback. The only way to conclude the gun buyback has been undone is to ignore a decade and a half of population growth.
Moreover, the figure that really matters is the share of gun-owning households. In 1997 many households used the chance to clean out the closet and take a weapon that hadn't been used in years to the local police station (the most common weapon handed in was a .22 calibre rifle). So the share of gun-owning households dropped from 15 per cent to 8 per cent.
New firearms in Australia may be being bought by people who already have a weapon in the home. Adding a tenth gun to the household arsenal is much less risky than buying the first. Trouble is, surveys of household gun ownership are rare, so we don't know whether the share of gun-owning households has risen.
To understand the policy success of the National Firearms Agreement, it's important to recognise precisely what happened. Alongside the gun buyback, what had been a patchwork of state and territory regulations was strengthened and harmonised. Self-loading rifles, self-loading shotguns and pump-action shotguns were banned. Firearm owners were required to obtain licences and register their weapons.
While the changes were backed by the then Labor opposition, political credit must go to then prime minister John Howard and National Party leader Tim Fischer for standing up to the hardliners in their own parties. They paid a short-term electoral price but history will judge them well.
In the 1990s some argued that the gun buyback would make no difference to the firearms homicide and suicide rates. Yet careful studies have shown otherwise. In the decade before Port Arthur, Australia had an average of one mass shooting (involving five or more deaths) every year. Since then, we have not had a single mass shooting. The odds of this being a coincidence are less than one in 100.
cont:

Since: Dec 10

Brisbane, Australia

#97628 Jan 21, 2013
cont:
The gun buyback also had some unexpected payoffs. While at the Australian National University, in work with my former academic colleague Christine Neill, I looked at the effect of the Australian gun buyback on firearm suicide and homicide rates. Shocking as mass shootings are, they represent a tiny fraction of all gun deaths. If there's a gun in your home, the person most likely to kill you with it is yourself, followed by your spouse.
Neill and I found that the firearm suicide and homicide rates more than halved after the Australian gun buyback. Although the gun death rate was falling before 1997, it accelerated downwards after the buyback. Looking across states, we also found that jurisdictions where more guns were bought back experienced a greater reduction in firearms homicide and suicide.
We estimate that the Australian gun buyback continues to save about 200 lives per year. That means thousands of people are walking the streets today who would not be alive without the National Firearms Agreement. Other work, including that by public health researchers Simon Chapman, Philip Alpers, Kingsley Agho and Michael Jones, reaches a similar conclusion.
For the United States, where Alpers will present research on the Australian experience at the Summit on Reducing Gun Violence in America this week, reform is tougher. According to the General Social Survey, 32 per cent of US households own a gun, and a patchwork of city and state laws means that restrictions in one jurisdiction are often undercut by people travelling interstate to buy a weapon.
Historically, the US National Rifle Association was a moderate body, akin to some Australian shooting groups. It supported the first federal gun laws in the 1930s, and backed a ban on cheap ''Saturday night specials'' in the 1960s. Since the 1977 ''Cincinnati Revolt'', when hardliners took over, the NRA has opposed all restrictions on firearms ownership, including bans on assault rifles and armour-piercing bullets (''cop killers''). Members of Congress rate the NRA the most powerful lobbying organisation in the nation.

The challenge for American legislators today is to stand up to these powerful extremists, and follow the example of Australia's leaders in 1996. With 86 Americans dying each day because of gun accidents, suicides or homicides, perhaps our experience can persuade sensible US legislators that there is a better way. As in Australia, the onus is on the conservative side of politics.
For Australia, the challenges in firearms policy are more modest, but still real. All states and territories should heed the call from the Minister for Justice, Jason Clare, to implement a national firearms register. This will help to keep track of weapons when they are sold or their owners move interstate. And it will help to ensure that Australian firearms do not fall into the wrong hands.
Andrew Leigh is the federal member for Fraser, and a former professor of economics at the Australian National University.
A: If Obama is serious he should canvas countries who have been successful in reducing or stopping the amount of massacres in their countries because of the introduction of tough gun control laws and strong conviction to find a solid solution to the problem......
There are many countries who live with bloodshed and violence and massacre's daily because of guns .....and only a handful that can honestly say they have succeeded in removing the threat because of the stricter gun control laws....
"Australia" can lay claim to being one that been successful.
Brit Expat

Lunel, France

#97629 Jan 21, 2013
Dr Freud wrote:
<quoted text>
There was once a self-proclaimed British Expat,
Who was enamored of declaring both this, and that,
But upon closer inspection of his declarations,
It was found that he engaged in deceits, and deceptions,
Being nothing more than a whole reeking load of bull scat!
Hee hee. Where do you reside in the UK? ENGLISH?PAKI?ECT?ECT?ECT?

I'm of the great days. The Empire.
boo

Thailand

#97631 Jan 21, 2013
The overall body plan of ducks is elongated and broad, and the ducks are also relatively long-necked, albeit not as long-necked as the geese and swans. The body shape of diving ducks varies somewhat from this in being more rounded. The bill is usually broad and contains serrated lamellae, which are particularly well defined in the filter-feeding species. In the case of some fishing species the bill is long and strongly serrated. The scaled legs are strong and well developed, and generally set far back on the body, more so in the highly aquatic species. The wings are very strong and are generally short and pointed, and the flight of ducks requires fast continuous strokes, requiring in turn strong wing muscles. Three species of steamer duck are almost flightless, however. Many species of duck are temporarily flightless while moulting; they seek out protected habitat with good food supplies during this period. This moult typically precedes migration.

The drakes of northern species often have extravagant plumage, but that is moulted in summer to give a more female-like appearance, the "eclipse" plumage. Southern resident species typically show less sexual dimorphism, although there are exceptions like the Paradise Shelduck of New Zealand which is both strikingly sexually dimorphic and where the female's plumage is brighter than that of the male. The plumage of juvenile birds generally resembles that of the female.
Feeding


Pecten along the beak
Ducks exploit a variety of food sources such as grasses, aquatic plants, fish, insects, small amphibians, worms, and small molluscs.

Diving ducks and sea ducks forage deep underwater. To be able to submerge more easily, the diving ducks are heavier than dabbling ducks, and therefore have more difficulty taking off to fly.

Dabbling ducks feed on the surface of water or on land, or as deep as they can reach by up-ending without completely submerging.[3] Along the edge of the beak there is a comb-like structure called a pecten. This strains the water squirting from the side of the beak and traps any food. The pecten is also used to preen feathers.

A few specialized species such as the mergansers are adapted to catch and swallow large fish.

The others have the characteristic wide flat beak adapted to dredging-type jobs such as pulling up waterweed, pulling worms and small molluscs out of mud, searching for insect larvae, and bulk jobs such as dredging out, holding, turning headfirst, and swallowing a squirming frog. To avoid injury when digging into sediment it has no cere. but the nostrils come out through hard horn
boo

Thailand

#97632 Jan 21, 2013
The ducks have a cosmopolitan distribution occurring across most of the world except for Antarctica. A number of species manage to live on sub-Antarctic islands like South Georgia and the Auckland Islands. Numerous ducks have managed to establish themselves on oceanic islands such as Hawaii, New Zealand and Kerguelen, although many of these species and populations are threatened or have become extinct.

Some duck species, mainly those breeding in the temperate and Arctic Northern Hemisphere, are migratory; those in the tropics, however, are generally not. Some ducks, particularly in Australia where rainfall is patchy and erratic, are nomadic, seeking out the temporary lakes and pools that form after localised heavy rain.[citation needed]

Predators


Ringed Teal
Worldwide, ducks have many predators. Ducklings are particularly vulnerable, since their inability to fly makes them easy prey not only for predatory birds but also large fish like pike, crocodilians, and other aquatic hunters, including fish-eating birds such as herons. Ducks' nests are raided by land-based predators, and brooding females may be caught unaware on the nest by mammals, such as foxes, or large birds, such as hawks or eagles.

Adult ducks are fast fliers, but may be caught on the water by large aquatic predators including big fish such as the North American muskie and the European pike. In flight, ducks are safe from all but a few predators such as humans and the Peregrine Falcon, which regularly uses its speed and strength to catch ducks.
boo

Moscow, Russia

#97634 Jan 21, 2013
Many people dream one day of having some ducks in the backyard and there are quite a few different breeds you can pick from. Ducks are bred for all sorts of purposes; as snail eaters, egg layers, for meat or simply as a hobby so it's just a matter of choosing a breed that suits your backyard and needs.

Breeds

The Pekin is described as an attractive large white duck, although the plumage can show a tinge of cream or yellow. They weigh 3.5-4kg (about 8-9lb) with yellow or reddish-orange bill and legs. They are usually bred for meat but are also attractive ducks in the backyard.

Other duck breeds mentioned in our segment include the Muscovy which is actually a separate species. Muscovies come in colours including black, blue, white, black & white, and white. They are docile, placid and good foragers for snails. They are also bred for their meat and eggs.

The Cayuga takes it name from Lake Cayuga in the US. These are large and pretty green-black ducks which are good layers and are quieter than other breeds.

Khaki Campbells are medium sized ducks (2.25-2.5kg (5-5.5lb)) with slender necks. They are mainly khaki coloured with a dark brown upper head and neck. These are fast growing and easy to raise ducks, usually bred as layers because their eggs are a similar size to chicken eggs.



Temperament

Ducks are intelligent and friendly in general. Some breeds are quieter than others but most breeds contain lovable characteristics

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 5 min King Clutch 284,263
Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 7 min cpeter1313 306,613
End of the road for Freedom to Marry, NOM? 9 min Cordwainer Trout 4
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 15 min Calvin_Coolish 163,300
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 16 min litesong 48,606
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 18 min shinningelectr0n 1,144,590
York: With immigration action, Obama moves to c... 42 min Bama Yankee 3
Ben Carson: Race Relations Have 'Gotten Worse' ... 50 min Swedenforever 52
Elizabeth Warren calls out Obama on nominee 1 hr Donny Brook 17
Immigrants Social Security eligible in Obama plan 2 hr Bama Yankee 25
Who pays for the White House Thanksgiving meal? 3 hr See the Light 8
Holder: We're Not Done Investigating Ferguson P... 5 hr Black Rhino 143

US News People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE