Barack Obama, our next President

do your homework wrote:

<quoted text>
Poor Aunt Bettie, taking cheap shots at anyone who dares to disagree with her. Not only are your granny bloomers in a wad, they've been wet since you think you have the President on the road to impeachment. Well time to change your underwear!! Word on the street is Republicans aren't getting much traction with their focus on Benghazi over the last week. Voters trust Hillary Clinton over House Republicans on the issue of Benghazi by a 49% to 39% margin and Clinton's 52% to 44% favorability rating is identical to what it was in late March. You can stop peeing in your bloomers. Aint' happening!!

Now, now, it was all in gest.

You think satirical political comedy is news but don't know when someone's really kidding around?

Is this correct?

TSM wrote:

Obama blows off the Liberal Media takes one combined question on the two scandals plaguing his administration’ Benghazi/IRS!! We know if Bush had acted in this manner the press would have gone Berserk, Red Flags would have gone up ‘what is the President Hiding and What Does He Know And When Did He Know It ‘ Because of Obama’s like of Candor with the Press will the Press be curious and pursue the President/Administration for Answers?

but Bush did.

and not a peep from the MSM. or the Republicans in Congress.

frontporchreactionary wrote:

<quoted text> You mean the same Frank L Vandersloot, confidante money man for Mitt Romney's campaign ,who's being sued by one of his top executives for a whole host of charges including slander ,defamation of character, and interference in prospective business relations? "Former high-earning “Marketing Executive” for Melaleuca alleges that after being “interrogated” by Melaleuca management and an in-house attorney, she was wrongfully terminated then publicly slandered by the company and VanderSloot
The lawsuit, T. Dorfman, Inc. and Terry Dorfman individually vs. Melaleuca, Inc. and Frank L. VanderSloot individually, was filed two days ago on December 7th in the United States District Court in the District of Utah, Northern Division and seeks a judgment against Melaleuca for “not less than $5.1 million.”
The detailed Dorfman vs. Melaleuca and VanderSloot complaint runs 19 pages " Check this out: http://www.mlm-thewholetruth.com/network-mark...

Trying to justify IRS Gestapo tactics?

Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:

<quoted text>
Let me redo this.
In March 2003, after UNMOVIC's efforts to verify Iraq's disarmament, Blix expressed skepticism over Iraq's claims to have destroyed its stockpiles of anthrax and VX nerve agent in Time magazine.
He said he found it "a bit odd" that Iraq with "one of the best-organized regimes in the Arab world" would claim to have no records of the destruction of these illegal substances.
He went on to say, "I don't see that they have acquired any credibility."
George W. Bush gave Saddam Hussein an ultimatum to leave power, the UN pulled out all the inspectors from Iraq and, days later, the invasion began.
Saddam had been given his last chance and no promises were broken by Bush.

Last chance for what? Hussein was completely surrounded, he had no control over his own country's airspace--U S and British jets patrolled the skies at will, there was no need for an invasion--Hussein wasn't able to go anywhere or do anything.

2004....

Citing July Speech, I.R.S. Decides to Review N.A.A.C.P.

In an interview Thursday, Mr. Bond defended his remarks, saying they focused on policy, not politics.

"This is an attempt to silence the N.A.A.C.P. on the very eve of a presidential election," he said. "We are best known for registering and turning out large numbers of African-American voters. Clearly, someone in the I.R.S. doesn't want that to happen."

He added, "It's Orwellian to believe that criticism of the president is not allowed or that the president is somehow immune from criticism."

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/29/politics/29...

Karl Rove speaking on Fox Monday morning about what would have happened if the IRS had targeted liberals for scrutiny during the Bush administration:

We'd have every major liberal newspaper in America calling for investigation ending in impeachment. It'd be leading the evening news. We'd have have every group that had liberal or progressive tendencies demanding answers and marching on the White House. And leaders of Congress, Democrats in Congress, demanding to have answers. It'd be a nightmare at the Bush White House had this been done on our watch.

Poor Republicans. Always the victim of hypocritical liberals. Except:

Stepping up its probe of allegedly improper campaigning by churches, the Internal Revenue Service on Friday ordered a liberal Pasadena parish to turn over all the documents and e-mails it produced during the 2004 election year with references to political candidates.

All Saints Episcopal Church and its rector, the Rev. Ed Bacon, have until Sept. 29 to present the sermons, newsletters and electronic communications.

The IRS investigation was triggered by an antiwar sermon delivered by its former rector, the Rev. George F. Regas, at the church two days before the 2004 presidential election. The summons even requests utility bills to establish costs associated with hosting Regas' speech. Bacon was ordered to testify before IRS officials Oct. 11.

Maybe it's just me, but somehow I'm forgetting the part about where George W. Bush got impeached because the IRS investigated liberals under his watch. That doesn't mean we should ignore what happened under President Obama, but Rove's baseless hyperventilating is a reminder to keep things in perspective. Of course, with Darrell Issa in charge of the House Government Oversight committee, fat chance of that happening.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/05/13/1208...

Realtime wrote:

<quoted text>Did you read past the headline? Probably not eh?

How do you read past a radio report? The report said regulatory hold-ups by the Obama administration. Take it up with CBS.

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Just out of curiosity, what does one do with a degree in political science?
Do you or your school feel any guilt about putting students in debt for a worthless degree?

George W Bush majored in political science at Harvard and look how he turned out. So, did Robert Gates.

IRS Ends 2-Year Probe Of NAACP's Tax Status

Angela Ciccolo, an NAACP lawyer, noted that although Bond's remarks were made in July 2004, the investigation did not begin until October, just when the NAACP was attempting to register voters. "The timing of the investigation is critical," she said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
poor China.

And poor Canada.

Realtime wrote:

<quoted text>Wish I'd said that.
BTW that clown has been here since the beginning and has yet to post anything of interest?

You're pretty desperate to team up with mini me. Lets see, we have a brand new copy cat character made up because of me and an unregistered who's post count isn't tallied by this site crying about post counts. Just post your resume, butwipe.

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree. That evil Katie trapped Palin by asking what she read. We all knew right whiners are too stupid to read. Katie should not have embarrassed Palin by asking a question that we ll knew she couldn't answer.

You and I both don't know what in the hell you are talking about, Dood.

frontporchreactionary wrote:

<quoted text> Tried that ;didn't happen when George W Bush tried to jump-start a nuclear renaissance in the U S in 2005(mostly on borrowed Chinese money),but Wall Street refused to go along because nukes are the worst, riskiest speculative bets in the market. Get it;the irony here? Wall Street banks who nearly brought down the entire U S financial system and ignited a world-wide recession with risky, speculative bets on exotic derivatives trading told Bush that NUKES were TOO RISKY even for them to invest their money in!

Tell that to Obama. Seems I remember him throwing a few billion towards building some new nuke plants.

frontporchreactionary wrote:

<quoted text> Tried that ;didn't happen when George W Bush tried to jump-start a nuclear renaissance in the U S in 2005(mostly on borrowed Chinese money),but Wall Street refused to go along because nukes are the worst, riskiest speculative bets in the market. Get it;the irony here? Wall Street banks who nearly brought down the entire U S financial system and ignited a world-wide recession with risky, speculative bets on exotic derivatives trading told Bush that NUKES were TOO RISKY even for them to invest their money in!

When additional electric power is necessary, nuclear power will return. In fact, if existing nuclear plants are shut down, the power supply will be seriously strained.

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Trying to justify IRS Gestapo tactics?

You mean a Bush W appointee IRS 'Gestapo tactics'; don't you?

Jimmy wrote:

<quoted text>
That's a fact. Look at how they attacked NJ Raider about a month ago over the phag/gay issue because NJ Raider didn't go along. The DemocRATS here were like a bunch of piranha fish.
The sad part is even when the Democrat Political Hacks (including Obama) present an obscenely ridiculous lie, the Kool-Aid drinking Bobbleheads just ask for more.

That was priceless. But lily is back to kissing nj's butt

Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:

<quoted text>
Now, now, it was all in gest.
You think satirical political comedy is news but don't know when someone's really kidding around?
Is this correct?

That's 'jest' Bittie. Want a good laugh? Republicans believe Benghazi is the biggest scandal ever in American history and most of them couldn't tell you what country Benghazi is in!!! And that's not satire. Laugh it up!!!

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Just out of curiosity, what does one do with a degree in political science?
Do you or your school feel any guilt about putting students in debt for a worthless degree?

About the same thing you do with a liberal arts one. Bartender and waitress.

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
We discovered that man is killing it but you don't give a crap. Yeah burn that coal!!!!! Pump those greenhouse gases!!!!!!!!!

Stop breathing, Warthog, and you'll help with those greenhouse gases.

Insanity: US Approves Bee Death Pesticide as EU Bans It

May 13, 2013

Corporate politics is business as usual inside the United States, as I am once again shocked to report the EPA has sided with industry lobbyists over public health in approving a highly dangerous pesticide that the European Union recently decided to ban over fears of environmental devastation. Not only have neonicotinoid pesticides been linked repeatedly to mass bee deaths, also known as Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), but the continued use of such pesticides threatens other aspects of nature (and humans) as well.

What’s even more amazing is that the decision not only comes after the EU publicly discussed the major dangers surrounding the use of the pesticides, but after the USDA released a report surrounding the continued honeybee deaths and the related effects — a report in which they detailed pesticides to be a contributing factor. Just the impact on the honeybees alone, and we now know that these pesticides are killing aquatic life and subsequently the birds that feed upon them, amounts to a potential $200 billion in global damages per year. We’re talking about the devastation of over 100 crops, from apples to avocados and plums.

And there’s countless scientists and a large number of environmental science groups speaking out on this. The EPA has no lack of information the subject. And sure, there are other contributing factors to bee deaths, there’s no question about that. We have an environment right now being hit with Monsanto’s Roundup even in residential areas, we have chemical rain, we have insane amounts of EMF — but it’s pretty clear that neonicotinoid pesticides are at least a major contributing factor. And beyond that, they have no place in the food supply to begin with...

http://www.infowars.com/insanity-us-approves-...

In Our Nation, the EPA was Ruled to be UN-Constitutional thus UNLAWFUL in the early 1970's

http://www.libertyroundtable.com/2011/02/04/e...

http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml