Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
792,181 - 792,200 of 1,084,161 Comments Last updated 3 min ago
TSM

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860639
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Obama playing Golf with Tiger is like the ‘Odd Couple,’ it’s like Success meeting Failure, Tiger the President!!
Tiger’s records, Most USGA National Championships, Most PGA Tour Wins, Most Masters Victories etc.!!
Obama’s record 1/5 Americans in Poverty, America in Debt to the Tune of16 trillion, 12 million Americans Unemployed, the list goes On!!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860640
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

sonicfilter wrote:
Obama’s Minimum-Wage Gambit Puts Republicans on Defensive
The president’s surprise call for an increase to $9 an hour in the State of the Union has the GOP on the wrong end of popular opinion again.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02...
....again.
Get rid of the minimum wage entirely.
If a person is still making minimum wage after any appreciable time working for a living, that's all they are worth... if that much.
Why should an employer pay more for the same useless employee?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860641
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Republicans Try To Intimidate Nonpartisan Accounting Office For Debunking Their Economic Theory

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/17/1...

....again.
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860642
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

sonicfilter wrote:
Obama’s Minimum-Wage Gambit Puts Republicans on Defensive
The president’s surprise call for an increase to $9 an hour in the State of the Union has the GOP on the wrong end of popular opinion again.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02...
....again.
They just cannot get a break. They are like the coyote chasing the roadrunner. Here comes another anvil.
Nj raider 1

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860643
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, jeeezzz.... what bullshit.
A person born a minority has more opportunity than a non-minority. All they have to do is take advantage of those opportunities.
Ever hear of "affirmative action", you goddam idiot?
If you want to actually discuss this, please tell us why minorities still aren't taking advantage of those opportunities that have been available to them for fifty goddam years.
Why do you think this is the fact?
What opportunities are you harping on? Did you ever think the need for affirmative action points directly to the inequalities/biases black people face. If blacks have more opportunities, why then don't you state them & make them clear because affirmative action only made it so a certain% of black were offered the same opportunities as white people. Please do back up your claims with evidence. Teach me something I don't know!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860644
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Get rid of the minimum wage entirely.
If a person is still making minimum wage after any appreciable time working for a living, that's all they are worth... if that much.
Why should an employer pay more for the same useless employee?
i just love it when those on the wrong side of public opinion just want to get rid of the issue that they can't win.

we see that on FOX a lot.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860645
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Homer 2016 wrote:
Ok so now we are down to 49 states with West Virginia being declared Unconstitutional in the minds of sane people. Flack's unwillingness to self-deport himself out of the real state of Virginia should have INS breathing down his neck shortly.
Not to worry Flack I hear they are working on an 8 year path to citizenship.
What else going on today?
What don't you understand about the legislators rebelling against the federal republic not being the representation of the state of Virginia in the federal republic?

"New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress."

Since it was only one state, and the legislators rebelling against the federal republic and participating as a funcitoning element of another country cannot be considered as representation in the federal republic for the state of Virginia, and the legislators loyal to the federal republic petitioned for the creation of a new state, and Congress consented to this request, how the hell do you figure West Virginia was unconstitutionally admitted?

Show us where the loyal legislators of Virginia violated this clause:

"Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."

If you cannot show that this clause was violated, then you have to admit that West Virginia was admitted into the union constitutionally.
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860646
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
It wasn't me that went for race, dufus. That's the way the goddam laws were written.
Please tell us about "affirmative action", then tell us after 50 goddam years of preferrential treatment, minorities still aren't taking advantage of the opportunities that have been given specifically to them and no other race for 50 years.
Why do you think minorities aren't taking advantage of the opportunities established solely for them?
Because whites are still 72% of the population and I know you don't believe this but racism is still alive and well and thriving in some areas.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860647
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Nj raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> What opportunities are you harping on? Did you ever think the need for affirmative action points directly to the inequalities/biases black people face. If blacks have more opportunities, why then don't you state them & make them clear because affirmative action only made it so a certain% of black were offered the same opportunities as white people. Please do back up your claims with evidence. Teach me something I don't know!
More "victim" bullshit.
Everyone is a goddam victiim, dufus. Life isn't fair. Get used to that fact of life.

Now, since you are admitting that the affirmative action programs gave preferrential treatment to black people, please continue the discussion and tell us why black people are still in the same situation now as they were 50 years ago when the preferrrential treatment for them began.

... well?
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860648
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Nj raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> What opportunities are you harping on? Did you ever think the need for affirmative action points directly to the inequalities/biases black people face. If blacks have more opportunities, why then don't you state them & make them clear because affirmative action only made it so a certain% of black were offered the same opportunities as white people. Please do back up your claims with evidence. Teach me something I don't know!
Affirmative action is a joke, companies can easily get around it.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860649
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
i just love it when those on the wrong side of public opinion just want to get rid of the issue that they can't win.
we see that on FOX a lot.
You forgot to put content into your post. I gave a reason to eliminate the minimum wage. What is your reason to keep it? And, why do you think it is good for the economy to increasei it?

By the way, you never answered the question of where the money will come from to pay for Obama's government.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860650
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>Moderan Liberal GW Bush and the Liberal Republicans are good example too how they looted 7 trillion dollars in 2003 from future generations by adding Medicare Part D to the Federal Deficit to pay for the current entitlemnet society that needed to do something different then expecting the Federal Government to be the provider.
Liberal Republicans are as bad as Democrat Libtards!!!

Neverless, I differentiate between them as Liberals v/s Libtards.

Where Liberals are irresponsible hypocrite Republicans and Libtards are mentally disordered Democrats.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860651
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Nj raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> Bullshit! Those entitlement programs are in jeopardy because the rich raped the current tax system & found ways to escape from paying into the programs. The rich don't pay into medicare,medicaid, & SS. Thats where the problem lies. This country is in debt because the rich continue to take alot & give very littler back in terms of taxes. You don't need a palm reader to see that!
Social Security benefits are not guaranteed.

They are not guaranteed legally because workers have no contractual or property rights to any benefits whatsoever. In two landmark cases, Flemming v. Nestor and Helvering v. Davis, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Social Security taxes are not contributions or savings, but simply taxes, and that Social Security benefits are simply a government spending program, no different than, say, farm price supports. Congress and the president may change, reduce, or even eliminate benefits at any time.

Social Security’s Sham Guarantee

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/s...

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860652
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>Just another example of the total inability of the right wing to mount a logical, fact based argument .
Actually, Flack is right!

I had seen Libtards in action!

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860653
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
What don't you understand about the legislators rebelling against the federal republic not being the representation of the state of Virginia in the federal republic?
"New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress."
Since it was only one state, and the legislators rebelling against the federal republic and participating as a funcitoning element of another country cannot be considered as representation in the federal republic for the state of Virginia, and the legislators loyal to the federal republic petitioned for the creation of a new state, and Congress consented to this request, how the hell do you figure West Virginia was unconstitutionally admitted?
Show us where the loyal legislators of Virginia violated this clause:
"Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."
If you cannot show that this clause was violated, then you have to admit that West Virginia was admitted into the union constitutionally.
Homer is just another useful idiot.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860654
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
It wasn't me that went for race, dufus. That's the way the goddam laws were written.
Please tell us about "affirmative action", then tell us after 50 goddam years of preferrential treatment, minorities still aren't taking advantage of the opportunities that have been given specifically to them and no other race for 50 years.
Why do you think minorities aren't taking advantage of the opportunities established solely for them?
....the life prospects of an American are more dependent on the income and education of his parents than in almost any other advanced country for which there is data.

How do we explain this? Some of it has to do with persistent discrimination. Latinos and African-Americans still get paid less than whites, and women still get paid less than men, even though they recently surpassed men in the number of advanced degrees they obtain.

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/...

your view is all about white male privilege....

and those of them who failed in life who need to blame others.
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860655
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
What don't you understand about the legislators rebelling against the federal republic not being the representation of the state of Virginia in the federal republic?
"New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress."
Since it was only one state, and the legislators rebelling against the federal republic and participating as a funcitoning element of another country cannot be considered as representation in the federal republic for the state of Virginia, and the legislators loyal to the federal republic petitioned for the creation of a new state, and Congress consented to this request, how the hell do you figure West Virginia was unconstitutionally admitted?
Show us where the loyal legislators of Virginia violated this clause:
"Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."
If you cannot show that this clause was violated, then you have to admit that West Virginia was admitted into the union constitutionally.
The legal legislature was in absentia having seceded temporarily from the Union. Had they successfully left and had been recognized as a seperate country then you might have a case. Even then West Virginia should have been Virginia, the mere fact that they created a new state called West Virginia violates the Constitution.

Bottom line West Virginia was created illegally and should never been allowed per Arcticle 4 Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution.

End of story.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860656
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah moron, the economy's gone from being in the ditch to more than three years of steady growth.
Just another example of the total inability of the right wing to mount a logical, fact based argument .
Still 12% unemployment, LOL!!!

Oh never mind, Obama CHANGED the way he calculates unemployment!!!

See? Liberals are brain dead hypocrites easy to manipulate by the Media!

Don't Be Fooled, The Obama Unemployment Rate Is 11%

http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012...
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860657
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

flack wrote:
<quoted text> Homer is just another useful idiot.
Article 4 Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution agrees with Homer.

So now we know how you really feel about the Consitution, you are all for it only when it suits your purpose.
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#860658
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
More "victim" bullshit.
Everyone is a goddam victiim, dufus. Life isn't fair. Get used to that fact of life.
Now, since you are admitting that the affirmative action programs gave preferrential treatment to black people, please continue the discussion and tell us why black people are still in the same situation now as they were 50 years ago when the preferrrential treatment for them began.
... well?
A level playing field still does not exist for minorities in this country.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••