Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
773,761 - 773,780 of 1,100,503 Comments Last updated 34 min ago

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#838908 Jan 13, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>But the conservative industrialists were allied with Hitler because they didn't like Hindenburg.
You know? That sounds eerily familiar (in a reverse sense) to those companies in America that after the November 2012 election, said they would have to lay off people thanks to Obamacare and his "liberal" policies.
Right, the Conservative were and did back Hitler and where Hitler got his support.

“Grow the power within yourself”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#838909 Jan 13, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>AND????

AND? What do you mean "AND"??

Here you were even given MORE leads to find soe facts. What's wrong with you??
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#838910 Jan 13, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Really? If memory serves, the US is half way through withdrawing from Afghanistan and is also ahead of schedule. The new plans call for an even quicker withdrawal.
Pakistan is an enigma. They take US funds while covering for those who kill US troops.
You got a complaint? I suggest you demand to know from the Pakistani government why the heck they're so complacent! Don't you think they might have an interest in their people?
Or are you making Pakistan a satellite country of the US now?
Pick your poison. You can't sit on both sides of the same line.
Why stay in Afghanistan one day longer if we announce that we will withdraw by a date certain? The Tol-E-Bon (Obama's emphasis) will just sit back until we leave, picking off American targets of opportunity just for the fun of it. There is no chance that the Afghan government will survive after we leave.

Get serious or get out NOW!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#838911 Jan 13, 2013
Hitler and Germany: 1928-35

Hitler found his greatest support in traditionally conservative small towns. He campaigned with attacks on Marxism, making it clear that by Marxism he meant the Social Democrats. Hitler appealed to morality, attacking free love and what he inferred was the immorality of Berlin and some other major cities. He promised to stamp out big city corruption. He called for a spiritual revolution, for a "positive Christianity" and a spirit of national pride. Hitler repeatedly called for national renewal. He and his National Socialists benefited from the recent upheaval in the Soviet Union and the rise in fear and disgust for Bolshevism. His party's posters read:

If you want your country to go Bolshevik, vote Communist. If you want to remain free Germans, vote for the National Socialists.

http://www.fsmitha.com/h2/ch16.htm

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#838912 Jan 13, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Well. You must know something history doesn't about "stopping" Hitler prior to 1938.
Simply alluding to a date doesn't mean a thing.
The 1938 Munich Agreement permitting Nazi Germany's annexation of Czechoslovakia signaled that the West was unwilling to oppose Hitler's ambitions.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#838913 Jan 13, 2013
VeganTiger wrote:
<quoted text>
no surprise there. Do you want me to give you the time, place and number o killed also or can you google it yourself??
I think that statement disqualified you for further discussions with me about Germany in the 30's and 40's. We can still discuss other things, but I think with regards to this issue, there are too many gaps in your knowledge that you can retain anything I tell you without it simply leaking out through all holes. Or what else are you going to use to tell me that anyone not liberals are nazis? Were the poles nazis? They had a nationalist government and there are multiple documented episodes of Polish people assaulting the German minority BEFORE the war started. Finally, before you now rack up some false indignation trying to call me a nazi for "defending" germans invading poland try to check out if I am telling the truth first. THEN, just realize I am using a rare (but not particularly liberal) mode of thinking -> trying to see if it is possible a coin has two sides even if you don't flip it.
Son, it's your claim. If you're not going to support your position and you don't know what you're talking about, I'm certainly not going to help you!

REGARDLESS of what the government was in Poland, it wasn't in the purview of the either Russia or Germany to take it over. Germany's claim to invade was under the pretense to "protect" their people. Russia as a buffer state.

You don't want to "discuss" it son? Fine. You're beginning to take the losers way out by tossing out questions in deference to facts. That's up to you. But like a right wing extremist, if I don't see things your way and you can't show me why you're right, you back out because you claim I'm limited.

Sheesh you people. You certainly are a curious bunch!
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#838914 Jan 13, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
Hitler and Germany: 1928-35
Hitler found his greatest support in traditionally conservative small towns. He campaigned with attacks on Marxism, making it clear that by Marxism he meant the Social Democrats. Hitler appealed to morality, attacking free love and what he inferred was the immorality of Berlin and some other major cities. He promised to stamp out big city corruption. He called for a spiritual revolution, for a "positive Christianity" and a spirit of national pride. Hitler repeatedly called for national renewal. He and his National Socialists benefited from the recent upheaval in the Soviet Union and the rise in fear and disgust for Bolshevism. His party's posters read:
If you want your country to go Bolshevik, vote Communist. If you want to remain free Germans, vote for the National Socialists.
http://www.fsmitha.com/h2/ch16.htm
YES!

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#838915 Jan 13, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Why stay in Afghanistan one day longer if we announce that we will withdraw by a date certain? The Tol-E-Bon (Obama's emphasis) will just sit back until we leave, picking off American targets of opportunity just for the fun of it. There is no chance that the Afghan government will survive after we leave.
Get serious or get out NOW!
lol! in 2008, I recall bushie saying he wouldn't give a withdrawal date from iraq because it would tip off the enemey. Then presidential candidate Obama and Al Maliki of iraq announced a timetable for withdrawal.

Shortly thereafter, bushie also offer a general schedule of withdrawal.

You people and your political posturing. Sheesh!
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#838916 Jan 13, 2013
VeganTiger wrote:
<quoted text>
AND? What do you mean "AND"??
Here you were even given MORE leads to find soe facts. What's wrong with you??
I have no clue what his point is.

I'm hoping he does.

As I told you before, if you don't know your point, I'm not going to do your work for you!

About time you self proclaimed "independent" people start actually showing it instead of relying on others to do your work for you!

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#838918 Jan 13, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
The 1938 Munich Agreement permitting Nazi Germany's annexation of Czechoslovakia signaled that the West was unwilling to oppose Hitler's ambitions.
Yep. A poor practice on their part. Yet, I don't see how it would have prevented an invasion.

You could say the same about Chamberlain and "peace in our time."

But I'm of a differing opinion on that.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#838919 Jan 13, 2013
VeganTiger wrote:
<quoted text>
Google it. Or read a book. You can find FACTS about this even in a Barnes&NOble book store where the military history books are. Otherwise, you could google both French, Czech or British contingency invasion plans of Ruhr Gebiet in case of invasion of Czechoslovakia. OR you could read the German General staff's OWN evaluation of the risk of reoccupying Rheinland in 1935.
yaaaawn.. I am hitting the bed, Something tells me, I will wake up tomorrow morning having forgotten MORE European history overnight than you will ever be able to absorb. Let's stick to talking about how confiscating 180 million guns from law-abiding citizens is going to run absolutely smoothly with no risk of mass killings or civil war. If Obama can pull this one of without a shot fired, he truly IS more gifted than even Hitler with regards to subjugation.
lol! Dump and run son.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#838920 Jan 13, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! in 2008, I recall bushie saying he wouldn't give a withdrawal date from iraq because it would tip off the enemey. Then presidential candidate Obama and Al Maliki of iraq announced a timetable for withdrawal.
Shortly thereafter, bushie also offer a general schedule of withdrawal.
You people and your political posturing. Sheesh!
Iraq and Afghanistan are two completely different situations.

Iraq has strategic importance and is/was winnable.

Afghanistan has no strategic importance and is not winnable.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#838921 Jan 13, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Yep. A poor practice on their part. Yet, I don't see how it would have prevented an invasion.
You could say the same about Chamberlain and "peace in our time."
But I'm of a differing opinion on that.
The two are the same event, dumbass.
Navy Corpseman

United States

#838922 Jan 13, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>I know son. In fact, you can take the "YOU LOOT" part out of your claim and you'd be even more accurate!
Your State of Hawaii is doing fantastic in education and taxes!

Excellent job with unenjoyment,and crime!

Colleen Hanabusa(D)dummy!
Forum carlsbad nm

Hobbs, NM

#838923 Jan 14, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey stupid! The mortgage lenders like Countrywide and Indy Mac who made those toxic loans were never under any regulations. Are you all of a sudden a proponent of bigger government?
Why are they toxic? Everyone needs a home.
If our President was doing his job which is to take care
of the people of the US then there wouldn't be any problems.
Governor Martinez of New Mexico wants to keep back all of the
third graders so she can have a raise?
They give the state money for the amount of children that are
attending school.
I loved Catholic school for my kids even
if I had to pay for it. The children learn from workbooks
and they teach them God.
No one knows how high you can climb with him.



PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

#838924 Jan 14, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you should do the research yourself?
In the meantime:
Angelo Mozilo, the former Countrywide Financial CEO charged with fraud and insider trading by the Securities and Exchange Commission, had a lot of "friends." The Democratic leadership in Congress just doesn't want you to know their names -- or the details of their loans from Countrywide.
What we know is that Senators Chris Dodd and Kent Conrad were among the VIPs who received sweetheart mortgages under the "Friends of Angelo" program. What we don't know is how many other government officials also received such favors, or what exactly Countrywide expected in return.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1245888655537...
The Portfolio account of Countrywide's VIP loan program names Chris Dodd, early Obama backer Kent Conrad, and Richard Holbrooke as recipients of special loans through the firm's CEO.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0608/F...
Take the log out of your eye.
That's a copout Carol, you put the numbers out so it's up to you, not me to justify them.
In the meantime, The House Ethics Committee investigated these Friends of Angelo loans and Countrywide's VIP unit and found that while it offered quicker, more efficient processing and some discounts, the loans met basic underwriting standards and didnít offer the best deals available in the marketplace.
www.nypost.com/.../friends_of_angelo_probe_en... ...
lol

Winter Park, FL

#838925 Jan 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Afghanistan has no strategic importance and is not winnable.
Oh, not so. There is the opium production, drug routes and oil pipeline routes (and natural resources) that they have secured and want to keep.
Not 'winnable', and sustainable, I'd agree. Being there at all was folly. But staying there is pure folly. But stay we will. For the obvious reasons.
We went to Iraq for nothing but to secure the oil for big mega corporations.
Mission accomplished.
Lincoln

United States

#838926 Jan 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
As stated, I am a fiscal conservative.
Arguments based on region are irrelevant to me.
Abortion is an anchor sinking the conservative cause and those demanding laws against individual behavior are the worst kind of statists.
And, finally, attempts to destroy the public school system instead of improving same are ridiculous.
Abortion is an anchor sinking the conservative cause and those demanding laws against individual behavior are the worst kind of statists.

.... it continues with the religious right in control!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#838927 Jan 14, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, you want more detail, Treasury gets the money from revenues including the sale of debt instruments.
You schizoidtards need to make up your alleged "minds", is he all powerful bent bringing fundamental change to the US or is he a weak puppet? You've asserted both positions today you schizophrenic little freak.
What do I think he is? I think he's the second coming of Bush and can't understand why you retards don't worship the man. The only real difference between him and Bush is skin color so ...
I do believe you're beginning to understand the question. The answer requires a source of money for an answer. You came close to acknowledging that in your post when you said the Treasure gets its money from somewhere. To answer the question, you have to identify the SOURCE OF MONEY the Treasure will receive money from.

And, that fundamental change you intend to bring....
Would that be money growing on trees that the Treasury can use as a source of money?
And, would that be a fascist dictatorship where the furher Obama can write his own laws to suit his ignorant whim?

Not a chance of that happening without killing a few million people, dufus. You really are disconnected from just who is living here in America, aren't you?

You do know that if you continue to push your fascist government onto the American population, you will start a civil war, don't you? You may get your ignorant race war that you think you want.
You do know that when the smoke clears the winners will most certainly hang the losers, don't you?
If it's your neck the noose is being slung around, don't whine. You asked for it, idiot. Take it like a man.
You idiots don't know a paradise when you're living right in the middle of it.
Fundamental change to a system where everyone living in it now can choose their own living standard.... that's a hoot.

See you at the hanging tree, dufus.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#838928 Jan 14, 2013
Let's begin with the unfinished business of last week. There were two questions asked that nobody in the world has been able to answer, and nobody here on this site has answered. The closest anyone came to answering these questions was some link that gave a bunch of no-answers as to the location of Obama, and some other idiot gave the answer of the Treasury as a source of money.
Still, nobody knows where Obama was during the 7-hour battle between the United States and Al Qaeda, and still nobody knows where the money will come from to pay for Obama's government.
The Treasure isn't a source of money. The Treasury is a repository. Additionally, the Treasury is 16.5 TRILLION dollars in debt. There isn't any money there, anyway.
So, let's begin with the questions:

Where exactly was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the United States in Banghazi while the battle was being watched on a live feed in the White House?

And;

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

I'll be out of the ocuntry for a week or so, maybe only 5 days if everything goes well. I'll check the homework of you ignorant clowns when I get back. You ignorant Democrats, try not to fuck things up too much while the grownups are away.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 4 min Sharrp Shooter 256,439
Anti-illegal immigration Border Convoy headed t... 4 min Here Is One 428
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 4 min DebraE 54,979
Perry, Paul bash Obama for 'no strategy' on Syria 5 min truth-facts 2
3 states, plaintiffs want Supreme Court to hear... 9 min Fa-Foxy 13
Longtime GOP Texas Gov. Perry wins another term (Nov '10) 9 min That Fart Guy 22,304
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 9 min Obama Zombies 151,287
Who do you side with in Ferguson? 16 min OnlyPatchWork 1,817
Teen's Shooting Highlights Racial Tension 56 min Who 1,483
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

US News People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••