Activists rally in Detroit for immigration reform

Apr 10, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Detroit News

A few dozen members of a coalition of labor activists held a brief rally outside a Homeland Security office Wednesday in support of sweeping immigration reform being considered in Congress.

Comments (Page 53)

Showing posts 1,041 - 1,060 of1,155
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
bob

Phoenix, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1105
May 10, 2013
 
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
What an idiot. You weren't conquered? One way or another, you were.
My ancestors from Europe? And they forced us to speak Spanish? You're confused...
You have no idea what is my ethnicity, you halfwit. I am not Mexican.
You are a perfect example of why so much of the world thinks you Yanks are childish at spoiled halfwitted crybaby bastards.
and yet you still live in america among the Yanks . Once again why are you here????your home country not good enough ???? Why is that????

“TUEBOR”

Since: Jul 11

Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1106
May 10, 2013
 
I hope ICE was on hand checking immigration documents. It is high time we rounded up all the foreigners that don't belong here and ship them off to detention camps.
bob

Phoenix, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1107
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
What an idiot. You weren't conquered? One way or another, you were.
My ancestors from Europe? And they forced us to speak Spanish? You're confused...
You have no idea what is my ethnicity, you halfwit. I am not Mexican.
You are a perfect example of why so much of the world thinks you Yanks are childish at spoiled halfwitted crybaby bastards.
Thats funny !!!!!!!! Americans dont go to mexico or another country and have kids so they can get welfare and other freebees . americans dont run to other countries to get free health care .or free schooling . and demand it even if they never paid into it . Seems to me they hate yanks because we dont want to give give give see what Mexico or anyother country will give you . LOL!!!!!! you got it good and complain !!!!!!!!! If you dont find another country toi whine too.
petro

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1108
May 10, 2013
 
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
How could Jews steal their own country?
Learn history. That territory (and many others) were stolen by the Arabs. Arab imperislism is possibly the most vile in all of history, if not that of their Muzscum brothers the Mughals.
Which “Americans” aren't allowed sovereignty? You are referring to Native Americans, I presume?
Ýou need to learn some history and get your head straight.
And you, sin huevos....NEED TO GO BACK to your country or planet.
bob

Phoenix, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1109
May 10, 2013
 
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, racist turd boy.
The USA is largely responsible for trashing Mexico. It was not only Spain. France and UK have guilt in this also.
You know NOTHING about Mexican history or culture, and it shows with every post, nitwit racist gringo scum boy.
Mexico had extensive trade relations with the Southwest for a long time, long before the Spanish got here. Mexican traders called pochitl were all over North America, boy.
See how little you know, halfwit? Moron. Racist. Pig.
Mexico is freeto close her borders anytime she wants and keep her people there. America does not need Mexico. AH , but does Mexico need America ?????
bob

Phoenix, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1110
May 10, 2013
 
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, racist turd boy.
The USA is largely responsible for trashing Mexico. It was not only Spain. France and UK have guilt in this also.
You know NOTHING about Mexican history or culture, and it shows with every post, nitwit racist gringo scum boy.
Mexico had extensive trade relations with the Southwest for a long time, long before the Spanish got here. Mexican traders called pochitl were all over North America, boy.
See how little you know, halfwit? Moron. Racist. Pig.
France was never in Mexico . What did you put that out of your butt???? Source please LOL!!!!!!!!!!Never said they didnt trade .who cares ???? I did tell you this was not their land until the spanish came . Spanish and their guns and horses. Mexicans had never seen a horse.
JewGoyimAparthei d

Brewster, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1112
May 10, 2013
 
bob wrote:
<quoted text>France was never in Mexico . What did you put that out of your butt???? Source please LOL!!!!!!!!!!Never said they didnt trade .who cares ???? I did tell you this was not their land until the spanish came . Spanish and their guns and horses. Mexicans had never seen a horse.
The French Intervention of Mexico where France was going to re-colonize Mexico due to Mexico not being able to pay it's debt to France & other Europeans!

What, Sin Baros has left out is that France attacked Mexico during the American civil war so that the U.S couldn't enforce the Monroe Doctrine to protect Mexico!

That when the U.S civil war was done the U.S been able to enforce the Monroe Doctrine & bought troops down to the border of Mexico & created a Blockade against French ships who were trying to recolonize Mexico!
JewGoyimAparthei d

Brewster, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1113
May 10, 2013
 
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
So says Cavalli-Sforza the leading expert on the human genome.
litically-correct smoke screen that Cavalli-Sforza regularly pumps out to keep his life’s work — distinguishing the races of mankind and compiling their genealogies — from being defunded.” In Cavalli-Sforza’s own words, direct from his unabridged 1994 book “The History and Geography of Human Genes”(HGHG, written with Paolo Menozzi and Alberto Piazza), which I have open on the desk beside me:


The [genetic] color map of the world [see below] shows very distinctly the differences that we know exist among the continents: Africans (yellow), Caucasoids (green), Mongoloids…(purple), and Australian Aborigines (red). The map does not show well the strong Caucasoid component in northern Africa, but it does show the unity of the other Caucasoids from Europe, and in West, South, and much of Central Asia”[HGHG, p. 136]


Cavalli-Sforza's genetic map of the world, from HGHG. He even put the damn thing on the cover.

Sailer goes on to explain that


Cavalli-Sforza’s team compiled extraordinary tables depicting the ‘genetic distances’ separating 2,000 different racial groups from each other. For example, assume the genetic distance between the English and the Danes is equal to 1.0. Then, Cavalli-Sforza has found, the separation between the English and the Italians would be about 2.5 times as large as the English-Danish difference. On this scale, the Iranians would be 9 times more distant genetically from the English than the Danes, and the Japanese 59 times. Finally, the gap between the English and the Bantus (the main group of sub-Saharan blacks) is 109 times as large as the distance between the English and the Danish.(The genetic distance between Japanese and Bantus is even greater.)

Neither Zek nor abagond can refute any of this. Unfortunately, that does not stop them from disagreeing, with predictably incoherent results.

Despite the alleged arbitrariness of races, Cavalli-Sforza’s six genetic color maps (the world, Africa, Asia, Europe, the Americas, and Oceania) clearly depict black Africans, Khoisans (Bushmen and Hottentots), East Asians, south-west Asians, white Europeans similar to north Africans, native North Americans, native South Americans, and native Australians (HGHG, color section, Figures 1–6). To be precise, they clearly depict these races according to Cavalli-Sforza’s own captions. In fact, the only races from Richard Lynn’s “Race Differences in Intelligence” which are not clearly depicted are
1.Arctic Peoples (or Eskimos) as clearly distinct from American Indians — Cavalli-Sforza’s caption to Figure 5 suggests this is “probably because [Eskimos] inhabit a very thin area on the coast,”
2.South-East Asians as clearly distinct from East Asians”— his caption to Figure 3 notes the “extremely dark color that makes Southeast Asia almost invisible,” and
3.Pacific Islanders, who occupy an even tinier area, as clearly distinct from native Australians — the map of Australia shows four major regions, one of which is present in Australia but not New Guinea.


http://unamusementpark.com/2011/04/debunking-...
JewGoyimAparthei d

Brewster, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1114
May 10, 2013
 
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
250,000 Mayans tortured and killed by deathsquads funded, armed and trained by the Reagan Administration. Did you approve of that, pig?
Reagan was big against Communism of course... That was the big threat back then.... Look at the Cuban Missle crsis.... Not only was a Nuclear war very close there with Soviets vs America from the Cuban Communist outpost for Soviets..... But... We learned just rather recently that the Cuban Missle crisis had ordered to deploy against the U.S which was at the last moment denied.

A Nuclear war even maybe worse than WW2 was very close to being started.

Now... In Guatemala you had Communist types who had long supported a Communist like Government to come into Guatemala & take land from those who owned land.

What had gone down in this genocide was that Mayans were fighting against the Guatemalan Government & supporting Communism.

For this reason Reagan had supported this against Communism in fear that Guatemala would become like another Cuba & a outpost for Soviets.

Of course... The genocide was in excess.

Not denying that.... However... Also can't deny the Communist threat & the Mayan masses who had long been attacking & supporting Communist like revolutions against the Guatemalan government!

To say they hadn't provoked the Guatemalan government some would be false.

However.... Of course the Guatemalan Government went way too far & did genocide!

Even so... This doesn't even compare to the genocide that the Soviet Union & Communist China did.

...
....
.....
...... Why do I hear so many scold the U.S "Right Wingers" for such Anti Communist measures in Latin America.

Yet... Rarely hear people talk about how the "Left Wingers" Truman & F.D.R had been behind Potsdam & Yalta conference & had supported Soviet opression, murder & famine into Central Europe!

F.D.R & Truman had far more involvement in pushing the Soviet Union into Central Europe than Reagan did in supporting the Guatemalan Government of Montt!
JewGoyimAparthei d

Brewster, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1115
May 10, 2013
 
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Might doesn't make right. Mexican civilization was superior to european if we look at city planning, science, medicine, etc.
Think about what europe was like in 1519, you idiot. LOL!!!
Well... What by 1519!?

You had German Johannes Gutenberg printing press already.

You had Italian Leonardo Da Vinci's art & all his brainstorming ideals!

You Polish Copernicus proving the Central Sun Solar System model with advanced mathematics.

Europeans had invented the wheel going back to over 5,000 years ago in Poland of the Bronocice pot!

I mean the Aztecs had never invented the wheel like Europeans had like this!?

Since: May 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1116
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, racist turd boy.
The USA is largely responsible for trashing Mexico. It was not only Spain. France and UK have guilt in this also.
You know NOTHING about Mexican history or culture, and it shows with every post, nitwit racist gringo scum boy.
Mexico had extensive trade relations with the Southwest for a long time, long before the Spanish got here. Mexican traders called pochitl were all over North America, boy.
See how little you know, halfwit? Moron. Racist. Pig.
Hahaha i like you, you're calling everyone racist who doesn't agree with your point of view.
I highly suggest you get off the computer and go stir up some shit in the real world. After-all, you're right, are you not?

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1117
May 10, 2013
 
FaithUSA wrote:
I hope ICE was on hand checking immigration documents. It is high time we rounded up all the foreigners that don't belong here and ship them off to detention camps.
You're a fascist who is now known to the appropriate authorities, though they probably already knew about you, they don't give me that information.

Such as you should not walk free. You will be dealt with, I'm sure.

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1118
May 10, 2013
 
Agent_Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Hahaha i like you, you're calling everyone racist who doesn't agree with your point of view.
I highly suggest you get off the computer and go stir up some shit in the real world. After-all, you're right, are you not?
Ha ha you're a moron... the people I call racist have expressed clear racism. You doubtless are aso a racist piece of traitorous scum, since you think it's all a big joke.

Stir up shit? It's a democracy, you fascist traitorous bastard, and being active politically is a patriotic duty and right.

But not to a fascist like you, right?

F U

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1119
May 10, 2013
 
JewGoyimApartheid wrote:
<quoted text>
Well... What by 1519!?
You had German Johannes Gutenberg printing press already.
You had Italian Leonardo Da Vinci's art & all his brainstorming ideals!
You Polish Copernicus proving the Central Sun Solar System model with advanced mathematics.
Europeans had invented the wheel going back to over 5,000 years ago in Poland of the Bronocice pot!
I mean the Aztecs had never invented the wheel like Europeans had like this!?
Mayan math and astronomy was as advanced as that of Europe. Aztec medical science was superior.

You cannot compare civilizations. They each have gone in their own directions. The development of non-European civilizations was largely stifled with the onset of Eurocolonialism.

Europeans were building on a legacy which included the Balkans, Greece, Mesopotamia, Egypt, and to some extent India and Africa.

European do not get full credit for any of it. Nobody does.

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1120
May 10, 2013
 
JewGoyimApartheid wrote:
<quoted text>
Reagan was big against Communism of course... That was the big threat back then.... Look at the Cuban Missle crsis.... Not only was a Nuclear war very close there with Soviets vs America from the Cuban Communist outpost for Soviets..... But... We learned just rather recently that the Cuban Missle crisis had ordered to deploy against the U.S which was at the last moment denied.
A Nuclear war even maybe worse than WW2 was very close to being started.
Now... In Guatemala you had Communist types who had long supported a Communist like Government to come into Guatemala & take land from those who owned land.
What had gone down in this genocide was that Mayans were fighting against the Guatemalan Government & supporting Communism.
For this reason Reagan had supported this against Communism in fear that Guatemala would become like another Cuba & a outpost for Soviets.
Of course... The genocide was in excess.
Not denying that.... However... Also can't deny the Communist threat & the Mayan masses who had long been attacking & supporting Communist like revolutions against the Guatemalan government!
To say they hadn't provoked the Guatemalan government some would be false.
However.... Of course the Guatemalan Government went way too far & did genocide!
Even so... This doesn't even compare to the genocide that the Soviet Union & Communist China did.
...
....
.....
...... Why do I hear so many scold the U.S "Right Wingers" for such Anti Communist measures in Latin America.
Yet... Rarely hear people talk about how the "Left Wingers" Truman & F.D.R had been behind Potsdam & Yalta conference & had supported Soviet opression, murder & famine into Central Europe!
F.D.R & Truman had far more involvement in pushing the Soviet Union into Central Europe than Reagan did in supporting the Guatemalan Government of Montt!
Bull$hit. You are making apologies for deathsquads. This was a war of the Guatemalan elite against the people. They wanted to maintain the plantation system and their privileges, and many Maya were in revolt due to being tired of being virtual slaves to that system.

It was in the interest of USA corporate profits that Reagan aided and abetted the genocide in Guatemala. It is no more excuseable than any genocide, whether that of Hitler or Pol Pot.

There is no ethnical way a non-sociopathic person can support what happened there.

Reagan's support of Ríos Montt and the other murderers was decisive and more extensive by far than anything FDR and Truman did. Could the USA have pushed the Soviets back out of eastern Europe when Germany fell? How long would that war have taken? Nobody wanted it. You should blame Hitler for the Soviet occupation of eastern Europe.

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1121
May 10, 2013
 
JewGoyimApartheid wrote:
<quoted text>
litically-correct smoke screen that Cavalli-Sforza regularly pumps out to keep his life’s work — distinguishing the races of mankind and compiling their genealogies — from being defunded.” In Cavalli-Sforza’s own words, direct from his unabridged 1994 book “The History and Geography of Human Genes”(HGHG, written with Paolo Menozzi and Alberto Piazza), which I have open on the desk beside me:
The [genetic] color map of the world [see below] shows very distinctly the differences that we know exist among the continents: Africans (yellow), Caucasoids (green), Mongoloids…(purple), and Australian Aborigines (red). The map does not show well the strong Caucasoid component in northern Africa, but it does show the unity of the other Caucasoids from Europe, and in West, South, and much of Central Asia”[HGHG, p. 136]
Cavalli-Sforza's genetic map of the world, from HGHG. He even put the damn thing on the cover.
Sailer goes on to explain that
Cavalli-Sforza’s team compiled extraordinary tables depicting the ‘genetic distances’ separating 2,000 different racial groups from each other. For example, assume the genetic distance between the English and the Danes is equal to 1.0. Then, Cavalli-Sforza has found, the separation between the English and the Italians would be about 2.5 times as large as the English-Danish difference. On this scale, the Iranians would be 9 times more distant genetically from the English than the Danes, and the Japanese 59 times. Finally, the gap between the English and the Bantus (the main group of sub-Saharan blacks) is 109 times as large as the distance between the English and the Danish.(The genetic distance between Japanese and Bantus is even greater.)
Neither Zek nor abagond can refute any of this. Unfortunately, that does not stop them from disagreeing, with predictably incoherent results.
Despite the alleged arbitrariness of races, Cavalli-Sforza’s six genetic color maps (the world, Africa, Asia, Europe, the Americas, and Oceania) clearly depict black Africans, Khoisans (Bushmen and Hottentots), East Asians, south-west Asians, white Europeans similar to north Africans, native North Americans, native South Americans, and native Australians (HGHG, color section, Figures 1–6). To be precise, they clearly depict these races according to Cavalli-Sforza’s own captions. In fact, the only races from Richard Lynn’s “Race Differences in Intelligence” which are not clearly depicted are
1.Arctic Peoples (or Eskimos) as clearly distinct from American Indians — Cavalli-Sforza’s caption to Figure 5 suggests this is “probably because [Eskimos] inhabit a very thin area on the coast,”
2.South-East Asians as clearly distinct from East Asians”— his caption to Figure 3 notes the “extremely dark color that makes Southeast Asia almost invisible,” and
3.Pacific Islanders, who occupy an even tinier area, as clearly distinct from native Australians — the map of Australia shows four major regions, one of which is present in Australia but not New Guinea.
http://unamusementpark.com/2011/04/debunking-...
They cannot be divided adequately into “races” for various reasons I'll get into when it's not so late.
JewGoyimAparthei d

Brewster, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1122
May 10, 2013
 
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
They cannot be divided adequately into “races” for various reasons I'll get into when it's not so late.
Well... The lines between race might have fuzzy endings & beginings.

They obviously do exist!

If not.... How can you tell your race & even your ethnicity by a DNA sample!?

Why can a forensics expert look at a skeletal remains to find out that persons race!?

Obviously there is basis in racial differences then!

As if the Congo Pygmies & Dutch of the Netherlands are the same people!?

Everything from their massive height difference,(Which the Dutch are well over a entire foot taller than the Congo Pygmies)

Then to their difference in features show that all to well!

Of course Congo Pygmies & the Dutch don't overlap in features at all!

So... How could we say they are not different races even if the regions between the Netherlands & Congo Pygmies might have a "fuzzy blended line" in between!?
Faith

New Baltimore, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1123
May 10, 2013
 
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a fascist who is now known to the appropriate authorities, though they probably already knew about you, they don't give me that information.
Such as you should not walk free. You will be dealt with, I'm sure.
Get fckd, sh*tskin.
JewGoyimAparthei d

Brewster, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1124
May 10, 2013
 
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Bull$hit. You are making apologies for deathsquads. This was a war of the Guatemalan elite against the people. They wanted to maintain the plantation system and their privileges, and many Maya were in revolt due to being tired of being virtual slaves to that system.
It was in the interest of USA corporate profits that Reagan aided and abetted the genocide in Guatemala. It is no more excuseable than any genocide, whether that of Hitler or Pol Pot.
There is no ethnical way a non-sociopathic person can support what happened there.
Reagan's support of Ríos Montt and the other murderers was decisive and more extensive by far than anything FDR and Truman did. Could the USA have pushed the Soviets back out of eastern Europe when Germany fell? How long would that war have taken? Nobody wanted it. You should blame Hitler for the Soviet occupation of eastern Europe.
If the U.S didn't get involved with Latin America to support Anti Communist measures.

Then all of Latin America would have likely become a Communist bloc.

One which could have been used with Soviets to invade the U.S!

It was a very rough time then with the Communist concerns of the Cold war era.

But... The Communists were supporting their Communist Imperialism around too!

Remember when Che Guevara had traveled across Latin America & even Africa trying to spread Communism!?

Remember when Soviet Union had supported Communist China & Communist Mongolia down into Communist Vietnam & Cambodia!?

..
...
....
...... Communists were the biggest imperialists going!

Before the Soviet Union was even created they had invaded Ukraine in the 1917 - 1919 Soviet Ukrainian war!

Then had invaded Georgia & the Caucasus region right after the Soviet Union had been created.

... Of course Communist China right after it's creation invaded & has still occupied Tibet!

...
.....
......
....... Montt's genocide was certainly in excess & wrong!

However.... Communism was & still is a serious concern!

As is the famine, opression & mass murder that goes along with Communism!

“TUEBOR”

Since: Jul 11

Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1125
May 10, 2013
 
Viva United Fruit Co.!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1,041 - 1,060 of1,155
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••