Police: Arrested teen claims to be Se...

Police: Arrested teen claims to be Sen. Rand Paul's son

There are 232 comments on the CBS News story from Jan 7, 2013, titled Police: Arrested teen claims to be Sen. Rand Paul's son. In it, CBS News reports that:

A teen who claims to be the son of U.S. Sen. Rand Paul was arrested Saturday night at Charlotte Douglas International airport, CBS Kentucky affiliate WKYT-TV reports .

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS News.

First Prev
of 12
Next Last

“Make America Great Again”

Since: Jun 07

Bring Obama Back!

#1 Jan 7, 2013
The purified, holier than thou right-wing tea-baggers family values on display for all to see, LOL!

And these are the very people who want to legislate their “morals” on everyone else.
senior citizen

Granite City, IL

#4 Jan 7, 2013
Marine Corp Pat wrote:
The purified, holier than thou right-wing tea-baggers family values on display for all to see, LOL!
And these are the very people who want to legislate their “morals” on everyone else.
At least he did not murder 4 Americans in Benghazi and try to cover it up like a cat in a litter box like Obama and Hillary has. At his early age he has owned up to more than Obama has at his old age.

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#5 Jan 7, 2013
Looks like him - is he trying to get away from his insane, far-Right parent and join the rest of humanity, or what?

Heh

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#6 Jan 7, 2013
senior citizen wrote:
<quoted text>
At least he did not murder 4 Americans in Benghazi and try to cover it up like a cat in a litter box like Obama and Hillary has. At his early age he has owned up to more than Obama has at his old age.
You appear to be another right-winger who blames our President and Sec'y of State for the terrorists' crimes, while giving the terrorists a pass. Why are you on the side of terrorism? Should the Homeland Security people be checking you out?

Since: Oct 08

Alpharetta, GA

#7 Jan 7, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
You appear to be another right-winger who blames our President and Sec'y of State for the terrorists' crimes, while giving the terrorists a pass. Why are you on the side of terrorism? Should the Homeland Security people be checking you out?
so when you guys blamed bush for 9/11, that was ok? but when we blame obama for Benghazi, thats wrong?

Since: Jan 13

Clearwater, FL

#8 Jan 7, 2013
inbred Genius wrote:
<quoted text>
so when you guys blamed bush for 9/11, that was ok? but when we blame obama for Benghazi, thats wrong?
That can easily be reversed. So when you guys said Bush was not to blame for 9/11, that was ok? but when we say Obama was not to blame for Benghazi, thats wrong?

But to me, the hypocrisy on the right is over the top. When 9/11 happened, the right wingers were all shouting "Let's rally around the President!" But when Benghazi happened, the same right wingers shouted, "Let's attack the President!"
senior citizen

Granite City, IL

#9 Jan 7, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
You appear to be another right-winger who blames our President and Sec'y of State for the terrorists' crimes, while giving the terrorists a pass. Why are you on the side of terrorism? Should the Homeland Security people be checking you out?


You are one of those that blamed BUSH for 9/11 - you have a double standard. Obama and Hillary did NOT TELL THE TRUTH, they lied and continued to lie for weeks until AFTER THE ELECTION. They threw Susan Rice under the bus to save their own azz (VIDEO). The four Americans did not have a chance because their requests for more security was ignored. The four Americans also have mother and fathers who love them dearly and still have not been told what happened. In today's world we have politicians that are NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYTHING THEY DO ARE SAY. I want to have Hillary tell her story under oath - the same with Obama.

Since: Jan 13

Clearwater, FL

#10 Jan 7, 2013
senior citizen wrote:
<quoted text>
At least he did not murder 4 Americans in Benghazi and try to cover it up like a cat in a litter box like Obama and Hillary has. At his early age he has owned up to more than Obama has at his old age.
Please explain how the President and the Secretary of State "murdered 4 Americans." Also please explain how they "tried to cover it up." Oh, never mind, I already know you can't. You Obama/Hillary haters are really a bunch of loons. And you probably can't figure out why you lost the election, can you?
Jane Dough

Barre, VT

#11 Jan 7, 2013
a 19 year old kid drank beer on a plane...
wow...

I guess "news" today means anything that gets the left salivating...
senior citizen

Granite City, IL

#12 Jan 7, 2013
Calm Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
Please explain how the President and the Secretary of State "murdered 4 Americans." Also please explain how they "tried to cover it up." Oh, never mind, I already know you can't. You Obama/Hillary haters are really a bunch of loons. And you probably can't figure out why you lost the election, can you?
They had asked for help and were ignored. Red Cross and the British left and Obama did not want to screw up his campaign so he let them DIE and then he LIED by sending Susan Rice out - It has already been proven it was a terrorist attack and not as Obama claimed - a VIDEO - speak of stupid - that is our President.

Since: Jan 13

Clearwater, FL

#14 Jan 7, 2013
senior citizen wrote:
<quoted text>
They had asked for help and were ignored. Red Cross and the British left and Obama did not want to screw up his campaign so he let them DIE and then he LIED by sending Susan Rice out - It has already been proven it was a terrorist attack and not as Obama claimed - a VIDEO - speak of stupid - that is our President.
Let me take your "arguments" one at a time.

1. "They had asked for help and were ignored". I am not aware of any evidence that Obama or Hillary Clinton were told that the embassy was at risk, and that they ignored such information.

2. "The Red Cross and the British left". What does that have to do with Obama or Hillary?

3. "Obama did not want to screw up his campaign and so he let them die". This doesn't even make any sense. How exactly would letting four Americans die help Obama's campaign?

4. "Obama lied by sending Susan Rice out". Huh? How does having Susan Rice be the spokesperson constitute lying?

5. "It has been proven that it was a terrorist attack". When did Obama say that it was not a terrorist attack? And even if Obama and other administration officials thought the attack was linked to a video, so what? Would those four people be any less dead?

The bottom line is that the right wing in this country is trying to create a "scandal" where there is none. The only way you could assign any sort of guilt to Obama or Hillary would be to prove that they were somehow involved in planning, or carrying out the attacks. The fact that they may have given the wrong motivation for the attack is irrelevant. "They said it was a video". "They didn't call it terrorism". Who cares? Like I said, calling the attacks terrorism after it happened won't magically prevent the attacks from having taken place. And erroneously saying that a video was the reason for the attacks didn't cause the four deaths. You right wingers are grasping at straws for political purposes.

Since: Oct 08

Alpharetta, GA

#16 Jan 7, 2013
Calm Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
That can easily be reversed. So when you guys said Bush was not to blame for 9/11, that was ok? but when we say Obama was not to blame for Benghazi, thats wrong?
But to me, the hypocrisy on the right is over the top. When 9/11 happened, the right wingers were all shouting "Let's rally around the President!" But when Benghazi happened, the same right wingers shouted, "Let's attack the President!"
you may be a calm liberal, but you are still a liberal, that tells me all I need to know. So far, in my 4-5 years of topix, I have yet to see a liberal answer a direct question, without tap dancing around the question,and finally giving the dem playbook answer.

you're new here, so I'll sit back and watch you change the world, with just a few keystrokes. That's what libs do, you know.

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#17 Jan 7, 2013
inbred Genius wrote:
<quoted text>
so when you guys blamed bush for 9/11, that was ok? but when we blame obama for Benghazi, thats wrong?
Stop asking stupid questions, Georgia. I wasn't talking to you anyway.

Only an imbecile, or a Republican (but I repeat myself) would think that Benghazi is remotely related to 9/11.

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#18 Jan 7, 2013
There is ONE point to make here, however:

Why did the Right think it was outrageous to suggest that Bush had let terrorists attack us on 9/11, but now think it OK to attack Mr. Obama concerning the terrorist attack on Benghazi, a situation he had FAR less to do with than Bush did with 9/11?

Can any of you on the Right answer that question?

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#19 Jan 7, 2013
senior citizen wrote:
<quoted text>
They had asked for help and were ignored. Red Cross and the British left and Obama did not want to screw up his campaign so he let them DIE and then he LIED by sending Susan Rice out - It has already been proven it was a terrorist attack and not as Obama claimed - a VIDEO - speak of stupid - that is our President.
When you can present evidence that Mr. Obama knew of the danger but refused to do anything about it, for campaign or any OTHER reasons, let us see it.

Until then you're merely guilty of slander and the enabling of terrorism

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#20 Jan 7, 2013
senior citizen wrote:
<quoted text>
You are one of those that blamed BUSH for 9/11 - you have a double standard....EDITED....
You are a liar. I blamed the terrorists of al-Qai'da for 9/11 and still do.

Do NOT make up lies and attribute them to me. You don't want me for an enemy, old boy.

Since: Jan 13

Clearwater, FL

#21 Jan 7, 2013
inbred Genius wrote:
<quoted text>
you may be a calm liberal, but you are still a liberal, that tells me all I need to know. So far, in my 4-5 years of topix, I have yet to see a liberal answer a direct question, without tap dancing around the question,and finally giving the dem playbook answer.
you're new here, so I'll sit back and watch you change the world, with just a few keystrokes. That's what libs do, you know.
"you are still a liberal, that tells me all I need to know". The language of a true fanatic. How about addressing the argument I made, instead of babbling about irrelevancies, like how long you have been posting here, or that I'm new here, or any of your other talking points about how "liberals change the world."

The point I made is valid, that right wingers like yourself are hypocrites. When Americans die at the hands of terrorists during a Republicans term in office, you rally around the Republican to protect him for political purposes. And when Americans die at the hands of terrorists during a Democrat's term in office, you attack the Democrat, again for political purposes. It seems to me that its all a part of the same desparate strategy to fool people into thinking that Americans are safer from terrorism under Republican presidents than under Democratic presidents.

“JESUS WOULD IMPEACH THE GOP!!!”

Since: May 09

Lake Success, N.Y.

#23 Jan 7, 2013
Calm Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
"you are still a liberal, that tells me all I need to know". The language of a true fanatic. How about addressing the argument I made, instead of babbling about irrelevancies, like how long you have been posting here, or that I'm new here, or any of your other talking points about how "liberals change the world."
The point I made is valid, that right wingers like yourself are hypocrites. When Americans die at the hands of terrorists during a Republicans term in office, you rally around the Republican to protect him for political purposes. And when Americans die at the hands of terrorists during a Democrat's term in office, you attack the Democrat, again for political purposes. It seems to me that its all a part of the same desparate strategy to fool people into thinking that Americans are safer from terrorism under Republican presidents than under Democratic presidents.
Excellent analysis of the right wing mentality. This actually gave those such as Inbred a reason to continue their relentless assault on the current president, after Obama had told the world Bin Laden was killed.

They first stated Obama only did this with Bush policies in place. This may be so - but Obama was there less than 3 years, and the job was accomplished. Bush had 8 years, and did absolutely nothing. I even gave this Inbred fool all the released, declassified CIA documents showing conclusively that Bin Laden's family was in fact flown out of this country 2 days after 9/11 - his response was crickets, naturally. He thought this information was all the fabrication of Michael Moore, when clearly it was not.

You have entered the alternate reality where the intellectually inept, AKA the republicans, come to bitch and moan. I wish you well.
the rest of us

Saint Paul, MN

#24 Jan 7, 2013
TonyT1961 wrote:
<quoted text>
Excellent analysis of the right wing mentality....BLAH,FART,BLAH... .
Wrong again fartsack, it is YOU who are the classic example of the dimwitted leftist whom nobody will listen to in real life, so you somehow think it is different on topix. Well numbnuts, IT ISN'T.

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#25 Jan 7, 2013
the rest of us wrote:
<quoted text>
No appearances necessary for you, we KNOW you are the classic deluded leftist gasbag who somehow thinks anybody but other far left douches gives a sh*t about your asinine non-stop posting. What an incredible waste of time you are.....but then again that is also classic leftist mentality.
Quit stalking me, troll. Your posts have been reported to Topix moderators for violating the TOS.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 12
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Aquarius-WY 1,566,381
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 3 min Buck Crikkk Crockkk 17,322
News In video: Donald Trump tells Boy Scouts - Washi... 4 min TrumpRant 39
News GOP favor dropping tax beneficial to blue states 5 min CodeTalker 7
News President Trump's new message man Anthony Scara... 9 min The FACTory 123
News Dear Trump Voters: The 1950's Aren't Coming Back 9 min old_moose 564
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 23 min The FACTory 222,014
News By a 2-to-1 margin, Americans prefer Obamacare ... 6 hr Red Crosse 476
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 6 hr Chris Jarvis 8272 280,061
More from around the web