Who still takes global warming seriou...

Who still takes global warming seriously?

There are 30922 comments on the Farmington Daily Times story from Jan 28, 2010, titled Who still takes global warming seriously?. In it, Farmington Daily Times reports that:

Despite the recent discovery of the e-mails that resulted in "Climate Gate" and the fact this has been one of the coldest and harshest winters in many years, Gov.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Farmington Daily Times.

LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#30519 Oct 19, 2012
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course his bit on plant emitting CO2 was a classic as well.
When they decay or during the night sure. What is your point? That you cannot understand the biology of plants? You don't understand ANYTHING so that is not an exception.
litesong

Everett, WA

#30520 Oct 19, 2012
litesong wrote:
Good that your(dirtling's) piles(hemorrhoiks for pigs) are causing you difficulties.
/////////
SpaceBlues wrote:
You do possess extrasensory perceptions!
Amazing observations to me.
//////////
litesong wrote:
Thank you for the compliment. However, hemorrhoiks are supposed to be spelled hemorrhoinks.
factologist

Huntsville, AL

#30521 Oct 19, 2012
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
<quoted text>
non-fact. In fact a lie. Show any reference where I said that. You obviously cannot read plain English (like Earthling) and 'revisede' it to your own fancy.
My sincere apology. It was Steve Chase's post, not yours, that had the screwy concept of CO2 absorption. I do seem to get you two mixed up. Are you two related?
factologist

Huntsville, AL

#30522 Oct 19, 2012
Earthling-1 wrote:
<quoted text>I have the rest on file, but most of it can be found here:
What is the most STUPID post made by an AGW'er.....I nominate LessHypeMoreFact
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
After careful consideration and a slap on the butt from LHMF for attributing a post to him that was actually made by Steve Chase, I nominate Steve Chase for the most stupid AGW'er post(s)/poster ever made.
But,I nominate LHMF as a close runner up.

Tina receives my nom for the most stupid poster who is currently posting, period. AGW'er or Denier.(Of course not including Trolls like Litesong and PHD. I don't consider them "stupid posters", they simply post stupid Troll things, frequently ).

I just don't like Trolls. Don't you feel that way?
PHD

Houston, TX

#30523 Oct 19, 2012
factologist wrote:
<quoted text>After careful consideration and a slap on the butt from LHMF for attributing a post to him that was actually made by Steve Chase, I nominate Steve Chase for the most stupid AGW'er post(s)/poster ever made.
But,I nominate LHMF as a close runner up.
Tina receives my nom for the most stupid poster who is currently posting, period. AGW'er or Denier.(Of course not including Trolls like Litesong and PHD. I don't consider them "stupid posters", they simply post stupid Troll things, frequently ).
I just don't like Trolls. Don't you feel that way?
So you must have a hate for your----self.
factologist

Huntsville, AL

#30524 Oct 19, 2012
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>So you must have a hate for your----self.
There is a difference, PHD, between countering a post with opinions and following someone around just to write disrespectful things, the way you and litesong do. Obviously, it's your right to do so, I just don't happen to like it. Further, I believe it is beneath you both, as you both seem informed about the subject.
I do admit that every now and then I will act the Troll and, yes, I don't like myself when I do.

Than you for reminding me.
litesong

Everett, WA

#30525 Oct 19, 2012
litesong wrote:
Arctic sea ice extent is above the 2007 sea ice extent & is above the average minimum for the 2000's, at 5,798,750 km2 (October 16, 2012), this day's sea ice leap, the size of S. Dakota! The sun has been unseen from the North Pole for 4 weeks, temperatures above the 80th parallel lower than the last two weeks of dates for 2007 & other recent years, & temperatures on landforms surrounding the Arctic Ocean as low as -20 degC.
Arctic Ocean warmth is & will continue to keep Arctic sea ice thinner through the coming winter & even spring. As of October 2, Arctic sea ice VOLUME is ~23% lower than any satellite recorded year AND indications of submarine-detected Arctic sea ice yearly VOLUME.
Yes, the Arctic sea ice VOLUME is disappearing, year to year, quicker than the Arctic sea ice extent.
//////////
litesong continues:
Presently, Arctic sea ice extent is above the 2007 sea ice extent for yesterday's date & is above the average minimum Arctic sea ice extent for the 2000's, at 6,072,656 km2 (October 18, 2012), the last two days' slowing rate, increasing at an Arkansas area per day. However, present Arctic sea ice area is similar to 2007 Arctic sea ice area. Temperatures above the 80th parallel average minus 17 degC, the past week's plus of temperatures below the same week of 2007 & other recent years. Present temperatures on landforms surrounding the Arctic Ocean, are way below freezing, a broad swath of Siberia into the minus double digits, as low as -20 degC.
Arctic Ice Pack is much closer to the Russian islands, Franz Joseph Land & Svalbard, beginning to encircle the islands. Sea ice connected to the islands is strongly developing around the islands(connecting one set of Russian islands to the mainland). Arctic Ice Pack is extending far south into the vast clear waters north of Alaska & Siberia. While waiting for Arctic Ice Pack to connect with islands, huge sea ice floes strongly developed in the vast clear waters north of Siberia(due to broad double digit minus Siberian temps flooding into Arctic waters & vortex mixing breaking down stratified solar heated waters?) AND connected the Ice Pack to far eastern Siberia, truly a remarkable development!

A detail noted 9 days ago is a raggy taggy developing edge along a part of the semi-circle, possibly NOT coincidental with the HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS (plus?) OF SQUARE KILOMETERS, of waters north of Alaska & Siberia that are VASTLY CLEAR. Might the raggy taggy edge indicate huge turbulence & currents in this largest(ever?) ice free, & resulting southerly-directed heat stratified Arctic waters? I wonder if there might develop more raggy taggy edging, enough to form a swirl pattern? Such a vast swirl at such a huge scale would be impossible...... wouldn't it?
Eight days ago, noted near the raggy taggy ice pack, have developed 3 tiny pixel ice floes(arced?), separated from the Arctic ice pack toward southerly directions. Seven days ago, the number of ice floes increased to 8 & indeed they formed an ARC. Pretty sure they represent a large scale vortex in open Arctic water! Further data, show that the vortex is true!

The west end of the Northwest Passage is ice blocked & filled, altho the east end is fairly ice free.
Downwellings in unusual clear Arctic waters, normally sea ice covered in decades past, can be transporting only tattered traces of extra solar energy to continental shelf, Arctic Ocean & sea depths, since the sun will be fully set 24 hours a day, tomorrow north of the 80th parallel. Southern Arctic waters get only a skimming from the sun for a few hours a day, which is only double digit degrees off the horizon, at most!
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#30526 Oct 19, 2012
factologist wrote:
<quoted text>My sincere apology. It was Steve Chase's post, not yours, that had the screwy concept of CO2 absorption. I do seem to get you two mixed up. Are you two related?
What on earth are you babbling about now and who said it?

If you actually post a link to a thread I will continue the point until you either understand it, or show yourself incapable of reasoning. Your move.

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain retreat, SE Spain

#30527 Oct 20, 2012
factologist wrote:
After careful consideration and a slap on the butt from LHMF for attributing a post to him that was actually made by Steve Chase, I nominate Steve Chase for the most stupid AGW'er post(s)/poster ever made.
Nobody on Topix posts under that name, Steve Case would be the nearest, but he's a staunch sceptic, either you're confused, or wrong, because LessFact is the undefeated king of stupid AGW posts.

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain retreat, SE Spain

#30528 Oct 20, 2012
LessFactMoreHype, aka:
NobodyYouEverWantToKnow wrote:
That CO2 cannot be a 'pollutant'? Wrong. Anything CAN and IS a pollutant in a specific context. In this case, as a greenhouse gas causing 'thermal pollution' of the planet.
-
The point is really that the whole claim of 'CO2 is vital to life' and 'CO2 is plant food' promoted by Earthling is not so much that it is technically wrong, but that it is IRRELEVANT to the issue of CO2 as a 'thermal pollutant'. Agreed?
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain retreat, SE Spain

#30529 Oct 20, 2012
NobodyYouEverWantToKnow, aka:
LessFactMoreHype wrote:
When they decay or during the night sure. What is your point? That you cannot understand the biology of plants? You don't understand ANYTHING so that is not an exception.
Pot, kettle:
LessFactMoreHype wrote:
Most fruiting plants are polinated[sic] because those are the ones that have food values and thus something to give the bee an incentive to polinate[sic]. Weeds rarely have benefit to the bees.
This is a question that sounds intelligent only until you look closer..
http://www.topix.com/forum/us-senate/TGGBRGDH...
PHD

Houston, TX

#30530 Oct 20, 2012
factologist wrote:
<quoted text>There is a difference, PHD, between countering a post with opinions and following someone around just to write disrespectful things, the way you and litesong do. Obviously, it's your right to do so, I just don't happen to like it. Further, I believe it is beneath you both, as you both seem informed about the subject.
I do admit that every now and then I will act the Troll and, yes, I don't like myself when I do.
Than you for reminding me.
Well when you get the dirtling apologies for the unnecessary vile rude remarks this it makes about Americans and all others maybe things will change. Itís never beneath me to point out the dirtling and its vile comments. The dirtling doesnít have an opinion just useless babble tainted with hate covered with spam hot air.
PHD

Houston, TX

#30531 Oct 20, 2012
Earthling-1 wrote:
<quoted text>Nobody on Topix posts under that name, Steve Case would be the nearest, but he's a staunch sceptic, either you're confused, or wrong, because LessFact is the undefeated king of stupid AGW posts.
And your the commander of useless babble tainted with hate covered with spam cut and paste hot air. Have you seen your care giver today?
factologist

Huntsville, AL

#30532 Oct 20, 2012
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>And your the commander of useless babble tainted with hate covered with spam cut and paste hot air. Have you seen your care giver today?
Classic Trollese.

In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_ (Internet)
factologist

Huntsville, AL

#30533 Oct 20, 2012
Earthling-1 wrote:
<quoted text>Nobody on Topix posts under that name, Steve Case would be the nearest, but he's a staunch sceptic, either you're confused, or wrong, because LessFact is the undefeated king of stupid AGW posts.
You're right. Even a blind pig will find an acorn sometimes.(Just kidding).
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/farmington-nm...

"staunch sceptic" my arse. Staunchly septic with a case of dumb.
But do supply an example of him being a skeptic, if you can find one
PHD

Houston, TX

#30534 Oct 20, 2012
factologist wrote:
<quoted text> Classic Trollese.
In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
So now that you correctly identified your ----Self what could be your next move? AHHH more useless babble tainted with hate covered with spam cut and paste hot air. You should have used protection. I do believe you have some confusion with the English language. My statement would be fact and yours fiction. Try again trolette.

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain retreat, SE Spain

#30535 Oct 21, 2012
factologist wrote:
You're right. Even a blind pig will find an acorn sometimes.(Just kidding).
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/farmington-nm...
"staunch sceptic" my arse. Staunchly septic with a case of dumb.
But do supply an example of him being a skeptic, if you can find one
How many do you want, he's posted 2,798.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
PHD

Houston, TX

#30536 Oct 21, 2012
Earthling-1 wrote:
<quoted text>How many do you want, he's
We do not want anymore useless babble from you that's how many zero nada nothing. Now take your meds and see your care giver. My bad you have no friends so no care givers.
factologist

Huntsville, AL

#30537 Oct 21, 2012
Earthling-1 wrote:
Your referenced posts are examples of a denier, not a skeptic. But he certainly is not an AGWer, like I thought. He still my first choice for ignorance. He tops Tina.
PHD

Houston, TX

#30539 Oct 22, 2012
factologist wrote:
<quoted text>Your referenced posts are examples of a denier, not a skeptic. But he certainly is not an AGWer, like I thought. He still my first choice for ignorance. He tops Tina.
Well no one could top the Less than a Box of Rocks AKA"tina". Well your first runner up good job. Ignorance is a step above your position anothe good job on your part. Hat keep it up the Less than a Box of rocks needs a friend.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 3 min Bruddah Z 322,150
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Coffee Party 1,657,505
News Final push for Moore and Jones in Alabama Senat... 4 min Lawrence Wolf 98
News Still Untitled: Alabama Election - Roy Moore 5 min marg 46
News White House will override Obama's climate plan 5 min Trump is a joke 1,599
News Democrat Doug Jones wins Senate election in stu... 8 min Trump is a joke 1
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 10 min Frindly 14,755
News Many Christian conservatives are backing Alabam... 21 min Rupert B Jigglebo... 1,381
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 37 min Rider on the Storm 46,561
News Trump accusers call for congressional investiga... 39 min Retribution 87
More from around the web