Ron Paul on the Verge of Going Third Party?

Jan 12, 2008 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: National Ledger

Rep. Ron Paul's 1988 Libertarian Presidential campaign started with great promise: A former four-term Republican US Congressman running on the ticket of America's third largest party. via National Ledger

Comments
28,401 - 28,420 of 29,296 Comments Last updated May 13, 2014
UIDIOTRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29425
Dec 9, 2012
 
Bill R wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, I was a dues paying member of Amnesty International
for many years.
As for your diatribe about women's rights, my wife and
I both belonged to the National Organization for Women
for several years until their positions became too
strident and nonsensical.
Gay rights? Two farms nearby are owned and operated
by lesbian couples who, in my opinion, are or should
have the same rights as my wife and I do. They are
good friends and neighbors.
Incidentally, did you know that Sen Mark Hatfield,
whom I have mentioned several times on this forum,
was gay and lived with a man for many years?
Gee, imagine that .... a gay Republican.
My step-brother-in law is now my step-sister in law
and married another woman in Massachusetts. They
have been guests in our home and we enjoyed a nice
day this past summer on a one day cruise on the
Columbia River. She's has had a tough life and
deserves all the happiness that comes her way.
You fail to mention that I voted for Bill Clinton
and Hubert Humphrey. I understand that these people
are inferior to you because they have or had
credentials.
Not diatribe on Women rights, your on national ! You should know about INTERNATIONAL version try "International Women's Rights Groups '

nothing wrong with Gay Republican or gay Democrat or Gay whatever, as long they perform their duties in responsible upright matter and respect for people who put them into office.
No, tell us all about Sen Hatfield,and you worked for him?

So you voted for Clinton but you worked under Bushjr & Co in some capacity and u a lover of Bush is a very good MAn of moral character, am i right?

:)
UIDIOTRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29426
Dec 9, 2012
 
Bill R wrote:
<quoted text>
Excuse me, IO, but the last time I checked we were governed
by U.S. Constitution, not any collection of nations that
choose to meet and write their own legislation to serve their
own individual ends. We are a sovereign nation, not a
state governed by the rules of a body which has a miserable
record for honesty, integrity, and much worse.
Incidentally, apart from their tacit approval of such a
piece of worthless legislative garbage excreted onto a
piece of paper, exactly what countries are observing these
child's rights? Please produce evidence of other countries
altering their own governmental policies and laws to suit
the work of this U.N. committee ultimately designed to
extract money from other nations under the pretext of helping
children. Where is the evidence that this masturbatory piece
of crap has changed anything in the world that could not
or would not have been accomplished without it?
look what i found , not bogus, Bill!
----
US and UN council Writes THE world bill FOR world Children Rights /TREATY, AS world signed THE bill and TO HAVE IT ratify INTO LAW NEED another set of signatures but US and somalia only signed the world Children rights bill but DID NOT SIGN another SET OF signature get it ratify as binding US AND SOMALIA... BOTH DISINGENOUS! I somewhat disagreed with what you injecting.

iF YOU REALLY WANT TO UNDERSTAND THE DiFFERNCE BETWEEN US law and International law version on the Treaty.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_th...
The Convention deals with the child-specific needs and rights. It requires that states act in the best interests of the child. This approach is different from the common law approach found in many countries that had previously treated children as possessions or chattels, ownership of which was sometimes argued over in family disputes.

In many jurisdictions, properly implementing the Convention requires an overhaul of child custody and guardianship laws, or, at the very least, a creative approach within the existing laws. The Convention acknowledges that every child has certain basic rights, including the right to life, his or her own name and identity, to be raised by his or her parents within a family or cultural grouping, and to have a relationship with both parents, even if they are separated.

The Convention obliges states to allow parents to exercise their parental responsibilities. The Convention also acknowledges that children have the right to express their opinions and to have those opinions heard and acted upon when appropriate, to be protected from abuse or exploitation, and to have their privacy protected, and it requires that their lives not be subject to excessive interference.
---
1948 -- The preliminary draft of a World Constitution is published by U.S. educators advocating regional federation on the way toward world federation or government with England incorporated into a European federation.

The Constitution provides for a "World Council" along with a "Chamber of Guardians" to enforce world law. Also included is a "Preamble" calling upon nations to surrender their arms to the world government, and includes the right of this "Federal Republic of the World" to seize private property for federal use.
----
NWO = USA...
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29427
Dec 9, 2012
 
Bill R wrote:
<quoted text>
Invasion of other sovereignty comes in any number of ways,
IO. One of them is for other countries to attempt or assume
the right to take precedence over the law of another
country. That is what you are advocating. There is nothing
good or honorable about that any more than it is good or
honorable for the United States to write the laws of another
countries constitution in a manner that makes them subject to
the will of other countries, many of which are dictatorships.
Your argument is bogus.
Now, let me suggest that we give the United Nations all the
honor and credit it deserves and toss its political,
ideological garbage into another country. The U.N. does
some good, humanitarian things .... all of which can be done
for less money and without the ideological nonsense than the
putrid crap being uttered at the U.N. Let others do it, as
others can do it better and easier and more efficiently than
your precious temple on the East River.
In the place of the United Nations I would support or endorse
the creation of an international organization that consists
of democracies .... with all their faults and flaws. Dictator-
ships (whether Saudi Arabia or Ugabogoga) are excluded. Such
countries agree that no funds shall be extracted from their
citizens for projects outside their borders. Got that?
How's this, IO .... the United States shall not receive any
financial assistance from any other nation. Nor shall the
United States be required (ever, given her own financial plight)
to any other nation because its first responsibility is to the
citizens of the United States?
How's this, IO ....ahhhhh .... you get the idea. It is all
that antiquated nonsense that Washington (actually, no, Jefferson
stole) about not making allegiances with other countries. We
owe South Korea nothing. We owe Japan nothing. We owe the
Philippines nothing. And they may .... as they have by some
of their U.N. votes ... declare they owe us nothing.
Allegiances are earned. They are not edged in stone and
includes Israel and Saudi Arabia and anyone else.
America's first commitment must be to the protection of her
own .... get this, since you missed the word previously ...
sovereignty. The United States does not owe an ounce of
loyalty to a corrupt organization like the U.N..
If you disagree, renounce your citizenship and declare yourself
a citizen of the world.
Actually below piece is for this debate!

What about this , US invaded many nations Sovereignty and installs A US puppet dictatorship is this moral/legal/right thing to do?

1948 -- The preliminary draft of a World Constitution is published by U.S. educators advocating regional federation on the way toward world federation or government with England incorporated into a European federation.

The Constitution provides for a "World Council" along with a "Chamber of Guardians" to enforce world law. Also included is a "Preamble" calling upon nations to surrender their arms to the world government, and includes the right of this "Federal Republic of the World" to seize private property for federal use.
YEP USA = NWO
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29428
Dec 9, 2012
 
Gary wrote:
<quoted text>
Somalia is a collapsed state?
Give the Rand Paul morons half the chance and that's
just what America will be. A third world dystopia.
YEP US take advantage of sitaution . As US Oil Conglomerates with help US Military and backing Keyan Force to takeover 3/4 of their land mass , invaded for bloody Somalia petrol , no wonder Somalia Farmers turn to Privateering on the high seas .
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29429
Dec 9, 2012
 
Bill R wrote:
<quoted text>
Invasion of other sovereignty comes in any number of ways,
IO. One of them is for other countries to attempt or assume
the right to take precedence over the law of another
country. That is what you are advocating. There is nothing
good or honorable about that any more than it is good or
honorable for the United States to write the laws of another
countries constitution in a manner that makes them subject to
the will of other countries, many of which are dictatorships.
Your argument is bogus.
Now, let me suggest that we give the United Nations all the
honor and credit it deserves and toss its political,
ideological garbage into another country. The U.N. does
some good, humanitarian things .... all of which can be done
for less money and without the ideological nonsense than the
putrid crap being uttered at the U.N. Let others do it, as
others can do it better and easier and more efficiently than
your precious temple on the East River.
In the place of the United Nations I would support or endorse
the creation of an international organization that consists
of democracies .... with all their faults and flaws. Dictator-
ships (whether Saudi Arabia or Ugabogoga) are excluded. Such
countries agree that no funds shall be extracted from their
citizens for projects outside their borders. Got that?
How's this, IO .... the United States shall not receive any
financial assistance from any other nation. Nor shall the
United States be required (ever, given her own financial plight)
to any other nation because its first responsibility is to the
citizens of the United States?
How's this, IO ....ahhhhh .... you get the idea. It is all
that antiquated nonsense that Washington (actually, no, Jefferson
stole) about not making allegiances with other countries. We
owe South Korea nothing. We owe Japan nothing. We owe the
Philippines nothing. And they may .... as they have by some
of their U.N. votes ... declare they owe us nothing.
Allegiances are earned. They are not edged in stone and
includes Israel and Saudi Arabia and anyone else.
America's first commitment must be to the protection of her
own .... get this, since you missed the word previously ...
sovereignty. The United States does not owe an ounce of
loyalty to a corrupt organization like the U.N..
If you disagree, renounce your citizenship and declare yourself
a citizen of the world.
As to US receiving financial assistant , will never receive again as over 150 nations tired of US bullying/warmongering but our US abuse there trust , no longer will they trust US ! So how you gonna repair this with World community?

I would say US should mind it own business and start to close most US military bases from around the world . Who are the one in US causing all this problem with world?(Don't try to escape this question, as those on here and i have caught you few time in cookie too many times! BWHAHHHAAAAA)

Bill R

Raymond, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29430
Dec 9, 2012
 
UidiotRACEMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>Actually below piece is for this debate!
What about this , US invaded many nations Sovereignty and installs A US puppet dictatorship is this moral/legal/right thing to do?
1948 -- The preliminary draft of a World Constitution is published by U.S. educators advocating regional federation on the way toward world federation or government with England incorporated into a European federation.
The Constitution provides for a "World Council" along with a "Chamber of Guardians" to enforce world law. Also included is a "Preamble" calling upon nations to surrender their arms to the world government, and includes the right of this "Federal Republic of the World" to seize private property for federal use.
YEP USA = NWO
So .... your defense is a "preliminary draft of a World Con-
stitution published by U.S. educators?" C'mon IO, get serious.
The manner in which you advance your entire point here is
laughable .... a document published by a group of educators
is sum and substance of your defense or proof?

Tell me, if a group of U.S. scientists got together and
published a document declaring the moon to be made of
taco sauce, would that make it the opinion of the U.S.?

Groups and organizations write and publish all kinds of
things ....
Bill R

Raymond, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29431
Dec 10, 2012
 
UidiotRACEMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>As to US receiving financial assistant , will never receive again as over 150 nations tired of US bullying/warmongering but our US abuse there trust , no longer will they trust US ! So how you gonna repair this with World community?
I would say US should mind it own business and start to close most US military bases from around the world . Who are the one in US causing all this problem with world?(Don't try to escape this question, as those on here and i have caught you few time in cookie too many times! BWHAHHHAAAAA)
It is profoundly amusing to listen to you pretend to speak
for 150 countries, many of which are mired in problems far
worse than anything ever created by the United States.


Most of the problems in this world have nothing whatever
to do with the United States. They are the product of their
own mistakes, poor judgment, and corruption .... yet you
trace virtually everything wrong in the world to America.
And those problems would continue to exist if we entirely
withdrew from any involvement in international matters.
They are problems created by human nature itself and to
lay the blame on the United States is sophomoric nonsense,
however popular such an opinion may be in the pseudo-
academic circles in which you seem to thrive.

I have on many occasions advanced the very idea you present
about closure of U.S. bases around the world, but in a
rational manner, not in an ideological manner. To attempt to
portray my position as anything other than that is dishonest
on your part.
UIDIOTRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29432
Dec 10, 2012
 
Bill R wrote:
<quoted text>
It is profoundly amusing to listen to you pretend to speak
for 150 countries, many of which are mired in problems far
worse than anything ever created by the United States.
Most of the problems in this world have nothing whatever
to do with the United States. They are the product of their
own mistakes, poor judgment, and corruption .... yet you
trace virtually everything wrong in the world to America.
And those problems would continue to exist if we entirely
withdrew from any involvement in international matters.
They are problems created by human nature itself and to
lay the blame on the United States is sophomoric nonsense,
however popular such an opinion may be in the pseudo-
academic circles in which you seem to thrive.
I have on many occasions advanced the very idea you present
about closure of U.S. bases around the world, but in a
rational manner, not in an ideological manner. To attempt to
portray my position as anything other than that is dishonest
on your part.
Disingenous on your part!
Why over 130 non-aligned nations support Iran over USA?
Why over 179 NAtions member of UN council support Cuba and only 3 mnations supports USA?

Why over 139 nations support PAlestine as STATE over US/israel

Come on genius with 2 master degrees, can you counter this?
BHHAHAHHAHHAHA
Bill R

Raymond, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29433
Dec 10, 2012
 
UIDIOTRACEMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>Disingenous on your part!
Why over 130 non-aligned nations support Iran over USA?
Why over 179 NAtions member of UN council support Cuba and only 3 mnations supports USA?
Why over 139 nations support PAlestine as STATE over US/israel
Come on genius with 2 master degrees, can you counter this?
BHHAHAHHAHHAHA
Your responses here are amazingly immature and weak,
IO. Your intellectual dishonesty is appalling and,
to be clear, tiresome.

There has never been a vote of 130 non-aligned nations
supporting "Iran over USA." It has never happened.
What has happened is that there is disagreement with
the USA over particular policies or positions on
specific issues. Do you, sir, support Iran over the
USA? Do you, sir, support Iran over Israel? Do you,
sir, call for the destruction of Israel? Do you support
Hamas firing rockets into Israel by the hundreds and
condemn Israel for responding? Do you support bringing
bombs onto buses and killing innocent women and
children? Do you prefer Iran over the USA? Do you prefer
Cuba over the USA? Do you support Syria's slaughter of
it own people?

The questions I have asked you are on the same level
of dishonesty, IO. They do not represent your feelings
any more than the stupid idea that non-aligned
countries "support Iran over the USA." In truth, those
countries are opposed to particular USA positions in
regard to Iran, to Cuba, and so forth.

Rather than ramble on and on with the same babble, IO, take a course in logic somewhere because you are either patently
dishonest or lacking in logic. You offer nothing here but
third grade propaganda.

UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29434
Dec 10, 2012
 
Bill R wrote:
<quoted text>
Your responses here are amazingly immature and weak,
IO. Your intellectual dishonesty is appalling and,
to be clear, tiresome.
There has never been a vote of 130 non-aligned nations
supporting "Iran over USA." It has never happened.
What has happened is that there is disagreement with
the USA over particular policies or positions on
specific issues. Do you, sir, support Iran over the
USA? Do you, sir, support Iran over Israel? Do you,
sir, call for the destruction of Israel? Do you support
Hamas firing rockets into Israel by the hundreds and
condemn Israel for responding? Do you support bringing
bombs onto buses and killing innocent women and
children? Do you prefer Iran over the USA? Do you prefer
Cuba over the USA? Do you support Syria's slaughter of
it own people?
The questions I have asked you are on the same level
of dishonesty, IO. They do not represent your feelings
any more than the stupid idea that non-aligned
countries "support Iran over the USA." In truth, those
countries are opposed to particular USA positions in
regard to Iran, to Cuba, and so forth.
Rather than ramble on and on with the same babble, IO, take a course in logic somewhere because you are either patently
dishonest or lacking in logic. You offer nothing here but
third grade propaganda.
NOT PROPAGANDA and you prekindegarden disposition!
READUP and proof From UNITED NATION COUNCILS, and good US leaders critics of bad/immoral US foreign Policies.... overrides you stupidity, your many decades of brainwashing by AmeriKKKa faux Media corporatist /Govt impact controls got you jingositic pride and nationalistic fervor had pentrated you feeble minded as you can tell what is reality of fantasy, as your are illogical, empathyless, and lacking critical reasoning skill ... as you did not investigated into ugly US war History,had been intervening/invading/plunderin g ... and our US had aways been at war and war and many wars since inception of nation , i mean an US Militarisitic Empire...you want me list pages of ugly US wars since birth of a nation(more like evil Empire). Ignorant is bliss for
---
READUP ignorant ignorumus , don't let politics/religion get your in the way.
Over 50 years plus of obnoxious US sanctions on Cuba ,as Cuba has not done anything to US , as many Cubans and Children died from malnutrition...
---UNITED NATION Press Release GA/10203 Fifty-eighth General Assembly
Plenary
54th & 55th Meetings (AM & PM) GENERAL ASSEMBLY, FOR TWELFTH STRAIGHT YEAR, ADOPTS TEXT ON NECESSITY
OF ENDING UNITED STATES EMBARGO AGAINST CUBA
For the twelfth straight year, the General Assembly today overwhelmingly adopted a resolution on the necessity of ending the four-decade-old economic, commercial and financial embargo imposed by the United States against Cuba.
In a resolution, adopted by a vote of 179 in favour to three against (Israel, Marshall Islands and United States), with two abstentions (Morocco and Micronesia), the Assembly expressed its concern that since its earliest resolution on the matter in 1991, further measures had been taken by the United States to strengthen and extend the restrictions, which adversely affected the Cuban people and Cuban nationals living in other countries.
More to come!
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29435
Dec 10, 2012
 
fyi iNFO WISEHEMIER bwhahahahahaa
---Agian US causing dissension in The Middle East, as Iran never did anything to US, and see what US did to people in the Middle East and World wide for the raw resources and other ill money US global hegemonic agendas had many nations on heighten alert and collobatated to defend from US bully tactics , And ,even those American Professionals critics even pronounced Iran had right to develop nuclear power as deterrent and to protect their to Oil infrastructure, as US imperialistic invasion/plundering worldwide , if Iran wanted it would had gone to war with US long time ago but Iran never done anything to US.

FYI INFO!
Nonaligned Nations Back Iran on Nuclear Bid,...
www.nytimes.com/2012/09/01/world/middleeast/i... ...

Sep 01, 2012 · The 130-nation Nonaligned Movement unanimously decreed support for Iran’s disputed nuclear program, but the group’s final communiqué omitted any ...

-----
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29436
Dec 10, 2012
 
Abbas wins UN ‘birth certificate’ for Palestine state

By AFP Nov 30th, 2012
United Nations: The UN General Assembly on Thursday voted overwhelmingly to recognize Palestine as a non-member state, handing a major triumph to president Mahmud Abbas in the face of fierce US and Israeli opposition.

Abbas demanded the United Nations give a “birth certificate” to a Palestinian state and was rewarded with the backing of 139 countries.

Only nine members heeded Israeli warnings that the move could lead to more violence and voted against. Forty-one abstained.

The vote lifts the status of the Palestinian Authority from an observer entity to a “non-member observer state” with the same status as the Vatican.

Even though it is not a full member it can now join UN agencies and potentially join the International Criminal Court.
---

LAnd belong to palestine people for over 1000 years plus,1f you research back to ancient history on Philistine. and Isreal Zionist are real invaders , taking their land and killing many palestinians ...
The Palestine have outdated Weaponary /outdated and very few warplanes - While isreal had modern weaponary/many advanced war planes and the destructive Phosporous Rain... Better do research as ISreal is the real Invader.

The iSREAL zIONSIT INVASION IS MOST recent plundering in modern times, for over 80 years displacing palestine people from Gaza Strip. You know why US Neocons in power is Helping Isreal Zionsit =$$$$$$$$$ know aboput palestine NG platform of the Coast of GAZA strip... and a very important Strategic Location into middle East for the US oil conglomerates/US War-for-profiteers...= OIL/USD hegemony!

You didn't even research Archives for who land belong, nor you have research it in few sets of Enyclopedia on who the land belong to .
SO, what you have to Billr?

BWHAHHAHHAAaaa
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29437
Dec 10, 2012
 
That is : What YOU have to SAY BIll, the Ignorant on?
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29438
Dec 10, 2012
 
ADD! I SUPPORT IT only when i did my due diligence and with various facts supporting my conclusion in acquisition of various reseached materials from Enyclopedias, Institutions , Newspaper archives , maps , good people in power who does not let other sway them... BY doing heavy research you find who is the offenders are.
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29439
Dec 10, 2012
 
Bill R wrote:
<quoted text>
So .... your defense is a "preliminary draft of a World Con-
stitution published by U.S. educators?" C'mon IO, get serious.
The manner in which you advance your entire point here is
laughable .... a document published by a group of educators
is sum and substance of your defense or proof?
Tell me, if a group of U.S. scientists got together and
published a document declaring the moon to be made of
taco sauce, would that make it the opinion of the U.S.?
Groups and organizations write and publish all kinds of
things ....
GOT YOU AGAIN! USA = NWO! BWHAHHAHHHAHA

READUP!
The World Constitution and Parliament Association is founded which later develops a Diagram of World Government under the Constitution for the Federation of Earth. 1959 -- The Mid-Century Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy is published, sponsored by the Rockefeller Brothers' Fund. It explains that the U.S.: "...cannot escape, and indeed should welcome...the task which history has imposed on us. This is the task of helping to shape a new world order in all its dimensions -- spiritual, economic, political, social." September 9, 1960 --

President Eisenhower signs Senate Joint Resolution 170, promoting the concept of a federal Atlantic Union. Pollster and Atlantic Union Committee treasurer, Elmo Roper, later delivers an address titled, The Goal Is Government of All the World, in which he states: "For it becomes clear that the first step toward World Government cannot be completed until we have advanced on the four fronts: the economic, the military, the political and the social." 1961 -- The U.S. State Department issues a plan to disarm all nations and arm the United Nations. State Department Document Number 7277 is entitled Freedom From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. It details a three-stage plan to disarm all nations and arm the U.N. with the final stage in which "no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force."
Go to Part 2
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29440
Dec 10, 2012
 
ADD!
October 24, 1945 -- The United Nations Charter becomes effective. Also on October 24, Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho) introduces Senate Resolution 183 calling upon the U.S. Senate to go on record as favoring creation of a world republic including an international police force.
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29441
Dec 10, 2012
 
1948 -- UNESCO president and Fabian Socialist, Sir Julian Huxley, calls for a radical eugenic policy in UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. He states:

"Thus, even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy of controlled human breeding will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake that much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable."
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

Astoria, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29442
Dec 10, 2012
 
U BUSHBOT biLLR!
wake up time! bwhhahahaaaaaaa

1991 -- President Bush praises the New World Order in a State of Union Message:

"What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea -- a new world order... to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind... based on shared principles and the rule of law.... The illumination of a thousand points of light.... The winds of change are with us now."
Bill R

Raymond, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29443
Dec 10, 2012
 
UidiotRACEMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text> GOT YOU AGAIN! USA = NWO! BWHAHHAHHHAHA
READUP!
The World Constitution and Parliament Association is founded which later develops a Diagram of World Government under the Constitution for the Federation of Earth. 1959 -- The Mid-Century Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy is published, sponsored by the Rockefeller Brothers' Fund. It explains that the U.S.: "...cannot escape, and indeed should welcome...the task which history has imposed on us. This is the task of helping to shape a new world order in all its dimensions -- spiritual, economic, political, social." September 9, 1960 --
President Eisenhower signs Senate Joint Resolution 170, promoting the concept of a federal Atlantic Union. Pollster and Atlantic Union Committee treasurer, Elmo Roper, later delivers an address titled, The Goal Is Government of All the World, in which he states: "For it becomes clear that the first step toward World Government cannot be completed until we have advanced on the four fronts: the economic, the military, the political and the social." 1961 -- The U.S. State Department issues a plan to disarm all nations and arm the United Nations. State Department Document Number 7277 is entitled Freedom From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. It details a three-stage plan to disarm all nations and arm the U.N. with the final stage in which "no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force."
Go to Part 2


LMAO, IO! This post of yours as well as the others only
demonstrate my point, which is that you are woefully
ignorant and oblivious to the nature of logic.

On this one point alone you betray yourself. How's
that "arming the U.N." working out? Where did it go?

Thanks for playing.
Bill R

Raymond, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29444
Dec 10, 2012
 
UidiotRACEMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
U BUSHBOT biLLR!
wake up time! bwhhahahaaaaaaa
1991 -- President Bush praises the New World Order in a State of Union Message:
"What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea -- a new world order... to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind... based on shared principles and the rule of law.... The illumination of a thousand points of light.... The winds of change are with us now."
You have a problem with the U.S. supporting the "universal
aspirations of mankind .... based on shared principles and
the rule of law?" Gee, that sounds exactly what you have
been wanting rather than U.S. domination and imposing its
principles and laws and policies on the rest of the world.

Incidentally, once again you play with words and statements
like a fundamentalist preacher pulling up scripture verses
completely out of context in order to prove his point.
It is a game anyone can play, but you seem to think of it
as "research" or "intellect." It isn't.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••