Self-defense and not the "Stand Your Ground" law was used in Mr. Zimmerman's defense. The prosecutors were hand-picked to try this case. Both the prosecutors and the defense were involved in selecting the jury. The circumstantial evidence clearly proved Mr. Zimmerman could not be convicted as there was "reasonable doubt". The jurors took their jobs very seriously and made their decisions based on evidence and the law.Figured the crazy loon would had a newsflash on this rumor:
CASEY ANTHONY PREGNANT
Guess if you want to kill your 2 year old and profile and kill a black kid you could move to Florida.
They need to rewrite that law and get some better prosecutors. Jurors have seen too many CSI, NCIS, etc shows and expect nothing shy of the act being committed on video with witnesses to convict. There is circumstantial evidence that is pretty damning. What a damn shame for both the Zimmerman and Martin family. A real tragedy that shouldn't have happened.
Now back to the politics and fauxbox propaganda.
None of us were in the courtroom every day. We weren't there when jury instructions were given. We weren't there when this jury had to make one of the most difficult decisions of their lives. These six women (some of which were mothers) took their jobs seriously and did the best possible job with the information they were provided. We have the best judicial system in the world and should accept their findings. Based on the evidence, they found Mr. Zimmerman not guilty of second degree murder or manslaughter. They genuinely believed Mr. Zimmerman thought his life was in danger.