'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Full Story
whiteair

Eminence, KY

#78964 Feb 4, 2013
GhostofRaygun wrote:
<quoted text>You Repubs have been HAD on the Drill Baby Drill. What has happened is Exxon is EXPORTING US oil at a 70 year record pace. The more the US produces the more Exxon and Shell will send to China. Only thing more US oil does is make profit for oil companies. It's NOT staying in America !!!!!!!!!!
.
Report on 2012 Production: Domestic output grew by a record 766,000 barrels a day to the highest level in 15 years, government data show, putting the nation on pace to surpass Saudi Arabia as the world’s largest producer by 2020. Net petroleum imports have fallen by more than 38 percent since the 2005 peak and now account for 41 percent of demand, down from 60 percent seven years ago, moving the U.S. closer to energy independence than it has been in decades.
More that one factor is involved here.The oil companies,so they say,only earn about 4 % on investment.Not what you would call great.The reason for drilling is to allow this Nation to have it`s own,produce it`s own,selling only excess,and if possible go to the point of rebating to the people any possible money for use of the Countries fossil fuel and withdrawal of same.(limited amount available)Same as the Eastern Countries do.Now if the gov`t could sell to China,maybe offset our debt?The real problem with Obama and his environmental group is they don`t want us to use fossil fuel,even when the ethanol fouls the engines of our autos here.
In other words,there are a good many ways to look at this problem,and the best way,in my opinion,is to do what is best for the people and the Country<NOW!

We could refine our own,sell only excess.Gasoline price could be lower as well.The problem still is refusal to do what is in front of the face to get the best results for the Nation.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#78965 Feb 4, 2013
The price of oil should be regulated at $35.00 per barrel inside the US borders, this would stop all speculators and bring gas prices down where they should be $1.65 a gallon.
OBAMIES ZOMBIES

Dallas, TX

#78967 Feb 4, 2013
...right, gasoline in So. CA is $3.75+/ gal.
Our politicians don't pay for gas, we pay...they don't care!
American Lady

Danville, KY

#78969 Feb 4, 2013
Tofy, nobody is knocking the Democrats of old! It's this NEW set of "liberal minds" that are the ruination of the Dem Party! Back then Congress STILL worked together! Now a days the liberals HOLLER "it's OUR way or the highway!"

Most everyone liked IKE!
Can you say the SAME about the 0? NO!

OWL Gore of 'today' is NOTHING like his Father!

THAT is the "problem" of today's Dem's, most were/are riding on their families **COAT TAILS ... NOT making their name for themselves ... Clinton WAS/IS one of the BIGGEST crooks this Nation has EVER seen! Tho you guys STILL think he was GREAT!

Go "behind-the-scenes" and CHECK where the media did NOT tell the TRUTH about him, just the HIGH and good points! It was Newt Gingrich's Speaker term that balanced C's BUDGETS![1]

Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956: Creating the Interstate System

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/publicro...
==========
Interstate Highway System

Persons traveling through the United States today may find it difficult to imagine our country without the Eisenhower Interstate Highway System. It was not until June 29, 1956, when President Eisenhower signed the Federal Aid Highway Act, that interstate highways began to meet the challenge of the growing number of automobiles on the nation’s highways. While in Europe during World War II General Eisenhower viewed the ease of travel on the German autobahns. That, coupled with the experiences of a young Lt. Col. Eisenhower in the 1919 Transcontinental Convoy, convinced the President of the overwhelming need for safer and speedier highways. The President also felt that the newer, multi-lane highways were essential to a strong national defense.

http://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/research/o...

**
http://www.lvrj.com/news/political-parties-lo...

[1]
http://www.biography.com/people/newt-gingrich...
Sunlightfoundati on com

Bay Shore, NY

#78970 Feb 4, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>No, we are a Republic that derives its governance from the US Constitution.
The US Constitution has jurisdiction over all branches of the government and all branches must adhere to its law.
Even the USSC can be overruled by the Constitution.
No other future Supreme Court or any court is allowed to use Bush v Gore as precedent. Bush is truly an illegitimate President. http://tinyurl.com/2ps3e3
George W. Bush's January 20, 2001 inauguration was unconstitutional. This isn't because Bush lost the popular vote. Nor is it because he lost Florida and thus the electoral vote. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to hear the Florida recount lawsuit, Bush v. Gore, violated the U.S. Constitution. It's a states' rights issue. Elections fall under state law; the highest court that may resolve a legal challenge about an election is a state supreme court. The U.S. Supreme Court--a federal body--didn't have jurisdiction in the case.
http://yalelawjournal.org/2006/11/07/flanders...

Has Bush v. Gore Become the Case That Must Not Be Named?
August 15, 2006 / http://tinyurl.com/qbx2s
At a law school Supreme Court conference that I attended last fall, there was a panel on “The Rehnquist Court.” No one mentioned Bush v. Gore, the most historic case of William Rehnquist’s time as chief justice, and during the Q. and A. no one asked about it. When I asked a prominent law professor about this strange omission, he told me he had been invited to participate in another Rehnquist retrospective, and was told in advance that Bush v. Gore would not be discussed.
The ruling that stopped the Florida recount and handed the presidency to George W. Bush is disappearing down the legal world’s version of the memory hole, the slot where, in George Orwell’s “1984,” government workers disposed of politically inconvenient records. The Supreme Court has not cited it once since it was decided, and when Justice Antonin Scalia, who loves to hold forth on court precedents, was asked about it at a forum earlier this year, he snapped,“Come on, get over it.”
There is a legal argument for pushing Bush v. Gore aside. The majority opinion announced that the ruling was “limited to the present circumstances” and could not be cited as precedent. But many legal scholars insisted at the time that this assertion was itself dictum — the part of a legal opinion that is nonbinding — and illegitimate, because under the doctrine of stare decisis, courts cannot make rulings whose reasoning applies only to a single case.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/15/opinion/15t...
Sunlight Foundation com

Bay Shore, NY

#78972 Feb 4, 2013
Listen to ignorant Bush in his own words:

On “Meet the Press,” Bush said,“I put in my time, proudly so.” When pressed by Russert on why news reporters who previously investigated the charge could find no records of his Alabama service, Bush said,“They’re just wrong. There may be no evidence, but I did report; otherwise, I wouldn’t have been honorably discharged.

----------

Bush said,“They’re just wrong. There may be no evidence, but I did report; otherwise, I wouldn’t have been honorably discharged.

----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,

When asked why he served less than the six-year commitment, Bush responded,“I was going to Harvard Business School and worked it out with the military.”

MILITARY 101:

The military releases individuals for the convenience of the military, NOT FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE INDIVIDUAL ( e.g., so someone could attend business school).

Because the 111th FIS had a need for pilots at the time Bush was discharged, and because his early release could not have been for his own convenience, there must have been a reason the military could no longer use the services of Dumbya Bush.

======
Bush defends military service record in NBC interview /
President also backs Tenet, war against Iraq
http://tinyurl.com/2zyjug Feb. 9, 2004

President Bush defended his service in the National Guard during an interview aired Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” and offered to produce evidence to counter allegations raised by political opponents that he was AWOL for a time in 1972.

On “Meet the Press,” Bush said,“I put in my time, proudly so.” When pressed by Russert on why news reporters who previously investigated the charge could find no records of his Alabama service, Bush said,“They’re just wrong. There may be no evidence, but I did report; otherwise, I wouldn’t have been honorably discharged.

In other words, you don’t just say ‘I did something’ without there being verification. Military doesn’t work that way. I got an honorable discharge, and I did show up in Alabama.” http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4209283/
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#78973 Feb 4, 2013
Sunlightfoundation com wrote:
<quoted text>
No other future Supreme Court or any court is allowed to use Bush v Gore as precedent. Bush is truly an illegitimate President. http://tinyurl.com/2ps3e3
George W. Bush's January 20, 2001 inauguration was unconstitutional. This isn't because Bush lost the popular vote. Nor is it because he lost Florida and thus the electoral vote. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to hear the Florida recount lawsuit, Bush v. Gore, violated the U.S. Constitution. It's a states' rights issue. Elections fall under state law; the highest court that may resolve a legal challenge about an election is a state supreme court. The U.S. Supreme Court--a federal body--didn't have jurisdiction in the case.
http://yalelawjournal.org/2006/11/07/flanders...
Has Bush v. Gore Become the Case That Must Not Be Named?
August 15, 2006 / http://tinyurl.com/qbx2s
At a law school Supreme Court conference that I attended last fall, there was a panel on “The Rehnquist Court.” No one mentioned Bush v. Gore, the most historic case of William Rehnquist’s time as chief justice, and during the Q. and A. no one asked about it. When I asked a prominent law professor about this strange omission, he told me he had been invited to participate in another Rehnquist retrospective, and was told in advance that Bush v. Gore would not be discussed.
The ruling that stopped the Florida recount and handed the presidency to George W. Bush is disappearing down the legal world’s version of the memory hole, the slot where, in George Orwell’s “1984,” government workers disposed of politically inconvenient records. The Supreme Court has not cited it once since it was decided, and when Justice Antonin Scalia, who loves to hold forth on court precedents, was asked about it at a forum earlier this year, he snapped,“Come on, get over it.”
There is a legal argument for pushing Bush v. Gore aside. The majority opinion announced that the ruling was “limited to the present circumstances” and could not be cited as precedent. But many legal scholars insisted at the time that this assertion was itself dictum — the part of a legal opinion that is nonbinding — and illegitimate, because under the doctrine of stare decisis, courts cannot make rulings whose reasoning applies only to a single case.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/15/opinion/15t...
You can't get more illegitimate than Obama, he isn't even a citizen of the USA.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#78974 Feb 4, 2013
Sunlight Foundation com wrote:
Listen to ignorant Bush in his own words:
On “Meet the Press,” Bush said,“I put in my time, proudly so.” When pressed by Russert on why news reporters who previously investigated the charge could find no records of his Alabama service, Bush said,“They’re just wrong. There may be no evidence, but I did report; otherwise, I wouldn’t have been honorably discharged.
----------
Bush said,“They’re just wrong. There may be no evidence, but I did report; otherwise, I wouldn’t have been honorably discharged.
----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,
When asked why he served less than the six-year commitment, Bush responded,“I was going to Harvard Business School and worked it out with the military.”
MILITARY 101:
The military releases individuals for the convenience of the military, NOT FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE INDIVIDUAL ( e.g., so someone could attend business school).
Because the 111th FIS had a need for pilots at the time Bush was discharged, and because his early release could not have been for his own convenience, there must have been a reason the military could no longer use the services of Dumbya Bush.
======
Bush defends military service record in NBC interview /
President also backs Tenet, war against Iraq
http://tinyurl.com/2zyjug Feb. 9, 2004
President Bush defended his service in the National Guard during an interview aired Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” and offered to produce evidence to counter allegations raised by political opponents that he was AWOL for a time in 1972.
On “Meet the Press,” Bush said,“I put in my time, proudly so.” When pressed by Russert on why news reporters who previously investigated the charge could find no records of his Alabama service, Bush said,“They’re just wrong. There may be no evidence, but I did report; otherwise, I wouldn’t have been honorably discharged.
In other words, you don’t just say ‘I did something’ without there being verification. Military doesn’t work that way. I got an honorable discharge, and I did show up in Alabama.” http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4209283/
Irrelevant!
Funny, I was processing back to the states from SEA, they couldn't find my medical or dental records, two days later they found them, I was listed as deceased.
Sunlight Foundation com

Bay Shore, NY

#78975 Feb 4, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>You can't get more illegitimate than Obama, he isn't even a citizen of the USA.
Rightwing Republican Michele Bachmann says publicly that Obama is a Socialist Communist Muslim born in Kenya and not American.

Republicans are all talk!

Obviously you do not have a party who represents your views.

NOT ONE Republican voted against the Resolution that states Obama was born in Hawaii.

Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News are liars and propagandist.

Sincerely,
Josef Goebbels

ENCLOSED IS THE PROOF!

Congress: Yes, Obama Was Born in Hawaii ( 378 - 0 )
July 28, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/lhngae
Yesterday, an innocuous-sounding resolution in honor of the 50th anniversary of Hawaiian statehood came up for vote on the House floor.

The resolution from Hawaii Democrat Neil Abercrombie, which Greg Sargent first reported, included this line: "Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii…"

Why is that notable? Because it's just the sort of claim that angers the birthers – the movement of folks who believe, against overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that President Obama was not really born in Hawaii, and is thus not a U.S. citizen.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-519342...

---

GOP Sen. Lindsay Graham: Birthers Are Crazy, Beck is A Cynic
October 1, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/yefwbpu
Sen. Lindsey Graham,(R-SC) divested himself of the trappings of the extreme right wing of his party on Thursday, calling the popular Fox News host Glenn Beck a "cynic" and birthers "crazy."

Graham was speaking before The Atlantic's First Draft of History conference.

"So I'm here to tell you that those who think the president was born somewhere other than Hawaii are crazy. He's not a Muslim. He's a good man
http://snafu-ed.blogspot.com/2009/10/gop-sen-...

=====

Since: Dec 11

.

#78976 Feb 4, 2013
GhostofRaygun wrote:
<quoted text>You Repubs have been HAD on the Drill Baby Drill. What has happened is Exxon is EXPORTING US oil at a 70 year record pace. The more the US produces the more Exxon and Shell will send to China. Only thing more US oil does is make profit for oil companies. It's NOT staying in America !!!!!!!!!!
.
Report on 2012 Production: Domestic output grew by a record 766,000 barrels a day to the highest level in 15 years, government data show, putting the nation on pace to surpass Saudi Arabia as the world’s largest producer by 2020. Net petroleum imports have fallen by more than 38 percent since the 2005 peak and now account for 41 percent of demand, down from 60 percent seven years ago, moving the U.S. closer to energy independence than it has been in decades.
Exxon is owned by the richest Democrats in America ask Senator Jay Rockefeller (D) WV.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#78977 Feb 4, 2013
Sunlight Foundation com wrote:
<quoted text>
Rightwing Republican Michele Bachmann says publicly that Obama is a Socialist Communist Muslim born in Kenya and not American.
Republicans are all talk!
Obviously you do not have a party who represents your views.
NOT ONE Republican voted against the Resolution that states Obama was born in Hawaii.
Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News are liars and propagandist.
Sincerely,
Josef Goebbels
ENCLOSED IS THE PROOF!
Congress: Yes, Obama Was Born in Hawaii ( 378 - 0 )
July 28, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/lhngae
Yesterday, an innocuous-sounding resolution in honor of the 50th anniversary of Hawaiian statehood came up for vote on the House floor.
The resolution from Hawaii Democrat Neil Abercrombie, which Greg Sargent first reported, included this line: "Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii…"
Why is that notable? Because it's just the sort of claim that angers the birthers – the movement of folks who believe, against overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that President Obama was not really born in Hawaii, and is thus not a U.S. citizen.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-519342...
---
GOP Sen. Lindsay Graham: Birthers Are Crazy, Beck is A Cynic
October 1, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/yefwbpu
Sen. Lindsey Graham,(R-SC) divested himself of the trappings of the extreme right wing of his party on Thursday, calling the popular Fox News host Glenn Beck a "cynic" and birthers "crazy."
Graham was speaking before The Atlantic's First Draft of History conference.
"So I'm here to tell you that those who think the president was born somewhere other than Hawaii are crazy. He's not a Muslim. He's a good man
http://snafu-ed.blogspot.com/2009/10/gop-sen-...
=====
I think he was born here, but being born here does not make you an ipso facto citizen, there are requirement that must be adhered to.
Obama was born an ipso facto citizen of his father's nation, which prevents him from being given citizenship to the US.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#78980 Feb 4, 2013
Safe Browsing
Diagnostic page for netseer.com

What is the current listing status for netseer.com ?
Site is listed as suspicious - visiting this web site may harm your computer.

Part of this site was listed for suspicious activity 2 time(s) over the past 90 days.

What happened when Google visited this site?
Of the 16 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 5 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2013-02-04, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on 2013-02-04.
This site was hosted on 6 network(s) including AS14618 (AMAZON), AS31988 (ARISTEIA), AS16509 (AMAZON).

Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware?
Over the past 90 days, netseer.com did not appear to function as an intermediary for the infection of any sites.

Has this site hosted malware?
No, this site has not hosted malicious software over the past 90 days.

How did this happen?
In some cases, third parties can add malicious code to legitimate sites, which would cause us to show the warning message.

Next steps:
Return to the previous page.
If you are the owner of this web site, you can request a review of your site using Google Webmaster Tools. More information about the review process is available in Google's Webmaster Help Center.

http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebr...

Since: Dec 11

.

#78981 Feb 4, 2013
Bitethehand wrote:
<quoted text>
Being aware of that fact; would you follow a political party who learns from failed policies or on that learns from history?
A Jackass is stubborn, an elephant never forgets!
If you follow the Jackass you are DOOMED to repeat the failures od socialism, if toy follow the Elephant you may avoid falling into the same mistakes of history.
I like the idea behind the example/metaphor, I would be more explicit with details. The democrats throw good money after bad expecting a different result by making the same mistake time after time! Republicans learn from failures and do not repeat the policy that fails. Socialism which has been proven to fail, Democrats are choosing Americas most closely socialistic programs and policies and them attempting to TURBO charge them! Credit ratings of America have been down graded as a result of this behavior, failure to correct this will lead to MORE of THE SAME!

http://money.cnn.com/2011/08/05/news/economy/...

http://www.foxbusiness.com/government/2012/09...

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/...
wtf

Pikeville, KY

#78982 Feb 4, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>I think he was born here, but being born here does not make you an ipso facto citizen, there are requirement that must be adhered to.
Obama was born an ipso facto citizen of his father's nation, which prevents him from being given citizenship to the US.
Then explain why he is a 2 term President of the United States.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#78983 Feb 4, 2013
Is there not one media person in America willing to cut this lying CAIR spokesIslamist down to size?

When Nihad Awad, executive director of CAIR (Council on Anti-American Islamic Relations), is all over the airwaves, lying through his teeth saying “Jihad’ is NOT about aggression, NOT about committing harm against another person,” how hard would it be to expose his attempt to lull Americans into complacency about the sinister intentions of Islam’s supremacist goals?

http://www.barenakedislam.com/
American Lady

Danville, KY

#78984 Feb 4, 2013
I ain't here to do anything half-azzed
Don't give a damn what anyone might say
wtf

Pikeville, KY

#78985 Feb 4, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
I like the idea behind the example/metaphor, I would be more explicit with details. The democrats throw good money after bad expecting a different result by making the same mistake time after time! Republicans learn from failures and do not repeat the policy that fails. Socialism which has been proven to fail, Democrats are choosing Americas most closely socialistic programs and policies and them attempting to TURBO charge them! Credit ratings of America have been down graded as a result of this behavior, failure to correct this will lead to MORE of THE SAME!
http://money.cnn.com/2011/08/05/news/economy/...
http://www.foxbusiness.com/government/2012/09...
http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/...
Then why did Bush try the epic failure of trickle down Economics?

Explain.

“God Bless our Republic”

Since: Nov 12

Warrior for USA

#78989 Feb 4, 2013
Someone is playin 'dangerous games' on these pages.
I'm giving up on the libTARDS 'ignorance.
Let them THRIVE in it!
Shaking the dust off my feet ...

Since: Dec 11

.

#78990 Feb 4, 2013
American Lady wrote:
Safe Browsing
Diagnostic page for netseer.com
What is the current listing status for netseer.com ?
Site is listed as suspicious - visiting this web site may harm your computer.
Part of this site was listed for suspicious activity 2 time(s) over the past 90 days.
What happened when Google visited this site?
Of the 16 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 5 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2013-02-04, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on 2013-02-04.
This site was hosted on 6 network(s) including AS14618 (AMAZON), AS31988 (ARISTEIA), AS16509 (AMAZON).
Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware?
Over the past 90 days, netseer.com did not appear to function as an intermediary for the infection of any sites.
Has this site hosted malware?
No, this site has not hosted malicious software over the past 90 days.
How did this happen?
In some cases, third parties can add malicious code to legitimate sites, which would cause us to show the warning message.
Next steps:
Return to the previous page.
If you are the owner of this web site, you can request a review of your site using Google Webmaster Tools. More information about the review process is available in Google's Webmaster Help Center.
http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebr...
GOOD For YOU!
Did you get the Webmaster toolkit from the link I shared?

Use this like soap (frequently).
Don't click links unless you know how to scan them first.
LOL

Glasgow, KY

#78999 Feb 4, 2013
GhostofRaygun wrote:
<quoted text>What kind of traitor President would invite this man to his counsel? What President would allow this man to speak on the same stage with him?.
.
.
.
.
.
Nihad Awad is among the founders of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and serves as its executive director. In that role, he has attained a degree of political clout, invited to stand beside President George W. Bush at the Islamic Center of Washington days after the 9/11 attacks.
Doesn't mean the man's attitude or beliefs haven't changed drastically from one pres to the next. Maybe Bush gave him the inch that allowed Obama to give him the mile. Democrats are good at that.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 3 min positronium 293,633
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 4 min Blitzking 133,098
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 6 min Guru 181,948
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 8 min Teaman 1,154,619
Anti-gay Tenn. billboard stirs religion debate 10 min eyeful 2,945
Comer visits Morgantown to meet citizens, raise... 11 min Proud Citizen 2
US to start talks with Cuba to normalize full d... 15 min kuda 104
2016 hopeful Ben Carson pledges support for Israel 36 min barefoot2626 14
Anti-Castro protesters in Miami say 'it's not t... 1 hr USA Today 12
John McCain: No, Obama, Sony Hack Was 'Warfare' 3 hr RustyS 3
More from around the web