BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 225420 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Dale

United States

#173703 Oct 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
"I have stated ...."
Whoop Dee Doo! The little twit has stated a non sequitur and nobody cares.
A declaration that flies in the face of reason that nobody who is anybody gives a crap about.
Yup, that's Dufus Dale!
<quoted text>
LMAO!!! How would you know, you're just a low information tool.
Dale

United States

#173704 Oct 3, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Your Mom must be so proud
LMAO!!! She sure is!!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Newington, CT

#173705 Oct 3, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! How would you know, you're just a low information tool.
Yeah, right, the USSC, the courts, the Congress, and legal scholars throughout the US are low information tools that are simply unaware of the Play Law genius-in-his-own-mind.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
"I have stated ...."
Whoop Dee Doo! The little twit has stated a non sequitur and nobody cares.
A declaration that flies in the face of reason that nobody who is anybody gives a crap about.
Yup, that's Dufus Dale!
Dale

United States

#173706 Oct 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
Ever since 1790 it has been required that prior to naturalization in the US that aliens must be "under the jurisdiction" of the United States for a period of years. That means they had to be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States before they could be citizens.
Play Law cannot change that fact.
LMAO!!! Big difference in "under the jurisdiction" and "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof" (US Constitution). When you are "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof" you are a citizen.
Learn to Read

United States

#173708 Oct 3, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! How would you know, you're just a low information tool.
Wojar and his silly facts sure put a crimp in Play Law, don't they?
Democracynow org

Edison, NJ

#173709 Oct 3, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>ObamaKare is not the state health care program adopted by Massachusetts,not even close. Every state adopted state health care programs,but none was over 2700 pages or over fifty taxes. ObamaKare was basically Hillary Kare with a lot of additional taxes and requirement like taking dollars from our citizens to send to people three thousand miles away.
Why do you continue to believe the liars on Fox News and Rightwing Corporate Radio?

Liberal/Progressives wanted Single Payer Medicare For All Americans or even a Public Option .......

....... PERIOD.

--------

Assuring Affordable Health Care for All Americans
October 1, 1989 / http://tinyurl.com/8xb6rd9
http://www.heritage.org/research/lecture/assu...

==========

Obama says Heritage Foundation is source of health exchange idea
March 30th, 2010 / http://tinyurl.com/26xm72p
EDITOR'S NOTE: An analysis of this comment by President Barack Obama was published on April 1, 2010. After it appeared, the Heritage Foundation's communications office contacted us to argue that our rating of Mostly True was too generous to the president. We did some additional reporting to review our ruling. Our second round of reporting -- primarily talking to conservative policy experts outside of Heritage -- solidified our initial conclusions. Below is the updated version of our story, which retains the rating of Mostly True, published April 26, 2010.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...

=====

Summary Of A 1993 Republican Health Reform Plan
Feb 23, 2010 / http://tinyurl.com/amcg2tz
In November, 1993, Sen. John Chafee, R-R.I., introduced what was considered to be one of the main Republican health overhaul proposals: "A bill to provide comprehensive reform of the health care system of the United States."
Titled the "Health Equity and Access Reform Today Act of 1993," it had 21 co-sponsors, including two Democrats (Sens. Boren and Kerrey). The bill, which was not debated or voted upon, was an alternative to President Bill Clinton's plan. It bears similarity to the Democratic bill passed by the Senate Dec. 24, 2009, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/stories/2010/...
Dale

United States

#173710 Oct 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
Ever since 1790 it has been required that prior to naturalization in the US that aliens must be "under the jurisdiction" of the United States for a period of years. That means they had to be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States before they could be citizens.
Play Law cannot change that fact.
LMAO!!! Aliens have never been "and subject to the jurisdiction, thereof (US Constitution)", if this weren't so, we wouldn't need the Naturalization process.(See 14th Amendment)
Answer me one question! What citizenship does an alien hold prior to his naturalization?
Dale

United States

#173712 Oct 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, right, the USSC, the courts, the Congress, and legal scholars throughout the US are low information tools that are simply unaware of the Play Law genius-in-his-own-mind.
<quoted text>
LMAO!!! Dumb aren't they!!!
Dale

United States

#173713 Oct 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, right, the USSC, the courts, the Congress, and legal scholars throughout the US are low information tools that are simply unaware of the Play Law genius-in-his-own-mind.
<quoted text>
LMAO!!! No, I used the wrong word, it should have been "ignorant".
Democracynow org

Edison, NJ

#173714 Oct 3, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>Are you referring to the richest ten percent that already pay 80% of the taxes or the top fifty percent that pay 95% of the taxes?
The last time I checked your name Frank was not written on any of the 76,000 pages in the Tax Code.

Which means you are not represented in Congress like AT&T, Exxon/Mobil, and the Koch Brothers.

----------

Perfectly Legal: The Covert Campaign to Rig our Tax System to Benefit the Super Rich- and Cheat Everyone Else
http://tinyurl.com/3ptn5qm / May 18, 2004
One of the country's top investigative reporters reveals how the richest people within the top 1 percent of the country has rigged the tax code and other laws in its favor.
Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative reporter David Cay Johnston has been breaking pieces of this story on the front page of The New York Times for nine years, work for which one business school professor calls him ├Čthe de facto chief tax enforcement officer of the United States├«. With Perfectly Legal, he puts the whole shocking narrative together in a way that will stir up media attention and make readers angry about the state of our country. And he has sound advice on what to do.
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/181339-1

--------

The Rich Get Richer, and They Have You to Thank, Says David Cay Johnston / Nov 19, 2010 / http://tinyurl.com/ppa7j3v
The rich, thanks to government handouts, are getting richer at everyone else's expense. At least that's what David Cay Johnston claims in the book Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves at Government Expense (and Stick You with the Bill)
"This enormous growth of incomes at the top is not the result of market forces -- there's some market forces -- but it's largely the result of all these rules nobody knows about," he tells Dan and Aaron in this clip.
The problem starts with government subsidies, says Johnston, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist. States are spending around $70 billion on government subsidies, he estimates. That doesn't include the hundreds of billions more doled out in federal subsidies.
"Is that capitalism?," he complains. "Go compete in a competitive arena. Don't go to Washington and say 'give me money' either by saying 'I don't have to pay taxes' or forcing other people to pay taxes that go to me. Go earn your money in the marketplace."
http://moneybob.com/2010/11/21/david-cay-john...

=======

The richest get richer
March 15, 2012 / http://tinyurl.com/7rwexnb
The aftermaths of the Great Recession and the Great Depression produced sharply different changes in U.S. incomes that tell us a lot about tax and economic policy.
The 1934 economic rebound was widely shared, with strong income gains for the vast majority, the bottom 90 percent.
In 2010, we saw the opposite as the vast majority lost ground.
National income gained overall in 2010, but all of the gains were among the top 10 percent. Even within those 15.6 million households, the gains were extraordinarily concentrated among the super-rich, the top one percent of the top one percent.
Just 15,600 super-rich households pocketed an astonishing 37 percent of the entire national gain.
The different results in 1934 and 2010 show how a major shift in federal policy hurts the vast majority and benefits the super-rich.
http://blogs.reuters.com/david-cay-johnston/2...

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Newington, CT

#173715 Oct 3, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Big difference in "under the jurisdiction" and "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof" (US Constitution). When you are "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof" you are a citizen.
And the moron diddles over a distinction without a difference.

No one will ever care about Play Law.
wojar wrote:
Ever since 1790 it has been required that prior to naturalization in the US that aliens must be "under the jurisdiction" of the United States for a period of years. That means they had to be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States before they could be citizens.
Play Law cannot change that fact.
Dale

United States

#173716 Oct 3, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Wojar and his silly facts sure put a crimp in Play Law, don't they?
LMAQO!!! If it were Play Law he might have a chance, but as it stands now he is just like you, just flapping his lips in the stale air of his apartment.
Dale

United States

#173717 Oct 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
And the moron diddles over a distinction without a difference.
No one will ever care about Play Law.
<quoted text>
LMAO!!! The difference is stated in the 14th amendment.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Newington, CT

#173718 Oct 3, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Aliens have never been "and subject to the jurisdiction, thereof (US Constitution)", if this weren't so, we wouldn't need the Naturalization process.(See 14th Amendment)
Answer me one question! What citizenship does an alien hold prior to his naturalization?
Dufus Dale wants to go down the same old blind alley again.

How pathetic.

Aliens must be subject to the jurisdiction of the US before naturalization in the US. That's been the law for over 200 years.
wojar wrote:
Ever since 1790 it has been required that prior to naturalization in the US that aliens must be "under the jurisdiction" of the United States for a period of years. That means they had to be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States before they could be citizens.
Play Law cannot change that fact.
Democracynow org

Edison, NJ

#173719 Oct 3, 2013
Joe OBiden wrote:
Pdamerica org wrote:
<quoted text>Of course 91% tax on the wealthy was too much and below 70% was the right thing at that time.
Unfortunately average Americans are always getting stuck paying the bills and the top 1% percentile find the loopholes the Congress passed for them.
Why is the tax code over 76,000 pages long?
Answer: Because both corrupt parties benefit their corporate masters at the expense of average Americans.
You will never hear this from corrupt corporate owned Mainstream media or corrupt corporate owned Rightwing media.
Loopholes, Loopholes, and more Loopholes.
The recent Sequester proves that: Hollywood & NASCAR benefited while working American taxes got taken out with FICA.
Why did Hollywood and NASCAR have to benefit from this?
Scam, Scam, and more Scams.
<quoted text>
It is the poor that are not paying their fair share of the taxes. There should be a tax of one thousand dollars per person per year. If you do not pay the tax, they should take away everything you own to include your Obama phone.
As our friend Ellen1 so eloquently stated you need income to tax.

BTW: Why are you blaming the indigent American victims instead of the wealthy few who own most of Congress?

---------

JUST A TASTE OF THE WALL STREET CORPORATE FASCIST RACIST TEA BAG REPUBLICAN PARTY SUPPORTERS!

Palin Supporters' Strange World
http://tinyurl.com/53h7ot
http://fr.youtube.com/watch...

Mom, Why Do You Want Me to Go to Iraq?
http://tinyurl.com/437pnn
http://fr.youtube.com/watch...

The Sidewalk to Nowhere, McCain Supporters in Bethlehem, PA
http://tinyurl.com/4dexd9
http://fr.youtube.com/watch...

Tell McCain to End the Politics of Hate
http://tinyurl.com/3g7zmj


Learn to Read

United States

#173720 Oct 3, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAQO!!! If it were Play Law he might have a chance, but as it stands now he is just like you, just flapping his lips in the stale air of his apartment.
If it weren't play law it might matter to some Court. Please let us know if that ever happens.(We won't wait up)
Dale

United States

#173721 Oct 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Dufus Dale wants to go down the same old blind alley again.
How pathetic.
Aliens must be subject to the jurisdiction of the US before naturalization in the US. That's been the law for over 200 years.
<quoted text>
LMAO!!!LMAO!!! The present US citizenship law has only been in operation for 147, and as plainly stated in the 14th amendment, aliens have never been, "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof (US Constitution)".
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#173722 Oct 3, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Your inability to comprehend English is not my problem. I meant exactly what I said. I believe the US should remove religious concerns from foreign policy. You disagree?
Nothing wrong with my comprehension. Your statement came off exactly as I said and you decline to explain. That's alright. I have a pretty good idea of what you meant.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

East Hartford, CT

#173723 Oct 3, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! The difference is stated in the 14th amendment.
Dufus Dale's lind alley. The difference is between the rational and irrational. Dale doesn't know the difference.

Dale really believes it is interesting to beg the same question 1000 times with irrational ramblings.

He may as well try to square the circle with straight edge and compass. No one will care about that either.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
And the moron diddles over a distinction without a difference.
No one will ever care about Play Law.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

East Hartford, CT

#173724 Oct 3, 2013
blind alley

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... 1 min Truth is might 10,466
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 1 min replaytime 209,930
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 2 min Cornelius Scudmister 244,034
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min VetnorsGate 1,433,289
News Clinton blames Republican leaders for a 'paraly... 3 min payme 1,996
News If Donald Trump Was President, Here's What Woul... (Oct '15) 4 min USA 11,284
News News Trump on unarmed Clinton guards: 'Let's se... 8 min payme 780
News Post-debate poll: Clinton takes round one 9 min fireyfellow44 271
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 2 hr valerie 395,974
More from around the web