BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
136,141 - 136,160 of 175,149 Comments Last updated 17 min ago
Grand Birther

Louisville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155166
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Anything new on that Benghazi beat-down thing GB? Haven’t heard from since you ran off to see if they would be marching Obama off in cuffs. I saw him today just as jolly as ever. Care to clue us in?
http://swampland.time.com/2013/05/08/benghazi...
Rep. Chaffetz: Hillary Clinton must testify again about Benghazi attacks.
If this happens, Obama will be thrown under the bus.
Hillary will not take the blame alone.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155167
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Rep. Chaffetz: Hillary Clinton must testify again about Benghazi attacks.
If this happens, Obama will be thrown under the bus.
Hillary will not take the blame alone.
A simple question Grand Birther. What makes you think that there were US troops or armed US personnel anywhere near Benghazi who could have saved the people in the Consulate?

What makes you think that the reason that there were not sufficient armed personnel IN the Consulate was not due to Congressional cutbacks in funding???
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155168
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!! Yep, Obastard was born a citizen of his father's nation, get use to it!
Obama however is a Natural Born Citizen of the United States and no amount of Dufus fable pasting can change that

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155169
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama however is a Natural Born Citizen of the United States and no amount of Dufus fable pasting can change that
True, but never underestimate birther hate as the greatest motivator, LTR.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155170
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Now how can I be wrong, that would be calling the Constitution wrong, sorry the Constitution is the law of the land which has jurisdiction over all three branches of the government and can only be changed by an amendment.
Obama was born a citizen of his father's nation, which makes him ineligible for citizenship in the USA, unless he be naturalized and that has not happened.
The Constitution IS the law of the land. However, it does not say what YOU think. It says what the Wong Kim Ark Supreme Court decision says, which is that every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is a Natural Born US Citizen. Neither that decision or any other has ever said that the meaning of Natural Born Citizen is affected by the citizenship of a parent or of both parents. EVERY means every---every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is a Natural Born Citizen.

"Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are “natural born citizens” and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are “natural born citizens” eligible to serve as President …”—- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

Hollander v. McCain (New Hampshire 2008) ruling:“Those born “in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” U.S. Const., amend. XIV, have been considered American citizens under American law in effect since the time of the founding, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 674-75 (1898), and thus eligible for the presidency,

Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling:“It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.”

Purpura v. Obama (New Jersey 2012) ruling:“No court, federal, state or administrative, has accepted the challengers’ position that Mr. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” due to the acknowledged fact that his father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen by virtue of the then applicable British Nationality Act. Nor has the fact that Obama had, or may have had, dual citizenship at the time of his birth and thereafter been held to deny him the status of natural born. It is unnecessary to reinvent the wheel here.… The petitioners’ legal position on this issue, however well intentioned, has no merit in law. Thus, accepting for the point of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a ‘natural born Citizen’ regardless of the status of his father.”

Voeltz v. Obama (Florida 2012) ruling:“However, the United States Supreme Court has concluded that ‘[e]very person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States.‘Other courts that have considered the issue in the context of challenges to the qualifications of candidates for the office of President of the United States have come to the same conclusion.[The judge cites Hollander and Ankeny]

Allen v. Obama (Arizona 2012) ruling:“Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co., 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986(1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President.… Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise.”
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155171
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>The Constitution IS the law of the land. However, it does not say what YOU think. It says what the Wong Kim Ark Supreme Court decision says, which is that every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is a Natural Born US Citizen. Neither that decision or any other has ever said that the meaning of Natural Born Citizen is affected by the citizenship of a parent or of both parents. EVERY means every---every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is a Natural Born Citizen.

.”
The Constitution also says that SCOTUS (and not Dufus Dale) is charged with resolving disputes as to interpretation and meaning. Of course Dufus's crayola edition omits that part

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155173
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Ah, now we know how ABC found out that James Holmes was a member of the Colorado TEA Party. The IRS had unlawfully obtained a list of it's members And then gave that list to a few 'trusted' members of the Lame Stream Media!!!
That's right. The IRS had targeted "TEA Party" and "Patriot" groups for 'investigations' which made at least TWO violations of our Constitution!

IRS Apologizes for Targeting Conservative Groups
Posted on May 10, 2013

Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/05/irs-apolo...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155174
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Rep. Chaffetz: Hillary Clinton must testify again about Benghazi attacks.
If this happens, Obama will be thrown under the bus.
Hillary will not take the blame alone.
Yep, and Admiral Mullen and Ambassador Pickering have refused to testify before the House committee investigating the Benghazi embassy attack. Are they afraid to testify how they did THEIR investigation? Why did they not interview Sec. Clinton?
Now I learned something along time ago that someone investigating himself, will get the answers he WANTS and the last thing Hillary wants is the truth!
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155175
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, and Admiral Mullen and Ambassador Pickering have refused to testify before the House committee investigating the Benghazi embassy attack. Are they afraid to testify how they did THEIR investigation? Why did they not interview Sec. Clinton?
Now I learned something along time ago that someone investigating himself, will get the answers he WANTS and the last thing Hillary wants is the truth!
Were there any US troops or armed guards within an hour or a few hours away from the Consulate who could have gotten there in time to save lives? Answer: No. IF there were troops or guards who could have gotten to the Consulate, would they have been able to do it by helicopter? Answer: No, there were none; they would have had to have driven at night at the risk of being ambushed. So, the question boils down to why there weren't sufficient armed guards at the consulate in Benghazi, and the answer is that in part the Obama administration was responsible and in part Congressional budget cuts were responsible.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155176
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Airports, Industry Challenge FAA's Towers Decision In Court
By Kerry Lynch kerry.lynch@aviationweek.com

May 08, 2013
Credit: FAA
Airport and industry executives are arguing that FAA moved to eliminate funding for 149 air traffic control towers without conducting proper environmental and safety assessments in violation of federal law and are asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in California to mandate continued funding for the program.

Dozens of municipalities have joined in a lawsuit spearheaded by the City of Spokane, Wash., in an effort to halt FAA’s plan to drop funding for the contract towers on June 15. The American Association of Airport Executives (AAAE) and U.S. Contract Tower Association (USCTA) have also joined the growing number of lawsuits by recently filing briefs. Other associations, including the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA), are filing amicus curiae – or friends of the court – briefs in support of the lawsuits. FAA must now review and respond to the multiple filings.

FAA in March announced it would end funding for about 60% of the contract tower program as part of its effort to cut $600 million from the remainder of its fiscal 2013 budget as required under sequestration.
http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155177
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Now Jacques, do not get your panties in a wad over this as I know this will never happen. I subscribe to a lot of looney-left and looney-right sites and I know they are both off the deep end.
Soooo, why did I post this? Well, to let you know I think they are off the deep end and I am knot!

Treasonous President Obama to Charge 14 Governors with Treason? by Dave Jolly

Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/10763/treasonous...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155178
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
A link? You? What nerve. I asked you for 3 links yesterday. Still waiting, Mr "I always supply links". Start with Obama saying to military that he cared more about his career than anyone or words to that effect.
As to the BP case, for god's sake it was all over the newspapers and tv. BP pleaded NO CONTEST and paid the biggest ever punitive damages. NO CONTEST is mostly arrived at by consensus and to avoid jail time. So, Obama himself, yes, Obama himself is keeping the faulty valve in his closet.
Did I put the comment about Obama not caring about the military in "quotes"? NO!!! It is figuratively speaking!!! Obama's action, or lack thereof, speak for themselves.
Yes, BP did plead no contest for some of the charges but were others charged? Now, this article was posted earlier this year and they still have not settle. WHY? Because other parties besides BP are involved!!!
Ahead of Trial, Talk of a BP Settlement in 2010 Oil Spill
By BARRY MEIER and CLIFFORD KRAUSS
Published: February 23, 2013
With a major civil trial scheduled to start Monday in New Orleans against BP over damages related to the explosion of an offshore drilling rig in 2010, federal officials and those from the five affected Gulf Coast states are trying to pull together to strike an 11th-hour settlement in the case.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/24/business/en... [WamWam]

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155179
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Just to educate you again. Prior to the 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill there was no requirement for offshore rigs to have anti-blowout preventers but after that oil spill they were required.
The fact is is that the anti-blowout preventer on the Deep Sea Horizon FAILED and BP has an active lawsuit against the Horizon of that valve.
But the Lame Stream Media will NOT report it. WHY? Because they all tow the Obama line that BP is responsible!!!

1969 Santa Barbara oil spill
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Santa Barbara oil spill occurred in January and February 1969 in the Santa Barbara Channel, near the city of Santa Barbara in Southern California. It was the largest oil spill in United States waters at the time, and now ranks third after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon .....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1969_Santa_Barba...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155180
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Oooo boy, is the press putting the heat on James Carney's press conference on both Benghazi and the IRS illegally targeting the TEA Party groups.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155181
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oooo boy, is the press putting the heat on James Carney's press conference on both Benghazi and the IRS illegally targeting the TEA Party groups.
I enjoy watching Carney do the Texas Two-Step while the press shoot bullets at his feet!!! Even CBS News was shooting at him!!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155182
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
A link? You? What nerve. I asked you for 3 links yesterday. Still waiting, Mr "I always supply links". Start with Obama saying to military that he cared more about his career than anyone or words to that effect.
As to the BP case, for god's sake it was all over the newspapers and tv. BP pleaded NO CONTEST and paid the biggest ever punitive damages. NO CONTEST is mostly arrived at by consensus and to avoid jail time. So, Obama himself, yes, Obama himself is keeping the faulty valve in his closet.
Hey Jacqueau, Did you miss this?

AP/ April 20, 2011, 11:13 PM
BP sues rig maker for $40B; also sues cap maker

NEW ORLEANS - BP on Wednesday sued the maker of the device that failed to stop last year's calamitous Gulf oil spill and the owner of the rig that exploded, alleging that negligence by both helped cause the disaster.

The British company said in papers filed in federal court in New Orleans that it is suing rig owner Transocean for at least $40 billion in damages, accusing it of causing last year's deadly blowout in the Gulf of Mexico that led to the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history. BP says every single safety system and device and well control procedure on the Deepwater Horizon rig failed.

It also is suing Cameron International, which provided a blowout preventer with a faulty design, which caused an unreasonable amount of risk that harm would occur. Both companies have filed counter claims against BP.
http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-201_162-20055860....

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155183
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Obama has had a nasty habit of blaming people without any facts. It was the cops fault that they arrested Dr. Gates! And it was that film that caused the riots that resulted on the Benghazi embassy attack!
And without anything but his own bigotry against Big Oil, he blames BP. And the Libtards eat up every word of his!!!

President Obama blames giant oil company BP for deadly explosion
BY JOSE MARTINEZ / DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER / MAY 2, 2010

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/pres...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155184
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Oh, in 1989 and 1990 I flew off shore to oil platforms and every helo deck had a shut down valve and I was told if I think I needed to push it, it would shut down the whole platform .... at the seafloor. There were several other valves throughout the platform.
I was also told if I did hit that valve without any cause to do so, that would be the last second I would ever be allowed on any oil platform!

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155185
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
It did not go well for the Obama Administration. More hearings are planned.
The hearing effectively ended Hilary's Presidential aspirations.
She may begin to tell Obama's secrets to save herself if charged.
A major reason Obama has skated for so long – and particularly with Republican leaders – is that no one wishes his or her legacy to include having brought down America’s first black president. There is the very real concern that such action might ignite civil unrest.
July 4th is coming and so may a new Revolution.
Interesting way to try to win elections GB, but hey, when you have no idea’s what else can you do? I’m sure the electorate will appreciate the fact your Party spent the last four years holding hearings and trying to repeal Obamacare.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155186
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Rep. Chaffetz: Hillary Clinton must testify again about Benghazi attacks.
If this happens, Obama will be thrown under the bus.
Hillary will not take the blame alone.
She already has accepted full responsibility for any state dept mistakes as well she should, but that’s not the same as taking blame. Blame should always be placed where it belongs and that’s with the perpetrators and your Party don’t seem to know the difference.

Don’t have a clue what you’re insinuating by she won’t take the blame alone. She’s the only one your Party is trying to wreck before 16. It certainly didn’t do anything for Romney’s chances.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••