BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#114759 Oct 5, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
The SCOTUS is the "Law of the Land?" When did the SCOTUS start drafting law and under what Constitutional authority do they do so?
As we already know, the Supreme Court does not and cannot write laws.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#114760 Oct 5, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
The fool laughs at himself once again.
I'm laughing at you Pops, thinking you look cute in your wittle veil. LMAO
Just me -

Los Angeles, CA

#114761 Oct 5, 2012
American Lady wrote:
Quebec police make multi-million dollar maple syrup bust in New Brunswick
http://blogs.theprovince.com/2012/10/03/quebe...
*_*
Why would anyone bother clicking on your links?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#114762 Oct 5, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue Moron, the largest drivers of the defecit and therefore national debt, as a percentage of the federal budget, are: the wars, the unfunded prescription plan, the Bush-era tax cuts.
To call the PBS budget "a lot of money," is beyond dumb. The cost:benefit analysis has been done and PBS wins.
Cut our government in half. Now, that's a big savings. It would also make for a much more effective government while also flushing out a lot of trash we don't need in DC to begin with. Dims will freak. Cut our government in half????????? Yes, with a good sharp axe.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#114763 Oct 5, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Whatever...you have cherry picked and distorted the facts to prove you misguided point.
I greatly dislike Raygunz because of his archaic views.
Since when has Freedom become archaic? You think it is a violation of the law to comply with a federal law?
The cops pickup a guy who is acting crazy so a judge has him Bakerized for three days during which the doctors give him some anti-psychotic medication. On the third day he goes back in front to the judge and the guy seems sane so the judge releases him IAW the federal law. Now the guy doe snot stay on the free meds he was given and goes off his rocker again and again he is picked up by the cops and again he is taken in front of the same judges who puts him back in the psycho ward and is again given the same medicine and again on the third day sees the same judge who again has to release him. Do you think the cops like this? How about the judge? How about the doctors? They are all complying with the same stupid law that LBJ signed into law in 1967.
Ronald Reagan did not sign it, LBJ did!!! And you blame Reagan? You are the one who is sick in the head!
Oh, were you one of those that can not be held more than three days?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#114764 Oct 5, 2012
For the record; I have serious questions about the latest Border Patrol Agent being killed by friendly fire. Sounds like Holder and Omama are at it again.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#114765 Oct 5, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
As we already know, the Supreme Court does not and cannot write laws.
that is exactly what the Fuller Court tried to do with the Ark v. US.
It also looks like Justice Roberts may have given us another deduction by changing the Fine to a Tax.

“playtime...”

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#114766 Oct 5, 2012
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
That is an impressive list of accomplished individuals that support Governor Romney, but please don't disregard the following individuals that support obama.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =TswMeHnh2cAXX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Most economist believe that Obama will do a better job with the economy then Romney...

The Economist polled hundreds of professional academic and business economists. Our main finding should hearten Mr Obama. By a large margin they rate his overall economic plan more highly than Mr Romney’s, credit him with a better grasp of economics, and think him more likely to appoint a good economic team (see chart). They do not hold the perpetually disappointing recovery against him; half of respondents graded his record as good or very good, compared with just 5% who said that about George Bush in our poll four years ago.“It all depends on the counterfactual,” said Justin Wolfers, an economist at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, referring to how bad things might have been without the president’s emergency measures.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#114767 Oct 5, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue Moron, the largest drivers of the defecit and therefore national debt, as a percentage of the federal budget, are: the wars, the unfunded prescription plan, the Bush-era tax cuts.
To call the PBS budget "a lot of money," is beyond dumb. The cost:benefit analysis has been done and PBS wins.
Okay, prove it? Itemize the national budget for the last ten years for us? If you can.
Oh, I agree with you for unfunded social programs as the are EXTRA- Constitutional. There is no FEDERAL primary schools inside the U.S.(except for DoD schools). There are no FEDERAL colleges or universities (except for the military academies). Since there are no Federal schools, why do we have a Federal Department of Education?
From Wiki: The United States Department of Education, also referred to as ED or the ED for (the) Education Department, is a Cabinet-level department of the United States government. Recreated by the Department of Education Organization Act (Public Law 96-88) and signed into law by President Jimmy Carter on October 17, 1979, it began operating on May 4, 1980.
Yep, invented by Jimmy Carter. What an idiot he is!!!
By the way, I did not agree with Bush on the prescription drug plan!
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#114768 Oct 5, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Do transient aliens have the same duties, responsibilities, rights and freedom as a citizen while here?
Answer: Transient aliens have to obey the law. That is what "subject to the jurisdiction" means. They are not citizens, so they do not have the rights or duties of citizens. But both transient aliens and citizens are subject to the jurisdiction since they must obey the law.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#114769 Oct 5, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
"Open Question for the Thread:
"Please identify what U.S. President(s) since 1901 had better achievement in terms of economics during the first 45 months of their first term than the present administration. Please cite the multiple metrics that support your conclusion. Thank you."
====
LRS wrote:
all
Everyone knows that cannot be true, because the most ignorant and least-well educated President in our great nation's entire history posted economic metrics that were far worse than Obama in EVERY category including the unemployment rate.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#114770 Oct 5, 2012
Since Obama has become president, the budget for the Dept. of Education has more than doubled.

US$32 billion (2009)
US$56 billion (est. 2010)
US$71 billion (est. 2011)

While the budget for DoD has just kept up with inflation.

US$530.1 billion (2010)[2]
US$549.1 billion (2011)[3]
US$553.0 billion (est. 2012)

But it does not end there. Obama has saddled DoD with a lot of things that have nothing to do with Defense like "Going Green"!!! And I am not talking about the color of their equipment or uniforms either!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#114771 Oct 5, 2012
cat__ wrote:
<quoted text>
Most economist believe that Obama will do a better job with the economy then Romney...
The Economist polled hundreds of professional academic and business economists. Our main finding should hearten Mr Obama. By a large margin they rate his overall economic plan more highly than Mr Romney’s, credit him with a better grasp of economics, and think him more likely to appoint a good economic team (see chart). They do not hold the perpetually disappointing recovery against him; half of respondents graded his record as good or very good, compared with just 5% who said that about George Bush in our poll four years ago.“It all depends on the counterfactual,” said Justin Wolfers, an economist at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, referring to how bad things might have been without the president’s emergency measures.
What a crock! Have another hit, you need it.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#114772 Oct 5, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
"Open Question for the Thread:
"Please identify what U.S. President(s) since 1901 had better achievement in terms of economics during the first 45 months of their first term than the present administration. Please cite the multiple metrics that support your conclusion. Thank you."
====
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Sorry, you fail as your that president create wealth is just wrong. President do not create wealth. The value of our paper money is based on We the People. In fact, the more paper money Obama prints, the less the value of the paper money that the people hold.
Oh, just what is our current GDP growth rate? 1.3%(Sep.)! Now, what is the current inflation rate? 1.69%(Aug.) Any time your inflation are is above your GDP growth rate, you are in a RECESSION!
The answer must include the name of an American president.
What is your answer?
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#114773 Oct 5, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm laughing at you Pops, thinking you look cute in your wittle veil. LMAO
Still stuck in middle school???

The entire board joins you in you laughing at yourself.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#114774 Oct 5, 2012
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Answer: Transient aliens have to obey the law. That is what "subject to the jurisdiction" means. They are not citizens, so they do not have the rights or duties of citizens. But both transient aliens and citizens are subject to the jurisdiction since they must obey the law.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...
Some brains are just bent. What else can you say?
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#114775 Oct 5, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Since when has Freedom become archaic? You think it is a violation of the law to comply with a federal law?
The cops pickup a guy who is acting crazy so a judge has him Bakerized for three days during which the doctors give him some anti-psychotic medication. On the third day he goes back in front to the judge and the guy seems sane so the judge releases him IAW the federal law. Now the guy doe snot stay on the free meds he was given and goes off his rocker again and again he is picked up by the cops and again he is taken in front of the same judges who puts him back in the psycho ward and is again given the same medicine and again on the third day sees the same judge who again has to release him. Do you think the cops like this? How about the judge? How about the doctors? They are all complying with the same stupid law that LBJ signed into law in 1967.
Ronald Reagan did not sign it, LBJ did!!! And you blame Reagan? You are the one who is sick in the head!
Oh, were you one of those that can not be held more than three days?
You think freedom is archaic? Sad, so very sad.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#114776 Oct 5, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
#114,294
"Still waiting for those Supreme Court cites and the written document containing all of natural law."
====
Justice Dale wrote:
Sorry, Justice Gray would not allow, he used his own interpretation as to the law that the 14th was written under.
“Doubtless, the intention of the congress which framed, and of the states which adopted, this amendment of the constitution, must be sought in the words of the amendment, and the debates in congress are not admissible as evidence to control the meaning of those words.” Justice Gray, WKA v. US (1898)
Thank you. The words of Justice Gray completely support my position (the only position of anyone who knows ANYTHING about The Law).
Now where is this natural law of yours written -- what book or treatise or other codification?

“playtime...”

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#114777 Oct 5, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
What a crock! Have another hit, you need it.
What's a crock is how any economist can back up a plan that they don't have all the full details for. How can Romney get any economist to back him?

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#114778 Oct 5, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
"Please make the case for the Class that the Louisiana Purchase was permitted under our sacred United States Constitution."
====
akpilot wrote:
Article II Sec 2.
Section. 2.
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
.
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
.
The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.
==
Where does it state the President may enter into land purchases from other nations?
==
"The purchase of the territory of Louisiana took place during the presidency of Thomas Jefferson. At the time, the purchase faced domestic opposition because it was thought to be unconstitutional. Although he agreed that the U.S. Constitution did not contain provisions for acquiring territory, Jefferson decided to go ahead with the purchase anyway in order to remove France's presence in the region and to protect both U.S. trade access to the port of New Orleans and free passage on the Mississippi River." Wikipedia

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 4 min Le Duped 168,275
Obama: Racism, bias in US will take time to tackle 4 min scirocco 2,385
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min Grey Ghost 1,173,183
In parting shot, Obama prods India on religious... 6 min inbred Genius 13
Who do you side with in Ferguson? 11 min Bob 11,228
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 11 min openyourminds 142,171
Republican leaders look for escape plan on immi... 12 min spud 7
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 25 min scirocco 304,834
McCain gives thumbs up to 'American Sniper' movie 1 hr serfs up 85
More from around the web