BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 237687 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#89601 Jul 7, 2012
American Lady wrote:
We may hear from the Supreme Court on this issue soon. Irion has submitted his Georgia case to the Supreme Court. I wonder what Chief Justice Roberts will do…lol
SADLY, amerlady doesn't know that Supreme Court RULES forbid the hearing of the "Geogia case."

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#89602 Jul 7, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
Most abstracts are unacceptable for passports and other official purposes.
Please be the first to tell the Class what (1) constitutional principle,(2) applicable statute,(3) any final federal appellate court holding,(4) American legal tradition, or (5) legal precedent holds that a state-issued birth document has ANY LEGAL BEARING on presidential eligibility under Art. II,§ 1,¶ 5 (orig’l) of the United States Constitution or even may be considered?

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#89603 Jul 7, 2012
American Lady wrote:
Have you never heard of The Ten Commandments? Written on stone tablets? Intended to be immutable? And so far, they still are. Still used as the basis of EVERY LAW in the Christian world? 10 simple rules that most every child learns before he is 12 years old?
EVERY LAW??? REALLY???
Please tell the Class on which of the Ten Commandments Art. II,§ 1,¶ 5 of the [original] United States Constitution is based. Thank you.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#89604 Jul 7, 2012
"Please tell the Class the name of the macroeconomist you most respect. Same question with respect to the monetary theorist you most respect. Thank you."
====
Just Sayin wrote:
I listen to many economists who profess to be experts and then draw my own conclusions.
Is this your way of stating that you don't actually know the names of ANY ECONOMISTS, much less understand what they are saying.
HERE'S YOUR DARE: name the two economists you most respect.
The betting is that you don't know the names of two economists because you were too stupid in high school to get into any college. Prove us wrong.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#89605 Jul 7, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
I was posted approximately ten pages back.
The Class thinks you are lying AGAIN. Post it once more.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

#89606 Jul 7, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
I personally consider economists to be "little people" with big opinions
Name any economist who expresses her "opinion" as part of her professional writings.
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

#89607 Jul 7, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Please be the first to tell the Class what (1) constitutional principle,(2) applicable statute,(3) any final federal appellate court holding,(4) American legal tradition, or (5) legal precedent holds that a state-issued birth document has ANY LEGAL BEARING on presidential eligibility under Art. II,§ 1,¶ 5 (orig’l) of the United States Constitution or even may be considered?
That's your forte. You answer it.

Here check this out.

http://www.wnd.com/2011/09/344461/

Smellin' Ellen says they have changed it so it won't make a difference if this is deleted and off the record.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#89608 Jul 7, 2012
American Lady wrote:
Sound crazy? Then you need to call US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and have him committed.
He ruled in the case of United States vs. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992):
====
"In fact, the whole theory of it's foundation is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between Government and the people.
==========

DWIDIOT tuna fish wrote:
I GUARANTEE you that Justice Scalia (who is a graduate of Georgetown and Harvard) DID NOT WRITE what you try to pass off as his writing.

==========
Supreme Court
United States v. Williams (90-1972), 504 U.S. 36 (1992).
[ Stevens ] Opinion
[ Scalia ] Syllabus
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 90-1972

UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v. JOHN H. WILLIAMS, Jr.
on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit

[May 4, 1992]

Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court.

----------A----------
"[R]ooted in long centuries of Anglo American history," ...
"In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people."

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/90-1972...

==========

"I" guaraDAMNtee YOU it's there!
LeRoy_Snot_V

Shreveport, LA

#89609 Jul 7, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
EVERY LAW??? REALLY???
Please tell the Class on which of the Ten Commandments Art. II,§ 1,¶ 5 of the [original] United States Constitution is based. Thank you.
What's with all this "please tell the class" crap? Elementary school teacher?
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

#89610 Jul 7, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
"Please tell the Class the name of the macroeconomist you most respect. Same question with respect to the monetary theorist you most respect. Thank you."
====
<quoted text>
Is this your way of stating that you don't actually know the names of ANY ECONOMISTS, much less understand what they are saying.
HERE'S YOUR DARE: name the two economists you most respect.
The betting is that you don't know the names of two economists because you were too stupid in high school to get into any college. Prove us wrong.
Ah Ah Ah
Don't get testy teacher or I'll go tell the principal that we have been having elicit sex after school hours and get you fired.
LeRoy_Snot_V

Shreveport, LA

#89611 Jul 7, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Name any economist who expresses her "opinion" as part of her professional writings.
The class just said; Blow it out your rear sphincter!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#89612 Jul 7, 2012
American Lady wrote:
American Lady wrote:
Sound crazy? Then you need to call US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and have him committed.
He ruled in the case of United States vs. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992):
====
"In fact, the whole theory of it's foundation is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between Government and the people.
==========
DWIDIOT tuna fish wrote:
I GUARANTEE you that Justice Scalia (who is a graduate of Georgetown and Harvard) DID NOT WRITE what you try to pass off as his writing.
==========
Supreme Court
United States v. Williams (90-1972), 504 U.S. 36 (1992).
[ Stevens ] Opinion
[ Scalia ] Syllabus
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 90-1972
UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v. JOHN H. WILLIAMS, Jr.
on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit
[May 4, 1992]
Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court.
----------A----------
"[R]ooted in long centuries of Anglo American history," ...
"In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people."
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/90-1972...
==========
"I" guaraDAMNtee YOU it's there!
Learn how to read, BirfoonLady. "It" is NOT there.
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

#89613 Jul 7, 2012
LeRoy_Snot_V wrote:
<quoted text>
What's with all this "please tell the class" crap? Elementary school teacher?
We humor her. It's all she has.
LeRoy_Snot_V

Shreveport, LA

#89614 Jul 7, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Learn how to read, BirfoonLady. "It" is NOT there.
Birfoon isn't there either.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#89615 Jul 7, 2012
"The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, see Hale, supra, at 59-60, 65, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day to day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge."
United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 (1992).

Birfoons, got an effing clue what "constituting court" means?
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

#89616 Jul 7, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah Ah Ah
Don't get testy teacher or I'll go tell the principal that we have been having elicit sex after school hours and get you fired.
By the way. Where is that WET TEE SHIRT teacher? The class just thinks you were LYING.
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

#89617 Jul 7, 2012
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

#89618 Jul 7, 2012
The difference between a Birth Cetrtificate and a Birth Abstract

CERTIFIED BIRTH CERTIFICATE

The certified birth certificate is the most common. It's required to register a child for school, sports and to obtain a driver's license for individuals born after 1963.

A registrar's raised, embossed, impressed or multicolor seal and signature are present on all certified birth certificates. It also contains the date it was filed with the registrar.

For federal employment and passport purposes, a certified birth certificate is required. Matters such as immigration, Native American Registry and dual citizenship require a certified copy.

BIRTH ABSTRACT

A birth abstract is a computer summary of the information related to the birth.

Information may be unavailable on an abstract.

Most abstracts are unacceptable for passports and other official purposes.

Some states, such as Texas, offer Birth Verification Letters. The letter verifies registered births in the state. It includes the child's name, date and county of birth and state file number.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#89619 Jul 7, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
And you can thank your lucky stars for that or you would have had to play grab-ass tag with any male/female employer you encountered thereafter.
If it was good enough for the President it should be good enough for any employer.
Grab-ass tag with any male/female, if it would occur during a third Clinton term is guessing at best. But, let's say it did happen, it would in itself be irresponsible and not recommended conduct for a President. Having said that, if the economy did not tank like it id in 2007-2008 during GWB's term, if Afghanistan and Iraq had not occurred, anyone in his or her right mind would gloss over Clintonian shenanigans in a 3rd term White House and hope indeed that there was a third Clinton term instead of the disastrous horrible GWB's two terms of klled GIs, Afghans, Iraqis, hundreds of thousands of them, economic disaster. But hey, with GWB, no hanky - panky in the White House. But at what price!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#89620 Jul 7, 2012
Just Sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
We humor her. It's all she has.
Speakin of humor ... got any good new (or really old) Spam Fables to paste in? I know that last one went down in flames but we promise only to laugh at the next attempt and not even hint that you might want to click on a link proving how stupid you are.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Obama who 1,497,857
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 1 min taletha 413,086
News Thousands of demonstrators protest Trump in Atl... 2 min Ms Sassy 1,508
News Yes, Mass Deportations Are Coming. And We Know ... 3 min USA 70
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 5 min Radio Flyer 3016 313,384
News Immigration detainee denied transgender treatment 5 min ElChucolate9I5 13
News Jorge Ramos: 'This is our country, not theirs' 6 min Mikey 2
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... (May '16) 9 min Just Think 21,245
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 14 min chazmo 36,513
News White House adviser asked FBI to dispute Russia... 45 min jonjedi 46
News US conservatives urged not to squander Trump pr... 2 hr jonjedi 21
More from around the web