'The War Is Not Over'

There are 20 comments on the Los Angeles Times story from Sep 12, 2006, titled 'The War Is Not Over'. In it, Los Angeles Times reports that:

WASHINGTON - President Bush led the nation on Monday in marking the fifth anniversary of the Sept.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Los Angeles Times.

ABs

Decatur, GA

#289307 Aug 1, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you do not know how forensic tests are conducted at a bombed site, what you are left with are only debris and bits and pieces of evidences.
The experts collect all these details and then re-create the scene, this is done in a slow and tedious process.
Even the smallest clue leads to know the whole secret, the same holds for WTC also.
You think there would have been Tons and Tons of Explosives left after the fall and with a label "These are explosives used to bring down WTC"!!
Read on the next episode of report with cool mind and do not get upset.
I know how much pain it causes you to read it.
Was there a response coded in this useless response anywhere??? I am reading and yet nothingness...no engineering rationale at all in your sheepled responses...I am thinking the reason you selected MUQ is because EEL was already taken...

Jones donate now ludicrous report has been debunked of this there is no doubt...what else you got, comrade EEL?
gp org

Brooklyn, NY

#289308 Aug 2, 2013
John_Schuylkill County_Pa wrote:
<quoted text>there was nothing phony about George Bush. He was a compassionate conservative. He was compassionate to Africans and Democrats
Are you saying there is nothing phony about the Clinton's?

LOL

==========

PREWAR INTELLIGENCE / Insulating Bush
http://tinyurl.com/qda9q March 30, 2006
Karl Rove, President Bush's chief political adviser, cautioned other White House aides in the summer of 2003 that Bush's 2004 re-election prospects would be severely damaged if it was publicly disclosed that he had been personally warned that a key rationale for going to war had been challenged within the administration. Rove expressed his concerns shortly after an informal review of classified government records by then-Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen J. Hadley determined that Bush had been specifically advised that claims he later made in his 2003 State of the Union address -- that Iraq was procuring high-strength aluminum tubes to build a nuclear weapon -- might not be true, according to government records and interviews.
Hadley was particularly concerned that the public might learn of a classified one-page summary of a National Intelligence Estimate, specifically written for Bush in October 2002. The summary said that although "most agencies judge" that the aluminum tubes were "related to a uranium enrichment effort," the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research and the Energy Department's intelligence branch "believe that the tubes more likely are intended for conventional weapons."
Three months after receiving that assessment, the president stated without qualification in his January 28, 2003, State of the Union address: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production."
http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0330...
gp org

Brooklyn, NY

#289309 Aug 2, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
Was Rumsfield also "expecting attack on Pentagon"?
What John O' Neil dieing has to do with it?
Yes brothers and sisters dieing does fuel nationalism, but not to the extent that you hide "real criminals" and keep on running after red herring.
Rumsfeld was warned something was coming. Did not know when.

John O'Neill knew something was coming. Did not know when.

The thousands of NYPD & FDNY will not cover up for the U.S. government.

That only could take place in Saudi Arabia a cover up that big, not here.

==========

Questioning Nearly Every Aspect of the Responses to Sept. 11
http://tinyurl.com/mmvsw / June 18, 2004
WASHINGTON, June 17 - For most of 2002, President Bush argued that a commission created to look into the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks would only distract from the post-Sept. 11 war on terrorism.
Now, in 17 preliminary staff reports, that panel has called into question nearly every aspect of the administration's response to terror, including the idea that Iraq and Al Qaeda were somehow the same foe.
Far from a bolt from the blue, the commission has demonstrated over the last 19 months that the Sept. 11 attacks were foreseen, at least in general terms, and might well have been prevented, had it not been for misjudgments, mistakes and glitches, some within the White House.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/18/politics/18...

Nine Questions to impeach Bush / Cheney

23 August 2006 / http://tinyurl.com/n8dx52l

1.Who lost Iraq? 2. Did Rumsfeld order torture (and if not, who did)? 3. Who blew 9/11?
4. What did the airlines know, and when did they know it? 5. How wide is the domestic surveillance net? 6. Is Big Oil pulling an Enron? 7. Who's making money off your retirement? 9. Grounds for impeachment?
http://warisacrime.org/node/13980

==========

KUCINICH: Takes House Floor, Moves for Cheney Impeachment
http://tinyurl.com/yv25lt / Nov 6, 2007 /
gp org

Brooklyn, NY

#289311 Aug 2, 2013
Bush 'approved intelligence leak'
US President George W Bush authorised the leak of classified material to the media to defend the invasion of Iraq, a former White House aide has testified.
http://tinyurl.com/goxnd 7 April 2006
The testimony, cited in court papers, comes from Lewis Libby, who is facing trial in connection with a separate leak involving a CIA agent's identity.
Mr Bush, who is not accused of allowing the agent's outing, is under pressure to say if he was behind any other leak.
He has in the past condemned leaks and has said he would sack anyone involved.
The White House has so far failed to comment on Mr Libby's testimony.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4885100.s...
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#289312 Aug 2, 2013
Obama is lawless and a very bad man.
Obama is very foolish by doing all the bad.
Obama is the Black man who is confused and feels lost in today's world.
Obama is no good in everything but does wrongs all the time.
Obama cannot be allowed for any respect and entitlement for anything because he is so bad and evil.

When in old times, Kings and Hitler gave no civil rights to people, people should have more civil liberty in modern times in comparison to the old past.

Yet, Obama is the worst of all time, by acting as the tyrant as neo-Hitler of using repressive, massive surveillance of masses by massively destruction of civil liberty of masses at all time high, by committing genocide of basic human rights needs of US public, as not going forward but backward.

Obama acts as another neo-Hitler nowadays by engaging hacking the world.

NO people of the world want to use US model of snooping on public to further decay their people's basic and fundamental rights any more, by being a follower of the Neo-Hitler villain Obama policy, in other matters as well.

This is the new world that no nation can commit so much wrongdoings.

US has been acting as a neo-Hitler these days with the awful Obama by oppressing general human rights freedom of many people around the world, by spying on them in addition to hacking and by committing massive rules breaking as a big thug tyrant around the world.

US is not a free country any more nor a nation for freedom people, as US becomes a very bad and evil country.
US is a very fragile, weak, depressed and wrong country and Obama is the evil.

There must be no more breaking world rules from US again in these new times of the new world.

The world cannot move on, until US must be learning the lesson, that global people are required to manage the essential direction by conducting the responsibilities required to engage in the utmost needed worldwide policies to oversee US wrongs.
Obama is a very bad sinner and wrong doing.

NO Black and other people together are any good because of Black man Obama.

Obama does not know what the lives of people who are not bad are like, by standing in the way of people to play foul all the time.
Obama entitles nothing but be checked as evil villain wrong doer TO BE CHECKED and nailed down--and THAT IS very bad US.
Obama has poor taste as the wrongful man on earth from US.
John_Schuylkill County_Pa

Brooklyn, NY

#289313 Aug 2, 2013
gp org wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you saying there is nothing phony about the Clinton's?
LOL
==========
PREWAR INTELLIGENCE / Insulating Bush
http://tinyurl.com/qda9q March 30, 2006
Karl Rove, President Bush's chief political adviser, cautioned other White House aides in the summer of 2003 that Bush's 2004 re-election prospects would be severely damaged if it was publicly disclosed that he had been personally warned that a key rationale for going to war had been challenged within the administration. Rove expressed his concerns shortly after an informal review of classified government records by then-Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen J. Hadley determined that Bush had been specifically advised that claims he later made in his 2003 State of the Union address -- that Iraq was procuring high-strength aluminum tubes to build a nuclear weapon -- might not be true, according to government records and interviews.
Hadley was particularly concerned that the public might learn of a classified one-page summary of a National Intelligence Estimate, specifically written for Bush in October 2002. The summary said that although "most agencies judge" that the aluminum tubes were "related to a uranium enrichment effort," the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research and the Energy Department's intelligence branch "believe that the tubes more likely are intended for conventional weapons."
Three months after receiving that assessment, the president stated without qualification in his January 28, 2003, State of the Union address: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production."
http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0330...
i guess you can say that the Clinton Democrats had George Bush and me convinced that there were weapons of mass destruction
spocko

Oakland, CA

#289315 Aug 2, 2013
ABs wrote:
The TRUTH of why the United States of Lawyers are ramming fag marraige on the masses...money to be made on divorces...
What the f*** are you homophobe saying? No one has to get married if they do not want to gay or straight ...
ABs wrote:
Supporters of Colorado's new civil unions law say the first state ruling of its kind declaring a same-sex divorce final sets a precedent for gay couples married in other states who want to legally terminate their relationships in Colorado without uprooting their lives.
Juli Yim and Lorelei Jones wed in Massachusetts in 2009, where same-sex marriage is legal. Yim said that relationship went sour and she found a new partner in Colorado.
Colorado is one of several states that treat gay and straight couples the same in almost every respect through civil unions or domestic partnerships. Gay couples are not allowed to marry in Colorado, but can get divorced there under state statute.
Some states' gay marriage laws require in-state residency to dissolve a relationship. Gay-rights advocates contend the requirement is more than an inconvenience because it can put lives on hold for those who have moved to different states.
Denver lawyer Kyle Martelon said there is some confusion on how gay couples can get divorced, and the issues are different in other states.
The time has come for good old fashion tar and feathers...right frankeh?
GP org

Brooklyn, NY

#289316 Aug 2, 2013
John_Schuylkill County_Pa wrote:
<quoted text>i guess you can say that the Clinton Democrats had George Bush and me convinced that there were weapons of mass destruction
NOW you are speaking my language some what.

LOL

A Pox On Both Houses!
GP org

Brooklyn, NY

#289317 Aug 2, 2013
John_Schuylkill County_Pa wrote:
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=i 87cZ3Og6ts
Thanks for the video of Democrats lying because the Newt Gingrich Republicans made Regime Change in Iraq American policy. With Clinton's signature.

==========

"Terrorism" and Blowback
Part Three: "Terrorism," Blowback and US Foreign Policy during the Clinton Years
http://tinyurl.com/y9fwml
http://www.janrainwater.com/htdocs/3.htm

----------

It was Bill Clinton who refined the art of killing innocent Iraqis following the Gulf War. One of his first acts as president was to bomb Iraq, following the alleged assassination plot against George HW Bush. Clinton's missiles killed the famed Iraqi painter Leila al Attar as they smashed into her home. Clinton presided enthusiastically over the most deadly and repressive regime of economic sanctions in history--his UN ambassador Madeline Albright calling the reported deaths of half a million children "worth the price." Clinton initiated the longest sustained bombing campaign since Vietnam with his illegal no-fly zone bombings, attacking Iraq once every three days for the final years of his presidency. It was under Clinton that Ahmed Chalabi was given tens of millions of dollars and made a key player in shaping Washington's Iraq policy. It was Clinton that mercilessly attacked Iraq in December of 1998, destroying dozens of Baghdad buildings and killing scores of civilians. It was Clinton that codified regime change in Iraq as US policy. Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq but he could not have done it without the years of groundwork laid by Clinton and the Democrats. How ironic it was recently to hear Clinton call the war "a big mistake."

==========

Vote for Change? Atrocity-Linked U.S. Officials Advising Democratic, GOP Presidential Frontrunners / January 03, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/2blb3d
Independent journalist Allan Nairn and American Conservative correspondent Kelley Beaucar Vlahos discuss a little-addressed facet of the 2008 campaign: many of the top advisers to leading presidential candidates are ex-U.S. officials involved in atrocities around the world
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/1/3/vote_for...
ABs

Atlanta, GA

#289319 Aug 3, 2013
spocko wrote:
<quoted text> What the f*** are you homophobe saying? No one has to get married if they do not want to gay or straight ... <quoted text>
What I am saying, meee dear francis the beacon of just and fair causes, is that Russian lawyers will be making much less money in divorce courts than LGBT supporting American ones will be...
GP org

Sayville, NY

#289321 Aug 3, 2013
New Players on the Scene:
A.Q. Khan and the Nuclear Black Market
http://tinyurl.com/yeg3nsb / 01 March 2005
In October 2003, Italian coast guard cutters pulled alongside a German-flagged cargo vessel bound for Libya called the BBC China. Upon inspection, authorities found precision machine tools, aluminum tubes, molecular pumps, and other components for building approximately 10,000 “P-2” gas centrifuges designed for enriching uranium to specifications required for a nuclear weapon.
These components were traced back to a publicly traded Malaysian engineering company called Scomi Precision Engineering. Scomi had manufactured the parts at the behest of a Sri Lankan, Buhary Sayed Abu Tahir. Via his front company in Dubai, SMB Computers, Tahir arranged to deliver the parts to Libya for its hidden nuclear weapons program.
The Italian authorities ensured that the cargo never arrived at its destination. The seizure of the BBC China’s cargo was a key part in a chain of events that led Libyan President Muammar Qadhafi to “come out of the cold” and renounce his weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs in December 2003.
http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itps/0305/ij...
ABs

Atlanta, GA

#289323 Aug 4, 2013
I wonder where my conspiracista comrade of 9 11 has disappeared to...planning on how to remove infidels from muslim lands I suppose? Or perhaps tying to figure out how much effort it takes to paint on nanothermite without being noticed...
GP org

Sayville, NY

#289325 Aug 4, 2013
ABs wrote:
I wonder where my conspiracista comrade of 9 11 has disappeared to...planning on how to remove infidels from muslim lands I suppose? Or perhaps tying to figure out how much effort it takes to paint on nanothermite without being noticed...
Our friend went back to his native India.

He has been shooting blanks and has to go get more ammo.

I will turn him on to a Russian General who agrees with him.

LOL

Be well ABs.

==========

Axis for Peace General Ivashov:“International terrorism does not exist”
by General Leonid Ivashov / http://tinyurl.com/a3ymn / 17 January 2006
General Leonid Ivashov was the Chief of Staff of the Russian armed forces when the September 11, 2001, attacks took place. This military man, who lived the events from the inside, offers an analysis which is very different to that of his American colleagues. As he did during the Axis for Peace 2005 conference, he now explains that international terrorism does not exist and that the September 11 attacks were the result of a set-up. What we are seeing is a manipulation by the big powers; this terrorism would not exist without them. He affirms that, instead of faking a “world war on terror”, the best way to reduce that kind of attacks is through respect for international law and peaceful cooperation among countries and their citizens.
http://www.voltairenet.org/article133909.html...
henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

#289326 Aug 5, 2013
JBH wrote:
++++++++=
Will China's economy crash?
By Michael Pettis, Special to CNN
updated 7:47 AM EDT, Mon July 29, 2013
Should we be concerned about China?
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
Michael Pettis: Some experts think that China's economy is in big trouble
Pettis: Most likely, China's growth rate will decline in the coming years
He says the country needs to shift from investment to consumption model
Pettis: If China recalibrates its economy in the right way, everyone will benefit
Editor's note: Michael Pettis is a professor of finance at Peking University, a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and author of "The Great Rebalancing" (Princeton University Press).
+++++++==
Related to the above, all along just a couples of months ago, you were told China's economy will fall sooner or faster than ever.
Its economy uprising is basically using your money to buy theirs, where US-that-Bush (who is still wanted by the world as a definite War Criminal very badly) started that by promoting that China to pose to this world with lots of problems, especially to US people, and US Obama could not do anything about it. Look at what US right now is as it is a gangland of tyrant police state beyond hacking.
Look at what Iraq is now with lots of daily big bombings, when to this time, no wonder the stupidity of Bush said history would vindicate him because stupidity has no limit.
Not necessarily the whole world will fall, and still other economies will grow, like Russia's, India's and some Latin American countries', including even South and North Korea's and some others'.
That person Bush has been wrong in everything, including making the man-made hysteria of Axis-of-evil.
Despite US economic professors have won Nobel Prize in Economics, they are the ones who are still confused.
They are fools BECAUSE NO ONE CAN SAVE IT.
As Long as we have capitalism there will be wars at least. In the nuclear Age we will have always the thread of a world wide Inferno. As long as we have hundreds of AKWs the whole world is endangered with out a nuclear war to be die out as a human race. The forecast about is quite easy to realise.
henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

#289327 Aug 5, 2013
JBH wrote:
++++++++=
Will China's economy crash?
By Michael Pettis, Special to CNN
updated 7:47 AM EDT, Mon July 29, 2013
Should we be concerned about China?
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
Michael Pettis: Some experts think that China's economy is in big trouble
Pettis: Most likely, China's growth rate will decline in the coming years
He says the country needs to shift from investment to consumption model
Pettis: If China recalibrates its economy in the right way, everyone will benefit
Editor's note: Michael Pettis is a professor of finance at Peking University, a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and author of "The Great Rebalancing" (Princeton University Press).
+++++++==
Related to the above, all along just a couples of months ago, you were told China's economy will fall sooner or faster than ever.
Its economy uprising is basically using your money to buy theirs, where US-that-Bush (who is still wanted by the world as a definite War Criminal very badly) started that by promoting that China to pose to this world with lots of problems, especially to US people, and US Obama could not do anything about it. Look at what US right now is as it is a gangland of tyrant police state beyond hacking.
Look at what Iraq is now with lots of daily big bombings, when to this time, no wonder the stupidity of Bush said history would vindicate him because stupidity has no limit.
Not necessarily the whole world will fall, and still other economies will grow, like Russia's, India's and some Latin American countries', including even South and North Korea's and some others'.
That person Bush has been wrong in everything, including making the man-made hysteria of Axis-of-evil.
Despite US economic professors have won Nobel Prize in Economics, they are the ones who are still confused.
They are fools BECAUSE NO ONE CAN SAVE IT.
Of course not capitalist economy is a suicide Society
spocko

Oakland, CA

#289328 Aug 5, 2013
With the Israel-Palestinian peace talks Washington acts like a matchmaker . . . between rapist and victim. The art of US diplomacy in the Middle East is evidently to give Israel a carte blanche to do whatever it likes with regard to trampling on Palestinian rights and lives.
ABs

Snellville, GA

#289329 Aug 5, 2013
spocko wrote:
With the Israel-Palestinian peace talks Washington acts like a matchmaker ... between rapist and victim. The art of US diplomacy in the Middle East is evidently to give Israel a carte blanche to do whatever it likes with regard to trampling on Palestinian rights and lives.
Dammmmmm democrats....and just when you thought we were going to have some of that change thingy...can't trust them half whites for sh*t...
Very Sad

Toronto, Canada

#289330 Aug 6, 2013
The Bengazi attack is so hush hush, because Obama Is so embarrassed by the truth and believe me it is a cover up of all cover ups.
The word is that the ambassador was raped, tortured and dragged through the streets of Bengazi that the Public would be to traumitized to deal with it. This is not half of it. The administration was in the midst of shipping Libyan Russian armaments overland, the turks by the boat load, there is so much going on that it is a mess.
John_Schuylkill County_Pa

Brooklyn, NY

#289331 Aug 6, 2013
Very Sad wrote:
The Bengazi attack is so hush hush, because Obama Is so embarrassed by the truth and believe me it is a cover up of all cover ups.
The word is that the ambassador was raped, tortured and dragged through the streets of Bengazi that the Public would be to traumitized to deal with it. This is not half of it. The administration was in the midst of shipping Libyan Russian armaments overland, the turks by the boat load, there is so much going on that it is a mess.
the sucker that made the video is still in jail
Corky46

Orlando, FL

#289332 Aug 6, 2013
Very Sad wrote:
The Bengazi attack is so hush hush, because Obama Is so embarrassed by the truth and believe me it is a cover up of all cover ups.
The word is that the ambassador was raped, tortured and dragged through the streets of Bengazi that the Public would be to traumitized to deal with it. This is not half of it. The administration was in the midst of shipping Libyan Russian armaments overland, the turks by the boat load, there is so much going on that it is a mess.
If you know about the Russia arms shipment, then you must be in danger.

You are very brave to let the free world know.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Sending weapons to Ukraine will soon be irrelevant 1 min Oliver Cromwell 280
News Gay marriage foe's argument seems to leave Supr... 1 min Not Yet Equal 100
News Republicans are not compassionate 2 min Earl 93
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min RoxLo 1,223,812
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 min Patriot AKA Bozo 53,007
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 4 min cpeter1313 309,746
News Ben Carson confirms presidential campaign 4 min fairisfairno 33
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 10 min Igor Trip 161,790
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 28 min Valerie 326,082
News Riots in Baltimore raise questions about police... 34 min barefoot2626 483
News 5 Reasons The American Dream Is Eluding Black P... 1 hr INFIDEL 1,075
More from around the web