Supreme Court Rejects Secret Surveillance Challenge
Join the discussion below, or Read more at ABC News.
#1 Feb 26, 2013
Well, in Canada ehhh..have a look see at the ' David Eby (BCCLA) letter to the RCMP - regarding covert surveillance technology that allows authorities to turn off phones remotely, intercept communications -
The RCMP do not disclose electronic surveillance techniques or equipment on the primary grounds of concern for officer safety ? The days of your communications provider ensuring privacy are gone..Not needed !
And....to challenge such issues ..........ehhh!
#2 Jun 4, 2013
Throw in recent rulings like the arrestee dna collection ruling the supreme court seems to be advocating a police state. They should be advocating citizens rights over government entities.
I've always felt it puzzling that alot of politicians and supreme court judges are overly pro law enforcement. Is it because they work with them or know them. Or do they feel safer as an individual because they ruled in law enforcements favor?-Is there way of saying protect me? Not you be 'me' as in own selfish interests.
But supreme court justices being like your typical bureaucratic politician need to maintain the status quo to maintain the status, career and pay.
Never forget that supreme court justices were appointed and approved by politicians which means there are political favors to pay off. And future deals to make.
Add your comments below
|Why a contested Republican convention would be ...||5 min||Ritual Habitual||1|
|Diplomacy by Air Strike Is an All-American Trad...||6 min||Ritual Habitual||1|
|Lyndon Baines Obama||6 min||Ritual Habitual||1|
|The New Right: Warriors For The Poor||7 min||Ritual Habitual||1|
|Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08)||8 min||mdbuilder||1,346,152|
|Sanders initially cast VA scandal as partisan e...||9 min||Bernie The Commie||1|
|The e-mail scandal stretches far beyond Hillary :0||10 min||woodtick57||13|
Find what you want!
Search US News Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC