Fewer moderates in Congress, more gridlock?

When the next Congress cranks up in January, there will be more women, many new faces and fewer tea party-backed House Republicans from the class of 2010.

[Ninthman]

What we need is fewer azzholes in congress and a different president. That's what we need.

[Makes sense]

Is drama queen Lindsey Olin Graham a moderate? He was having a tirade about Benghazi today.(yawn)

[HeavensToMergatr oid]

Tea Party-ism was a two-year long blast of foul, gaseous wind, now relegated to a curious, unpleasant after-smell. What are the followers going to do now with their costume tri-corner hats and knee-socks?

[HeavensToMergatr oid]

Makes sense wrote:

Is drama queen Lindsey Olin Graham a moderate? He was having a tirade about Benghazi today.(yawn)

Lindsey Graham is the not-so-straight counterpart to John McCain's angry old codger behind the newspaper at the coffee shop. If they think they're leaders, then they should lead instead of lobbing futile grenades from their back-line listening posts.

[conservative crapola]

HeavensToMergatroid wrote:

Tea Party-ism was a two-year long blast of foul, gaseous wind, now relegated to a curious, unpleasant after-smell. What are the followers going to do now with their costume tri-corner hats and knee-socks?

Having failed. They reside, castrated, in the 'where are they now' file...alongside the even less intelligent birthers.

hahahahahahahahaha

[RayOne]

The seasonal dance at the 'fiscal','electoral' cliff is a devices over used by Washington DC elites, no matter who holds power. This time the MSM is compliant and waiting for a bailout.
Each 'CliffReport' should have an 'Transparency' attachment.
Open the books, don't hide the deals. Both parties are on the same side. And, that includes MSM.
Foreign reporters are more likely to ask questions Americans want asked.

[Le Jimbo]

HeavensToMergatroid wrote:

Tea Party-ism was a two-year long blast of foul, gaseous wind, now relegated to a curious, unpleasant after-smell. What are the followers going to do now with their costume tri-corner hats and knee-socks?

Obama's Soviet Mistake
19.11.2012
By Xavier Lerma

Putin in 2009 outlined his strategy for economic success. Alas, poor Obama did the opposite but nevertheless was re-elected. Bye, bye Miss American Pie. The Communists have won in America with Obama but failed miserably in Russia with Zyuganov who only received 17% of the vote.

Vladimir Putin was re-elected as President keeping the NWO order out of Russia while America continues to repeat the Soviet mistake.

After Obama was elected in his first term as president the then Prime Minister of Russia, Vladimir Putin gave a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland in January of 2009. Ignored by the West as usual, Putin gave insightful and helpful advice to help the world economy and saying the world should avoid the Soviet mistake.

Recently, Obama has been re-elected for a 2nd term by an illiterate society and he is ready to continue his lies of less taxes while he raises them. He gives speeches of peace and love in the world while he promotes wars as he did in Egypt, Libya and Syria. He plans his next war is with Iran as he fires or demotes his generals who get in the way.

DOCTOR VISITS IN UK TO BE REPLACED BY SKYPE... Ah yes, the future of Obama Care.

[conservative crapola]

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>

lejimcrow worthlessness: Day 20.

hahahahahahahahaha

[abortionkillsPeo ple]

HeavensToMergatroid wrote:

Tea Party-ism was a two-year long blast of foul, gaseous wind, now relegated to a curious, unpleasant after-smell. What are the followers going to do now with their costume tri-corner hats and knee-socks?

dream on fool

[SirPrize]

This article is typical left-wing whining that the Progresives didn't get everything they want. Now, they will be expected to compromise. They'd rather stall and cast blame, though.

[Makes sense]

Ninthman wrote:

What we need is fewer azzholes in congress and a different president. That's what we need.

By "we", you mean "the losers". LOL

[Don Joe]

SirPrize wrote:

This article is typical left-wing whining that the Progresives didn't get everything they want. Now, they will be expected to compromise. They'd rather stall and cast blame, though.

Didn't get everything? When did the left get anything?

[Le Jimbo]

Makes sense wrote:

<quoted text>
By "we", you mean "the losers". LOL

Yes, the liberals.

[conservative crapola]

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>

Once con-nie gets the bullshit out of their exploding heads that their entitled to the WH, maybe they can move FORWARD.....maybe not.

hahahahahahaha

[Le Jimbo]

conservative crapola wrote:

<quoted text>
Once con-nie gets the bullshit out of their exploding heads that their entitled to the WH, maybe they can move FORWARD.....maybe not.
hahahahahahaha

Obama promised Ms. Vanzant that he would make sure everything was taken care of from Sandy and her marina..........she said yesterday that nothing has been done for her marina or her yet and is now very upset for the false promise. Typical Obama, promise much, do little.

[conservative crapola]

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>

lejimcrow promised a rugby landslide...typical lejimcrow.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[Mykro]

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text> Obama promised Ms. Vanzant that he would make sure everything was taken care of from Sandy and her marina..........she said yesterday that nothing has been done for her marina or her yet and is now very upset for the false promise. Typical Obama, promise much, do little.

DUMBOSPAM.

[SirPrize]

Don Joe wrote:

<quoted text>
Didn't get everything? When did the left get anything?

Stop whining. You're only proving my point!

[Mykro]

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text> Obama promised Ms. Vanzant that he would make sure everything was taken care of from Sandy and her marina..........she said yesterday that nothing has been done for her marina or her yet and is now very upset for the false promise. Typical Obama, promise much, do little.

DUMBOSPAM.

[Don Joe]

SirPrize wrote:

<quoted text>
Stop whining. You're only proving my point!

So let's see, we didn't get health care reform, the GOP got that. We didn't get the Afghan war ended, the GOP got it to continue. We didn't get the Iraq war ended in a timely fashion. We didn't get investigations into the criminality of the bush white house. We didn't get investment to get the economy going. We didn't get repeal of the Pat Act. We didn't get the gigantic bush federal government size reduced. We didn't get jobs. We didn't get reform of education. We didn't even get democrats in positions to do anything.

Your point was the the dems are whining because they didn't get everything. It is correct that the dems didn't get everything, because Obama is a republican and should have changed his political affiliation before the election.

You don't like Obama because he has a democrat label. I don't like Obama because all his policies are republican. No wonder the economy can't recover.

So what should a person do, when all the policies are wrong? Just sit there and allow the nation to go down the tubes?