Who says Mormons aren't Christians?

Oct 12, 2011 Full story: CNN 31,993

Editor's note: Dean Obeidallah is an award-winning comedian who has appeared on TV shows such as Comedy Central's "Axis of Evil" special, ABC's "The View," CNN's "What the Week" and HLN's "The Joy Behar Show." He is executive producer of the annual New York Arab-American Comedy Festival and the Amman Stand Up Comedy Festival.

Full Story
Care Enough To Google It

Yuba City, CA

#20308 Feb 16, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
Show us one place in the Old Testament God commands the Israelite nation to practice polygamy. I'll wait.
You have REPEATEDLY claimed the Lord never commanded nor approved of polygamy:

I've showed the world here, you're a lying, Satanic sociopath.

Your false Satanic claim is

"The Lord never commanded polygamy."

----------
Adult men in Israel under the law of Moses, were commanded to marry, with some exceptions: religious service, military duty, etc.

Therefore the law commanding marriage to wife of a dead brother, meant polygamy MUST occur: as it did on a REGULAR basis, being a COMMANDMENT.

Elders also commanded, to try to talk men into it: and punish a man who won't.

Deuteronomy 25:
"25:5 If brethren dwell together, and one of them die, and have no child, the wife of the dead shall not marry without unto a stranger:

her husband's brother shall go in unto her, and take her to him to wife, and perform the duty of an husband's brother unto her.

25:6 And it shall be, that the firstborn which she beareth shall succeed in the name of his brother which is dead, that his name be not put out of Israel.

25:7 And if the man like not to take his brother's wife,
then let his brother's wife go up to the gate unto the elders, and say,

"My husband's brother refuseth to raise up unto his brother a name in Israel, he will not perform the duty of my husband's brother."

25:8 Then the elders of his city shall call him, and speak unto him: and if he stand to it, and say, I like not to take her;

25:9 Then shall his brother's wife come unto him in the presence of the elders, and loose his shoe from off his foot,

***and spit in his face***,

and shall answer and say,

"So shall it be done unto that man that will not build up his brother's house."

25:10 And his name shall be called in Israel, The house of him that hath his shoe loosed.
==========

The LAW COMMANDS.

The law commands the Elders to TALK to MEN about why they won't obey

The law commands the punishment be ***THE WOMAN SPIT in HIS FACE***

The law commands from THEN ON he be known as one who WOULDN'T OBEY the COMMANDMENT.

You're a Satan possessed, family & heterosexualityhating,
pathological liar,

who'll try yet to claim it isn't in the Bible.

As we see it is.

It's called Levirate marriage.

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#20309 Feb 16, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
That isn't what the Bible teaches. Your good works will never outweigh your sins.
Excuse me, perhaps I should have explained in more detail:

1- Good works = means doing your DUTY - which includes repenting for your sins.

2- Living a good life = means doing the best you can in ALL things - that's "DUTY" again isn't it.

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#20310 Feb 16, 2013
NoMo wrote:
<quoted text>
U make an awful lot of false assumptions in that..lol. Lots of judgment too.
And in the below post you made you didn't make lots of judgements and false assumptions?
"Of course I did!" you'll state. "My judgements and assumptions are always 100% correct about Mormons. And if I'm incorrect, refer to the first statement."

will say if the Mormon church is guilty of the things you claim, you have no room to speak blame. You did allow a young boy to die at his own hands. You said you knew for a fact he was being bullied and beaten at home by family and parents and at schools by Mormon kids. AND YOU DID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO SAVE HIM FROM HIS DISTRESS.
YOU DID NOTHING. YOU LET HIM DIE. YOU'RE AS MUCH A MURDERER AS YOU CALL THE PEOPLE IN THE MORMON CHURCH.
You call the LDS church and it's people filth and you're nothing but a piece of filth yourself for letting a child kill themself. You caused a suicide by not stopping it. And you want to speak evil of others? Fricking get a check on you're own reality.
...
Currently, your church
Causes suicides thru it's bullying, bigoted treatment of gay members, especially it's children. Actively persues legislation to maintain bigotry on local, state, national and international levels. Regularly uses and supports Evergreen Intl., scarring and harming children and adults, in many cases, for life.
Keeps women as second class members to the point of the relief society president squashing and bashing female members who want to remain in the church as equals. These poor women get death threats for wearing pants to church..Remember the extreme antidepressant use capital is Utah?
Scams the members into paying tithes, even if doing so puts them in extreme financial straits, has them scrubbing ward and stake house toilets weekly(or more) for free, while opening an 8 Billion dollar ( and quite horrid..terrible layout and the security are like stalkers/secret service wanna-bes) Mall, owning big game hunting lodges, until recently, running the largest gun market in the country(KSL), owning large chunks of media and real estate, laundering Mitts money for 10 years, so he didn't pay taxes,( this list is Waay too long)..u get the idea...and giving less than 1% annually to charitable causes.
Involves itself in national, international and State(what they are currently doing in utah is disgusting)legislation along with using its sway with the BSA to enforce the continuation of hate and bigotry..and they are doing it atm, almost on a weekly basis.
Uses the controls of shame knowing that the other mos( families included many times)are always watching you and it's considered a "good work" if they tell your bishop.
concerned in Eygpt

Aberdeen, UK

#20311 Feb 16, 2013
Why LDS Mormons are not Christian

The Mormon Temple

Participation in what is called the temple “endowment” ceremony is an important facet of the LDS faith since it is in this ritual where Mormons learn secret “key words,”“signs” and “tokens” that they hope will help them return to God’s presence.

Brigham Young, Mormonism’s second president, claimed,

“Your endowment is, to receive all those ordinances in the house of the Lord, which are necessary for you, after you have departed this life, to enable you to walk back to the presence of the Father, passing the angels who stand as sentinels, being able to give them the key words, the signs and tokens, pertaining to the Holy Priesthood, and gain your eternal exaltation in spite of earth and hell”(Discourses of Brigham Young, p. 416).

Without their temples, Mormons are told that exaltation (or Godhood) in the next world is an impossibility. By completely obeying various laws and ordinances, faithful Latter-day Saints hope that they too can achieve the status of “Gods” and “Goddesses.”

Since its founding in 1830, the LDS Church has caused quite a controversy among Bible-believing Christians. While Mormons have every right to believe as they may, many leaders of the LDS Church have made some serious accusations against what millions of Christians hold dear. These statements must be challenged in light of history and the Bible.

Latter-day Saints are told that their temples restore temple worship as discussed in the Bible. Mormon Apostle Mark E. Petersen claimed the LDS ceremony actually follows the pattern of biblical days when he wrote:

“In Biblical times sacred ordinances were administered in holy edifices for the spiritual salvation of ancient Israel. These buildings thus were not synagogues, nor any other ordinary places of worship... Following the pattern of Biblical days, the Lord again in our day has provided these ordinances for the salvation of all who will believe, and directs that temples be built in which to perform those sacred rites”(Why Mormons Build Temples, p. 2).

To test what Mr. Petersen has said, all one needs to do is examine the temple ceremony as it was practiced during biblical times. If the LDS temple ceremonies had their precedent in the Bible, it would be logical that today’s rites would be similar to what took place in Israel until AD 70 when the Jerusalem temple was destroyed. But there are many difference, including:

cont...
concerned in Eygpt

Aberdeen, UK

#20312 Feb 16, 2013
The Mormon Church has more than 100 other temples scattered across the globe; the Jews recognized only the temple in Jerusalem.
The primary activity at the Jerusalem temple was the sacrifice of animals as atonement for the sins of the people. Worshipers in ancient Israel went to the temple with an attitude of unworthiness before an all holy God. They approached His temple with humility as they looked to have their sins covered. In stark contrast, Mormons enter their temples with a positive sense of worthiness. A person cannot enter a Mormon temple (after it is dedicated) unless he or she is considered “worthy.”
The priests officiating in the Jerusalem temple had to be from the tribe of Levi. This was commanded in Numbers 3:6-10. The Mormon Church ignores such commands and allows its “temple-worthy” members who have no such background to officiate in its temples.
Wedding ceremonies never occurred in the Jerusalem temple, yet this is a common practice in LDS temples.
Baptism for the dead is the most common activity in Mormon temples. No such practice was ever performed in the Jerusalem temple.
While many Mormon families have been “sealed” for time and eternity in LDS temples, the Jerusalem temple provided no such ordinance.
Mormons are told that the temple ceremony came by way of revelation to Mormonism’s founder Joseph Smith, Jr. According to Mormon Apostle John Widtsoe,“Joseph Smith received the temple endowment and its ritual, as all else he promulgated, by revelation from God”(Joseph Smith-Seeker After Truth, p. 249). Mormon Apostle Bruce R. McConkie echoed this same thought when he said the temple ordinances were “given in modern times to the Prophet Joseph Smith by revelation, many things connected with them being translated by the Prophet from the papyrus on which the Book of Abraham was recorded”(Mormon Doctrine, p. 779). This is quite a statement since the Book of Abraham (regarded by Latter-day Saints as sacred scripture) has been shown to be an inaccurate translation of an ancient Egyptian funeral text.

For more info on this MORMON practice that is clearly not Christian never practiced by Jesus or his Disciples goto http://www.mrm.org/temple

Mormons are Christian they are a Cult as their Temple rituals clearly demonstrate.

Truth Matters.

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#20313 Feb 16, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
1. I'm not gay.
2. I'm a guy. I use to be an elder and high priest in the LDS church.
3. Don't believe everything you read on the internet.
4. Show me where I have lied about the Mormon church. I do provide evidence from LDS publications when talking about the teachings of Mormonism.
1a. I agree. But you're a poor excuse for an ex-mo turned anti-mo.
2a. You might be a guy but you were never an elder as one that knows his own doctrines.
3a. Amen that we can agree on this :)
4a. A liar? You just claimed the WoW was by way of a commandment from the Lord and it wasn't. You have said rumours were facts. They aren't. You stated second hand info and hearsay were facts and they aren't. You stated two court recorded statements were facts that Smith had sex with women. That was a lie. One Woman lied three times and admitted to knowing nothing of what she claimed. The other witness actually claimed nothing of Smith being sexually active. Some more lies. You stated it was a fact that Smith had sex with his wives. Well he married over 30 wives in three years. Your statement means he had sex with each of those thirty plus wives and you say you had facts to prove it. All your "facts" are actually statements made by first, second, third and fourth parties. You never actually proved Smith had sex with those wives by what is actually called a fact by court definition. So more lies.
You have stated some truths at times I agree.
But as long as you call something a 'fact' that a court of law wouldn't recognize as a 'fact' it remains a statement without credibility.
concerned in Eygpt

Aberdeen, UK

#20314 Feb 16, 2013
Why again Mormons are not Christians.
Garments of the Holy Priesthood

Garments of the Holy Priesthood. Sacred underwear worn by faithful temple Mormons which, they are told in the temple, "will be a shield and protection to you against the power of the destroyer until you have finished your work here on earth." Sewn into the garments are markings that resemble the compass, square, and level of Freemasonry. Mormons are told these garments are symbolic of the covering God gave Adam and Eve after their fall. According to twelfth President Spencer Kimball,“Temple garments afford protection. I am sure one could go to extreme in worshiping the cloth of which the garment is made, but one could also go to the other extreme. Though generally I think our protection is a mental, spiritual, moral one, yet I am convinced that there could be and undoubtedly have been many cases where there has been, through faith, an actual physical protection, so we must not minimize that possibility”(The Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, p. 539). According to a church manual,“The garment provides a constant reminder of the covenants you have made in the temple. You should treat it with respect at all times. You should not expose it to the view of those who do not understand its significance, and you should not adjust it to accommodate different styles of clothing. When you wear it properly, it provides protection against temptation and evil. Wearing the garment is an outward expression of an inward commitment to follow the Savior”(Truth to the Faith, p. 173).

Again this was never Practiced by Jesus or his Disciples and is Ocultic at the very least.

For more info on the NON Christian practice of LDS holy underwear goto.
http://www.mrm.org/underwear

Truth matters only someone in a non Christian Cult would think HOLY underwear with not Christian symbols on it would afford them protection.
concerned in Eygpt

Aberdeen, UK

#20315 Feb 16, 2013
Why Mormonism is a false Religion it contraicts itself

God Cannot Lie
Book of Mormon: Ether 3:12; 2 Nephi 9:34 yet

God Commands Lying
Pearl of Great Price: Book of Abraham - Ch. 2:22-25

God’s Word Unchangeable
Book of Mormon: Alma 41:8 yet

God’s Word Can Change
Doctrine and Covenants: Section 56:4-5

No Pre-Existence of Man
Book of Mormon: Jacob 4:9; Alma 18:28, 34-36 yet

Man Pre-Existed
Doctrine and Covenants: Section 93:23, 29-33
PGP: Book of Abraham - Chapter 3:18, 21-23

ANT The BEST FOR LAST in LIGHT OF THE POLYGAMY debate.

Polygamy Condemned
Book of Mormon: Jacob 1:15; 2:24; 3:5; Mosiah 11:2

YET

Polygamy Commanded
Doctrine and Covenants: Section 132:1, 37-39, 61

Truth Matters

MOROMONS are not Christians there Scriptures tell us so.

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#20316 Feb 16, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a lot of double talk. It's either a commandment or not. If it isn't a commandment, it shouldn't be a requirement. They are suppose to be in the business of teaching the gospel of Jesus Christ, not making up rules just for the hell of it because they can. They are denying, according to them, the highest levels of the teachings of Jesus Christ when they deny someone a temple recommend based on a persons inability to keep the WoW. They make Jesus a liar again when he says:
Matthew 11:30
For My yoke is easy and My burden is light.”
But according to Mormonism, Jesus was the biggest liar of all.
You seem to be having issues with this and as a 30 year member of the Mormon church who insinuates he read and swallowed all the teachings preached to him, you're ignorance and self inflated anti-Mormon ego is showing badly dude.
I pasted you what Joseph Smith said God said. It wasn't a commandment. And yet you question the difference between a commandment and a requirement. Commandments in this case are of God. Requirements are usually of men. In some cases of God. You can find 'requirements' from God in the Bible if you look that weren't stated as a commandment.
Try it this way. Why don't you search it out and see if any of the prophets have stated God lied, that the WoW was by way of a commandment, not a requirement and than get back to me with your proof it was given as a commandment.
concerned in Eygpt

Aberdeen, UK

#20317 Feb 17, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>
1a. I agree. But you're a poor excuse for an ex-mo turned anti-mo.
2a. You might be a guy but you were never an elder as one that knows his own doctrines.
3a. Amen that we can agree on this :)
4a. A liar? You just claimed the WoW was by way of a commandment from the Lord and it wasn't. You have said rumours were facts. They aren't. You stated second hand info and hearsay were facts and they aren't. You stated two court recorded statements were facts that Smith had sex with women. That was a lie. One Woman lied three times and admitted to knowing nothing of what she claimed. The other witness actually claimed nothing of Smith being sexually active. Some more lies. You stated it was a fact that Smith had sex with his wives. Well he married over 30 wives in three years. Your statement means he had sex with each of those thirty plus wives and you say you had facts to prove it. All your "facts" are actually statements made by first, second, third and fourth parties. You never actually proved Smith had sex with those wives by what is actually called a fact by court definition. So more lies.
You have stated some truths at times I agree.
But as long as you call something a 'fact' that a court of law wouldn't recognize as a 'fact' it remains a statement without credibility.
Wow no surprise here no surprise

You don't show he has taken anything out of context or lied with and kind of verifiable evidence.

NOPE once again its no surprise with no surprise just accusations and hear say that are backed up with nothing.

YOU operate and accuse just like the Devil does Mmmmmm

I don't think this a coincidence

Truth and Facts matter not your Hear Say.

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#20318 Feb 17, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
The definition of "one flesh" is a whole lot deeper than just having sex:
Question: "What does it mean to be one flesh in a marriage?"
Answer: The term “one flesh” comes from the Genesis account of the creation of Eve. Genesis 2:21-24 describes the process by which God created Eve from a rib taken from Adam’s side as he slept. Adam recognized that Eve was part of him—they were in fact “one flesh.” The term “one flesh” means that just as our bodies are one whole entity and cannot be divided into pieces and still be a whole, so God intended it to be with the marriage relationship. There are no longer two entities (two individuals), but now there is one entity
Nice twist from your paste. But it's a lie actually. Your source stated... "Adam recognized that Eve was part of him—they were in fact “one flesh.”...no such recognition took place by Adam. Adam never said they were "one flesh" because a rib was used from him to make eve from.
And to be literal according to the story line, God took a BONE, not flesh to make Eve from.
The story goes as follows...
21 And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;

22 And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.

23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.

24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

So it's important to follow what Adam actually said and not was reinterpreted as you claim is the truth...
"..Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh:.."
Adam never, ever, a single solitary time ever, said he and Eve were one flesh in that garden after his rib was taken from him by God.
Two humans can't melt into one another like colours or the such two become one flesh like Siamese twins. Now Siamese twins are a literal factual example of two humans being 'one flesh'.
Two humans according to what Adam said God revealed to him, they could be 'one flesh' in the act of sexual intercourse where physically for a short time their bodies are joined together as 'one flesh' before seperating to be 'two fleshes'.
"One flesh" had an exclusive definition. Tack onto it any other 'spiritual' meanings you want and that won't make it correct of what you do.

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#20319 Feb 17, 2013
concerned in Eygpt wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow no surprise here no surprise
You don't show he has taken anything out of context or lied with and kind of verifiable evidence.
NOPE once again its no surprise with no surprise just accusations and hear say that are backed up with nothing.
YOU operate and accuse just like the Devil does Mmmmmm
I don't think this a coincidence
Truth and Facts matter not your Hear Say.
lol...yeah yeah yeah...why don't you come out of that pyramid? Seems a lack of fresh oxygen has you babbling on like a foolish idiot again, just saying :)
concerned in Eygpt

Aberdeen, UK

#20320 Feb 17, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>
lol...yeah yeah yeah...why don't you come out of that pyramid? Seems a lack of fresh oxygen has you babbling on like a foolish idiot again, just saying :)
NOPE once again its no surprise with no surprise just accusations and hear say that are backed up with nothing.
YOU operate and accuse just like the Devil does Mmmmmm
I don't think this a coincidence
Truth and Facts matter not your Hear Say.
Care Enough To Google It

Yuba City, CA

#20321 Feb 17, 2013
Maimonides, LEGENDARY Jewish Scholar: recognized as one of the most accurate and irrefutable experts on Israelite law.

Maimonides' work is referred to as "classical Judaism".

Ishut-
Chapter 9,
Halacha 13:

***"A man may wed several women at one time on one day*** and recite the marriage blessings for all of them at the same time.

With regard to the celebrations, however, he must rejoice with each bride the time allotted to her: seven days for a virgin, three days for a non-virgin. One celebration should not be allowed to overlap with another."

==========
God's LAW surrounding
LEVIRATE marriage,

venomously spoken of, by pro-Sodomites such as Dana Robertson is HATED by Satanists who despise ALL law from God.

The claim "God/Moses/Abraham/Israel is a sexual pervert" is repeatedly made
as they try to hijack Christianity from Jesus Christ.

Here is an excerpt from "Yibbum v Chalitzah"
Chapter One - which is discussion of Levirate marriage,

reflecting the evil deceit practiced by Satanist pro-Sodomite family destroyers attempting to hijack Abrahamic/Judaic/Christianic history of worship.

"Halacha 1

It is a positive commandment1 of Scriptural law for a man to marry the widow of his paternal2 brother if he died without leaving children, as [Deuteronomy 25:5] states: "[And one of them dies] childless,... her husband's brother should cohabit with her." [This applies to a widow] from nisu'in, or from erusin.

[The childless widow is referred to as a yevamah; the rite through which they marry, yibbum.]"

..."Halacha 9

***When a man who has many wives dies,***
[a brother who] engages in relations or performes the rite of chalitzah with one of them frees the others from all obligations.[The deceased's brother] may not marry two [of the deceased's wives], as [implied by Deuteronomy 25:9]"

==========
The people who despise God's family plan, also despise the rest of his plan.

They believe they are going to dictate to God, what God can dictate to them, mankind and womankind.

They are going to curse God and die like so many before them whose minds were turned from the plan God had for mankind and womankind, to perversity of Sodomite lechery and self-delusion.

"If I love him our homosexuality isn't sin."

"If I don't want to do it, God's commandments are null."

What it is,

is Satan inside human beings telling them to defy God.
Care Enough To Google It

Yuba City, CA

#20323 Feb 17, 2013
God doesn't ask people what He has permission to command love and don't love.

God commands.

People rebel.

Mormon.org
Care Enough To Google It

Yuba City, CA

#20324 Feb 17, 2013
More Classical Jewish Law from Maimonides

"Yibbum v Chalitzah"

Halacha (rule of law) 10

The laws pertaining to a yevamah who is fit to perform yibbum30 and refuses to do so are the same as those governing a woman who rebels against her husband.31 We compel her yavam to perform chalitzah with her,32 and she forfeits [the money due her by virtue of her] marriage contract.

***When the deceased is survived by many wives,***

the one that the yavam asks to perform yibbum and refuses is considered to have "rebelled."

He should perform chalitzah with her, and she forfeits [the money due her by virtue of her] marriage contract.The other wives who were not asked [to perform yibbum] receive [the money due them by virtue of their] marriage contracts, as other widows do.
XXX13

Waterloo, IA

#20325 Feb 17, 2013
fedupwiththemess wrote:
I do. They do not go by the bible nor does the bible mention mormonism it it. They have created a so called "extension" or another book of the bible calling it the book of mormon. Mormonism was created by a horny man wanting to screw more than one woman so he made it up saying GOD told him to do so. Women fell for it.
Sounds exactly like Islam.
Care Enough To Google It

Yuba City, CA

#20326 Feb 17, 2013
Sodomite, Satanic accusers who curse God for His family organization are going to reap the kind of family organization Satan gives his servants, as we all see, they are reaping now:

In the United States Satan is visiting the people with little rewards for their having served him with great energy:

50ish % divorce,

50% of your women raped or molested by the time you die

50% of you husbands admit adultery on your wife

50% of your women on hard pharmaceuticals,

God alone knows how many on other under-the-table drugs, so your women can bear even being one of you.

30% of your men raped or molested by the time you die

20% of your young adults has some venereal disease.

Face it: serving Satan has taken a toll on you that you can't offset by printing more money.
Care Enough To Google It

Yuba City, CA

#20327 Feb 17, 2013
If you know the people of this world have their own agenda that involves doing what they want to who they want, and thinking they get away with it,

you don't have to go down the same path as the one we all know, the people of the world have chosen.

Many of them are even ashamed of the fact God teaches heterosexuality.

They ordain and pay pro-Sodomite perverts

to teach them the things they want to hear,

in exchange for money and priestly robes, and

popularity with themselves.

Sending off their own children, into a river of filth

they teach is Godly virtue

so they can think of themselves as progressive.

If you don't want to be part of that,

visit Mormon.org

Pray about what Joseph Smith said.

Pray about HOW GOD ACTUALLY USES WHEN HE DOES THINGS,

when He has something,

He wants to do.

Ask yourself if you want to be part of that set of numbers above.

44% divorce
50% women molested
30% men molested
50% women on hard pharmaceuticals
50% husbands admit divorce.

Those are the kinds of numbers a church of Satan puts up when you follow it's principles.

Those are the kinds of numbers the people you see here calling God too blind to judge them, put up, when their real God is Satan of the Sodomites and Sinners
concerned in Eygpt

Aberdeen, UK

#20328 Feb 17, 2013
Care Enough To Google It wrote:
Maimonides, LEGENDARY Jewish Scholar: recognized as one of the most accurate and irrefutable experts on Israelite law.
Maimonides' work is referred to as "classical Judaism".
Ishut-
Chapter 9,
Halacha 13:
***"A man may wed several women at one time on one day*** and recite the marriage blessings for all of them at the same time.
With regard to the celebrations, however, he must rejoice with each bride the time allotted to her: seven days for a virgin, three days for a non-virgin. One celebration should not be allowed to overlap with another."
==========
God's LAW surrounding
LEVIRATE marriage,
venomously spoken of, by pro-Sodomites such as Dana Robertson is HATED by Satanists who despise ALL law from God.
The claim "God/Moses/Abraham/Israel is a sexual pervert" is repeatedly made
as they try to hijack Christianity from Jesus Christ.
Here is an excerpt from "Yibbum v Chalitzah"
Chapter One - which is discussion of Levirate marriage,
reflecting the evil deceit practiced by Satanist pro-Sodomite family destroyers attempting to hijack Abrahamic/Judaic/Christianic history of worship.
"Halacha 1
It is a positive commandment1 of Scriptural law for a man to marry the widow of his paternal2 brother if he died without leaving children, as [Deuteronomy 25:5] states: "[And one of them dies] childless,... her husband's brother should cohabit with her." [This applies to a widow] from nisu'in, or from erusin.
[The childless widow is referred to as a yevamah; the rite through which they marry, yibbum.]"
..."Halacha 9
***When a man who has many wives dies,***
[a brother who] engages in relations or performes the rite of chalitzah with one of them frees the others from all obligations.[The deceased's brother] may not marry two [of the deceased's wives], as [implied by Deuteronomy 25:9]"
==========
The people who despise God's family plan, also despise the rest of his plan.
They believe they are going to dictate to God, what God can dictate to them, mankind and womankind.
They are going to curse God and die like so many before them whose minds were turned from the plan God had for mankind and womankind, to perversity of Sodomite lechery and self-delusion.
"If I love him our homosexuality isn't sin."
"If I don't want to do it, God's commandments are null."
What it is,
is Satan inside human beings telling them to defy God.
The Man you quote lived in the 5th Century and rejected Jesus as Lord and Savior. He does as you do back Polygamy with Jewish Tradition not biblical precedent (exegesis for scripture) he would be known in Jesus's day as a Pharisees and we know what Jesus thought of them. Devils

It had been Tradition for the the Jews of his day to have rejected Jesus as Messiah for over 500 years.

Do you honestly believe you are going get a true Christian to believe a man who rejected Jesus as Savior and Messiah ( king of the Jews ) as automotive or an Authority on God's word.

He is of the Devil as he denies the Father's Son Jesus he denies the Father. He is a Pharisee

YOU sure do climb into bed with some strange bed fellows AND ONCE AGAIN SHOW YOU do not what you write about or who you are use as source to justify sinning.
Essentially you have quoted a man of he devil and are saying do as he says negate scripture as he negates scripture.

It would be laughable if it were not your eternal destiny on the line.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Climate change scientists predicted monster sto... 1 min IB DaMann 4
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 11 min Wojar 183,895
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 12 min Nutz 168,453
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 14 min Bluestater 1,173,845
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 14 min ChristineM 142,715
Obama Calls for Two Years of Free Community Col... 49 min RADIO 865
Pentagon: Bergdahl detainee returned to fight 1 hr irateminger 6
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 4 hr Make World peace ... 305,244
Who do you side with in Ferguson? 5 hr Son of Man 11,325
More from around the web