Who says Mormons aren't Christians?

Who says Mormons aren't Christians?

There are 32098 comments on the CNN story from Oct 12, 2011, titled Who says Mormons aren't Christians?. In it, CNN reports that:

Editor's note: Dean Obeidallah is an award-winning comedian who has appeared on TV shows such as Comedy Central's "Axis of Evil" special, ABC's "The View," CNN's "What the Week" and HLN's "The Joy Behar Show." He is executive producer of the annual New York Arab-American Comedy Festival and the Amman Stand Up Comedy Festival.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CNN.

sportxmouse

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23395 Apr 12, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
Chiasmus ...
I asked you how a farm boy with little education could write such in depth scripture with out Guidance... and with the Hebrew "chiasmas" parallel culture in 90 days.

Could you do it?

Are you smarter than Joseph Smith? Do you have more education than him? Could you do what he did?

sportxmouse

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23396 Apr 12, 2013
Colorado Chick wrote:
The ONLY difference between Mormons and Christians.. IS THAT..Mormons MARRY multiple wives to satisfy their Sexual Pleasure and Take care of them. Christians ARE Tempted to CHEAT with Strange women, WHO are ONLY used for Sexual DESIRE and TOSSED aside...So, if you compare the Two religions, I'd SAY that the MORMON beliefs are truer to the Bible teachings... FOR, they do have more than one wife, WHO in turn helps the FIRST wife with Chores, raising the children and can learn from her...
I agree with you that in the Biblical times they were instructed to have multiple wives, the same as in the brief time that the Mormons did in the mid 1800's.

However, I disagree for the reasoning. To my knowledge not all men were allowed to marry more than one wife for what reason is unknown to me.

And, I agree that the wife's all helped with the Chores, and raising children... I can not even imagine having a family of say 5 out in the wilderness alone, and having to carry water, cook, clean, plant food with no plows... omg doing that and more with just one mom would be impossible.

Thank you for your input.

Oh, Mormon's do not practice polygamy any longer.

sportxmouse

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23397 Apr 12, 2013
Malachi 3:1
"Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me: and the Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple, even the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in: behold, he shall come, saith the LORD of hosts."

This prophecy was fulfilled on April 3, 1836 in the Kirtland, Ohio. Joseph is the "messenger", who had prepared the way for the Lord through the restoration of all things. The Lord, Jesus Christ, did indeed come suddenly to His temple in Kirtland, Ohio, appearing to the prophet, Joseph, and to Sydney Rigdon. During that same experience Moses and Elijah appeared to them also and conferred the keys for missionary and temple work.

Ezekiel 37:16-20
"Moreover, thou son of man, take thee one stick, and write upon it, For Judah, and for the children of Israel his companions: then take another stick, and write upon it, For Joseph, the stick of Ephraim, and for all the house of Israel his companions: And join them one to another into one stick; and they shall become one in thine hand. And when the children of thy people shall speak unto thee, saying, Wilt thou not shew us what thou meanest by these? Say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will take the stick of Joseph, which is in the hand of Ephraim, and the tribes of Israel his fellows, and will put them with him, even with the stick of Judah, and make them one stick, and they shall be one in mine hand. And the sticks whereon thou writest shall be in thine hand before their eyes."

This is a reference to the Book of Mormon and the Bible being companion books that compliment each other. The Book of Mormon is a true volume of scripture, prophesied in the Bible, and brought forth by God. Since the Book of Mormon is the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy then Joseph Smith is indeed a Prophet of God.

sportxmouse

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23398 Apr 12, 2013
1 Corinthians 15:40-41
"There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another.
There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon,
and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory."

Explain what that celestial, terrestrial, and terrestrial bodies are?

sportxmouse

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23399 Apr 12, 2013
The Bible also testifies of Jospeh Smith,
Isaiah 29:11-12
Malachi 3:1
Ezekiel 37:16-20

YOU can't fraudulantly deny the artifacts... the evidence in Meso-America...

So you never address it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Step_pyramid

DENY THAT... LOOK AT THE SIMULARITIES IN THE STEPS OF THE PYRAMIDS...

https://www.google.com/search ...

hmmm...

YOU CAN'T Snap your fingers and make them disappear...

ADDRESS the facts...

ADDRESS the scriptures testifying of Joseph Smith...

ADDRESS the artifacts in found today...

sportxmouse

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23401 Apr 12, 2013

sportxmouse

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23402 Apr 12, 2013
What do you know? Tell me, better yet show me... I will know if it's true and so will God...

I've done my research... I'm an analyst... and fully aware that just because you say it and make the quotes that you assume will make your point, doesn't mean you prayed about it... and got answers from the Holy Ghost?

or, did you get hurt by someone and become angry at that person then give up on the gospel?

those who preach against the gospel will not prosper.

Even Joseph Smith said that most saints won't make it unless they straighten up.

I hope you see the facts that are present today that could not have been known by Joseph Smith...

Archeologist have went from the sites spoken about in the Book of Mormon... and the measured the distance spoken in the Book of Mormon... and guess what the distance spoken are accurate.

Why are you so critical?

What happened to you?

If you know the facts and have read and are educated and have the Holy Ghost how can you deny it?

Did someone in the church hurt you?

Are you taking it out on the Lord and his word?

Read and compare... analyze the date present today... and pray (ALOT).

You can find the truth if you search for it.

Just because it's said on the Internet doesn't make it true. I can say the Sun rises at noon... but it doesn't make it so just because I spoke it on the Internet.

The facts present today are mystifying...

The Book of Mormon was written in a creole language from Egyption Hieroglyphics and Jewish language combined... how would Joseph Smith have the knowledge to decypher these writtings?

The timelines referred to in the Book of Mormon match the historical finds of today.

Just because you were hurt by someone or don't believe doesn't make you right.

You really need to study the facts... analyze the data... and PRAY.
addin

London, UK

#23403 Apr 12, 2013
So , who said Mormons aren't Christians?

http:/www.rzeczywsieci.pl
addin

London, UK

#23404 Apr 12, 2013
So , who said Mormons aren't Christians?

http://www.rzeczywsieci.pl

sportxmouse

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23405 Apr 12, 2013
Luke 8:17
For nothing is hidden that will not be made manifest, nor is anything secret that will not be known and come to light.

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#23406 Apr 12, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, when Mormons have "a sit down to talk about tithing" it is called "tithing settlement."
Idiot.
I wasn't speaking about what Mormons call it. You were.
You and nomo spoke offensively of the tithing Mormons make. I didn't.
I made a comparison the Christian ministers expected tithes from their members as the Mormon leaders expect from their members. You two didn't like that comparison and denied it took place.
I was speaking about terminology ministers used for their members when discussing tithing pledges. You continued to reference Mormons.
I was speaking about the value tithing holds for most Christian churches that aren't financially self sufficient. You didn't. You denied there was any such importance.
You and nomo declared churches you two attended didn't ask for tithes, insinuating the churches you two attended were so financially set that they didn't need tithes to help pay monthly costs.
Get it yet?

sportxmouse

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23407 Apr 12, 2013
City of Nephi (Guatamal/Kaminaljuju)
10 days = 80 miles

*to

Water of Mormon (Lake of Atitlan)
8 days = 65 miles

*to

Land of Helam (Almolonga)
1 day = 8 miles

*to

Valley of Alma (Quetzaltenango)
12 days = 96 miles

*to

City/Land of Zarahemla (Chiapas Depression)

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#23408 Apr 12, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
First, this poetic style has always been in the Bible. Whether anyone had a name for it or not is beside the point; the style was present for Joseph Smith to imitate.
It figures that's Tanner's logic makes sense to you. Especially since she's what you're not, a civil polite intelligent anti-Mormon that doesn't usually lie to make a point.
Next, she does a bit of a twist in her statement. Smith couldn't imitate the existence of a specific type of writing in all the right places if he knew nothing about it. Tanner doesn't mention that fact. That's called deception by purpose.
What Tanner doesn't tell you is someone that doesn't know what their copying, they'll reword it in all the wrong places and maybe a few right places because they don't know what their re-writing as Smith is accused of doing.
Therefore it's a fact that Smith in rewriting a specific undiscovered type of writing, he would have massacred it over and over. Those later recognizing Chiasmus, they would have been able to read Smith's book and could point to where he destroyed what should have been Chiasmus and where he unknowingly wrote out chiasmus correctly.
But it's been noted that Smith rewrote Chiasmus as correctly as it was written into the OT without knowing it. Tanner doesn't go over that fact because she can't explain it herself. So it's easier for Tanner to just excuse it away with Smith got lucky in that he didn't slaughter any Chiasmus in rewriting it in the BOM.

sportxmouse

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23409 Apr 12, 2013
http://www.ancientamerica.org/library/media/H...

This is a link about "The Tree of Life Stone"

It was left in by the Nephites 200 BC

Quote
http://www.moroni10.com/lehi_stone.html
"Izapa Stela 5: The Lehi Stone
This stone, currently possessed by The Smithsonian, was discovered in the ancient Mesoamerican city of Izapa, in 1941, by archaeologist Matthew W. Stirling. The stone carving has been dated to the Preclassic Guillen Phase between 300 BC and 50 AD. While both LDS and Non-LDS scholars debate the interpretation of the carving, it's hard to ignore the striking similarity it has to Lehi's dream of the "Tree of Life" found in 1 Nephi chapter 8. The tree of life, the people eating fruit, and other resemblances to the account of Lehi's dream, coupled with the location it was found, and it being dated dead on to the Book of Mormon timetable, makes this an intriguing evidence of Book of Mormon authenticity. But like all faith evidences, this won't make people believe who don't already."

sportxmouse

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23410 Apr 12, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>
It figures that's Tanner's logic makes sense to you. Especially since she's what you're not, a civil polite intelligent anti-Mormon that doesn't usually lie to make a point.
Next, she does a bit of a twist in her statement. Smith couldn't imitate the existence of a specific type of writing in all the right places if he knew nothing about it. Tanner doesn't mention that fact. That's called deception by purpose.
What Tanner doesn't tell you is someone that doesn't know what their copying, they'll reword it in all the wrong places and maybe a few right places because they don't know what their re-writing as Smith is accused of doing.
Therefore it's a fact that Smith in rewriting a specific undiscovered type of writing, he would have massacred it over and over. Those later recognizing Chiasmus, they would have been able to read Smith's book and could point to where he destroyed what should have been Chiasmus and where he unknowingly wrote out chiasmus correctly.
But it's been noted that Smith rewrote Chiasmus as correctly as it was written into the OT without knowing it. Tanner doesn't go over that fact because she can't explain it herself. So it's easier for Tanner to just excuse it away with Smith got lucky in that he didn't slaughter any Chiasmus in rewriting it in the BOM.
Exactly!

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#23411 Apr 12, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
Time will tell who the idiot is.
The only idiocy here is those that think a religion that is based on God setting up for a purpose a man and a woman for a marriage and family, that this is the core reason for mankind's existence in this religion, the only idiocy belongs to those that think this religion will just roll over and destroy itself because of popular opinion.

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#23412 Apr 12, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
You're debating BS. I never said the churches don't collect tithe, I said they don't have tithing settlements. You're the one that said they do. You.
Oh you're so very correct! I am debating a huge amount of your BS, that's a fact Jack!
You're debating that Christian church ministers don't sit down with individual members of any church and discuss what their monthly pledge will be according to their income. You're debating they do no such thing. You said Christian ministers "DON'T HAVE TITHING MEETINGS/SETTLEMENTS/SESSIONS/ DISCUSSIONS/PLEDGES" with their members. That is what you just stated again.
That means according to your BS thinking, Christian ministers know how much it costs to run their church each month but they have not a clue if that'll be done because they don't talk about tithes to individual members. The minister to your BS thinking passes out a basket each sunday and by the last Sunday of the month he just hopes and prays that there's enough to pay the bills with.
See, you and nomo are missing a bit of real time information. Of you I expect this idiocy. But of nomo, she claims to have been on the financial boards of churches so she knows for a fact steady regular tithe payers PAY THE FRICKING BILLS. You can't pay those bills unless YOU KNOW IN ADVANCE THAT THE MONEY WILL BE THERE TO PAY THOSE BILLS.
Therefore ministers DO HAVE ONE ON ONE TITHE SESSIONS with regular tithe paying members to see what they will pay monthly into the church kitty. Than the minister will know if he'll have enough to pay the monthly bills with. And if he comes up short, it's bake time and donation time and fast.
But according to you and nomo, the Christian ministers you two know don't worry about monthly bills because their so well off they don't need tithes to pay bills. And that thinking proves how far off in la-la land you two live. Get it?

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#23413 Apr 12, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
No, worthless, I moved from one location far from another 4 times, requiring me to find a new church each time. The only thing that floats is you cockamamie excuses for posts.
<quoted text>
Never said that. Again you try to change the topic, which usual when you stick foot in mouth.
<quoted text>
And you need to stop being a 5 yr old throwing hissy fits when you are caught being stupid. I've been talking about tithing settlement. You've been talking crap.
That's what I said. You floated from one church to the next. What didn't you understand?
Actually that's what you did state in so many words. You stated none of your ministers sat with the members of your church so he could find out if there were any regular tithe payers or not. That implies all the ministers you have had didn't need tithes to pay monthly bills. That implies they had a money source other than tithes to pay all their bills. That defines them as financially self sufficient. that means your ministers didn't have a care if they got $10 or a $100 in the collection plate because according to you, they didn't need to know what they would receive from tithes because they didn't need those tithes. That is what you stated.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#23414 Apr 12, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>
I wasn't speaking about what Mormons call it. You were.
You and nomo spoke offensively of the tithing Mormons make. I didn't.
I made a comparison the Christian ministers expected tithes from their members as the Mormon leaders expect from their members. You two didn't like that comparison and denied it took place.
I was speaking about terminology ministers used for their members when discussing tithing pledges. You continued to reference Mormons.
I was speaking about the value tithing holds for most Christian churches that aren't financially self sufficient. You didn't. You denied there was any such importance.
You and nomo declared churches you two attended didn't ask for tithes, insinuating the churches you two attended were so financially set that they didn't need tithes to help pay monthly costs.
Get it yet?
Whining because you made an idiot out of yourself again? Hahahaha

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#23415 Apr 12, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>
That's what I said. You floated from one church to the next. What didn't you understand?
Actually that's what you did state in so many words. You stated none of your ministers sat with the members of your church so he could find out if there were any regular tithe payers or not. That implies all the ministers you have had didn't need tithes to pay monthly bills. That implies they had a money source other than tithes to pay all their bills. That defines them as financially self sufficient. that means your ministers didn't have a care if they got $10 or a $100 in the collection plate because according to you, they didn't need to know what they would receive from tithes because they didn't need those tithes. That is what you stated.
Hahahaha.....you failed. Have some dignity, man.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min RoxLo 1,565,521
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 2 min Trump Eats Babies 16,837
News Democrats aim to blast Trump for favoring wealthy 4 min Trump Eats Babies 1,140
News The NRA And The Worst Ad You May Ever See 4 min FormerParatrooper 89
News By a 2-to-1 margin, Americans prefer Obamacare ... 11 min fingers mcgurke 357
News A call for change as human smugglinga Read Stor... 12 min LOL 29
News How should an angry liberal celebrate the Fourt... 12 min fingers mcgurke 555
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 33 min Millstone 279,830
News President Trump's new message man Anthony Scara... 1 hr The FACTory 55
More from around the web