U.S. Army Officer Calls Obama an "Imp...

U.S. Army Officer Calls Obama an "Impostor"

There are 18757 comments on the WNBC-TV New York story from Feb 24, 2009, titled U.S. Army Officer Calls Obama an "Impostor". In it, WNBC-TV New York reports that:

A U.S. Army soldier said he thinks Obama is an "impostor" and is pushing for further investigation into Obama's citizenship.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at WNBC-TV New York.

Since: Oct 08

none

#3566 Mar 25, 2009
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
I know canada is a socialist country and scialism is the transitional form leading to communism.
Socialism-(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.
Considering that Canada has private businesses that means they AREN'T Socialist. Quit being stupid.
SHADOW wrote:
Collectivist-The principles or system of ownership and control of the means of production and distribution by the people collectively, usually under the supervision of a government.

But Canada isn't a Collectivist nation and it has no intention of ever being one. So again, you're being stupid.
SHADOW wrote:
It involves control of the people by government taking from some to give to others. It doesn't work, never has and never will.
Do you drive? Get off those roads that the government made by taking money from some and giving it to someone else to build them. Oooooooo Ebil Socialism.
SHADOW wrote:
Preach to someone else.
No I'm not preaching, I'm mocking, and you deserve it.

takion1

“FIGHT THE POWER!”

Since: Feb 08

LOUISVILLE

#3567 Mar 25, 2009
JodiJustice31 wrote:
<quoted text>
NO ONE has yet to determain what "Natural Born Citizen" technically means. Are you saying you've got the answer...lol? In fact, anyone important doesn't care about the issue. His mother was American, and he was born in Hawaii.
You have yet to answer why EVERYONE has backed off the issue, EXCEPT for bloggers and Obama haters? Why? and please quit dodging the question.
You are delusional.
No one has backed off.
There are still active cases in the court system.
Some cases get dismissed and new ones get filed.

Day 65 after the inauguration and the questions surrounding Obama's citizenship still have not been fully answered.

This issue is not going to go away until those questions get answered.

Since: Mar 09

K.C.

#3568 Mar 25, 2009
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
I know canada is a socialist country and scialism is the transitional form leading to communism.
Socialism-(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.
Collectivist-The principles or system of ownership and control of the means of production and distribution by the people collectively, usually under the supervision of a government.
It involves control of the people by government taking from some to give to others. It doesn't work, never has and never will. Preach to someone else.
Socialism involves state ownership of the means of economic production and state-directed fund’s. America's democratic capitalist system is neither socialist nor pure free market; rather, it mixes the two, and it has at least since the progressive income tax was introduced 95 years ago. Under it, the wealthy pay higher income tax rates than those who are less fortunate do.
Government intervenes in U.S. "free markets" all the time. The deduction that homeowners get for mortgage interest is one form, for it subsidizes housing. The Pentagon procurement that sustains U.S. defense contractors such as Boeing, Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics is another.
For that matter, President Bush and many other Republicans, including McCain, backed a massive federal government rescue of ailing financial institutions this fall, one that's committed more than $1 trillion so far to "private" banks, even taking partial state ownership of the nine biggest.

takion1

“FIGHT THE POWER!”

Since: Feb 08

LOUISVILLE

#3569 Mar 25, 2009
A Watcher wrote:
Shadow if there is any proof that you have no clue what Socialism or Communism is is the fact that you called Canada Communist.
The only "Communist" nation in the world is North Korea.(And that's because everyone is equally broke)
China is still a communist nation, along with Cuba, Laos and Vietnam in addition to North Korea.

While these countries share a similar system of government, they have adopted very different economic policies over the past 15 years.[when?] For instance, the People's Republic of China has introduced sweeping market reforms. In addition, the various Communist states use different terms to identify themselves and their social systems. Laos has removed all references to Marxism-Leninism, communism and socialism in the Constitution in 1991.[citation needed] North Korea has removed references to Marxism-Leninism from its constitution and officially describes itself as following the ideology of Juche.[12] Vietnam is "in transition toward socialism in the light of Marxism-Leninism" and Cuba is "a socialist state guided by ideas of Marx, Engels and Lenin and in transition to a communist society".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_state

Since: Oct 08

none

#3570 Mar 25, 2009
Matt wrote:
<quoted text>
Since communism has been considered subversion, and the practice thereof treason, the courts will be full...
Actually despite what McCarthy tried to convince, it wasn't illegal to have communist ideology, it was being part of or supporting any group. And all he could do was "Out them to the public" or kick them out of whatever government office they were in.

Lastly Communism is a dead ideology, I doubt you'll find many of them in the US.
give me a break

Lexington, KY

#3571 Mar 25, 2009
A Watcher wrote:
<quoted text>Actually despite what McCarthy tried to convince, it wasn't illegal to have communist ideology, it was being part of or supporting any group. And all he could do was "Out them to the public" or kick them out of whatever government office they were in.
Lastly Communism is a dead ideology, I doubt you'll find many of them in the US.
McCarthy didn't try to convince people being a communist was illegal. He simply didn't want communists working in sensitive areas of the government with security clearances and worked dilligently to have them removed from those places.
give me a break

Lexington, KY

#3572 Mar 25, 2009
A Watcher wrote:
<quoted text>Yes and what country was he born in?
The United States. But he was not natural born in any accepted or proffered meaning of the phrase. The only meaning in use at the time the founding fathers were writing the Constitution was Vattel's. He clearly wouldn't qualify on that one.

"The US has first claim as he was born on US soil. By most judgements you can say that was enough. But since you yahoos can't accept it I'll have to explain in more detail."

Where are you getting this "first claim" nonsense. Please cite a source. If he was a citizen of two countries, which he admits he was on his own website, then he was a dual national AT BIRTH. This precludes him from being a natural born citizen. The natural born part of it is obtained AT BIRTH. It can't be changed later on no matter what happens to your citizenship.

"Since you claim "At birth" he's a Duel citizen... 1 problem with that claim.
When he reaches adulthood he could only choose one. The other claim would cease to exist.
When I mean cease to exist I mean completely, the "duel citizen" was wiped from the record."

First, it's not my claim. Obama says this on his website Fight the Smears. Second, the only thing that ceased to exist was his Kenyan citizenship. This has nothing to do with how he acquired his US citizenship. Furthermore, under British law, he was still a British subject even after his Kenyan citizenship expired. They recognize dual citizenship.

"Of course this whole thing is moot because the founding fathers seem to have decided not to put in the "Both have to be citizens clause"."

They didn't put it in the Constitution, but the framers of the 14th Amendment did when they included the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof". There are also at least two other laws which state you must be born in the US and not subject to any foreign power. Obama clearly was subject to a foreign power, namely Great Britain.

takion1

“FIGHT THE POWER!”

Since: Feb 08

LOUISVILLE

#3573 Mar 25, 2009
Day 65 of the Usurpation of the U.S. Constitution.
----------
Federal criminal complaint contends Obama ineligible
Ex-officer alleges prez used 'contrivance, concealment, dissembling and deceit'
----------
Posted: March 25, 2009
11:55 pm Eastern

Selected excerpts,

An ex-military officer has raised the stakes in the ongoing dispute over Barack Obama's eligibility to be president, filing a criminal complaint against the "imposter" with the U.S. attorney's office for the Eastern District of Tennessee.

Retired U.S. Navy officer Walter Francis Fitzpatrick III, who has run a campaign for two decades to uncover and try to correct what he believes are criminal activities within the military, accused the president of "treason."

"Now you have broken in and entered the White House by force of contrivance, concealment, conceit, dissembling, and deceit. Posing as an impostor president and commander in chief you have stripped civilian command and control over the military establishment."

He cited the deployment of "U.S. Army active duty combat troops into the small civilian community of Samson, Ala.," and said, "We come now to this reckoning. I accuse you and your military-political criminal assistants of TREASON. I name you and your military criminal associates as traitors. Your criminal ascension manifests a clear and present danger. You fundamentally changed our form of government. The Constitution no longer works.

"I identify you as a foreign born domestic enemy," he wrote.

The 1975 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis told WND that a short time after his complaint was filed he was visited by two U.S. Secret Service agents, but they left after telling him they perceived no threat to the president in the document.

WND reported this week that officials at the Justice Department, along with those at the Supreme Court, confirmed that documentation in a case challenging Obama's eligibility had arrived and was scheduled for an evaluation.

That case is being handled by California attorney Orly Taitz, who is working through her Defend Our Freedoms Foundation to handle several cases raising questions over Obama's qualification to be president under the Constitution's demand that the office be occupied only by a "natural born" citizen.

Taitz was informed by Karen Thornton of the Department of Justice that all of the case documents and filings have arrived and have been forwarded to the Office of Solicitor General Elena Kagan, including three dossiers.

But he says the new complaint against Obama should define the issue of the president's eligibility.

"They either have to come and get me or get Mr. Obama's eligibility proved. He has an officer in his military saying he is guilty of trespass on the Constitution," Fitzpatrick told WND.

"They can recall me against my will to active duty," he said. "I would refuse. It's an illegal order by a man who is not by commander in chief."

Adding fuel to the fire is Obama's persistent refusal to release documents that could provide answers. While his supporters cite an online version of a "Certification of Live Birth" from Hawaii, critics point out such documents actually were issued for children not born in the state.

Hawaiian officials have confirmed they have a birth certificate on file for Obama, but it cannot be released without his permission, and they have not revealed the information it contains.

John Eidsmoe, an expert on the U.S. Constitution working with the Foundation on Moral Law, has told WND a demand for verification of Obama's eligibility appears to be legitimate.

Eidsmoe said it's clear that Obama has something in the documentation of his history, including his birth certificate, college records and other documents that "he does not want the public to know."

http://www.wnd.com/index.php...
Heh

Morehead, KY

#3574 Mar 25, 2009
If you think the office of President is given to someone without a proper background check, then you are dillusional.

takion1

“FIGHT THE POWER!”

Since: Feb 08

LOUISVILLE

#3575 Mar 25, 2009
Day 65 of the Usurpation of the U.S. Constitution.
----------
Selected excerpts,
A lawyer spearheading the effort in Washington state to bring light to the issue of Barack Obama's eligibility to be president says he was shadowed all day today by officers with the federal Department of Homeland Security, the Snohomish County sheriff's office and the Everitt city police department.
"There's definitely observation," attorney Stephen Pidgeon told WND. "Maybe observation in anticipation of making an arrest."
Pidgeon has been the attorney for Washington state plaintiffs challenging Obama's eligibility to be president under the Constitution's demand for that office to be occupied only by a "natural born" citizen. Dozens of similar cases have been filed around the country since the election and many have been dismissed, often because judges rule the plaintiffs don't have "standing" to bring a complaint.
The Washington state case, however, cites state law that vests in citizens the right to raise questions about an elected official's authority, effectively granting standing to those plaintiffs.
The case, although it has been filed, has not been brought to court for hearings yet.
"The fact of the matter is that we have taken the position and it is consistent with Orly Taitz' position that Barack Obama failed to establish his bona fides by the election on November 4," he said. "We alleged under Democratic National Committee rules he had a burden to establish to the DNC's satisfaction his eligibility. He never did.
"As a consequence the burden remains on him. He didn't meet the burden of proving his eligibility to hold the office."
He said voters cannot simply rewrite the Constitution's eligibility requirements in a presidential vote. For one thing, only 52 percent voted for Obama, and the Constitution requires approval from two-thirds of the states for an amendment.
He also cited U.S. senators and congressman who have credited the online "fact" organizations such as snopes or factcheck for authenticating Obama's eligibility.
"Any senator who would rely on snopes or factcheck to establish a judicial opinion whether or not this person has documented his eligibility is a fool," Pidgeon said. And citing a federal judge who said the issue of Obama's eligibility already had been "twittered," he said that is "tantamount to malpractice."
http://www.wnd.com/index.php...

takion1

“FIGHT THE POWER!”

Since: Feb 08

LOUISVILLE

#3576 Mar 25, 2009
Justice, Supremes confirm getting eligibility challenge
Taitz documents demanding proof of Obama's birthplace to be reviewed
Posted: March 24, 2009
----------
Selected excerpts,

The U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Justice Department today confirmed that documentation challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president has arrived and soon will be evaluated.
Confirmation came from Defend Our Freedoms, the foundation through which California attorney Orly Taitz has been working on a number of cases that raise questions over Obama's qualification to be president under the Constitution's demand that the office be occupied only by a "natural born" citizen.

Taitz was informed by Karen Thornton of the Department of Justice that all of the case documents and filings have arrived and have been forwarded to the Office of Solicitor General Elena Kagan, including three dossiers and the Quo Warranto case.

"Coincidently, after Dr. Taitz called me with that update, she received another call from Officer Giaccino at the Supreme Court," the website posting said. "Officer Giaccino stated both pleadings have been received and [are] being analyzed now."

The report from the Supreme Court said the documents that Taitz hand-delivered to Chief Justice John Roberts at his appearance at the University of Idaho a little over a week ago also were at the Supreme Court.

Also,

WND reported earlier on a proposal by U.S. Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., and the criticism he's taking for suggesting that the issue be avoided in the future by having presidential candidates supply their birth certificate.

Posey said he made the suggestion because he's seeking the truth, and "the more and more I get called names by leftwing activists, partisan hacks and political operatives for doing it, the more and more I think I did the right thing."

http://www.wnd.com/index.php ...

takion1

“FIGHT THE POWER!”

Since: Feb 08

LOUISVILLE

#3577 Mar 25, 2009
The TRUTH of the matter is that,

The issue of the President’s citizenship was dodged, hushed, denied, hidden, ignored, and otherwise buried by America’s Main Stream Media, effectively keeping the issue away from the Public during Mr. Obama’s two-year-campaign”.

The TRUTH will VANQUISH the Illegal Alien from the White House.
usmcsniper1

Foster City, CA

#3578 Mar 25, 2009
Chicago Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. Easterling is an Army Officer, and subject to the rules and protocols of the US Army.
His behavior is treasonous, and he should be court martialed.
First of all you do not know what the hell you are talking about! His opinions are not treasonous and charging him with a courtmartial is just stupid. All that can be done is that commander officer will issue orders for him to refrain from political discourse. Then if he disobeys that legal order then he will be subjected to a summary courtmartial. I just love will civilians act like they are experts in military law. Compared to my liberal counterpart, I am the expert. Americans have a right to see Mr. Obama's birth certificate ASAP! Every household in America should be mailed the exact copy of this birth certificate as proof positive. Would that be too difficult for that illegal alien to produce?
SHADOW

Fredericksburg, TX

#3579 Mar 26, 2009
A Watcher wrote:
<quoted text>Shadow I don't use "Talking points".
I dare you to find the "Talking points" where I got my posts from.
Of course you're a guy who thinks Socialism is Marxism so what can you expect.
You can't get off the 18 years later crap. What is important is what he was when he was born. And yes you sound just like your messiah hussein had a tele prompter in front of you. You don't have an original thought in you fat little socialist head.
SHADOW

Fredericksburg, TX

#3580 Mar 26, 2009
JodiJustice31 wrote:
<quoted text>
Shadow...the king of dodging questions:)
Lets see your too stupid to see the answer too????
You keep posting that stupid dodging questions all over and now I am beginning to see all these people you accuse of dodging questions have written answers that you can't read. All these people responding to your lunitic rants are all dodgers? Someone is not marching to the same music but I think the rest of the world knows it is you.

Since: Feb 09

Newark, OH

#3581 Mar 26, 2009
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't get off the 18 years later crap. What is important is what he was when he was born. And yes you sound just like your messiah hussein had a tele prompter in front of you. You don't have an original thought in you fat little socialist head.
AGAIN...question dodged...lol
He said to show him where he used "talking points"????(you accused him of that) Soooo, where are they?

Since: Feb 09

Newark, OH

#3582 Mar 26, 2009
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets see your too stupid to see the answer too????
You keep posting that stupid dodging questions all over and now I am beginning to see all these people you accuse of dodging questions have written answers that you can't read. All these people responding to your lunitic rants are all dodgers? Someone is not marching to the same music but I think the rest of the world knows it is you.
If I were you, I wouldn't be calling anyone "stupid" while using a sentence like "Lets see your too stupid to see the answer too"...lol

Yes, I'll keep posting that you're the king of dodging questions. You proved it, by my example in the post above:)
No, not everyone that disagrees with me are "dodgers". In fact,'Give me a Break' disagrees with me, but she/he answers my posts in an intelligent undodging way:)..and I've pointed that out to her in a post before.
So, you're WRONG AGAIN.
Also, please point me to where I've posted ONE lunatic rant...just one. This outta be good:)

Since: Feb 09

Newark, OH

#3583 Mar 26, 2009
takion1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are delusional.
No one has backed off.
There are still active cases in the court system.
Some cases get dismissed and new ones get filed.
Day 65 after the inauguration and the questions surrounding Obama's citizenship still have not been fully answered.
This issue is not going to go away until those questions get answered.
I think everyone can plainly see who's delusional here...lol

Name ONE person (of importance) that hasn't backed off the issue?

ANYONE can file a lawsuit...ANYONE.
I'm asking, what are the steps being taken by political officails, or congress to prove Obama ineligible? Any 'Obama hater' can, waste the courts time, and keep getting their cases thrown out, but I'm asking in the WHITE HOUSE, who's pressing the issue there? Tell me?
Mostly, why are you wasting your time with such a moot issue. Why not the economy or healthcare, or something with substance that you can make reasonable point with. I mean, this issue is like beating a dead horse. Get over it. Suck it up, and accpet your president. Don't you want this country to succeed...can't you give it a chance?
Quit being such a Debbie Downer:(

Since: Feb 09

Newark, OH

#3584 Mar 26, 2009
takion1 wrote:
Justice, Supremes confirm getting eligibility challenge
Taitz documents demanding proof of Obama's birthplace to be reviewed
Posted: March 24, 2009
----------
Selected excerpts,
The U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Justice Department today confirmed that documentation challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president has arrived and soon will be evaluated.
Confirmation came from Defend Our Freedoms, the foundation through which California attorney Orly Taitz has been working on a number of cases that raise questions over Obama's qualification to be president under the Constitution's demand that the office be occupied only by a "natural born" citizen.
Taitz was informed by Karen Thornton of the Department of Justice that all of the case documents and filings have arrived and have been forwarded to the Office of Solicitor General Elena Kagan, including three dossiers and the Quo Warranto case.
"Coincidently, after Dr. Taitz called me with that update, she received another call from Officer Giaccino at the Supreme Court," the website posting said. "Officer Giaccino stated both pleadings have been received and [are] being analyzed now."
The report from the Supreme Court said the documents that Taitz hand-delivered to Chief Justice John Roberts at his appearance at the University of Idaho a little over a week ago also were at the Supreme Court.
Also,
WND reported earlier on a proposal by U.S. Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., and the criticism he's taking for suggesting that the issue be avoided in the future by having presidential candidates supply their birth certificate.
Posey said he made the suggestion because he's seeking the truth, and "the more and more I get called names by leftwing activists, partisan hacks and political operatives for doing it, the more and more I think I did the right thing."
http://www.wnd.com/index.php ...
MAN, your copy and paste button must be EXHAUSTED:)

Since: Oct 08

none

#3585 Mar 26, 2009
The life of Takion1.

1. Wake up. Time: 4:00 minutes
2. Eat a poptart while trying to press Ctrl C on the toaster. 1:00 minute
3. Clears his screen saver by pressing Ctrl V 0:05 seconds
4. Gets out his "Big list of Copys" 0:30 seconds
5. Open up topix, open up multiple threads 2:00
6.Copy\Paste Ctrl C, Ctrl V 0:10
7.Copy\Paste Ctrl C, Ctrl V 0:10
8.Copy\Paste Ctrl C, Ctrl V 0:10
9.Copy\Paste Ctrl C, Ctrl V 0:10
10.Copy\Paste Ctrl C, Ctrl V 0:10
11.Copy\Paste Ctrl C, Ctrl V 0:10
12.Copy\Paste Ctrl C, Ctrl V 0:10
13.Short rest, makes a "Sheeple" comment.):30 sec
14.Repeat steps 6 through 10 repeatedly 300:00
15. Eats lunch, fantasizes about sheep. 20:00
16.Repeat steps 6 through 10 repeatedly 300:00
17.Repeat steps 6 through 10 repeatedly 300:00
18. Eat dinner. 30:00
19.Repeat steps 6 through 10 repeatedly 200:00
20.Repeat steps 6 through 10 repeatedly 200:00
21.Repeat steps 6 through 10 repeatedly 200:00
22.Pass out, fingers continue pressing the keys.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Dueling groups to rally at Confederate landmark 2 min Synque 412
News Thousands set for May Day march through downtow... 3 min wild child 2
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 4 min _White American_ 381,001
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 4 min Abe 222,622
News Ted Nugent Wants Those On Welfare To Forfeit Ri... (Dec '12) 4 min Change your Wife 33
News Haiti Refuses To Accept Deportation Of Illegal ... 4 min tomin cali 12
News Donald Trumpa s bizarre California GOP conventi... 5 min Liberte 12
News Violence follows California Trump rally, about ... 5 min Denny CranesPlace 61
News North Carolina's rush to bigotry 10 min DBWriter 1,730
News Assault weapon bans should stand 41 min Sheriff Joe 529 763
More from around the web