U.S. Army Officer Calls Obama an "Impostor"

Full story: WNBC-TV New York

A U.S. Army soldier said he thinks Obama is an "impostor" and is pushing for further investigation into Obama's citizenship.
Comments
3,301 - 3,320 of 18,697 Comments Last updated Monday

Since: Oct 08

none

#3546 Mar 25, 2009
Krakus wrote:
<quoted text>
Question the legitimacy of the National Command Authority and treason is a viable charge under the UCMJ.
And according to official US military law, the act of treason in war time is punishable by death.
Matt

San Francisco, CA

#3547 Mar 25, 2009
A Watcher wrote:
<quoted text> And according to official US military law, the act of treason in war time is punishable by death.
Since communism has been considered subversion, and the practice thereof treason, the courts will be full...
SHADOW

Fredericksburg, TX

#3548 Mar 25, 2009
A Watcher wrote:
Shadow if there is any proof that you have no clue what Socialism or Communism is is the fact that you called Canada Communist.
The only "Communist" nation in the world is North Korea.(And that's because everyone is equally broke)
I know canada is a socialist country and scialism is the transitional form leading to communism.

Socialism-(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.

Collectivist-The principles or system of ownership and control of the means of production and distribution by the people collectively, usually under the supervision of a government.

It involves control of the people by government taking from some to give to others. It doesn't work, never has and never will. Preach to someone else.

SHADOW

Fredericksburg, TX

#3549 Mar 25, 2009
A Watcher wrote:
<quoted text>After he turned 18 he didn't have that status at birth.
All legal evidence of being "Duel citizen" ceased to exist.
At birth. Now write that 500 times and see if you can remember. Your post makes no sense.
Remember "at birth" not when he turned eighteen or eighty.

Since: Mar 09

K.C.

#3550 Mar 25, 2009
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
You ass, of course you would side with our socialist/communist democrats you live in a socialist,communist country (canada).
What makes you think we give a hoot about what another socialist/communist from canada thinks about the US to begin with?
You do understand that "socialist/communist " are not synonomous, don't you? If you do then you know the definition of the two, now if you would please apply either to the current administration's agenda or progress.... Still waiting....
Your accusation's carry no weight if not backed up by fact and since there is no basis for your stand, your opinion is irrelevant.
SHADOW

Fredericksburg, TX

#3551 Mar 25, 2009
Like I care what weight you put on my comments. They are there to read. Since you have a reading problem let me explain--I never said they were the same now did I. Socialism is a springboard to communism. Where you been, everyone knows that.
What the hell do you think Hussein and his band of merry (gay) thieves lending money to banks and car companies until the government is majority owner is producing. overnment getting involved in private business is a mistake. Government can't handle what they have now.
Telling anyone who will listen that re-distribution of wealth (someone elses money)
is the patriotic thing to do is socialism. Depends on whether he is taking your money or giving you someone elses money I guess.
First comes socialism, get the people dependant on government and transition them to communism. The problem is the line between the two is not black and white.
Arguing whether a country like Korea is socialist or communist is of little value since they both destroy Capitalism and that is what has made this country the envy of the entire world.
Now take you opinion and stuff it.
give me a break

Lexington, KY

#3552 Mar 25, 2009
A Watcher wrote:
<quoted text>After he turned 18 he didn't have that status at birth.
All legal evidence of being "Duel citizen" ceased to exist.
That statement makes absolutely no sense. Your status at birth can't be retroactively changed. Natural born is a manner of acquiring your citizenship. You can always give up your citizenship but you can never change the fact you were naturally born into a particular country.

Since: Mar 09

K.C.

#3553 Mar 25, 2009
SHADOW wrote:
Like I care what weight you put on my comments. They are there to read. Since you have a reading problem let me explain--I never said they were the same now did I. Socialism is a springboard to communism. Where you been, everyone knows that.
What the hell do you think Hussein and his band of merry (gay) thieves lending money to banks and car companies until the government is majority owner is producing. overnment getting involved in private business is a mistake. Government can't handle what they have now.
Telling anyone who will listen that re-distribution of wealth (someone elses money)
is the patriotic thing to do is socialism. Depends on whether he is taking your money or giving you someone elses money I guess.
First comes socialism, get the people dependant on government and transition them to communism. The problem is the line between the two is not black and white.
Arguing whether a country like Korea is socialist or communist is of little value since they both destroy Capitalism and that is what has made this country the envy of the entire world.
Now take you opinion and stuff it.
So just curious, are you of the opinion the President Obama should have made legislation the would have forced AIG bonus recips. to return the money?
Krakus

United States

#3554 Mar 25, 2009
Matt wrote:
<quoted text>
Since communism has been considered subversion, and the practice thereof treason, the courts will be full...
Considered as such by whom, exactly? It certianly is not considered as such under the law, so the court dockets are safe from congestion.
SHADOW

Fredericksburg, TX

#3555 Mar 25, 2009
Steadfast one wrote:
<quoted text>So just curious, are you of the opinion the President Obama should have made legislation the would have forced AIG bonus recips. to return the money?
First let me qualify something. Bonus is not what these payments were. A number of these employees were paid at year end, earning one dollar salary plus the payment at the end of the year. No politician should be telling an employee of a private company what to do especially when it becomes extortion as in this case.
If obama and his cronies had bothered to read that 1100 pages of welfare they would have seen that and stopped the payments then if that is what they wanted. On the contrary the administration and cabinet members hammered out the deal to pay the payments themselves. We know this now because when Cris Dodd got squeezed he told us it wasn't his fault, no it was turbo tax tim that got that ball rolling. You know the turbo tax tim that first said he knew nothing about it and was blind sided. Just a bunch of tax dodging liars.
If you want to regulate where the money goes read the proposal and make the stipulation. Don't try to change horses in mid stream and for God's sake quit threatening these people and their families.
SHADOW

Fredericksburg, TX

#3556 Mar 25, 2009
give me a break wrote:
<quoted text>
That statement makes absolutely no sense. Your status at birth can't be retroactively changed. Natural born is a manner of acquiring your citizenship. You can always give up your citizenship but you can never change the fact you were naturally born into a particular country.
You know watcher has his democratic talking points and he is going to repeat them. He doesn't even comprehend what he is saying. Hasn't a clue. He will continue on this ridiculous rant until he is fed some other point to spew all over. Sad little fellow indeed.

Since: Mar 09

K.C.

#3557 Mar 25, 2009
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
First let me qualify something. Bonus is not what these payments were. A number of these employees were paid at year end, earning one dollar salary plus the payment at the end of the year. No politician should be telling an employee of a private company what to do especially when it becomes extortion as in this case.
If obama and his cronies had bothered to read that 1100 pages of welfare they would have seen that and stopped the payments then if that is what they wanted. On the contrary the administration and cabinet members hammered out the deal to pay the payments themselves. We know this now because when Cris Dodd got squeezed he told us it wasn't his fault, no it was turbo tax tim that got that ball rolling. You know the turbo tax tim that first said he knew nothing about it and was blind sided. Just a bunch of tax dodging liars.
If you want to regulate where the money goes read the proposal and make the stipulation. Don't try to change horses in mid stream and for God's sake quit threatening these people and their families.
That was the long way around the barn! and you still didn't answer. Should President Obama have forced them to return the money?
SHADOW

Fredericksburg, TX

#3558 Mar 25, 2009
Steadfast one wrote:
<quoted text>That was the long way around the barn! and you still didn't answer. Should President Obama have forced them to return the money?
I most certainly did answer you but maybe it was too far around the barn for you , so let me repeat what my post said---

"No politician should be telling an employee of a private company what to do especially when it becomes extortion as in this case".

That exact quote was from my first reply
Now that looks pretty simple to me how about you?? Yes the president is considered a politician and it is not his money to take back.
hater

Lexington, KY

#3559 Mar 25, 2009
Krakus wrote:
<quoted text>
Considered as such by whom, exactly? It certianly is not considered as such under the law, so the court dockets are safe from congestion.
Gotta agree with this. Last time I checked, it's not a crime to belong to any political party. Now, it probably won't get you invited to the code room in the Pentagon.....

Since: Oct 08

none

#3560 Mar 25, 2009
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
At birth. Now write that 500 times and see if you can remember. Your post makes no sense.
Remember "at birth" not when he turned eighteen or eighty.
You are still not getting it HE WAS NEVER A DUEL CITIZEN.

The entire record was wiped.

Since: Oct 08

none

#3561 Mar 25, 2009
give me a break wrote:
<quoted text>
That statement makes absolutely no sense. Your status at birth can't be retroactively changed. Natural born is a manner of acquiring your citizenship. You can always give up your citizenship but you can never change the fact you were naturally born into a particular country.
Yes and what country was he born in?

The US has first claim as he was born on US soil. By most judgements you can say that was enough. But since you yahoos can't accept it I'll have to explain in more detail. Since you claim "At birth" he's a Duel citizen... 1 problem with that claim.
When he reaches adulthood he could only choose one. The other claim would cease to exist.

When I mean cease to exist I mean completely, the "duel citizen" was wiped from the record.

Of course this whole thing is moot because the founding fathers seem to have decided not to put in the "Both have to be citizens clause".

Since: Oct 08

none

#3562 Mar 25, 2009
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
You know watcher has his democratic talking points and he is going to repeat them. He doesn't even comprehend what he is saying. Hasn't a clue. He will continue on this ridiculous rant until he is fed some other point to spew all over. Sad little fellow indeed.
Shadow I don't use "Talking points".

I dare you to find the "Talking points" where I got my posts from.

Of course you're a guy who thinks Socialism is Marxism so what can you expect.
Get Informed

Hull, GA

#3563 Mar 25, 2009
Since Obama preempted American Idol last night duing his "I'M B.O. AND YOU NEED TO WATCH ME" press conference.

Can I call in and vote him off!
anti-obama

Salyersville, KY

#3564 Mar 25, 2009
shadow wrote:
hes not just an imposter. he is a secret time traveling nazi muslim!
LOL

Since: Feb 09

Newark, OH

#3565 Mar 25, 2009
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
I most certainly did answer you but maybe it was too far around the barn for you , so let me repeat what my post said---
"No politician should be telling an employee of a private company what to do especially when it becomes extortion as in this case".
That exact quote was from my first reply
Now that looks pretty simple to me how about you?? Yes the president is considered a politician and it is not his money to take back.
Shadow...the king of dodging questions:)

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Who do you side with in Ferguson? 4 min Toby 2,337
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min No Surprize 1,102,013
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 5 min USMail XXXII 257,212
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 6 min Commietator 151,543
Teen's Shooting Highlights Racial Tension 8 min Truth 1,720
Supreme Court: Was gay marriage settled in 1972... 10 min Reverend Alan 688
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 12 min Jacques from Ottawa 177,547
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 2 hr FREE SERVANT 115,411
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

US News People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••