'We did it' letters eyed in NY bombing

[Highlander]

Dajokerman wrote:

<quoted text>
sighs... so let me put it to you like this high and tiny, will you say that we have never had a talk about gun contorl on a gun contorl topic thread?
you accuse me of attacks.

In post #208 — just one page away— I asked >YOU< to get the post# and the verbiage of what >YOU< accused me of.

I see you've =STILL= not done so, sidestepping your own remarks.

Dajokerman wrote:

but as everyone else on this thread can see that you have attacked nearly every person that has disagree with you or even tried to give you the facts that will allow you to hold on to your verison of reality.

Well, FACT-LESS, since you are here =AGAIN= waging a war with not facts, making yet ~another~ FACT-LESS assertion, I'll consider that you really are nothing other than unknowing troll.

[Highlander]

SEB in JA wrote:

<quoted text>
You should try that kind of circular thinking with someone else. Your mix-n-match of words doens't confuse me and I'm not biting.

All anyone has to do is go back to post# 214, and see that >YOU< remarked as such

SEB in JA wrote:

NEW and REVISED defintions MIGHT support your statement.

Now, what's that about 'circular thinking?'

[Dajokerman]

Highlander wrote:

<quoted text>
In post #208 — just one page away— I asked >YOU< to get the post# and the verbiage of what >YOU< accused me of.
I see you've =STILL= not done so, sidestepping your own remarks.

The only troll here is you my dear friend and it was a yes and no question, so just answer it, yes or no, have we ever had a disscussion on a gun contorl thread? The only person that is avoiding so far is you.

[Highlander]

Dajokerman wrote:

<quoted text>
The only troll here is you my dear friend and it was a yes and no question, so just answer it, yes or no, have we ever had a disscussion on a gun contorl thread? The only person that is avoiding so far is you.

In post #208 — just one page away— I asked >YOU< to get the post# and the verbiage of what >YOU< accused me of.
I see you've =STILL= not done so, sidestepping your own remarks.

[Dajokerman]

Highlander wrote:

<quoted text>
In post #208 — just one page away— I asked >YOU< to get the post# and the verbiage of what >YOU< accused me of.
I see you've =STILL= not done so, sidestepping your own remarks.

so is that a yes or a no?

[Highlander]

Dajokerman wrote:

The only troll here is you my dear friend and it was a yes and no question, so just answer it, yes or no, have we ever had a disscussion on a gun contorl thread? The only person that is avoiding so far is you.

In post #208 — just one page away— I asked >YOU< to get the post# and the verbiage of what >YOU< accused me of.
I see you've =STILL= not done so, sidestepping your own remarks.

[Highlander]

Oh, well, how about this:
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2008/03/0...

The guy sends a packet to 300 democrats — one or more of them gets pulled for a postal inspection— and guess what: IT'S SHOW TIME!!!!

Yeah! Bush & Co. NEED a new toy to play with, so they cook up the latest scheme to blowup a recruiting office —of all places— and then have freaking temerity to blame some poor sod who did nothing more than saturate-mail his party in the Congress.

This is beginning to sound like: 9-11-2001 all over again.

Actually, it's also a very poor imitation of Reichstag fire, just as was 9-11-2001

[Rick op]

Highlander wrote:

Oh, well, how about this:
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2008/03/0...
The guy sends a packet to 300 democrats — one or more of them gets pulled for a postal inspection— and guess what: IT'S SHOW TIME!!!!
Yeah! Bush & Co. NEED a new toy to play with, so they cook up the latest scheme to blowup a recruiting office —of all places— and then have freaking temerity to blame some poor sod who did nothing more than saturate-mail his party in the Congress.
This is beginning to sound like: 9-11-2001 all over again.
Actually, it's also a very poor imitation of Reichstag fire, just as was 9-11-2001

H.S.!

[Elliot Spitzer]

I did it.

[tyratookie2]

I don not think that Hilary will ein the election because she is such a fake! Obama is real politician and not just a big blunder like Hilary.