They were not successful at all and there still is no cure for aids. In fact some treatments have made the situation worse.<quoted text>
Again, what for? You can't provide peer-reviewed research to support Godmagic so you resort to cherry-picking from peer-reviewed biology papers using science you REJECT and claiming they say the complete opposite.
But no problem.
Since AIDS is a retrovirus and studied quite a lot in recent years:
Now demonstrated. Time for you to move goalposts again.
Yes I saw that. They speculated that it was viral. And ended up with a retrovirus based on that speculation. It's called coming up with a hypothesis and testing it. And they were successful. That's how science works. Not that you'd know anything about that since you're a hypocritical liar for Jesus who doesn't know anything about science except how to copy-paste from real science that creationists were not even involved in and pretend it says something completely different than what it actually does say. Because after all your biological knowledge is far greater than any scientist. Especially with all those appeals to Godmagic.
Translation - boo hoo.
You can quack and quack and quack and quack some more. Still you cannot hide from your evolutionary quackery when it comes to junk dna. My point 1 is established and there is absolutlely nothing of substance you can offer to refute it.
After all Aides deniers are evolutionists that are truley concerned that research is on the wrong track.
Indeed on my point 1, that creos made predictions and claims that are being validated as opposed to evos claims being falsified, is an undeniable fact you evos will need to suck up as much as you struggle with your pride.
That is it. You can go on and on and on and still the above claim will remain factual, and that does not depend on you liking it.