Evolution vs. Creation

Full story: Best of New Orleans

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Comments (Page 2,509)

Showing posts 50,161 - 50,180 of106,310
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52412
Oct 12, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>And yet, and yet...
almost one American in five now identifies as atheist/agnostic.
Doesn't that mean we outnumber Fundies?
LOL
Atheism/evolutionism is the fastest shrinking religion in the world.

"Stuff's gettin better"
2012

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52413
Oct 12, 2012
 
President Starky wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't write down the post number like I told you.
You will be sitting in the corner after class.
One more time.
My belief=
I believe(And when I say "I believe, I'm not saying I don't believe)
I believe(Pause) That the entire cosmos and virtually everything in it was created and not by accident.
I believe that the religion of evolution was designed for the sole purpose of trying to disprove something that cannot be disproved by trying to prove something which will not be proven.
This is belief=(What I believe) Not what I don't believe) but what I believe.
Once again-
Everything I just stated in this post (AND MANY OTHERS) is my belief, NOT what I don't believe BUT what I believe.
Now "Subduction Zone"
Write down this post number and stop telling me that I haven't said what I believe.
"Stuff's gettin better"
2012
And as you know that is still not good enough, and you are still a lying coward.

Thanks for letting me continue to call you such by continuing your past behavior. Thank you for admitting that you are a lying coward.

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52416
Oct 12, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

6

The Lying Coward wrote:
<quoted text>
Creation is a fact. Not a religion.
Some religions espouse creation.
You religion espouses evolution.
Then you should be able to find evidence that supports creation.

Last time I checked all of the evidence supported evolution.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52431
Oct 12, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
And as you know that is still not good enough, and you are still a lying coward.
Thanks for letting me continue to call you such by continuing your past behavior. Thank you for admitting that you are a lying coward.
No, its good enough.
You'll take it and you'll like it.
You're such a whining, spineless little dwe.
Evolution is a religion.

"Stuff's gettin better"
2012

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52432
Oct 12, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you should be able to find evidence that supports creation.
Last time I checked all of the evidence supported evolution.
Evidence of evolution?
LOL
Never has been any evidence.
Never will be evidence to back up your religion.

"Stuff's gettin better"
2012

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52433
Oct 12, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you should be able to find evidence that supports creation.
Last time I checked all of the evidence supported evolution.
Flagged!
anonymous

Franklin, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52434
Oct 12, 2012
 
President Starky wrote:
<quoted text>
No, its good enough.
You'll take it and you'll like it.
You're such a whining, spineless little dwe.
Evolution is a religion.
"Stuff's gettin better"
2012
And what do the spineful dwes do to make themselves heard on Topix? Pull the wings off of flies and talk about their feelings about it?

Starky must be looking for some action.
anonymous

Franklin, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52437
Oct 12, 2012
 
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
No need to.
2.3% LOL
It's already game over!!!
LOL
I already said it's how you ask the question.

Same Wikipedia. Religious demographics.

non-religous:14.09 percent.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_religious_...

See how easy it is to post a link?

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52438
Oct 12, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

straa wrote:
<quoted text>This is where your figures are woefully wrong, in britain,France and Germany, the number of atheists is a lot higher. When we fill out our census forms, it says tick which box you are, I am a catholic, like all my family, and so tick the catholic box, but none of us are cristian at all, we are all atheist, none of us go to church or pray, and it is like that for most western Europeans, if 17% of British are classed as atheist, the real number is more like 75%, and even those remaining 25%, that I never see anywhere by the way, are the small remains left of a dead construct in Europe, and are themselves mostly not true believers either.
Two world wars in less than thirty years, on our land, soil soaked in the blood of millions of young men and boys, two generations wiped out forever, entire cities destroyed and towns and villages that lost every single male living there in the war, all that death and destruction destroyed religeon in Europe, it killed Christianity stone dead, and its never recovered, plus most of our Christian extremists were deported to usa in the 1600s LOL, we are very sorry for dumping them on you and making them your problem
The numbers are spot on!
The numbers are for the WHOLE world.
While the percentage may be higher in places like your church, the percentage for the WHOLE world is 2.3%. That tends to keep the erroneous / slanted number out of it.

Lol
Having trouble with the facts?

I don't care how bloody your soil is. If you can't keep the enemy out of your land then shit happens. We over here do a pretty good job of keeping our soil clean. We spill the blood else where!

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52439
Oct 12, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

President Starky wrote:
<quoted text>OK so we know you're English, do you speak German by chance?
He would be speaking German had we not bailed their azz out if the war

Devil Dogs (USMC)

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52440
Oct 12, 2012
 
straa wrote:
<quoted text>Big parts of London were damaged, the battle of britain lasted for months before the British finally destroyed the German airforce, after then there were no more attacks on London unrolled just before the end of the war, when Hitler ordered his new v2 rockets to take revenge on London for Germany losing the war, it was purely for revenge as by then Berlin was allready surrounded by British,American and soviot troops, and Hitler shot himself two days later, but several rockets hit London, but compared to other European cities and countries, London and britain were not badly damaged thankfully
Spitfires!

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52441
Oct 12, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>You really should stop lying through your tooth.

When was 97% of the world atheist?

As for more recent numbers, these are from this week:

"
iOver the last five years, the number of Americans no longer affiliated with any religion ncreased by 25 percent. The study showed that 33 million Americans are now considered "unaffiliated" with any religious faction and 13 million people, about 19.7 percent, are identified as "atheist" or "agnostic.""

About 1 in 5 Americans now declare as "Atheist" or "Agnostic".

Full text and attribution here: http://www.examiner.com/article/new-study-rel...
"When was 97% of the world atheist?"

I'll repeat it again because I love it!

Please try and remember it this time.

Atheist claim that every human is born atheist. That would mean atheist start out with 100% of the world population.
The current percentage of the world population that is atheist today is 2.3%
That means 97.7% of atheist have left you faith!

"Over the last five years, the number of Americans no longer affiliated with any religion "

No longer affiliated with a religion is not the definition of atheist! LOL

Learn what the hell the name of your faith means. LOL

A survey published in the 2005 Encyclopedia Britannica stated that 2.3% of the world's population consists of individuals who profess "atheism, skepticism, disbelief, or irreligion, including the militantly antireligious." In regards to the 2.3% figure just mentioned, the 2005 survey cited by Encyclopedia Britannica survey did not include Buddhist in regards to the 2.3% figure and Buddhism can be theistic or atheistic."

Wikipedia:

"Another survey attributed to Britannica shows the population of atheists at around 2.4% of the world's population.[citation needed] It is difficult to determine whether atheism is growing or not"

Wikipedia :

"2005 poll by AP/Ipsos surveyed ten countries. Of the developed nations, people in the United States were most sure of the existence of God or a higher power (2% atheist, 4% agnostic)"

Wikipedia :

"According to one estimate, atheists make up about 2.3% of the world's population"

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52442
Oct 12, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>You really should stop lying through your tooth.

When was 97% of the world atheist?

As for more recent numbers, these are from this week:

"Over the last five years, the number of Americans no longer affiliated with any religion increased by 25 percent. The study showed that 33 million Americans are now considered "unaffiliated" with any religious faction and 13 million people, about 19.7 percent, are identified as "atheist" or "agnostic.""

About 1 in 5 Americans now declare as "Atheist" or "Agnostic".

Full text and attribution here: http://www.examiner.com/article/new-study-rel...
"About 1 in 5 Americans now declare as "Atheist" or "Agnostic"."

Ummm nope! Not even close!

Wikipedia :

"people in the United States were most sure of the existence of God or a higher power (2% atheist, 4% agnostic)"

Doesn't look like 20% to anyone that can read! LOL idiot!

You got 2% confused with 20%

Maths not your strong suit is it?

What are you good at (other then lying)?

Anything? Anything at all?

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52444
Oct 12, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>Double Fine lives in a place where the president has 6 wives, 20 kids, makes more than Obama and does less than a municipal worker.

But Double Fine likes it here
Talking about ones self in the third person is a sign of delusion.

Oh never mind it's "double vision" everyone knows your delusional.
Carry on.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52445
Oct 12, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>That is the core of the problem

Charles Idemi wrote, "<quoted text>
Without the use of Mathematics, Ohm's, Newton's, Joule's law etc are all empty. "

Wrong.

Mathematics only quantifies those laws for us.

Do you think that we made the laws, or do you think we discover them?
Are you totally nuts?
None of those laws could have come into being with out math, what a fool.

With out math there would be no science.

Moron.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52446
Oct 12, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
He would be speaking German had we not bailed their azz out if the war
Devil Dogs (USMC)
Next time maybe we'll sit it out and let the Gerrys roll on over em.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52447
Oct 12, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>You are giving the answer there:

Mathematics is INSTRUMENTAL.

It is AN INSTRUMENT.
With it there would be NO science.

You would just have apples on the ground. LOL

Dolt!

Since: Apr 12

Jinan, China

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52448
Oct 12, 2012
 
thewordofme wrote:
If evolution is a religion we should apply for tax-exempt status and then we could raise funds to defeat Christianity (and all other religions).
Just one problem though:
Then we won't be able to teach Evolution in the schools.
The Discovery Institute will recognize this,
and we will have to fight another case in Dover.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52449
Oct 12, 2012
 
Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>
That is the core of the problem
<quoted text>
Wrong.
Mathematics only quantifies those laws for us.
Do you think that we made the laws, or do you think we discover them?
Without the quantification, the theories or laws are useless.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52450
Oct 12, 2012
 
Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>
You are giving the answer there:
Mathematics is INSTRUMENTAL.
It is AN INSTRUMENT.
Without the instruments( jazz), the music is empty. Mathematics holds the key to Physics and Chemistry.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 50,161 - 50,180 of106,310
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••