The Bush White House Was Deaf to 9/11 Warnings

[E Pluribus Unum]

Lawrence Wolf wrote:

<quoted text>What else are the voices saying?

Woof! U think voice or VOA i'nn Cing NBC voice rik now;-000

[Va te faire le pompier]

Monika Lewinski was more important to the GOP than the AlQaeda attacks in Africa, Middle East, and NYC. And even after this report, the GOP continues to ignore because that crisis was part of their grandiose plan with the Middle East!
.
Bush must be hang!!!!

[TBagger Vance]

Bill Clinton fkd'd up...Could have taken out
Bin Ladin at least a dozen times in the 1990's

[Va te faire le pompier]

TBagger Vance wrote:

Bill Clinton fkd'd up...Could have taken out
Bin Ladin at least a dozen times in the 1990's

G.H.W. Bush fked up when he stationed thousands of US troops in Saudia Arabia that became the rally for the extremists nationalists to fight the invader: THE US!!! FK learn to keep your crooked invading fingers home!
.
Reagan fked up when he allowed a vacuum in Afghanistan and permitted the rise of the Taliban because they opposed the Iranian. Your desire to give a black eye to the Soviets ended up punching you in the nose! Failure to imagine unintended consequences is too much for the war warriors of the GOP!

[xnutmegger]

Va te faire le pompier wrote:

Monika Lewinski was more important to the GOP than the AlQaeda attacks in Africa, Middle East, and NYC. And even after this report, the GOP continues to ignore because that crisis was part of their grandiose plan with the Middle East!
.
Bush must be hang!!!!

WARNING :

Troll at work
CAUTION

[Bluebonnets-This tle]

Va te faire le pompier wrote:

Monika Lewinski was more important to the GOP than the AlQaeda attacks in Africa, Middle East, and NYC. And even after this report, the GOP continues to ignore because that crisis was part of their grandiose plan with the Middle East!
.
Bush must be hang!!!!

Why wasn't the attacks by al queda important to Clinton?????????? They ALL happend on his 8 years as President! Why was Waco and Ruby Ridge more important than al queda.

Why didn't the report say "al queda plans to fly airplanes into buidlings?" It only said "plans to attack", which is the same thing it said to slick willie!! Duh, it's Bush fault. You are pathetic.

[Bluebonnets-This tle]

Va te faire le pompier wrote:

<quoted text>
G.H.W. Bush fked up when he stationed thousands of US troops in Saudia Arabia that became the rally for the extremists nationalists to fight the invader: THE US!!! FK learn to keep your crooked invading fingers home!
.
Reagan fked up when he allowed a vacuum in Afghanistan and permitted the rise of the Taliban because they opposed the Iranian. Your desire to give a black eye to the Soviets ended up punching you in the nose! Failure to imagine unintended consequences is too much for the war warriors of the GOP!

Ah, so you were for Saddam taking over the entire middle east?
98% of democrats in senate and congress backed Bush I for the action. You are a troll.
Idiot.

[Va te faire le pompier]

xnutmegger wrote:

<quoted text>
WARNING :
Troll at work
CAUTION

Which one is more important: Clinton's sperm on Lewinski clothing or a truck running into the Twin Towers? According to the GOP, sperm is more smelly and tasty than an one eye arab!

[Va te faire le pompier]

Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:

<quoted text>
Ah, so you were for Saddam taking over the entire middle east?
98% of democrats in senate and congress backed Bush I for the action. You are a troll.
Idiot.

In 1980, after Reagan made a deal with Iran with the US hostages, Rumsfeld (A G. H. W. Bush aid) visited Saddam in 1981 and the US gave moral and financial assistance to Saddam to invade Iran in a revenge effort. That Whole affair ended up in strengthening the Iran military and will to avenge the West for ridiculing, intervening, and attacking Persia. Even worst was to assist the Zionist in conquering Jerusalem. All will end with the West picking up their tail in their mouth! So is the price for betting with the wrong horse! We get nothing from feeding an artificial country that don't belong in that region!

[Fox News Snake Oil Lies]

Brer Fox wrote:

<quoted text>
Hmmmm,it seems that most of your little blurbs are about sh1t that happened on Clinton's watch. All the investgative crap was reported about during Bush's term. AFTER the training for the attack was done and the speculation began. One important fact you DID overlook.... Clinton cigared klitty as terrorists target city.....

Absolutely Not!

Remember This?

==========

Generals Speak Out Against Rumsfeld
DoD Determines US Foreign Policy, PERIOD!!! Congress is SUPERFLUOUS!!! The only thing to FEAR, is NOT ENOUGH FEAR.

"We went to war with a flawed plan that didn't account for the hard work to build the peace after we took down the regime. We also served under a secretary of defense who didn't understand leadership, who was abusive, who was arrogant, who didn't build a strong team."
-- Retired Army Maj. Gen. John Batiste.

"My sincere view is that the commitment of our forces to this fight was done with a casualness and swagger that are the special province of those who have never had to execute these missions -- or bury the results."
-- Retired Marine Lt. Gen. Gregory Newbold.

"They only need the military advice when it satisfies their agenda. I think that's a mistake, and that's why I think he should resign."
-- Retired Army Maj. Gen. John Riggs.

"We grow up in a culture where accountability, learning to accept responsibility, admitting mistakes and learning from them was critical to us. When we don't see that happening it worries us. Poor military judgment has been used throughout this mission."
-- Retired Marine Gen. Anthony Zinni, former chief of U.S. Central Command.

"I really believe that we need a new secretary of defense because Secretary Rumsfeld carries way too much baggage with him.... I think we need senior military leaders who understand the principles of war and apply them ruthlessly, and when the time comes, they need to call it like it is."
-- Retired Army Maj. Gen. Charles Swannack.

"He has shown himself incompetent strategically, operationally and tactically, and is far more than anyone responsible for what has happened to our important mission in Iraq.... Mr. Rumsfeld must step down."
-- Retired Army Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton.

Perfect security is Not attainable at any price!!!
STAR WARS & other MISSILE DEFENSE for a Trillion Dollars may stop 8 atomic war heads, but 2 will still hit their mark.

What can be achieved besides mutually assured destruction, is BANKRUPTING the US TREASURY.
-- Retired Army General Wesley K. Clark, former Supreme Allied Commander Europe. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!

----------

Gen. Anthony Zinni, USMC,(Ret.) Remarks at CDI Board of Directors Dinner, May 12, 2004 http://tinyurl.com/8ldmo

I think the first mistake that was made was misjudging the success of containment. I heard the president say, not too long ago, I believe it was with the interview with Tim Russert that ... I'm not sure ... but at some point I heard him say that "containment did not work." That's not true.

So to say containment didn't work, I think is not only wrong from the experiences we had then, but the proof is in the pudding, in what kind of military our troops faced when we went in there.

The third mistake, I think was one we repeated from Vietnam, we had to create a false rationale for going in to get public support. The books were cooked, in my mind. The intelligence was not there. I testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee one month before the war, and Senator Lugar asked me: "General Zinni, do you feel the threat from Saddam Hussein is imminent?" I said: "No, not at all. It was not an imminent threat. Not even close. Not grave, gathering, imminent, serious, severe, mildly upsetting, none of those."
http://www.cdi.org/program/document.cfm...

=========

[Fox News Snake Oil Lies]

Gen. Anthony Zinni, USMC,(Ret.) Remarks at CDI Board of Directors Dinner, May 12, 2004 http://tinyurl.com/8ldmo
The sixth mistake, and maybe the biggest one, was propping up and trusting the exiles, the infamous "Gucci Guerillas" from London. We bought into their intelligence reports. To the credit of the CIA, they didn't buy into it, so I guess the Defense Department created its own boutique intelligence agency to vet them. And we ended up with a group that fed us bad information. That led us to believe that we would be welcomed with flowers in the streets; that led us to believe that this would be a cakewalk.

When I testified before Congress in 1998, after a grilling from Senator McCain and all those wonderful senators supported the Iraqi Liberation Act, and I told them that these guys are not credible and they are going to lead us into something they we will regret. At that time, they were pushing a plan that Central Command would supply air support and special forces, and we would put it into Iraq, and they would pied piper their way up to Baghdad and the whole place would fall apart. This plan was created by two senate staffers and a retired General. I happened to be the commander of central command, nobody bothered to ask me about how my troops would be used. And they were a little bit upset about me being upset about this.
These exiles did not have credibility inside the country or in the region. Not only did they not have credibility, it was clear that the information they were providing us many times was not correct and accurate. We believed in them. We also brought them in with us and deemed them into the governing council and the reception by Iraqis has been, to say the least, has not been great.
http://www.cdi.org/program/document.cfm...

[Fox News Snake Oil Lies]

Bush Republicans Planned Invading Iraq In 1998
Dear Mr. President: William J. Clinton
http://tinyurl.com/7ots / January 26, 1998
We are writing you because we are convinced that current American policy toward Iraq is not succeeding, and that we may soon face a threat in the Middle East more serious than any we have known since the end of the Cold War. In your upcoming State of the Union Address, you have an opportunity to chart a clear and determined course for meeting this threat. We urge you to seize that opportunity, and to enunciate a new strategy that would secure the interests of the U.S. and our friends and allies around the world. That strategy should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein’s regime from power. We stand ready to offer our full support in this difficult but necessary endeavor.
We urge you to articulate this aim, and to turn your Administration's attention to implementing a strategy for removing Saddam's regime from power. This will require a full complement of diplomatic, political and military efforts. Although we are fully aware of the dangers and difficulties in implementing this policy, we believe the dangers of failing to do so are far greater. We believe the U.S. has the authority under existing UN resolutions to take the necessary steps, including military steps, to protect our vital interests in the Gulf. In any case, American policy cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity in the UN Security Council.
We urge you to act decisively. If you act now to end the threat of weapons of mass destruction against the U.S. or its allies, you will be acting in the most fundamental national security interests of the country. If we accept a course of weakness and drift, we put our interests and our future at risk.
Sincerely, Elliott Abrams / Richard L. Armitage / William J. Bennett / Jeffrey Bergner

John Bolton / Paula Dobriansky / Francis Fukuyama / Robert Kagan / Zalmay Challises

William Kristol / Richard Perle / Peter W. Rodman / Donald Rumsfeld / William Schneider,

Vin Weber / Paul Wolfowitz / R. James Woolsey / Robert B. Zoellick
http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclinton...

========

Bush Caught Lying About September 11th
http://tinyurl.com/2eaehw
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[Mr_Bill]

E Pluribus Unum wrote:

<quoted text>
hey Dr. Bill_mr! U blame on Bush High Deafination TV and which branch is dat? Sharp or Philps ;-000

Philco

[PayThat CEO]

Mr_Bill wrote:

<quoted text>
Read the article.

They're not going to read it, Bill. It's beyond their comprehension.

[PayThat CEO]

Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:

<quoted text>
Ah, so you were for Saddam taking over the entire middle east?
98% of democrats in senate and congress backed Bush I for the action. You are a troll.
Idiot.

Saddam couldn't have taken over a port-o-potty.

[August]

The Clinton White House was also deaf to such warnings. What is your point?

[GoodNewz]

Fox News Snake Oil Lies wrote:

<quoted text>
Absolutely Not!
Remember This?
==========
Generals Speak Out Against Rumsfeld
DoD Determines US Foreign Policy, PERIOD!!! Congress is SUPERFLUOUS!!! The only thing to FEAR, is NOT ENOUGH FEAR....

please continue to send 20 links per hour. we are all waiting on them, and can't wait to read every word!!!

[Romney Flip Flopper Rino]

GoodNewz wrote:

<quoted text>
please continue to send 20 links per hour. we are all waiting on them, and can't wait to read every word!!!

http://tinyurl.com/62nmcq

[frank]

okimar wrote:

Looks like Bill is spreading the liberal lies again.... Usual,usual.

LOL ... liberal lies? as opposed to conservative lies?

[frank]

The direct warnings to Mr. Bush about the possibility of a Qaeda attack began in the spring of 2001. By May 1, the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation. Weeks later, on June 22, the daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be “imminent.