Immigration servuce to recognize gay ...

Immigration servuce to recognize gay marriage from other states

There are 79 comments on the Yuma Sun story from Jul 28, 2013, titled Immigration servuce to recognize gay marriage from other states. In it, Yuma Sun reports that:

PHOENIX Gay Arizonans who legally wed to foreigners in other states will be able to use their status to gain a visa and a path to citizenship for their spouses living here even though Arizona won't recognize their union.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Yuma Sun.

First Prev
of 4
Next Last

“A JOURNEY OF A THOUSAND MILES”

Since: Aug 08

MUST BEGIN WITH A SINGLE STEP!

#1 Jul 28, 2013
Federal rights, benefits and privileges, along with federal recognition of one's legal marriage SHOULD happen regardless of whether a State actually recognizes the marriage because sometimes a couple has to move for whatever reason and they should NOT become UNMARRIED just because of it......at the federal or state level!!!

Since: Dec 08

Toronto, ON, Canada

#2 Jul 28, 2013
Good news and Europa/Daniel P./FuFucksy, please shut up. We don't need to hear it.

Since: Dec 08

Toronto, ON, Canada

#3 Jul 28, 2013
BTW, what is a "servuce?" Doesn't anyone proofread any longer?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#4 Jul 28, 2013
JohnInToronto wrote:
BTW, what is a "servuce?" Doesn't anyone proofread any longer?
Not in Arizona.
Hoyt

Los Angeles, CA

#7 Jul 28, 2013
JohnInToronto wrote:
BTW, what is a "servuce?" Doesn't anyone proofread any longer?
Not queers. 99% of them are illiterate.

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#8 Jul 28, 2013
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Not in Arizona.
Nor much anywhere else these days.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#9 Jul 28, 2013
This Immigration Service ruling could be the big breakthrough that automatically invalidates all state-level anti-gay constitutonal amendments and hate laws
.
With federally recognized and enforced legally married gay couples living in every state; the states no longer have a horse in the race
Big Boob Babe

Alpharetta, GA

#10 Jul 28, 2013
Hoyt wrote:
<quoted text>
Not queers. 99% of them are illiterate.
Are we making you moist?

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#11 Jul 28, 2013
Rainbow Kid wrote:
This Immigration Service ruling could be the big breakthrough that automatically invalidates all state-level anti-gay constitutonal amendments and hate laws
.
With federally recognized and enforced legally married gay couples living in every state; the states no longer have a horse in the race
I suspect the Immigration Service lacks authority overturn state laws.

Only the courts can do that.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#12 Jul 28, 2013
Bama Yankee wrote:
<quoted text>
I suspect the Immigration Service lacks authority overturn state laws.
Only the courts can do that.
True
.
When state laws are trumped by the feds; it is up to each individual state to update or eliminate unenforceable state laws that are not in compliance

Since: Dec 08

Toronto, ON, Canada

#13 Jul 29, 2013
Hoyt wrote:
<quoted text>
Not queers. 99% of them are illiterate.
And your source for this revelatory piece of information?

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#14 Jul 29, 2013
I wish our immigration service would follow our laws, instead of writing their own.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#15 Jul 29, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
I wish our immigration service would follow our laws, instead of writing their own.
Earth to Brian, were you asleep when the US Supreme Court ruled on Windsor v United States? Immigration is a federal agency.

Do try to keep up.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#16 Jul 29, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
I wish our immigration service would follow our laws, instead of writing their own.
You do realize that with the recent Supreme Court ruling, the federal government, including the INS, must now recognize the legal marriages of all Americans, don't you? They are merely setting up the rules to allow that to happen. Sorry.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#17 Jul 30, 2013
Immigration law is written by Congress, not the INS.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#18 Jul 30, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
Immigration law is written by Congress, not the INS.
Both are at the federal level, and both must comply with federal law. After Windsor v United States that means the federal government acknowledges same sex marriages performed in jurisdictions that allow such unions.

Oh, and Brian, read this:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/gay-marria...

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#19 Jul 30, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
Immigration law is written by Congress, not the INS.
Yes dear, the laws are written by Congress, the rules designed to carry out such laws are written by the agencies that those laws were written for. Understand now?

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#20 Jul 30, 2013
lides wrote:
Both are at the federal level, and both must comply with federal law. After Windsor v United States that means the federal government acknowledges same sex marriages performed in jurisdictions that allow such unions.
Oh, and Brian, read this:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/gay-marria...
Windsor v United States applies to inheritance and tax law, not immigration law. Congress writes immigration law, they may set quotas or ban whoever they please. The case cited above was decided by government concession.

This is why we must vote to keep marriage one man and one woman.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#22 Jul 30, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Windsor v United States applies to inheritance and tax law, not immigration law. Congress writes immigration law, they may set quotas or ban whoever they please. The case cited above was decided by government concession.
This is why we must vote to keep marriage one man and one woman.
Sorry Charlie, try again. Windsor establishes that the federal government recognizes same sex marriages performed in states that allow them. There has additionally been a federal court ruling in Ohio holding that the state must recognize the same sex marriage of a couple who married in Maryland. http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/gay-marria...

I am starting to think that you lack basic reading comprehension skills. You have certainly misinterpreted a myriad of legal decisions and legal concepts.

“A JOURNEY OF A THOUSAND MILES”

Since: Aug 08

MUST BEGIN WITH A SINGLE STEP!

#23 Jul 30, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Windsor v United States applies to inheritance and tax law, not immigration law. Congress writes immigration law, they may set quotas or ban whoever they please. The case cited above was decided by government concession.
This is why we must vote to keep marriage one man and one woman.
Sorry Brian, but you'd be wrong......Windsor vs United States has to do with the Section 3 of DOMA and why it was UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!

You might want to read the ruling to help educate yourself on why Section 3 is no longer in place!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Boston Globe's front page: AR-15, 'Make It Stop' 1 min barefoot2626 359
News Hillary Clinton wavers on Second Amendment righ... 2 min barefoot2626 967
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 2 min Blitzking 199,139
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 2 min LivinginaChrysler... 228,347
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 min Rogue Scholar 05 216,407
News Obama says he respects Britain's decision to le... 4 min Cat74 8
News Obama: Notion that being armed would have saved... 5 min davy 827
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 10 min ritedownthemiddle 1,394,335
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 42 min Brian_G 387,768
News Rebellious Democrats disrupt House, stage protest 52 min Cat74 206
More from around the web