Albuquerque teenager 'shoots dead two...

Albuquerque teenager 'shoots dead two adults and three children'

There are 1973 comments on the The Guardian story from Jan 20, 2013, titled Albuquerque teenager 'shoots dead two adults and three children'. In it, The Guardian reports that:

A teenager shot dead two adults and three children inside a Albuquerque home, authorities in New Mexico said on Sunday.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Guardian.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#500 Jan 23, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Sure I have son! I can't help if you refuse to read and comprehend! That's your problem. Typical right wing extremist idiot... blaming someone else for your failures and shortcomings!
Why are you to scared to show us when and where??????

“Constitutionist/ SAF”

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#501 Jan 24, 2013
Who trained him ?
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#502 Jan 24, 2013
Shows wrote:
<quoted text>
your sick mind that you don't condemn stuff like that, but harass those that do.
Are you sure it wasn't you...?..."Santa Fe Spammer"
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#503 Jan 24, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
When was the last time you were able to open your mouth and say something that was true?
When was the last time you opened your mouth and dribbled before you swallowed...?
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#504 Jan 24, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
So you won't mind if a neighbor you've been feuding with has a tactical nuke in his garage and a fully automatic machine gun pointed toward your home.
Good to know.
Your "nuke" BS has been asked and answered...you're being ignorant and frivolous with this continued, losing, argument.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#506 Jan 24, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
So you won't mind if a neighbor you've been feuding with has a tactical nuke in his garage and a fully automatic machine gun pointed toward your home.
Good to know.
Wished you cared as much about the deaths in Benghazi.

CONGRESSMAN:'Only Person In Jail Right Now Is Filmmaker...
conservative crapola

Orefield, PA

#507 Jan 24, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>
half-senators johnson and paul were more worried about posturing for the teapussies and score points against Hillary. She made them look like amateurs. Both of them, typical teapussies, who rode into office due to low voter turnout.

hahahahahahahahaha

lecry-a-thon: Day 79

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#508 Jan 24, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Because cars serve a valid civilian purpose which outweighs their incidental dangerous nature.
Assaults weapons DO NOT.
Yes they do.........

Competition
Sport
Fun
Food
protection
Game management
Predator control
Varmint control

Remember the plague??

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#509 Jan 24, 2013
Just left of right wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course, that's a give but, how did those "people" enable us to become a country? Seriously, if Britian had guns (we are talking about guns in America) and we did not, what accent would you be speaking with now?
Which is why our MILITARY has guns; to keep us safe.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#510 Jan 24, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you to scared to show us when and where??????
lol! I already have my little eunuch.

Why are you so afraid to read?

You can read, right son?

Woohoo!

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#511 Jan 24, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
Your "nuke" BS has been asked and answered...you're being ignorant and frivolous with this continued, losing, argument.
No, it hasn't.

If you have a constitutional right to own an assault weapon, then I have a constitutional right to own tactical nuclear arms.

Either arms can be restricted or they can't.

So which is it?

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#512 Jan 24, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it hasn't.
If you have a constitutional right to own an assault weapon, then I have a constitutional right to own tactical nuclear arms.
Either arms can be restricted or they can't.
So which is it?
Yeah, uh good luck finding one of those. And good luck with finding any plutonium for it. Let us now how that search goes. maybe you can try down at that new store on the corner.....Suitcase Nukes R US.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#513 Jan 24, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it hasn't.
If you have a constitutional right to own an assault weapon, then I have a constitutional right to own tactical nuclear arms.
Either arms can be restricted or they can't.
So which is it?
They are right on the shelf next to the Eludium Q38 Explosive Space Modulators.

“Each Thought Creates A Reality”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#515 Jan 24, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>

If you have a constitutional right to own an assault weapon, then I have a constitutional right to own tactical nuclear arms.
Reductio ad absurdum always seems to work for you.

Don't think anyone thinks that government produced weapons in the public domain and under public control are the same as privately manufactured and held arms. That is why certain type of arms and ammunition are already restricted to the private sector. You seem to be the only one who is comparing apples to oranges to make your point and show its absurdity. Don't try to make others out to be as clueless or as disingenuous as you are.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#516 Jan 24, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Which is why our MILITARY has guns; to keep us safe.
So the military will stop the punk that is trying to kill you in the dark alley???

Will they also take care of the coyotes that are killing your sheep??

How about the ground squirrels that are digging holes and your cattle are breaking their legs??

How about that Bear that wants to make you dinner???

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#517 Jan 24, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! I already have my little eunuch.
Why are you so afraid to read?
You can read, right son?
Woohoo!
This is how you prove someone a liar troll..........
.
.
But for some reason you cant do it????

tell us why troll???
.
.
.
.

Lets all watch the moron Yea claim that the burden of proof is on the defense..........LOL

How stupid must a person be to think this???

Ok.......

You might want to use the restroom before you read this as some have wet their pants from laughing so hard........

.
.
.
.
.

On post # 46912 here http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKPEED...
The moron yea claimed that the burden of proof falls on the defense even after I had posed a link from a legal law lib ray showing what everyone else knows that the burden of proof falls on the prosecutionÂ…Â…

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Please post a link that shows that???
Would you like the link again that proves you wrong???
Burden of proof is on the prosecution
http://nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_p...

Yea wrote.
lol! Nope. Don't need to son.

That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!
You lead

Huntsville, AL

#518 Jan 24, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
So the military will stop the punk that is trying to kill you in the dark alley???
Will they also take care of the coyotes that are killing your sheep??
How about the ground squirrels that are digging holes and your cattle are breaking their legs??
How about that Bear that wants to make you dinner???
an exciting life.

So you need military weaponry.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#519 Jan 24, 2013
You lead wrote:
<quoted text>
an exciting life.
So you need military weaponry.
Ar is not military weaponry..........ROTFLMAO
Go ahead

Huntsville, AL

#520 Jan 24, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Ar is not military weaponry..........ROTFLMAO
roll on the floor, freak. I don't give a flying fck about your gun fetish and the names you give them.

It is overkill. Literally.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#521 Jan 24, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, uh good luck finding one of those. And good luck with finding any plutonium for it. Let us now how that search goes. maybe you can try down at that new store on the corner.....Suitcase Nukes R US.
Gee, could that be because it's illegal to buy, own, or build a tactical nuke?

Hmmm, now imagine if we make it illegal to buy, own, or build an assault rifle?

Yeah, that's EXACTLY the point.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News This gay Senate candidate is running in the lan... 2 min Strel 51
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... 2 min abc 7,594
News Hillary Clinton tops Donald Trump in battlegrou... 3 min Seriouslady 251
News How Donald Trump is slowly teaching Republicans... 5 min Imprtnrd 45
News McCain challenger: He's too old for the job 5 min WeTheSheeple 3
News Russian man convicted of hacking into US busine... 7 min In Got We Trust 3
News Trump, aiming to widen support, makes pitch to ... 8 min WeTheSheeple 49
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 9 min RealDave 1,418,219
News Donald Trump's immigration policy: Then and now 15 min WeTheSheeple 116
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 21 min Sharrp Shooter 393,250
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 29 min HILLARY 2016 239,344
More from around the web