LOL, this little sidestep you're doing is not fooling anyone.<quoted text>
Publications are not perceptions.
However, common sense needs no explanation by it's definition. Same as common knowledge.
It's connecting the dots. You just have to connect them all to see the picture or the picture is distorted.
WHAT "dots" have you "connected" that form your "common sense" "perception"? What is your source?
Is there some reason you are reluctant to share with us what lead you to the conclusion you came to?