Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310175 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Anonymous

United States

#283840 Feb 13, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>It's a physiological fact that a first term fetus cannot feel pain. You can read that in any book on human development. You like to google. Do that. As for women feeling "pain, I assume you mean emotional distress. Some may, and that is sad, but each woman is responsible for her own decisions. It's very rare that a woman is forced or coerced into having an abortion. No one wants that and no one supports that.
No, I don't think it would be a good thing to ever force a woman to do anything, and it is sad when anyone commits suicide.
I preached my bro -in -laws funeral 3 years ago, becouse of that. His own birrh mother Made him have sex with her and his two brothers, from the time he was 3 untill about 8.

Plus no one should let guilt take over their life.
We've all done things that we are not proud of.
Atleast I have.
Anonymous

United States

#283841 Feb 13, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Unless she's been determined to be mentally ill, no she wouldn't.
It's not very hard in some states to have someone put in for a " review " of mental status.
The Prince

Phillipsburg, NJ

#283842 Feb 13, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
I take it you're not going to address my post, and share with us all how any killing can be legal and illegal at the same time?
Slavery was leagl. if you were living then, would you have supported the legal right to own a slave?

Think for once! Try and think!
The Prince

Phillipsburg, NJ

#283843 Feb 13, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
"If the physician DOES determine it possesses the basic lung function to survive with ALS then he will deem it viable and ALS will be applied. He will not apply ALS to a non viable fetus so it can REACH viability....as numbskulls like Bitter and Chicky have claimed."
Have asked you before but do not recall your answer.
What happens when the newborn dies anyway? Was it nonviable? That's my answer. So even if the physician deems a fetus viable, births it early, applies ALS, but the newborn dies anyway, then for all intents and purposes, it was not viable.
What say you to that, Doc, old boy?
What happens when a nine month old, as yet unborn baby dies, was it ever viable? if a thirty year old doies was it ever viable?

You are just as dense.

Think for once! Try and think!

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#283844 Feb 13, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I don't think it would be a good thing to ever force a woman to do anything, and it is sad when anyone commits suicide.
I preached my bro -in -laws funeral 3 years ago, becouse of that. His own birrh mother Made him have sex with her and his two brothers, from the time he was 3 untill about 8.
Plus no one should let guilt take over their life.
We've all done things that we are not proud of.
Atleast I have.
That has nothing to do with my post, but thanks for sharing... I guess.
The Prince

Phillipsburg, NJ

#283845 Feb 14, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Its all in the wording. A woman could be severly depressed.
This is why they keep trying to pass laws, so thet may obtain their ultimate goal of abortion on demand at any stage.
You are doing a great job. Thankless but great just the same. These proabortion pagans will soon start pretending you no longer exist. Foomuffchew or one of the other of her klan will say something about you being a troll and they will go on as though you have proved nothing to them.

I have schooled them all on a few occassions and now they act like I don't exist. That is how it works. Or they will work together to ban you, another of there witchy ways. Your statements about God and life and the unborn child are rejected by these pagans. If they were to accept any of your premise, their entire belief system would collapse.

You must realize they all were once Christian women who were damaged early in life. They are hurt and angry. They lash out at Faith and most men. They embrcaed paganism and the freedom from responsibility it gives them. All you can reeally do at the end of the day is pray for their eternal soul.

Gods Bless!
The Prince

Phillipsburg, NJ

#283846 Feb 14, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
No actually you didn't. Your first response was to claim it was a stupid question, and your second didn't address the question at all.
3rd time's the charm with you apparently. Pity it takes calling you on your stupidity to get you to answer a simple question.
<quoted text>
"it would be" what? Murder? Sorry, no, its not. Never has been, never will be.
<quoted text>
So lets make sure we understand you correctly - "when its in its earliest stages (days or a week or two for instance)" and its in the womb, it IS a baby then - correct?
But when its in a test tube its not - right?
But the SECOND it goes from that test tube to the woman's womb, it MAGICALLY becomes a baby THEN huh?
@@
<quoted text>
ROFLAMO Uh no. IVF is NOT "under scientific study" you idiot.
<quoted text>
BWAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA!! ! Nobody asked you about anything "developed 8-10 weeks" - saline is not used in abortions (hasn't been for decades now) and nothing is torn apart in an 8-10 week abortion you hyperbolic bullshitter.
<quoted text>
Clear enough to let everyone know you have no rational answer to what was a VERY simple question.
Carry on freak.
"and nothing is torn apart in an 8-10 week abortion you hyperbolic bullshitter."

A tiny beating human heart is torn apart.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#283847 Feb 14, 2013
The Prince wrote:
<quoted text>
You are doing a great job. Thankless but great just the same. These proabortion pagans will soon start pretending you no longer exist. Foomuffchew or one of the other of her klan will say something about you being a troll and they will go on as though you have proved nothing to them.
I have schooled them all on a few occassions and now they act like I don't exist. That is how it works. Or they will work together to ban you, another of there witchy ways. Your statements about God as d life and the unborn child are rejected by these pagans. If they were to accept any of your premise, their entire belief system would collapse.
You must realize they all were once Christian women who were damaged early in life. They are hurt and angry. They lash out at Faith and most men. They embrcaed paganism and the freedom from responsibility it gives them. All you can reeally do at the end of the day is pray for their eternal soul.
Gods Bless!
If you have discussed anything with me, it wasn't as "The Prince." You can't accuse us of anything when we don't know who you are.
Anonymous

United States

#283850 Feb 14, 2013
The Prince wrote:
<quoted text>
Slavery was leagl. if you were living then, would you have supported the legal right to own a slave?
Think for once! Try and think!
Yes! This is the point, I was wishing they would see, but if they did, they didn't aknowledge it.

Many things have been legal, but it was still very much wrong.

Thanks for your other post as well. They do try to discredit any that disagree with them, or try and make them out to be a liar.

No matter what any of us say on this topic or in life, our hearts know the truth, and so does God.
It is that some of us need a new heart :)
Anonymous

United States

#283851 Feb 14, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>That has nothing to do with my post, but thanks for sharing... I guess.
Thank you :)

I don't think calling abortion a ok moral choice is "ok ", but saying that most are an bad moral choice would be fit.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#283853 Feb 14, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you :)
I don't think calling abortion a ok moral choice is "ok ", but saying that most are an bad moral choice would be fit.
I said that abortion is a moral right. You're speaking of something different and you don't even know it. You're funny.
Ocean56

AOL

#283854 Feb 14, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
Its all in the wording. A woman could be severly depressed.
I guess you have never heard of POST PARTUM DEPRESSION? Women have been known to become very depressed AFTER they have had a baby.

In any case, it is still a fact that the only person to decide whether or not to continue a pregnancy is the WOMAN who is pregnant. If it isn't YOUR pregnancy, it isn't your decision. Simple as that.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#283855 Feb 14, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes! This is the point, I was wishing they would see, but if they did, they didn't aknowledge it.
Many things have been legal, but it was still very much wrong.
Thanks for your other post as well. They do try to discredit any that disagree with them, or try and make them out to be a liar.
No matter what any of us say on this topic or in life, our hearts know the truth, and so does God.
It is that some of us need a new heart :)
For someone who professes to be honest and humble, you are decidedly neither. You do what you accuse of others, but are offended when treated the same. That's pretty hypocritical.
Ocean56

AOL

#283856 Feb 14, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
If both women were waiting to have abortions, they weren't far along enough in their pregnancies for there to be a fetal homicide charge. The rest of your post is just your personal opinion. Your opinion isn't relevant to anyone's pregnancy but your own.
Exactly. And since "Gtown" is a guy, he never has to worry about going through a pregnancy himself, so he has NO idea what a woman may have to suffer due to the medical issues of pregnancy.

Judging from some of his posts, it really seems to upset him that women can have sex and NOT want to get or stay pregnant. He has also made it clear what he thinks of women who don't ever want children. He believes they should be punished with lifetime celibacy because they have chosen NOT to procreate. Too bad for him, that ISN'T going to happen.
Obskeptic

Livonia, MI

#283857 Feb 14, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>No saline is used and at 8-10 weeks, nothing is torn apart.
Your in denial elise, and obviously failed to watch the video I linked too that shows the little hands and feet being removed with forceps in pieces. Deny reality all you want. It only emphasizes that you don't know, and don't know you don't know. Here is another "little" sample of the abortionists work that makes you feel so righteous and comforted.
http://www.circleofprayer.com/abortion-pictur...
Obskeptic

Livonia, MI

#283858 Feb 14, 2013
The Prince wrote:
<quoted text>
You are doing a great job. Thankless but great just the same. These proabortion pagans will soon start pretending you no longer exist. Foomuffchew or one of the other of her klan will say something about you being a troll and they will go on as though you have proved nothing to them.
I have schooled them all on a few occassions and now they act like I don't exist. That is how it works. Or they will work together to ban you, another of there witchy ways. Your statements about God and life and the unborn child are rejected by these pagans. If they were to accept any of your premise, their entire belief system would collapse.
You must realize they all were once Christian women who were damaged early in life. They are hurt and angry. They lash out at Faith and most men. They embrcaed paganism and the freedom from responsibility it gives them. All you can reeally do at the end of the day is pray for their eternal soul.
Gods Bless!
Thats because ignorant liberals go straight to the bully tactic of shutting down the debate or calling you juvenile names when their argument fails to persuade. They only embrace the freedom of their speech, and the rights that they declare are legitimate. If you disagree, your speech must be silenced, or ignored, or the source needs to be eliminated.
feces for jesus

Bellmore, NY

#283859 Feb 14, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are not making a very good point choosing those verses, but let us look at them. Isaiah 30:26 says : the light of the moon shall be as the light of the sun, and the light of the sun shall be sevenfold, as the light of seven days.
"It seems to me, that the brighter the sun is, the brighter the moon will be.
Isaiah 13:10 says : the sun shall be darkened in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine.
Again, it looks to me, that if the sun is dark, then so is the moon.
Both verses seem to indicate that the moons light depends on the sun.
Brighter the sun -brighter the moon.
Darker the sun -darker the moon.
You can try all you wish, but this is a sad attempt to discredit Gods Word.
"the moon shall not cause her light to shine" indicates the moon has it's own light. Of course you're always right when it comes to deciding what the bible means.
SapphireBlue

Orlando, FL

#283861 Feb 14, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Your in denial elise, and obviously failed to watch the video I linked too that shows the little hands and feet being removed with forceps in pieces. Deny reality all you want. It only emphasizes that you don't know, and don't know you don't know. Here is another "little" sample of the abortionists work that makes you feel so righteous and comforted.
http://www.circleofprayer.com/abortion-pictur...
Vacuum aspiration is commonly used until the 12th week of pregnancy. After anesthesia, a suction pump is inserted through the cervix into the uterus to vacuum out a developing fetus.

About as civilized as chopping it up and removing it piece by piece.
SapphireBlue

Orlando, FL

#283862 Feb 14, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
"the moon shall not cause her light to shine" indicates the moon has it's own light. Of course you're always right when it comes to deciding what the bible means.
The prophesy says "immediately after the distress of those days, the sun will be darkened and the moon will not give its light."

The moon's light is the reflection of the sun. So it makes perfect sense.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#283863 Feb 14, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Is the Jewish faith against abortion, as it stands now?
As I've posted before and you've ignored, this is the OFFICAL view of the American Jewish Congress.

Dear Friends,
Did you know that abortion can be a religious requirement? Not just
permitted, but required!
In some religious traditions, if the fetus endangers the life of the
mother, abortion is not a matter of choice; it is mandatory!
The conflict over abortion is not between "secularists" and "religionists,"
between "moral" people who value life and "immoral" people who do
not, but between different moral traditions, different understandings of
the sacredness of life.
According to some religious traditions, the sacredness of life can be
diminished far more by callousness to those already born than to the unborn,
however precious their promise.
These religious traditions believe that the sacredness of life requires
in some circumstances that the woman's well-being takes precedence over
that of the fetus.
Legislation that denies a woman's choice is objectionable not because
it limits some abstract notion of unrestrained freedom, but because it may
inflict irreparable damage to the human dignity of the woman who is carrying
the fetus.
Judaism affirms that nascent life has great value.
But it is not the only value.
In the face of the kind of desperation that drives women to risk their
lives and mutilate their bodies rather than carry the fetus to term, no one
has the right to say that other conflicting values do not exist.
When faced with such conflicting values, individuals should be able
to turn to their own moral traditions or religious faith for guidance.
Government has no business preempting that very personal process,
leaving women trapped without a choice.
We do not propose that a particular religious view of abortion find
expression in legislation. That would be violating someone else's religious
freedom. And many people's moral choices regarding abortion are deeply
personal, and not determined by any particular religious tradition.
In the face of such great moral and religious diversity, the proper role
of government in a free society is to allow different traditions to advocate
their respective views, and to leave the decision to the woman, answering
to God and to her conscience.
This

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 2 min Limbertwig 186,098
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 min red and right 191,992
News Why the Confederate flag flies in SC 4 min RayOne 2,032
News Marriage equality good for Missourians 7 min QUITTNER Jul 2 2015 2
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min shinningelectr0n 1,250,633
News Polygamous Montana trio applies for wedding lic... 8 min Novus Ordo Seclorum 20
News 'You can't have marriage equality without polyg... 10 min david traversa 9
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 11 min - Lady Liberty - 332,487
News Ukraine Crisis Facts Bring Discord to U.S. Migh... 15 min Novus Ordo Seclorum 929
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 1 hr red and right 168,613
More from around the web