Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 326323 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#270111 Dec 15, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Trust you and No Relevance to use this tragedy for your agenda. You're disgusting.
Your libturd ilk are exploiting the situation to politicize gun control, rather than the value of human life.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#270112 Dec 15, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Your libturd ilk are exploiting the situation to politicize gun control, rather than the value of human life.
I saw no one here do that. YOU and Stupid Sassy are the only ones on here that are exploiting the situation. And it's disgusting. You are both truly ugly inside.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#270113 Dec 15, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's what you guys refuse to see or acknowledge. A lot of you are no different than that selfish gunman shooting elementary-aged kids right before Christmas.
It doesn't matter you think your way is better. It doesn't matter you think you have all the answers. It does matter that you want to override the individual's decision with your form of "Christianity" regardless of what others want or their civil rights to believe in something different. It does matter you try to equate what's legal with what's illegal.
Not one of you has offered sincere condolences for this tragedy. But you have tried to use it to your advantage. And I find that disgusting.
Katie: A lot of you are no different than that selfish gunman shooting elementary-aged kids right before Christmas.

It is you who supports and promotes the intentional killing of small human beings, not us.

You made a blatantly stupid statement. Self-incriminating, to boot.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#270114 Dec 15, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Your libturd ilk are exploiting the situation to politicize gun control, rather than the value of human life.
By the way, I'm not a liberal, I personally own guns, and I disagree that more gun laws would have helped in this situation.

So, keep your assumptions to yourself.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#270115 Dec 15, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
But gestation has never been guaranteed. So until or unless you get around this biological fact, you've got nothing on women who choose to terminate unwanted or unhealthy pregnancies.
Katie: But gestation has never been guaranteed.

The parents sending their children to school yesterday wasn't guaranteed, either.

Your "gestation has never been guaranteed" has never had any merit as an "excuse" to intentionally kill defenseless human beings, and never will.

Van der Sloot
Common Sense

Newaygo, MI

#270116 Dec 15, 2012
Sure get rid of the baby if it's going to be inconvient but why not wait untill you see how it's going to work out. Just say they died in their sleep the law needs to understand that and overlook how a woman or man handle the things in their lives that are inconvient. A woman should be able to handle that chore once a baby is born and cut all that profit to the Dr's, health wise it's much safer for the mother.

“Make time ”

Since: Sep 09

for contemplation

#270117 Dec 15, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
First, I'm not upset at all. Second, it was a mention that it is confusing to the children when parents don't agree. It's confusing to children when one parent says a kid can do something and another says no. Raising children is easier when parents figure things out together and present a united front.
Ink, it's only confusing if there's a tug of war. Usually one parent has more control (in this case your daughter) when it comes to religious instruction. The fact that your s-i-l doesn't buy it, doesn't mean he's doing anything to interfere. OR is he?

So what if Daddy doesn't go to Mass and doesn't pray. They may grow up feeling sorry for all that he's missing. Or not. Hard to predict.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#270118 Dec 15, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
There's your problem, NR, and it's YOUR problem, nobody else's. You choose to make a false comparison and then expect everyone to believe you're correct.
Comparing the civil rights to determining one's own pregnancy to a mass school shooting is irresponsible, at best, or downright deceitful, at worst.
I know what I believe about you ... and it's not the "at best" scenario.
Katie, you become more delusional by the day. YOU are the "evil" in society mentioned when the Newtown shootings are discussed.

I pity you.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#270119 Dec 15, 2012
zef wrote:
<quoted text>
Since women are allowed to kill their babies with abortion if they don't want their baby in their body. Shouldn't I be allowed to have the colon restriction devices that I am being tortured with removed, since I don't want feces festering inside my body?
Ask your mommy to make you a Brown Cow. That'll fix you right up.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#270120 Dec 15, 2012
Junket wrote:
<quoted text>
Ink, it's only confusing if there's a tug of war. Usually one parent has more control (in this case your daughter) when it comes to religious instruction. The fact that your s-i-l doesn't buy it, doesn't mean he's doing anything to interfere. OR is he?
So what if Daddy doesn't go to Mass and doesn't pray. They may grow up feeling sorry for all that he's missing. Or not. Hard to predict.
Most of the time it is okay just as you say.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#270121 Dec 15, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Your poop device is artificial. Preborn babies naturally exist where they are supposed to be. Pregnancy is how mankind was created to procreate.
Conversely, no M.D. is going to rip out your intestines at your request because you no longer want to poop. M.D.'s realize pooping is natural & how mankind was created to rid waste.
I must admit, you are full of sh*t. Your poop restriction devices are working well.
It always comes down to the plumbing.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#270122 Dec 15, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
There are more non religious than Buddhists in the world.
Awesome!
zef

Los Angeles, CA

#270123 Dec 15, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
The gibberish was all yours, Stupid Sassy.
Your misstating of my position is duly noted.
You're still the disgusting one who is using these children to attack people.
Since slavery was abolished, the sadistic tyrants that are in control use these children as an excuse for torturing to death those they think of as useless slaves.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#270124 Dec 15, 2012
zef wrote:
<quoted text>
Since slavery was abolished, the sadistic tyrants that are in control use these children as an excuse for torturing to death those they think of as useless slaves.
Oh, go shove your paranoid delusions up your ass. They'll be good company for the imaginary device you keep saying is there.
Katie

Seattle, WA

#270125 Dec 15, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree. These so-called Christians are disgusting opportunistic vultures.

Even SassyJM rang the bell comparing the incomparable. What is wrong with them they would equate upholding civil rights to a guy who draws a gun on kids at school? On is own mother? Are they so fetus-focused that is all they see? Only the fetus? Have they forgotten or did they ever know the fetus is only ONE aspect of a varied law aimed at neither forcing nor allowing force to be part of a pregnant woman's individual decision to remain pregnant or not.
Katie

Seattle, WA

#270126 Dec 15, 2012
Kathwynn wrote:
<quoted text>
No, skanky, the real question is how blind are you people.
We weep over the murder of children and adults in crime that is both heinous and barbaric.
You weep over a medical procedure that is none of your business.
Exactly, KW.
zef

Los Angeles, CA

#270127 Dec 15, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Cpeter: There are no devices; you're just full of shit.
_____
You may need an anal retention device someday. It may get in the way of other activities in the lifestyle you've chosen.
Anal Incontinence disease treatement device:
http://www.google.co.ve/patents/US20030092962
* Gerbils not included
In america the sadistic tyrants that are in control use those devices to torture their victims to death.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#270128 Dec 15, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Even SassyJM rang the bell comparing the incomparable. What is wrong with them they would equate upholding civil rights to a guy who draws a gun on kids at school? On is own mother? Are they so fetus-focused that is all they see? Only the fetus? Have they forgotten or did they ever know the fetus is only ONE aspect of a varied law aimed at neither forcing nor allowing force to be part of a pregnant woman's individual decision to remain pregnant or not.
Well said!
Katie

Seattle, WA

#270129 Dec 15, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you explain it better.
If you didn't see it when Bit wrote it and you didn't see it when I wrote it ("...how the different facets are viewed"), why would I assume you'd see it the third time around? I *did* put the gist of it in this answer, though, so I guess we'll see if you get it or not.

(do you resemble the Chrissy side of Suzanne Somers?)
zef

Los Angeles, CA

#270130 Dec 15, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Even SassyJM rang the bell comparing the incomparable. What is wrong with them they would equate upholding civil rights to a guy who draws a gun on kids at school? On is own mother? Are they so fetus-focused that is all they see? Only the fetus? Have they forgotten or did they ever know the fetus is only ONE aspect of a varied law aimed at neither forcing nor allowing force to be part of a pregnant woman's individual decision to remain pregnant or not.
Fetus is how mature an individual is. How is my individual decision not to be tortured with the colon restriction devices I never gave anyone permission to put in my body, any different than a pregnant woman's individual decision to remain pregnant or not.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News GOP at war with itself (Mar '16) 3 min TdcClv 4,274
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min VetnorsGate 1,682,694
News Leaders say Trump presidency is at odds with ML... 4 min Lawrence Wolf 196
News Major shift as Trump opens way for Medicaid wor... 6 min Sandra 129
News 'Undocumented' but inspiring (Nov '12) 7 min Greyhound Southbound 116
News Bipartisan deal would create 12-year citizenshi... 14 min DR X 168
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 21 min Liberal Sillies 52,168
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 2 hr davy 17,396
News Oprah speech has Democrats buzzing about possib... 2 hr Doe 584
More from around the web