Poland calls for larger US military p...

Poland calls for larger US military presence in eastern Europe

There are 49 comments on the South China Morning Post story from Mar 22, 2014, titled Poland calls for larger US military presence in eastern Europe. In it, South China Morning Post reports that:

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk and Defence Minister Tomasz Siemoniak during a meeting with US Vice President Joe Biden in Warsaw, Poland.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at South China Morning Post.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#22 Mar 26, 2014
Russia isn't going to invade Poland..
what kind of idiot would even entertain that idea?
Dubya Tee Eff

Webster, MA

#23 Mar 26, 2014
foster wrote:
<quoted text>
How much more in taxes are you willing to pay in support of arming Poland?
Why not send a direst contribution to Poland?
Much more than Im willing to support countries like Pakistan and Syria. Do you feel we have already paid too much and what is the right amount in your mind?
Dubya Tee Eff

Webster, MA

#24 Mar 26, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:
Russia isn't going to invade Poland..
what kind of idiot would even entertain that idea?
I dont think that is the point. I think Poland is using Russia's recent agressions as a way to get the US to rush that Missle System they are all excited about.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#25 Mar 26, 2014
Dubya Tee Eff wrote:
<quoted text>Afghanistan, Albania, Angola, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Mongolia, Netherlands, Nicaragua, Palau, Panama, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Singapore, Slovakia, Solomon Islands, South Korea, Spain, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States, Uzbekistan...
Not one industrial nation huh? Do you just lie for the sake of lying or are you just so blindly biased to realize that you are completely uninformed?
bush had the backing of pretty much the whole world for the war against global terrorism and he pissed that away to fight his personal war. that is what his legacy is for ever...worst, decision. ever.
foster

Ashburn, VA

#26 Mar 26, 2014
Dubya Tee Eff wrote:
<quoted text>Much more than Im willing to support countries like Pakistan and Syria. Do you feel we have already paid too much and what is the right amount in your mind?
not one red nickle. what Putin does in Europe is not our problem. These people been cannibals since the dark ages

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#27 Mar 26, 2014
Dubya Tee Eff wrote:
<quoted text>Much more than Im willing to support countries like Pakistan and Syria. Do you feel we have already paid too much and what is the right amount in your mind?
i don't know...what do you think is the right price to keep their nukes out of the hands of some of the most crazy religious cult freaks on this planet..
(Outside the 700 club, of course...)
foster

Ashburn, VA

#28 Mar 26, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>bush had the backing of pretty much the whole world for the war against global terrorism and he pissed that away to fight his personal war. that is what his legacy is for ever...worst, decision. ever.
Bush chased a personal vendetta in Iraq and killed his credibility in the world
foster

Ashburn, VA

#29 Mar 26, 2014
Dubya Tee Eff wrote:
<quoted text>I dont think that is the point. I think Poland is using Russia's recent agressions as a way to get the US to rush that Missle System they are all excited about.
initially Poland rrejected the system. Putin actions changed their minds. still with what funding?
Dubya Tee Eff

Webster, MA

#30 Mar 26, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>bush had the backing of pretty much the whole world for the war against global terrorism and he pissed that away to fight his personal war. that is what his legacy is for ever...worst, decision. ever.
So are any of these "industrial" nations like foster claimed they weren't? That was my point. Bush was a bone head. I think thats pretty obvious but we dont need to lie to prove it. There is PLENTY of evidence out there.

foster got caught in yet another biased and bigoted LIE and is avoiding it.
foster

Ashburn, VA

#31 Mar 26, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>i don't know...what do you think is the right price to keep their nukes out of the hands of some of the most crazy religious cult freaks on this planet..
(Outside the 700 club, of course...)
Obama was working with Purtin to disarm Syria. its Pakastan thats the issue. Al Qadea subject to over throw both Govts
Dubya Tee Eff

Webster, MA

#32 Mar 26, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>i don't know...what do you think is the right price to keep their nukes out of the hands of some of the most crazy religious cult freaks on this planet..
(Outside the 700 club, of course...)
According to foster, not one "red nickle". Why dont you take it up with him? He obviously has the world in his pocket and the answers to all. I was simply pointing out his blatant idiocy.

I think what we pay into the UN by ways of $$$/troops/equipment is enough. Hell, it could be argued that we pay too much. t some point Europe has to deal with Russia but at the same time nukes are a global issue and can not be ignored. Though it really pisses me off that we send $$$ to countries that hate us while we have kids and veterans out on the streets of our own country starving and homeless. Its gotta balance out at some point right?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#33 Mar 26, 2014
Dubya Tee Eff wrote:
<quoted text>I dont think that is the point. I think Poland is using Russia's recent agressions as a way to get the US to rush that Missle System they are all excited about.
why would they want to pay for an ABM system that doesn't work?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#34 Mar 26, 2014
foster wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama was working with Purtin to disarm Syria. its Pakastan thats the issue. Al Qadea subject to over throw both Govts
yes, i was clearly talking about Pakistan.

syria does not have nukes...
Force

London, UK

#35 Mar 26, 2014
foster wrote:
<quoted text>
not one red nickle. what Putin does in Europe is not our problem. These people been cannibals since the dark ages
That's exactly correct. What happens in Europe is none of America's business. Who needs to see bible thumping inbreds running around dictating what Europe's policies should be. Biden and the neocon arms industry should gtf out of Poland.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#36 Mar 26, 2014
Force wrote:
<quoted text>
That's exactly correct. What happens in Europe is none of America's business. Who needs to see bible thumping inbreds running around dictating what Europe's policies should be. Biden and the neocon arms industry should gtf out of Poland.
ummm...as a NATO member..and the one paying the vast, vast majority of the bills for NATO and doing most of the heavy lifting and actual accomplishments of the whole group...uh, yeah, it really is.

cut us a check for all the past expenses and we'll stay here and rock on the front porch in retirement..
Brad

Bolton, CT

#37 Mar 26, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:
Russia isn't going to invade Poland..
what kind of idiot would even entertain that idea?
Ask Poland why they're suddenly,"beefing up,"their missile defense programs.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#38 Mar 26, 2014
Dubya Tee Eff wrote:
<quoted text>According to foster, not one "red nickle". Why dont you take it up with him? He obviously has the world in his pocket and the answers to all. I was simply pointing out his blatant idiocy.
I think what we pay into the UN by ways of $$$/troops/equipment is enough. Hell, it could be argued that we pay too much. t some point Europe has to deal with Russia but at the same time nukes are a global issue and can not be ignored. Though it really pisses me off that we send $$$ to countries that hate us while we have kids and veterans out on the streets of our own country starving and homeless. Its gotta balance out at some point right?
why do you keep pawning the4 sue off on him?

obviously it isn't enough...we need to keep stability in Pakistan, as shitty as that govt is,or take over the whole place...which do you think is cheaper? the Un isn't going to do that...

there is no way at all that those crazy MF's in Paki can get hold of those nukes...
foster

Ashburn, VA

#39 Mar 26, 2014
Dubya Tee Eff wrote:
<quoted text>According to foster, not one "red nickle". Why dont you take it up with him? He obviously has the world in his pocket and the answers to all. I was simply pointing out his blatant idiocy.
I think what we pay into the UN by ways of $$$/troops/equipment is enough. Hell, it could be argued that we pay too much. t some point Europe has to deal with Russia but at the same time nukes are a global issue and can not be ignored. Though it really pisses me off that we send $$$ to countries that hate us while we have kids and veterans out on the streets of our own country starving and homeless. Its gotta balance out at some point right?
We keep Pakistan fuse cool. That is cost enough.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#40 Mar 26, 2014
foster wrote:
<quoted text>
How much more in taxes are you willing to pay in support of arming Poland?
Why not send a direst contribution to Poland?
how does that further the military/ industrial/ congressional complex of the US?
foster

Ashburn, VA

#41 Mar 26, 2014
Dubya Tee Eff wrote:
<quoted text>Afghanistan, Albania, Angola, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Mongolia, Netherlands, Nicaragua, Palau, Panama, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Singapore, Slovakia, Solomon Islands, South Korea, Spain, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States, Uzbekistan...
Not one industrial nation huh? Do you just lie for the sake of lying or are you just so blindly biased to realize that you are completely uninformed?
Britian, Japan and Italy, neither committed fighting Troops. NATO & UN refused support

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News As anger over election of Donald Trump erupts, ... 1 min welfare check losers 4,857
News Being conservative is not being racist 1 min Barros chingon 53
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... (May '16) 1 min Dumass_Rick 18,173
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 min TRUMPTRUMPTRUMP 234,416
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 1 min Trump failed Us 409,542
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min SobieskiSavedEurope 1,482,782
News Trump's repeated claim that he won a 'landslide... 2 min U R A Know Nothing 3,756
News Actors, mayors rally at inauguration eve Trump ... 1 hr Mothra 67
More from around the web