Thug Playing Knockout Game Targets Wrong Michigan Man - Is Shot Twice

Full story: Gateway Pundit

Feel Good Story of the Day: A Lansing, Michigan man with a concealed weapons permit uses his gun to shoot the "knockout game" attacker.
Comments
1 - 20 of 153 Comments Last updated Dec 15, 2013
First Prev
of 8
Next Last
shakey

Warrenville, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Nov 22, 2013
 

Judged:

2

good....glad someone was able to knockout this savage.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Nov 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Mess with the bull, and you get the horn.
Kudishy

Las Vegas, NV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Nov 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

SatanRules wrote:
<quoted text>
your kind of horn
http://imageshack.us/a/img690/7515/081508pump...
I buggered your momma 4 times last night. She kept referring to it as your birth canal.
SatanRules

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Nov 23, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

3

Kudishy wrote:
<quoted text>I buggered your momma 4 times last night. She kept referring to it as your birth canal.
that's all right, your sister was swallowing one of my many loads....kiss her and see if you can taste me...
SatanRules

Phoenix, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Nov 23, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

by the way, your sister's poop is delicious...
2ndAmRight

Winter Park, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Nov 23, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

SatanRules wrote:
by the way, your sister's poop is delicious...
not as good as some of the co,cks I have sucked on.
SatanRules

Las Vegas, NV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Nov 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
not as good as some of the co,cks I have sucked on.
Bet I've sucked on more!!!! Even sp0cko, dan the woman, barefoot and larrywolfie combined haven't sucked as many as me!
SatanAlmighty

New York, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Nov 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Satan Almighty wrote:
<quoted text>
bet Marauder and 2ndAmright can suck a golf ball out of your rec-tum....
Bet I can too!! I love sloppy seconds and cream pies on the set of gay pornos!!

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Satan Almighty wrote:
<quoted text>
nah, Marauder is the best ...that's why the homeless love him..
Take a hike, sewer rat.

"Here, then, every man,--whether native or naturalized, whether free or bond--for the provision comprehended every class and colour--every man capable of shouldering a musket, was required to be trained and armed, by our present Constitution; and the proposed to it, designates the militia as only to be for defence, and in this view Blackstone himself regarded the militia. The very second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, previous to which several of the States had refused to come into the compact, he begged to recommend to the attention of his friend from Allegheny,(Mr. Forward)--"a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Mark the admirable adaption of the language. There is said (Mr. I) an argument in it more than I could make in a year, all condensed. A regulated right of every man, to do what? To hear arms--and the Constitution says this right to bear arms "shall not be infringed." This "well regulated militia," which is "necessary to the security of a free State" is the right of every man to bear arms, and it is a right which "shall not be infringed." And when his friend from Allegheny said at first,(as he had understood him,) that the federal power absorbed all the rights of the states on this subject, he (.Mr I) confessed that he had felt himself excited almost to pugnacity. This right exceeded, was beyond the reach of the federal Constitution--it was supreme, above the supremacy of the Constitution--it was a right which the Constitution could not touch. It was nothing less than man's right to self defence, that power which could not be impaired by any power of government."

- Mr. Charles Jared Ingersoll, Oct. 24, 1837, PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE CONVENTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, TO PROPOSE AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION, COMMENCED AT HARRISBURG MAY 2 1837 VOL. IV. Reported by JOHN AGG, Stenographer: Assisted By Messrs. Wheeler, Kingman, Draks, and McKinley. HARRISBURG: PRINTED BY PACKER, BARRETT, And PARKE. 1838.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

2ndAmRight wrote:
Oct. 24, 1837
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Does this sound familiar, GayDavyQ?
2ndAmRight wrote:
I'm not the one stuck in the 1800's troll, >you< are.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Nov 24, 2013
 
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Does this sound familiar, GayDavyQ?
<quoted text>
Big difference between quoting actual historical precedent. And spewing forth twisted lies, such as what >you< do,'shug'. If you had the capability to think, then perhaps you'd realize that fact.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Big difference between quoting actual historical precedent.
Quoting something from 200 years ago doesn't make in "precedent", Sweet Pea.

Especially when SCOTUS throws your "precedent" into the garbage.
"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.[United States v.] Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons."
Justice Scalia
This Century
Speaking for the majority
Heller Decision
from the Supreme Court of the United States

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Quoting something from 200 years ago doesn't make in "precedent", Sweet Pea.
Especially when SCOTUS throws your "precedent" into the garbage.
<quoted text>
Justice Scalia
This Century
Speaking for the majority
Heller Decision
from the Supreme Court of the United States
Hardly, troll:

"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed."

"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is PARAMOUNT to ALL positive forms of government ... The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms..."--Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers No. 28.

And:

"...Little more can reasonably be aimed at, with respect to the people at large, than to have them properly armed and equipped .... but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the USE OF ARMS, who stand ready to defend their own rights, and those of their fellow citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army; and the best possible security against it, if it should exist."--Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist No. 29, Independent Journal, Wednesday, January 9, 1788.

And in regard to the authority of the Federalist:

"The opinion of the Federalist has always been considered as of great authority. It is a complete commentary on our Constitution; and is appealed to by all parties in the questions to which that instrument has given birth. Its intrinsic merit entitles it to this high rank; and the part two of its authors performed in framing the constitution, put it very much in their power to explain the views with which it was framed..."--Chief Justice John Marshall, U.S. Supreme Court, Cohens v. Virginia (1821).

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

2ndAmRight wrote:
(1821).
Flagged for the spam you insist you never post...
2ndAmRight wrote:
I'm not the one stuck in the 1800's troll, >you< are.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

2ndAmRight wrote:
--Alexander Hamilton
the flaming queen.

Wipe your chin, dear.

He was also a monarchist.

And he knew the difference between slander and libel, shug.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Flagged for the spam you insist you never post...
<quoted text>
It is very convenient that you are flagging your own posts as spam, troll. For that makes it a little easier for the rest of us.

“Come and get it! ”

Since: Jan 09

Traverse City

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

The perpetrator was a black guy. Imagine that...

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Nov 25, 2013
 
Satan Almighty wrote:
<quoted text>
and you are still beating your meat with 200 year old nonsense...
More like I'm slapping you LIE-berals in the face with the FACTS. And enjoying every minute of it.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

2ndAmRight wrote:
It is very convenient that you are flagging your own posts as spam.
Wipe your chin, Troll.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
More like I'm slapping you LIE-berals .
Funny how your the one dripping DNA you COC-zucker.

The only thing you are slapping is your tiny monkey.

Delaware was a slave state, Shug.
SLANDER is speech, Sweetie Pie.
Alexander H. Stephens was a slave owner, GumsShow.
“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” FAKE QUOTE, Shug.

Wipe your chin, dear.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 8
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 8 min Cheech the Conser... 255,640
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 9 min John Galt 1,099,463
The latest on damaging earthquake in California 12 min Sneaky Pete 14
Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 12 min Brian_G 305,438
Who do you side with in Ferguson? 13 min Ramsey 1,451
Texas law professor calls for repeal of Second ... (Nov '13) 15 min Aquarius-WY 10,238
Supreme Court: Was gay marriage settled in 1972... 17 min DNF 409
Teen's Shooting Highlights Racial Tension 20 min Colbert 1,305
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 30 min Limbertwig 151,034
New fear: What happens in Ferguson if no charges? 1 hr boo ya 235
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

US News People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••