Supreme Court won't hear Planned Pare...

Supreme Court won't hear Planned Parenthood funding case

There are 854 comments on the CBS News story from May 28, 2013, titled Supreme Court won't hear Planned Parenthood funding case. In it, CBS News reports that:

The Supreme Court will not disturb a lower court ruling that blocks Indiana's effort to strip Medicaid funds from Planned Parenthood because the organization performs abortions among its medical services.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS News.

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#377 Jun 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
In a debate, precision is necessary, especially with words that can mean more than one thing. You don't want to be precise, that's clear. You may keep using the word, and I will keep pointing out that you really mean fertilization. It's that simple.
OR.....you may be trying to cloud the real issue by trying to 'distort' the true meaning of the word to begin with....

“I am the red pill!”

Since: Nov 07

Bronx NY

#378 Jun 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Then perhaps you should stop making them.
I don’t make ignorant posts I just respond to them…I do admit that your comparisons are so bizarre its hard to get a handle on them…you have a gift of mixing lies with truth and ignorance an the obvious, and your twisting it so it makes sense to you…
But no matter how many twists you put in a circle you always come back to the beginning…

Fetus=baby
Abortion =murder

So when you finish funning the chicane you will come back to those facts…

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#379 Jun 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Because "human being" is a religious/philosophical designation, not a biological one.
If a fetus is being gestated inside a human, then it's human.
O.M.G....you are 'now' going to actually try tp debate that we are 'human beings'????

The fact that a human heart is beating means a 'human being' is alive....

noun

1. any individual of the genus Homo, especially a member of the species Homo sapiens.

2. a person, especially as distinguished from other animals or as representing the human species: living conditions not fit for human beings; a very generous human being.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#380 Jun 6, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
OR.....you may be trying to cloud the real issue by trying to 'distort' the true meaning of the word to begin with....
LOL, the only distorting here is being done by you. I gave you the link to the medical definition. In talking about medical subjects, the medical language is pertinent.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#381 Jun 6, 2013
Bob J 1440 wrote:
<quoted text>
"I don’t make ignorant posts I just respond to them…"

This is a lie right here. You've made many ignorant posts.

"I do admit that your comparisons are so bizarre its hard to get a handle on them…you have a gift of mixing lies with truth and ignorance an the obvious, and your twisting it so it makes sense to you…"

No, this is also a lie.

"But no matter how many twists you put in a circle you always come back to the beginning…"

The twists are your own.

"Fetus=baby"

You will not find a dictionary that defines a fetus as a baby.

"Abortion =murder"

No, it does not equate.

"So when you finish funning the chicane you will come back to those facts…"

Since they are not facts at all, you are quite wrong, and this post is just another in a long line of ignorant posts from you. As I said, if you have a problem with ignorance, educate yourself.

“I am the red pill!”

Since: Nov 07

Bronx NY

#382 Jun 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, no, sorry. YOU are the delusional liar here, not I.
And I'm THRILLED that I disgust someone like you. If such a lunatic liar approved of me, I'd have to wonder what I was doing wrong.
You must belong to the flat earth society…no flat head society…your thrilled that you’re disgusting…how sad…you should be thrilled to have an opportunity to learn something!

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#383 Jun 6, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
"You're" in my face??? When did 'that' happen??...
I wasn't 'whining' about anything...YOU are the one whining about 'your hurt widdle feewings'....so take your own advice...
No one is 'attacking' you...you just can't stand up like an adult to opposition...
Ah...so this "ducking" and "dodging" were just imaginary...or more likely, lies.

Just as I expected. More proof you're a noisy, angry liar.:)

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#384 Jun 6, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
"O.M.G....you are 'now' going to actually try tp debate that we are 'human beings'????"

We who? You and I? No, I agree you and I are both human beings. You're a poor example of one, IMO, but still one. A fetus is not. You're talking about philosophical notions which are matters of opinion, not science. You want to call a fetus a human being, fine, but I won't debate as though such is a fact when it's not.

"The fact that a human heart is beating means a 'human being' is alive...."

I never said the fetus is dead. Stop confusing terms. The fact that it's being gestated inside a human makes it human. I already said so. And the fact that it's alive means it's alive. That has nothing to do with a philosophical opinion about what a "human being" is.

"noun
1. any individual of the genus Homo, especially a member of the species Homo sapiens.
2. a person, especially as distinguished from other animals or as representing the human species: living conditions not fit for human beings; a very generous human being."

The very fact that a fetus is defined as the "unborn" of a vertebrate clearly indicates it is not yet a member of the particular species. That is what I was taught, in science classes that had no agenda as far as the abortion debate.

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#385 Jun 6, 2013
Bob J 1440 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don’t make ignorant posts I just respond to them…I do admit that your comparisons are so bizarre its hard to get a handle on them…you have a gift of mixing lies with truth and ignorance an the obvious, and your twisting it so it makes sense to you…
But no matter how many twists you put in a circle you always come back to the beginning…
Fetus=baby
Abortion =murder
So when you finish funning the chicane you will come back to those facts…
Since neither of those things are true, maybe YOU should provide him with some 'facts' to come back TO?:)

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#386 Jun 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, the only distorting here is being done by you. I gave you the link to the medical definition. In talking about medical subjects, the medical language is pertinent.
..and "I" gave 'you' the info from a website on medical prenatal terminology that confirmed EVERYTHING I said....did you see it?

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#387 Jun 6, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
When's the last time you saw a vet advertise pet abortions??
Yet, you see 'abortion for sale' at every women's clinic....why is that??? That's why the two ar comparable....
I never claimed that "pets" had anything to do with it, idiot. I doubt any vet advertises "pet abortions," and have never heard of such a thing. Why are you deliberately confusing the issue? The two are not "comparable," since pets aren't humans, vets aren't doctors, and vets don't provide abortions.

Provide proof that you ever saw a sign saying "abortion for sale" at ANY women's clinic, liar...

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#388 Jun 6, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah...so this "ducking" and "dodging" were just imaginary...or more likely, lies.
Just as I expected. More proof you're a noisy, angry liar.:)
What proof are you talking about??? The 'proof' that 'you' were the whiner???....

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#389 Jun 6, 2013
Bob J 1440 wrote:
<quoted text>
You must belong to the flat earth society…no flat head society…your thrilled that you’re disgusting…how sad…you should be thrilled to have an opportunity to learn something!
Oh, how typically dishonest of you.

Thank you, for proving you also have no honesty in you.

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#390 Jun 6, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
What proof are you talking about??? The 'proof' that 'you' were the whiner???....
"I KNOW you are but what am I????"

LOL...grow up, bee-yotch.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#391 Jun 6, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
I never claimed that "pets" had anything to do with it, idiot. I doubt any vet advertises "pet abortions," and have never heard of such a thing. Why are you deliberately confusing the issue? The two are not "comparable," since pets aren't humans, vets aren't doctors, and vets don't provide abortions.
Provide proof that you ever saw a sign saying "abortion for sale" at ANY women's clinic, liar...
I have to disagree with you about one point. Vets DO perform abortions on animals. Not all of them, but many. I posted several links that describe the process involved, as well as one to a clinic that offers the service. They just aren't termed "abortions". They're usually called "mismating" and are normally done during a spay of a female animal that got out and mated when the owner was trying to keep them in.

The Fool was just trying to make a comparison that falied, and is now ignoring the facts.

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#392 Jun 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
I have to disagree with you about one point. Vets DO perform abortions on animals. Not all of them, but many. I posted several links that describe the process involved, as well as one to a clinic that offers the service. They just aren't termed "abortions". They're usually called "mismating" and are normally done during a spay of a female animal that got out and mated when the owner was trying to keep them in.
The Fool was just trying to make a comparison that falied, and is now ignoring the facts.
Ah, OK....hadn't heard of the procedure. Of course that's a good description of MOST of Fool's posts...:)

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#393 Jun 6, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, OK....hadn't heard of the procedure. Of course that's a good description of MOST of Fool's posts...:)
Too true :)

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#394 Jun 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
"O.M.G....you are 'now' going to actually try tp debate that we are 'human beings'????"
We who? You and I? No, I agree you and I are both human beings. You're a poor example of one, IMO, but still one. A fetus is not.
Who is the one trying to affirm killing unborn babies as a 'good' thing??? That would be YOU! You are a monster of unmeasurable proportion to believe such a hideous and disgusting practice is a
'good thing'!!!
You're talking about philosophical notions which are matters of opinion, not science. You want to call a fetus a human being, fine, but I won't debate as though such is a fact when it's not.
Ummmmm...it's not philosophical that human beings carry human beings in the womb...what else would we carry??? Kangaroos????

It is also a medical/scientific fact that the human heart beats four weeks after conception....hearts don't beat in 'non'-beings..something has to 'be' to have a heartbeat...

If you have a problem with medical/scientific facts, then you have a problem with living in general...which probably isn't too far off the mark....
"The fact that a human heart is beating means a 'human being' is alive...."
I never said the fetus is dead.
No, you said it's not a real human being...which of course it is...why else would a 'real human heart' be beating if it did not belong to a real human being.
Stop confusing terms. The fact that it's being gestated inside a human makes it human.
Well, at least there is some hope for you....
I already said so. And the fact that it's alive means it's alive. That has nothing to do with a philosophical opinion about what a "human being" is.
Oh dear, we lost her again...I'm not talking philosophy, YOU are...it is medical/scientific fact that we are all human beings...can you read???
"noun
1. any individual of the genus Homo, especially a member of the species Homo sapiens.

2. a person, especially as distinguished from other animals or as representing the human species: living conditions not fit for human beings; a very generous human being."

The very fact that a fetus is defined as the "unborn" of a vertebrate clearly indicates it is not yet a member of the particular species.
LOL! Oh, ok...hold up..let me get this straight...(snicker)

You admit that a 'fetus' of a human being is a 'human' fetus...

You admit that a 'human' fetus has a 'human' heart beating, which means of course that it is a 'real' live 'being', since a non-being would not have a heartbeat (because, again, as we know...hearts don't beat in non-being/inanimate objects)...

But you stop short by saying this is a human being because it is 'unborn' it's has NO particular or specific species orientation....(snicker)

So it could be like...I don't know....a 'monkey' or something, and we just won't know until it is born???(flat out laughing out loud!)
That is what I was taught, in science classes that had no agenda as far as the abortion debate.
So you are talking 'science', not 'medicine' now??? Uh-huh...(trying so hard not to laugh as I type this)....anyone ever teach you 'logic'??? Better yet, have you ever heard the word 'logic'?? You know..'logic' has no agenda as far as the abortion debate goes too....

Shall I introduce you???

log·ic

Noun

1. Reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity: "experience is a better guide to this than deductive logic".

2. A particular system or codification of the principles of proof and inference: "Aristotelian logic

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#395 Jun 6, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
I never claimed that "pets" had anything to do with it, idiot. I doubt any vet advertises "pet abortions," and have never heard of such a thing. Why are you deliberately confusing the issue? The two are not "comparable," since pets aren't humans, vets aren't doctors, and vets don't provide abortions.
Provide proof that you ever saw a sign saying "abortion for sale" at ANY women's clinic, liar...
You just proved my point...what we advertise to do to our human babies, we wouldn't even advertise for our pets...thank you for allowing the light bulb to come on inside your head!

Since: Apr 13

Hammond, IN

#396 Jun 6, 2013
Good for them . Maybe someone should look at the score card again it can't be right. I live in that bullshit state run by a bunch of right winged religious nut bags. We the people finally beat the church and it's sock puppets. Wonder what pence is going to run on the next election, no crayons for kindergartners?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Well Well 1,458,867
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 1 min AMERICAN SUNSHINE 253,268
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 2 min Rico from East Lo... 403,899
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 4 min THE LONE WORKER 216,740
News Barney Frank speaking at launch of LGBT justice... 4 min Imprtnrd 13
News Trump soaks up the adulation, brags about victory 6 min TRUMP WINNERS 161
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 7 min ThomasA 312,723
News Thousands of people march during rally at Bosto... 16 min Xstain Mullah Aroma 2,130
More from around the web