Rove heckled at college speech

There are 20 comments on the Politico story from Apr 10, 2013, titled Rove heckled at college speech. In it, Politico reports that:

Protesters repeatedly interrupted a speech by Karl Rove on Tuesday, calling the former White House adviser a "murderer" and "terrorist" for his role in the invasion of Iraq.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Politico.

bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#841 Apr 30, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>ummm...the gulf war was when Saddam invaded Kuwait and they, and the Suadis and other nations in the region, ASKED the US to come help.
your globalist conspiracy theories have as much fact as your history fantasies...
The Saudi royal family and the BANKSTERS have a long history together, going back to to their support of the Hitler War Machine.
The protection of BANKSTER assets was the reason for the US involvement in the war.

And, the respect and admiration that the BANKSTERS have for their ally was reflected in this display by the BANKSTER Underlings.



and this

http://www.youtube.com/watch...
==========
The radical Wahhabist Muslims DID not want US troops there.
bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#842 Apr 30, 2013
Brad wrote:
<quoted text>
And there it is,the million dollar question.
What to do about it?
Its what keeps these threads,and many more,active.
I say,go back to basics.
The nation was founded for the purpose of freedom and as a nation of laws.
The more diverse we get,the more we stray from our laws and re-interpret them to accommodate what we originally escaped.
I say we enforce the laws we have on the books to a "T".
No exceptions,no waivers for the elite and certainly no separate set of rules for law-makers.
We need 200,000 US Troops on the Mexican border for starters AND then we need Mexico to pay back the TRILLIONS they stole from the United States. That money could go to help the poor in this country, or maybe for education, or maybe reduce the national debt, or maybe bulid-up the middle class.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#843 Apr 30, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>
The Saudi royal family and the BANKSTERS have a long history together, going back to to their support of the Hitler War Machine.
The protection of BANKSTER assets was the reason for the US involvement in the war.
And, the respect and admiration that the BANKSTERS have for their ally was reflected in this display by the BANKSTER Underlings.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =TLWN0fubQaAXX
and this
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
==========
The radical Wahhabist Muslims DID not want US troops there.
just ignore the facts given and go right to your conspiracy theory, huh?

so you really need these conspiracies to show why your life is a failure? maybe it isn't that "the game is rigged"..maybe you are just a nutcase not up to making it in the real world? sounds far more plausible and the facts seem to back it up, where as there are no facts for you whack-job theories...
bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#844 Apr 30, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>just ignore the facts given and go right to your conspiracy theory, huh?
so you really need these conspiracies to show why your life is a failure? maybe it isn't that "the game is rigged"..maybe you are just a nutcase not up to making it in the real world? sounds far more plausible and the facts seem to back it up, where as there are no facts for you whack-job theories...
FACTS??? What facts do you offer; you think that because you have been programmed with mis-information that you deal in "facts".

You are what people call a lemming

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php...

"A member of a crowd with no originality or voice of his own. One who speaks or repeats only what he has been told."

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#845 Apr 30, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>
FACTS??? What facts do you offer; you think that because you have been programmed with mis-information that you deal in "facts".
You are what people call a lemming
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php...
"A member of a crowd with no originality or voice of his own. One who speaks or repeats only what he has been told."
yet it is you that okeeps posting other people's conspiracies...

hmmmm...

shiny side out...it shows you for the failure you are in life. this is why you wear the tin foil hats, so we can tell you freaks from the normal people...
Don Joe

Minneapolis, MN

#846 May 1, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>
"Gulf War I" was where Bush Sr. drew a line in the sand at the Saudi Arabian border. Although the US was defending Saudi Arabia, Osama bin Laden having offered his servives to the Saudi king to defend the muslim holyland, the radical Muslims were furious at US prescence in said holyland.
This manifested itself in an attack on the World Trade Center,
on February 26, 1993.....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trad...
"...a truck bomb was detonated below the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York, NY. The 1,336 lb (606 kg) urea nitrate–hydrogen gas enhanced device[1] was intended to knock the North Tower (Tower One) into the South Tower (Tower Two), bringing both towers down and killing thousands of people.[2][3] It failed to do so, but did kill six people and injured more than a thousand."
"In March 1994, four men were convicted of carrying out the bombing: Abouhalima, Ajaj, Ayyad and Salameh. The charges included conspiracy, explosive destruction of property and interstate transportation of explosives. In November 1997, two more were convicted: Ramzi Yousef, the mastermind behind the bombings, and Eyad Ismoil, who drove the truck carrying the bomb."
==========
A starting point----although 9-11 can be debated, it is pretty well established that sick muslim religious adherents had a motive, in their minds, and a desire to bring down the WTC.
PS----I have nothing of disdain for "W", but I feel the same about Obama as both of them are on the SAME team and it is the GLOBALIST, NWO team, not the American team.
Starting point... Yes, they had a motive. That much is easy to understand; however that does not mean they are guilty. After so many times being screwed by banks, I have motive to rob one, that doesn't mean I will do it.

I have disdain for w as well, and it is clear that w and Obama are on the same team.

The official 9/11 story is so far fetched, self contradictory, that it is impossible to believe. So while I don't know what happened, the ridiculous story from the government makes them complicit in at least the cover-up. Judging by the massive gains made by bush, it is clear bush had a motive as well.

We are not allowed an investigation into what happened. You cannot have a democracy without an informed populace. There is way too much propaganda and obfuscation. As to getting the word out, it is difficult to even find what the word is.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#847 May 1, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>
Not so, it was Axelrod and the dems who took Herman down with a massive propaganda campaign.
Right.

I like the way Axelrod went back nine years in time and set up Cain with his special... friend...

And made Cain think the 999 thing was his idea...

PS: it wasn't Axelrod's fault the GOP didn't have anyone better than Herman Cain.
Don Joe

Minneapolis, MN

#848 May 1, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>
We need 200,000 US Troops on the Mexican border for starters AND then we need Mexico to pay back the TRILLIONS they stole from the United States. That money could go to help the poor in this country, or maybe for education, or maybe reduce the national debt, or maybe bulid-up the middle class.
I can understand the desire to stop illegal immigration. Putting 200,000 US troops on the border might slow it down, but who is going to pay for all that? A better method would be to simply rescind Reagan and start enforcing the laws against those who hire illegals. Without jobs, most would leave. Mexico can't pay trillions, or even billions, and their economy is worse than ours.

When a corporation is convicted of hiring illegals, there should be very stiff fines. Not like the slap on the hands where they have to pay a small token after extracting millions in profits off the backs of the illegals. If a company has more than 50% illegal workers, all assets of the company should be forfeit and the CEO should go to jail. As the percentage goes down from 50%, they may be able to keep some portion of their assets. Whistle blowers should get 10% of the fines.
bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#850 May 1, 2013
Don Joe wrote:
<quoted text>
I can understand the desire to stop illegal immigration. Putting 200,000 US troops on the border might slow it down, but who is going to pay for all that? A better method would be to simply rescind Reagan and start enforcing the laws against those who hire illegals. Without jobs, most would leave. Mexico can't pay trillions, or even billions, and their economy is worse than ours.
When a corporation is convicted of hiring illegals, there should be very stiff fines. Not like the slap on the hands where they have to pay a small token after extracting millions in profits off the backs of the illegals. If a company has more than 50% illegal workers, all assets of the company should be forfeit and the CEO should go to jail. As the percentage goes down from 50%, they may be able to keep some portion of their assets. Whistle blowers should get 10% of the fines.
We are ACTUALLY at War with Mexico-----from their point of view. Everybody knows it, including the Swedish makers of of the vodka Absolut.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laplaza/2008/...

As Ron Paul said, we can send US troops half-way around the world to protect the Afghan/Pakistan border and we can't even protect our own border. Just with the savings of the cost of illegals being in this country will pay for the troops AND if that doesn't cover it, certainly, we can take our troops out of Europe, WWII being over militarily over 60 years.
==========
I love your idea concerning a corporation that has over 50% illegals; sieze all their assets and the CEO goes to jail. Brilliant!

Yes, a VERY STIFF FINE for companies that hire Illegals.
bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#851 May 1, 2013
Mr Big Bad John Roberts wrote:
<quoted text>So you are saying that Axelrod and the Democrats planted those women that the married Uncle Tom Cain had sex with? All that you are spewing is an overused Republiklan trick to fooling the public into taking the attention off of their racist GOP party as the real culprits of taking Cain down. Never mind the fact that Cain is in over his head, he was stupid enough to believe that he could actually be the Republiklan nominee. You have too many White racists for a Black man to represent your racisy party. Heck, Romney, as dumb as he was was a much bigger threat to the Obama re-election than any Uncle Tom Republiklan field hand you have. Since you are a racist, that ought to make you happy, LOFL!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Ha Ha

Only Sharon Bialek made the charge of Sexual Assault against Herman, with no proof.

There were charges of sexual harassment where money was paid out, but no signed agreement from Herman was ever produced, that would show he was a party to such an agreement.

No other women made any such charge, that was Bill Clinton you were thinking of.

Besides all that, Obama is an Uncle Tom, that is why he is acceptable for the dems. Doubt that???? Then think about Jesse Jackson Jr., David Patterson, Roland Burris and Kendrick Meeks.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#852 May 1, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha Ha
Only Sharon Bialek made the charge of Sexual Assault against Herman, with no proof.
There were charges of sexual harassment where money was paid out, but no signed agreement from Herman was ever produced, that would show he was a party to such an agreement.
No other women made any such charge, that was Bill Clinton you were thinking of.
Besides all that, Obama is an Uncle Tom, that is why he is acceptable for the dems. Doubt that???? Then think about Jesse Jackson Jr., David Patterson, Roland Burris and Kendrick Meeks.
more conspiracies about jesse jr, huh? seems everything on this planet is a conspiracy to you...
Brad

Manchester, CT

#854 May 1, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>
We are ACTUALLY at War with Mexico-----from their point of view. Everybody knows it, including the Swedish makers of of the vodka Absolut.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laplaza/2008/...
As Ron Paul said, we can send US troops half-way around the world to protect the Afghan/Pakistan border and we can't even protect our own border. Just with the savings of the cost of illegals being in this country will pay for the troops AND if that doesn't cover it, certainly, we can take our troops out of Europe, WWII being over militarily over 60 years.
==========
I love your idea concerning a corporation that has over 50% illegals; sieze all their assets and the CEO goes to jail. Brilliant!
Yes, a VERY STIFF FINE for companies that hire Illegals.
So companies should be fined and owners jailed for employing illegals?
Where do the Feds come down in all this?
In many states its illegal to use e-verify or even ask if a person is legal.
The borders,ports of entry and airports are federal jurisdiction.
Why not fine and jail Homeland Security,TSA and CBP for not doing their jobs,or yank federal funding to sanctuary cities?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#855 May 2, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
As Ron Paul said, we can send US troops half-way around the world to protect the Afghan/Pakistan border and we can't even protect our own border.
Not the job of the army to do immigration patrol, dear.

If you had served this country, you'd already know that the army isn't trained to be policemen, they are trained to kill people who are trying to kill them.

Of course, we can understand Rand Paul's confusion.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#856 May 2, 2013
bottlecap wrote:
Just with the savings of the cost of illegals being in this country will pay for the troops
Maybe you can get the army to harvest the fields and orchards too, eh?

Putting aside immigrants pay more in uncollected taxes than they "cost".

Shug...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#857 May 2, 2013
Brad wrote:
<quoted text>
So companies should be fined and owners jailed for employing illegals?
Where do the Feds come down in all this?
In many states its illegal to use e-verify or even ask if a person is legal.
The borders,ports of entry and airports are federal jurisdiction.
Why not fine and jail Homeland Security,TSA and CBP for not doing their jobs,or yank federal funding to sanctuary cities?
no, in no state at all is it illegal to use everify.

where do you get your info?

yes, if we go after the US 'citizens' causing the problem, we will solve it, and not just treat one of the symptoms..
Brad

Manchester, CT

#858 May 2, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>no, in no state at all is it illegal to use everify.
where do you get your info?
yes, if we go after the US 'citizens' causing the problem, we will solve it, and not just treat one of the symptoms..
One of the symptoms?
If Homeland Security actually secured our borders there wouldn't be 30 million illegals competing in the job market.
If the feds didn't subsidize sanctuary cities business owners wouldn't be hiring illegals.
Why should the private sector not only be expected to support the tax base,but then be expected to do the feds jobs?
Suppose the DHS is too busy stock-piling ammunition to do their jobs?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#859 May 2, 2013
Brad wrote:
<quoted text>
One of the symptoms?
If Homeland Security actually secured our borders there wouldn't be 30 million illegals competing in the job market.
If the feds didn't subsidize sanctuary cities business owners wouldn't be hiring illegals.
Why should the private sector not only be expected to support the tax base,but then be expected to do the feds jobs?
Suppose the DHS is too busy stock-piling ammunition to do their jobs?
it is private citizens' job to not break the law.

what part of illegal do you not understand?

y must you have the nanny state do everything for you?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#860 May 2, 2013
Brad wrote:
If Homeland Security actually secured our borders there wouldn't be 30 million illegals competing in the job market.
There aren't 30 million illegal aliens in this country, KnobJob.

No matter how many time you wipe your lips and repeat the lie: it does not become true, it remains a lie.
Brad

Manchester, CT

#861 May 2, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>it is private citizens' job to not break the law.
what part of illegal do you not understand?
y must you have the nanny state do everything for you?
All I expect is the tax payer funded agencies to do what they're paid to do.
Why support them otherwise?
When states step in and do the job DHS won't do,the feds fight them tooth and nail with the SC.
Wish they would stand up for their own citizenry with the same passion.
Brad

Manchester, CT

#862 May 2, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
There aren't 30 million illegal aliens in this country, KnobJob.
No matter how many time you wipe your lips and repeat the lie: it does not become true, it remains a lie.
Name one time the feds have even come close to estimating any number accurate,especially when it puts their agenda in question.
12 million illegals is about as accurate a number as the first estimate for the big dig.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min USAsince1680 1,224,162
News Riots in Baltimore raise questions about police... 1 min spocko 628
News It's Sheryl Crow vs. Duggars in Mo. (Oct '12) 2 min kuda 34
News Cartoon contest organizer known for inflammator... 2 min Who 50
News How Iran Solved Its Gay Marriage Problem 3 min Wall 3
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 6 min ChristineM 161,961
News Mark Hopkins: The Supreme Court and gay marriage 7 min WeTheSheeple 35
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 13 min positronium 326,327
News 5 Reasons The American Dream Is Eluding Black P... 23 min Cheech the Conser... 1,132
More from around the web