Well did you see those articles written by Nate Silver that the NYT published for several weeks prior to the election? You know, the 538 Blog?<quoted text>
The NYT doesn't tell truth. It prints bias and misleading articles. I have no idea why you posted this anyway. What does this have to do with the discussion at hand?
Mr. Silver sure didn't seem to be misleading anyone at all about what the results of the election would be.
As to why I post some of the things I post, it usually has a purpose that most folks with a brain can figure out.
Check these out:
Meanwhile, there are people on these boards claiming that Obama's Administration is inept, and that he only won re-election because of a hurricane, voter fraud, negative campaigning, giveaways, or my personal favorite, Democratic subterfuge during the primaries that watered down the GOP's choice of candidates.
Here's the unadulterated truth: The Obama campaign gathered together a vast coalition of economic, human, and technical resources, organized them, and then executed a plan to convince voters to go to the polls to reelect the President. That plan clearly succeeded.
For all of the derisive commentary the GOP loves to throw at Obama for his past as a dreaded, evil, "community organizer", I'd say that Mr. Obama firmly planted a pair of sharpened sticks in their eyes.
I think it's quite entertaining watching the removal process.