MSNBC's Alex Wagner Dismissed By Repo...

MSNBC's Alex Wagner Dismissed By Reporter After She Goes Political on D.C. Shooting

There are 247 comments on the NewsBusters.org story from Sep 16, 2013, titled MSNBC's Alex Wagner Dismissed By Reporter After She Goes Political on D.C. Shooting. In it, NewsBusters.org reports that:

Second Amendment foe Alex Wagner on Monday predictably attempted to use the tragic shooting at the Navy Yard in Washington D.C. to push for gun control.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at NewsBusters.org.

Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#190 Sep 23, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
The library of Congress is hardly a 3rd party skippy.
You lose
In its June 26 decision, a 5-4 majority of the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to keep and bear arms, and that the D.C. provisions banning handguns and requiring firearms in the home disassembled or locked violate this right.
In the majority opinion authored by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Court first conducted a textual analysis of the operative clause, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The Court found that this language guarantees an individual right to possess and carry weapons. The Court examined historical evidence that it found consistent with its textual analysis. The Court then considered the Second Amendment’s prefatory clause, "[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State," and determined that while this clause announces a purpose for recognizing an individual right to keep and bear arms, it does not limit the operative clause. The Court found that analogous contemporaneous provisions in state constitutions, the Second Amendment’s drafting history, and post-ratification interpretations were consistent with its interpretation of the amendment. The Court asserted that its prior precedent was not inconsistent with its interpretation.
The Court stated that the right to keep and bear arms is subject to regulation, such as concealed weapons prohibitions, limits on the rights of felons and the mentally ill, laws forbidding the carrying of weapons in certain locations, laws imposing conditions on commercial sales, and prohibitions on the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. It stated that this was not an exhaustive list of the regulatory measures that would be presumptively permissible under the Second Amendment.
"The library of Congress is hardly a 3rd party skippy."

Show me where the LOC was a principle in the DC vs Heller case sparky.

You lose

Once again...you're talking apples and oranges.

"Well-regulated" and the courts interpretation, that I have shown you, has NOTHING to with "regulations".

Now...pick one

“Well-regulated”– trained and disciplined in military arms, equipment and techniques

“Regulation”– your point from the court; “Although we do not undertake an exhaustive historical analysis today of the full scope of the Second Amendment, nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”

Your quote after what the court said is not exactly as stated;

You stated;

“It stated that this was not an exhaustive list of the regulatory measures that would be presumptively permissible under the Second Amendment.”

The court stated (Note #26, bottom of page 55);

“26 We identify these presumptively lawful regulatory measures only as examples; our list does not purport to be exhaustive.”

“presumptively lawful” meaning presumed to be lawful but is not in argument before the court and as they stated are identified “only as examples”.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#191 Sep 23, 2013
Not wrote:
<quoted text>
a dating site.
Not a spamming site there either "Santa Fe Spammer".

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#192 Sep 23, 2013
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>You said I changed on here , show me two posts of mine or just the numbers of my post where changed.
Go ahead ,and prove it .
I don't mind waiting.
First flip flop
Where Is My America wrote:
90 percent of the time they will be there after the fact.
If it isn't AFTER it must be BEFORE
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>I never said before a crime is committed but this does happen.
Then you claim
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>
Shotguns by definition are not assault weapons nor are AR-15's .
Which was proved wrong

Then guage and caliber was debunked using your logic
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
18" vs 28" just a little?
you forgot break action vs pump in most cases as well
Using your comparison I guess a 22 Semi auto LR is on par with an AR, both being rifles, semi auto, and an extended clip.
Don't see many cops using them however
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>

And again showing your ignorance. The tactical/special purpose and express shotguns are the SAME GUAGE (unless the hunters choose to use the smaller guages such as 16, 20, etc.) Cops and 99.999% of duck hunters all use 12 guage shells.
Your answer supports exactly what I said.

You aren't very bright.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#193 Sep 23, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
Because you are an idiot. Even when facts prove you wrong you shove your head further up your arse.
Ignorance is not something to be proud of skippy.
Hmmmm...and what do you say about yourself when someone else proves you wrong with the facts...?...that sphincter cutting off your air supply yet...?

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#194 Sep 23, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
"The library of Congress is hardly a 3rd party skippy."
Show me where the LOC was a principle in the DC vs Heller case sparky.
You lose
Once again...you're talking apples and oranges.
"Well-regulated" and the courts interpretation, that I have shown you, has NOTHING to with "regulations".
Now...pick one
“Well-regulated”– trained and disciplined in military arms, equipment and techniques
“Regulation”– your point from the court; “Although we do not undertake an exhaustive historical analysis today of the full scope of the Second Amendment, nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”
Your quote after what the court said is not exactly as stated;
You stated;
“It stated that this was not an exhaustive list of the regulatory measures that would be presumptively permissible under the Second Amendment.”
The court stated (Note #26, bottom of page 55);
“26 We identify these presumptively lawful regulatory measures only as examples; our list does not purport to be exhaustive.”
“presumptively lawful” meaning presumed to be lawful but is not in argument before the court and as they stated are identified “only as examples”.
right in the provided link skippy.

Game, set, and match skippy.. YOU LOSE

Now, unless you have ANYTHING to refute what the SCOTUS ruled this discussion is over. I don't care what you think, you heard, or the anonymous "they" said only reply with something factual.

If you can't then good day skippy.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#195 Sep 23, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmmmm...and what do you say about yourself when someone else proves you wrong with the facts...?...that sphincter cutting off your air supply yet...?
Don't know skippy. It hasn't happened yet
As we

Huntsville, AL

#196 Sep 23, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
Riiight "Santa Fe Spammer"...but there is in SYG, castle doctrine and self=defence laws.

.
have seen too often: not actually self defense, but excuses to shoot people.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#197 Sep 23, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
First flip flop
<quoted text>
If it isn't AFTER it must be BEFORE
<quoted text>
Then you claim
<quoted text>
Which was proved wrong
Then guage and caliber was debunked using your logic
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Your answer supports exactly what I said.
You aren't very bright.
Your really a strange bird.

You don't know sh!t about firearms but it gets worse.

A cop can already be on location , like at a school and they catch people in the act.

Maybe , you have herd the term stake out , it has nothing to do with carry out at Outback.

I have never commented on gauge until about ten posts ago asking if it referred to steel stock .

Why are you using a post by vet ?

Can you just admit your dumb as week old crap and leave it at that.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#198 Sep 23, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
right in the provided link skippy.
Game, set, and match skippy.. YOU LOSE
Now, unless you have ANYTHING to refute what the SCOTUS ruled this discussion is over. I don't care what you think, you heard, or the anonymous "they" said only reply with something factual.
If you can't then good day skippy.
Your "link" doesn't show the LOC as a Principle in the DC vs Heller case.

That's what I thought...proven wrong with the facts and the proof...direct from the United States Supreme Court...YOU tuck your tail and run.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#199 Sep 23, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't know skippy. It hasn't happened yet
Just did...and you're running.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#200 Sep 23, 2013
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>Your really a strange bird.
You don't know sh!t about firearms but it gets worse.
A cop can already be on location , like at a school and they catch people in the act.
Maybe , you have herd the term stake out , it has nothing to do with carry out at Outback.
I have never commented on gauge until about ten posts ago asking if it referred to steel stock .
Why are you using a post by vet ?
Can you just admit your dumb as week old crap and leave it at that.
Dizzy from spinning yet skippy?

I admit you are as dumb as week old crap skippy. I'll leave it at that.

You are dismissed skippy
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#201 Sep 23, 2013
As we wrote:
<quoted text>
have seen too often: not actually self defense, but excuses to shoot people.
Some, so you better be careful out there "Santa Fe Spammer".

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#202 Sep 23, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
Your "link" doesn't show the LOC as a Principle in the DC vs Heller case.
That's what I thought...proven wrong with the facts and the proof...direct from the United States Supreme Court...YOU tuck your tail and run.
It sure did skippy. Now I said:
Unless you have ANYTHING to refute what the SCOTUS ruled this discussion is over. I don't care what you think, you heard, or the anonymous "they" said only reply with something factual.
If you can't then good day skippy.

Since you could not find ANY SOURCE to refute you are dismissed.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#203 Sep 23, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
Just did...and you're running.
Not yet skippy and if I were running how am I still here to make you look like an even bigger imbecile?
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#204 Sep 23, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
It sure did skippy. Now I said:
Unless you have ANYTHING to refute what the SCOTUS ruled this discussion is over. I don't care what you think, you heard, or the anonymous "they" said only reply with something factual.
If you can't then good day skippy.
Since you could not find ANY SOURCE to refute you are dismissed.
No, it didn't...

I'm not refuting anything the SCOTUS ruled...in fact I showed you exactly what "THEY" said...yes, "THEY", meaning the Supreme Court.

The quote was direct from the court record as proven in the link I gave you. Your ignorance and failure to read or comprehend only show you for the idiot you are.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#205 Sep 23, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
Not yet skippy and if I were running how am I still here to make you look like an even bigger imbecile?
When is that supposed to start...?

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#206 Sep 23, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
Dizzy from spinning yet skippy?
I admit you are as dumb as week old crap skippy. I'll leave it at that.
You are dismissed skippy
You talk trash and you can't back it up.

Are you sure you are not a 17 year old guy ?

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#207 Sep 23, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it didn't...
I'm not refuting anything the SCOTUS ruled...in fact I showed you exactly what "THEY" said...yes, "THEY", meaning the Supreme Court.
The quote was direct from the court record as proven in the link I gave you. Your ignorance and failure to read or comprehend only show you for the idiot you are.
Unless you have ANYTHING to refute what the SCOTUS ruled this discussion is over.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#208 Sep 23, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
When is that supposed to start...?
Unless you have ANYTHING to refute what the SCOTUS ruled this discussion is over.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#209 Sep 23, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
Not yet skippy and if I were running how am I still here to make you look like an even bigger imbecile?
That will never happen.

You can't play well with others.

Your biggest issue is a lack of humility.

I doubt you have ever fired a gun , nothing wrong with that but your pretending to have a clue has gotten very old.

Your head is hard so put it to good work and get a job breaking walnuts.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Clinton says 'experienced leadership' needed to... 6 min Bama Yankee 1
News News Supreme Court set to close out current ter... 8 min Bama Yankee 14
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 10 min Tinka 199,259
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 18 min Rogue Scholar 05 216,661
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... 39 min 2all 3,319
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 46 min Into The Night 60,047
News Patrick Blanchfield: Stirring emotions, shootin... 51 min serfs up 7
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 1 hr VorenusI 387,993
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr OzRitz 1,394,925
News Donald Trump: Brexit is sign of independence de... 3 hr Quirky 178
News 50 dead in Florida nightclub shooting, worst in... 7 hr WeTheSheeple 1,297
More from around the web