Paul Ryan promises hate group that he'll fight equality

[snyper]

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Those don't require a license, marriage does. Most states won't give you one, doing so is against the law.

For the Court Clerks.

It's the sectarian religionists who forced their religious critria-for-participation into the secular legal structure.

It's not significantly different from the take-over of the new Egyptian Nation by the Islamic Brotherhood. Just a different sect of sectarian religionists.

[cpeter1313]

Off the message board, you're just another bigot. Between the rising popular mndate and the ever-increasing court triumphs, you and your kind are becoming superfluous.

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Off the message board I'm just another citizen who you'd like to see support gay marriage. Of course gays care what people think.
That's why they like to infiltrate elementary school classrooms and lie to other people's kids.

[Wondering]

AscendedFalmer wrote:

<quoted text>
You do nothing but dodge questions.
Could a gay couple who married in DC be charged with the crime of being married if they moved to VA and lived as spouses?
Can you show us one example of someone being charged with a crime in relation to marrying someone of the same sex, anywhere in the USA, ever?
What is the definition of illegal?
adj.
1. Prohibited by law.
2. Prohibited by official rules: an illegal pass in football.
3. Unacceptable to or not performable by a computer: an illegal operation.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/dict.aspx...
adjective
contrary to or forbidden by law, especially criminal law:
illegal drugs
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/engl...
If there isn't a law against it, it isn't illegal.

You do nothing but try to change my questions.
My question had nothing to do with someone marrying in one state and moving to another. Why can't a gay couple marry in a state that bans gay marriage? Easy one, it's against the law.
Prohibited by law, as in state constitution, as in state statute.
Work on your basic arithmetic, it can help you with your reasoning skills.

[Wondering]

snyper wrote:

<quoted text>
For the Court Clerks.
It's the sectarian religionists who forced their religious critria-for-participation into the secular legal structure.
It's not significantly different from the take-over of the new Egyptian Nation by the Islamic Brotherhood. Just a different sect of sectarian religionists.

Very simple. Against the law = illegal.

[Wondering]

cpeter1313 wrote:

Off the message board, you're just another bigot. Between the rising popular mndate and the ever-increasing court triumphs, you and your kind are becoming superfluous.
<quoted text>

Me, and my kind, aren't trying to convince anyone that your disorder is normal.
Give up the sales pitch, no one's buying it.

[spud]

cpeter1313 wrote:

Believe me, absolutely no gay people give a crap about your approval.
<quoted text>

Who are you kidding. Any time someone disagrees with you it's teabagger this or bigot that. To say that you don't crave approval is ridiculous.

[woodtick57]

spud wrote:

<quoted text>How can there be equal protection regarding state laws if their laws are all different? Can the federal government force the states to change their laws so that they're all the same? The lagal drinking age would be one simple example. If you wanna argue for gay marriage, I would think that it's more of a civil rights issue. As for having nothing to do with religion, you're right until it comes to teaching it in school. Every religion I'm aware of is against homosexuality, therefore it shouldn't be hard to understand why many parents don't want it taught to their children in elementary schools, Personally, I don't agree with homosexuality but it's none of my business what you people do. If a state wants to allow homosexual marriages, that's OK. I just don't wanna see it or be preached to about how normal it is. I truly believe there would be alot more acceptance of homosexuals if they weren't so insistant on displaying it and wanting everyones approval about it.

so your saying gays shhould stay in te closet...nice 1800th century view point.

how bout you never speak of your loved ones in public. or show pictures of them. or wear a wedding ring. no-one cares about you flaunting your sexuality like that...

[Wondering]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>
1. so your saying gays shhould stay in te closet...nice 1800th century view point.
2. how bout you never speak of your loved ones in public. or show pictures of them. or wear a wedding ring. no-one cares about you flaunting your sexuality like that...

1. How about they just be themselves and mind their own business?
2. But all of that is normal, even gays have a mother and father. If it bothers you, you don't have to look at the pictures. I wish I could say the same for those elementary school kids in Lexington that were forced to read gay story books.

[Quest]

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Those don't require a license, marriage does. Most states won't give you one, doing so is against the law.

And that's changing rapidly, now. Thank Goodness.

[Wondering]

Quest wrote:

<quoted text>
And that's changing rapidly, now. Thank Goodness.

Rapidly?

[cpeter1313]

All the research and medical authorities say it isn't a disorder. You have nothing to back up your claim to the contrary. I'm still waiting for one of you morons to demontrate how homosexuality fits the established criteria for mental illness.

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Me, and my kind, aren't trying to convince anyone that your disorder is normal.
Give up the sales pitch, no one's buying it.

[cpeter1313]

How do the two equate? I'm merely pointing out your lack of intellectual ability; why would I want a moron's approval?

spud wrote:

<quoted text>Who are you kidding. Any time someone disagrees with you it's teabagger this or bigot that. To say that you don't crave approval is ridiculous.

[Wondering]

cpeter1313 wrote:

1. All the research and medical authorities say it isn't a disorder.
2. You have nothing to back up your claim to the contrary. I'm still waiting for one of you morons to demontrate how homosexuality fits the established criteria for mental illness.
<quoted text>

1. No they don't, not all of them, just one. The GayPA.
2. Screw your criteria. I just have to see two guys or two girls together publicly displaying affection. I know that isn't normal. I don't need any science or study to reassure me.

[Mona Lott]

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
1. How about they just be themselves and mind their own business?
2. But all of that is normal, even gays have a mother and father. If it bothers you, you don't have to look at the pictures. I wish I could say the same for those elementary school kids in Lexington that were forced to read gay story books.

Yes.... the poor children..... having to go to school so they can be educated to be a productive member of society.... what a travesty.

[lides]

Wondering wrote:

Me, and my kind, aren't trying to convince anyone that your disorder is normal.
Give up the sales pitch, no one's buying it.

You and your kind, can't accept the simple reality that medical science does not classify homosexuality as a mental disorder.

I have challenged you, time and time again, to cite ANY reputable medical, scientific, or academic study or organization that DOES classify homosexuality as such and you have consistently FAILED to do so.

Merely reaffirming your own opinion does nothing to factually support your position.

[Mona Lott]

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
1. No they don't, not all of them, just one. The GayPA.
2. Screw your criteria. I just have to see two guys or two girls together publicly displaying affection. I know that isn't normal. I don't need any science or study to reassure me.

1. Yes they do.... and that makes you crazy.

[lides]

Wondering wrote:

2. Screw your criteria. I just have to see two guys or two girls together publicly displaying affection. I know that isn't normal. I don't need any science or study to reassure me.

Of course you don’t need facts to support your bigoted opinion. You don’t care about what is true, so much as what you want to believe.

Here’s some cold hard fact, Sparky. Homosexuals are people, the US Constitution is the law, and marriage is a protection of the law in every state in the union. The US Constitution mandates that state provide all persons (which would include homosexuals) equal protection of the laws.

Your personal opinion that some people are lesser people who should be treated as second class citizens with less than equal protection of the laws is a) unconstitutional, b) un-American, and c) exactly what tyrants the world over propose. Fortunately you lack the intelligence or ambition to ever be in any position of even modest power, so your bigoted opinion is irrelevant.

Keep your bigoted idiocy coming, all your posts do are destroy your own credibility.

[Wondering]

lides wrote:

<quoted text>
1. You and your kind, can't accept the simple reality that medical science does not classify homosexuality as a mental disorder.
2. I have challenged you, time and time again, to cite ANY reputable medical, scientific, or academic study or organization that DOES classify homosexuality as such and you have consistently FAILED to do so.
3. Merely reaffirming your own opinion does nothing to factually support your position.

1. I don't need convincing.
2. I've presented the opposing challege. You, and others, have consistently FAILED.
3. I know abnormal when I see it.

[Wondering]

lides wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course you don’t need facts to support your bigoted opinion. You don’t care about what is true, so much as what you want to believe.

I've been presented with no facts from any credible organization indicating that homosexuality is normal. I do know why I call you Justice Dumbass though, because it's true.

[lides]

Wondering wrote:

I've been presented with no facts from any credible organization indicating that homosexuality is normal. I do know why I call you Justice Dumbass though, because it's true.

Wondering, you are the one making the argument that homosexuality "isn't normal", which is an infantile argument to make. Normalcy is irrelevant, because what is normal is subjective and changes with the view of the individual. Clearly, you will never see homosexuality as normal, and it is your right to hold that bigoted opinion.

What IS at issue, is your argument that homosexuality is a mental disorder, an argument that has been abandoned by EVERY reputable medical, scientific, and academic organization, and which you have UTTERLY FAILED to support with factual evidence.

It is not my fault that you lack the intelligence to assemble even the most basic factual defense of your OPINION.