Oh you're gettin better. You doin some purty writing right there fer me.<quoted text>
What a curious standard.
When public support for global warming drops, warmists run to physiologists to explain why folks don't believe the "science".
And recently there have been an assortments of "studies" equating skeptics to conservatives and the religious.
So... the "science" doesn't stand on it's own in public opinion, and in response to that evidence, comes more "science" to browbeat skeptics with an assortment of chidings: "dark money", "anti-science", etc.
But, never mind. the zealotry on the other side of the argument.. never mind the name calling... never mind the condescension... never mind the haughty elitist tone of the "educated"... never mind their supercilious attitudes... that's "science".
"Clueless" would aptly describe your one-sided characterizations.
I lack you.