A Finance Overhaul Fight Draws a Swarm of Lobbyists
Join the discussion below, or Read more at The New York Times.
Since: Apr 07
#1 Apr 20, 2010
So if regulating derivatives and Goldman like deals are so profitable and necessary, why did the taxpayers have to bail out the banks and why do they need a too big too fail clause in the financial reform bill? If Congress and the taxpayers face such "consequences," then the bailout and future bailouts were not necessary. Perhaps the whole thing was (and is) a sham. Not only should taxpayers get TARP back but with interest and a share of the profits.
Add your comments below
|Perdue the better choice for Georgia in Washington (Oct '14)||Jan '18||Taxpayer||2|
|White House first discussed Bergdahl prisoner e... (Jun '14)||May '17||Lottery Traitors ...||95|
|Georgia Special Election Likely Advances to Jun... (Apr '17)||Apr '17||He Named Me Black...||2|
|Tea Party Whisperer Pleads Guilty to Making Fal... (Sep '15)||Oct '15||LeDuped||14|
|Threat To Bergdahl Led To US Action, Officials Say (Jun '14)||Mar '15||Dubya Tee Eff||33|
|What qualifies Michelle Nunn to be Georgia's US... (Oct '14)||Oct '14||Sam in Ellijay||1|
|The 2014 election might stretch into 2015, than... (Oct '14)||Oct '14||Marine Corp Pat||6|
Find what you want!
Search Saxby Chambliss Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC