Global warming: NASA study sees dramatic ecoystem shifts

Dec 23, 2011 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Summit County Voice

A United States military inquiry concluded that mistakes by both American and Pakistani troops led to airstrikes against two Pakistani posts on the Afghanistan border.

Comments
1 - 8 of 8 Comments Last updated Dec 26, 2011

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, SE Spain

#1 Dec 23, 2011
"ecoystem?"
ֿ
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#2 Dec 23, 2011
Earthling-1 wrote:
"ecoystem?"
ֿ
OHMYGOD!! Earthling spotted a typo!! Years, maybe decades of vital research costing billions down the drain. What a waste.. Now I guess we have to do it all over again, huh?
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#3 Dec 23, 2011
P.S. The preceding post was sarcasm. Anyone not pick up on that? See a doctor..

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, SE Spain

#4 Dec 23, 2011
This wasn't sarcasm though:
LessFactMoreHype, alias:
NobodyYouEverWantToKnow wrote:
That CO2 cannot be a 'pollutant'? Wrong. Anything CAN and IS a pollutant in a specific context. In this case, as a greenhouse gas causing 'thermal pollution' of the planet.
-
The point is really that the whole claim of 'CO2 is vital to life' and 'CO2 is plant food' promoted by Earthling is not so much that it is technically wrong, but that it is IRRELEVANT to the issue of CO2 as a 'thermal pollutant'. Agreed?
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
-
I'm still waiting for an explanation of your CO2 as a thermal pollutant theory?

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#5 Dec 25, 2011
After reading that I have to say that NASA must believe in creationism instead of eveolution.
umm

United States

#6 Dec 25, 2011
Isn't NASA an American company or something. Majority of Americans don't believe in global warming.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#7 Dec 25, 2011
Actually NASA is part of the goverment. One that is sometimes quoted by alarmist and other times quoted by skeptics.

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, SE Spain

#8 Dec 26, 2011
NobodyYouEverWantToKnow, alias:
LessFactMoreHype wrote:
P.S. The preceding post was sarcasm. Anyone not pick up on that? See a doctor..
You're the one who needs to see a doctor, for something other than your heart condition.
Then you should have these comments peer reviewed:
Forty is spelt with a U
Etymology is not a serious subject
Deforestations is a consequence of AGW
Epistemologists compile dictionaries
Epystemologists compile dictionaries
Samuel Johnson was an American
Ice calving is restricted by size
Spelt is an ancient grain
The equator doesn't have season
Cars can be charged with road collisions
Vikings didn't know how to live in a warmer Greenland
How much heat you are transferring at one time has NO relationship to the temperature of any objects
Alberta is a country
New Moore island is in the MOUTH of the several rivers
Insects and plants don't qualify as species
Enercon install offshore wind generators
Scientific laws aren't science
Climate and weather are not 'linked'
Predictions are just for astrologers
Ethanol is a very workable and effective solution
AGW is just the warming of the global average surface temperature due to GHGs
AGW is the global average
The science says that human emissions are responsible for MOST of AGW, which has SOME unknown but significant part of climate change
The IPCC report of 2001 and 2007 clearly show that GHGs are by far the largest contributor but not the exclusive contributor to AGW
America has two political parties
Climate and weather are not 'linked'
'nondenier' is a real word
Fruiting plants are especially chosen by bees for, "polination"
We acted on CFCs in the 70s
CO2 causes, "thermal pollution"
CO2 is a 'thermal pollutant'
CO2 levels are rising faster than the temperature can react
AGW is comparable to the Holocaust
Please show this 'ararmist club' and membership list.
And theory is the endpoint of science.
The 'unproven' stuff is 'hypothesis'.
The fact that all the scientific authorities confirm AGW as theory means that it IS science fact as defined.
There are no 'laws of science'
Scientific laws are NOT science
the science isn't going to change
While the science doesn't change rapidly it does change
And nowhere is there 'skepticism' of the science
Experiment is NOT science
Experiment can only give you data. It cannot PROVE anything
-
Plus what your crazy idea of what a PoP forecast means:
LessFactMoreHype wrote:
A POP of 30% means that the forecast is that about 30% of the area will get rain. They measure the 'area' of rain in the forecasts model(s) relative to the entire region.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Senator Mark Udall Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
No, Rep. Cory Gardner Has Not Had His Hips Repl... Aug 11 Nogods 2
Under fire, CIA chief has key ally Aug 7 barefoot2626 23
Colorado Democrats avoid fracking fight Aug 5 Le Jimbo 1
CIA director apologizes to Senate leaders Aug 1 the Light 3
Senate Democrats push bills on contraception, e... Jul '14 boo ya 24
Dems target women with bills on contraception, pay Jul '14 HillBilly 11
The Hill: Immigration Reform a Loser for Democr... Jul '14 Zeppelin 1
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Senator Mark Udall People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••