President Obama clears sanctions to s...

President Obama clears sanctions to squeeze Iran

There are 23 comments on the New York Post story from Mar 30, 2012, titled President Obama clears sanctions to squeeze Iran. In it, New York Post reports that:

President Barack Obama is moving ahead with tough new sanctions aimed at squeezing Iran's oil exports after determining there is enough crude on world markets to take the step without harming U.S. allies, The Associated Press has learned.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at New York Post.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Since: Nov 11

New York, NY

#22 Apr 1, 2012
These sanctions are total and complete bull crap.Obama has given waiver's to ten countries thereby rendering these sanctions useless and good for nothing more than a campaign tool. Back in 2009 Obama said"we won't talk forever" in regard's to Iran's nuclear program and he's right Iran will have a nuclear weapon soon enough and there will be no more need for Obama to talk about it.

Richmond, Canada

#23 Apr 1, 2012
What is wrong with Communism , as this is the question you people are interested in posing ?

I can tell you that it is the free world (countries supposed having freedom and /or with democracy ) versus non-free world (typically countries of Communism or going for Marxism ideology.)

Which world do you want to be in, the free world or non-free world?
It is too late for me to be with the Communism or non-free world----I can’t change and I won’t change to be (or a part with ) with the non-free or Communism world. The free world people are (have) the looks-of freedom

As far as that goes, free world does not need Communism people, while Communism people have needs for free world goodies. They have been trying to get them by doing fraudulent way of infiltration and con schemes to benefit themselves. At the same time there are queer elements trying to help them accommodating so that the Communism world (for example-China) flourishes to the extent that some people even praise their success in their economy. All that came from free world carrying the big loads at their people’s expenses. What they have done the better are coming from free world production. Then they try to appear big and show their position of elegant potentials, that wil make more people fall into their prey and trap further. In the proceeding of time in any amounts ( may be 20 to 50 years), the free world can be all over---finished.

If you were also to ask me the question,“Why would you not go for Muslim and Arab cultures belief?”
I also can tell you that it is too late for me because I am from the freedom culture world.
I would rather be with Christians than going along with something that is totally queer and abnormal Muslims like having insane cultures.

Pertaining to these aspects, it I s best not to associate with them, and not let them get close and don’t get close to them so that our freedom world will have to remain and last

We the free world people won’t change for anybody. We will GET GOING forever . Ultimately more people of this planet will join in . At last, the many people who have been neglected and still are in the midst of confusion, would wake up to the consciousness for their needs with freedom.

THERE ARE the foreigners from China,, who are Communists to come to USA to do their evil and bad conspiracy . They don’t care their people being abused with no rights there . Why would USA let them come, and train them to benefit them for them to do evil mission against the free-will freedom-looking people of the world?

Obama spoke with much opening-arm and welcoming-policy recently. That is why this world will be going down if there is Obama hanging in there, doing favor for the enemies-OBAMA IS THE BIGGEST FOE FOR FREE WORLD PEOPLE ON EARTH AND HE IS THE BIG OBSTRUCTION IN THE WAY OF FREEDOM SEEKING PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD.

On the other hand, there is the question of free-marker principle, which is answered as follows:

Not everything is done ACCORDING TO the book- that IS BASICALLY it.

THE QUESTION about free-market is reviewed with the approach to look into own needs for consideration for own benefits first, versus what the other trader wants (it means- are your needs more important than, to give to the other person's needs and would it be worthwhile?)

So based on this aspect stated , there is no free-market standpoint.

The above summarizes all, for the answers you ARE INTERESTED at this time .

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08


#24 Apr 1, 2012
OneRyder wrote:
Of course, like Angry Rick Santorum and Romneycare, the reich wing will complain about the tactic, yet they don't suggest what they would do differently in detail.
You'll hear Angry Rick say "I would enact tougher sanctions."
Romney says "Iran will not get a nuke if I was President" then when asked what he would do, he starts mumbling about listening to the generals, and keeping all options on the table.
Blah blah blah.
Nothing they say translates to anything different than current actions. But the reich wing say "Yeah, Romney would make sure Iran has no Nukes"
Instead, they should cheer the details "Yeah, Romney will listen to the generals and keep all options on the table!"
Yeah, whatever candidates. Sorta like Romney being for a timed withdrawal in Afghan but then being against it when Pres. Obama announced a withdrawal of our troops from the sh1thole meat grinder called Afghanistan.
Top Obama campaign donor accused of fraud
Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP)-- A major donor to President Barack Obama has been accused of defrauding a businessman and impersonating a bank official, creating new headaches for Obama's re-election campaign as it deals with the questionable history of another top supporter.
The New York donor, Abake Assongba, and her husband contributed more than $50,000 to Obama's re-election effort this year, federal records show. But Assongba is also fending off a civil court case in Florida, where she's accused of thieving more than $650,000 to help build a multimillion-dollar home in the state - a charge her husband denies.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Senator Mark Kirk Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News New Congress: Minorities gain but still overwhe... Nov '16 Le Jimbo 26
News Gay Group Criticized For Its Continued Support ... Oct '16 Christshariahns 4
News 'Did your ancestors come from Thailand to fight... Oct '16 pgh 1
News 2 vulnerable GOP incumbents break with Trump on... (Aug '16) Oct '16 spud 11
News Will Donald Trump Cost Republicans the Senate? ... Oct '16 o see the light 1
News President Barack Obama speaks at the Stony Isla... Oct '16 Go Blue Forever 13
News Dumping Trump: GOP members of Congress, governors Oct '16 WasteWater 2
More from around the web