Murkowski: Palin lacks 'intellectual ...

Murkowski: Palin lacks 'intellectual curiosity'

There are 1016 comments on the Politico story from Nov 15, 2010, titled Murkowski: Palin lacks 'intellectual curiosity'. In it, Politico reports that:

Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski said she would not support Sarah Palin if she decides to seek the presidency because the former governor lacks the "intellectual curiosity" for the job.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Politico.

Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1015 Nov 30, 2010
Rich wrote:
<quoted text> Your method of "proving" a lie is to recycle statents you made in an earlier post offering your own "personal opinion"of those statements as "facts".PRODUCE the PRECISE words that constitue any LIE. This is a transparent ploy of trying to put me into the position of disproving a negative,sorry I have no intention of being put into a defensive posture by means of your lack of honesty.
You lied son. Go back and read for a change...

http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/T9TUNP...

Yes, I'm trying to be as transparent so even someone like you can understand no matter how much you cry about your claims. And it's also a ploy to get you to see the facts and actual points.

And your claim that I lack honesty simply shows you prefer to attack the messenger and not bolster your message. You simply want people to accept your WORD as being fact. Sorry son, it doesn't work that way.

So grow up.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1016 Nov 30, 2010
Rich wrote:
<quoted text> Still can't figure it out boy?
lol! Still can't figure out what you're trying to say can you son?

No surprise. You always attack the messenger and not the message when you're lost. And in this case, it's clearly your message you're having trouble with.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1017 Nov 30, 2010
Rich wrote:
<quoted text> Cling to your delusions.
And still again, always attacking the messenger and not the message.

The only defense you know since facts are lacking for you.
Rich

Bedford, NY

#1018 Nov 30, 2010
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>You lied son. Go back and read for a change...
http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/T9TUNP...
Yes, I'm trying to be as transparent so even someone like you can understand no matter how much you cry about your claims. And it's also a ploy to get you to see the facts and actual points.
And your claim that I lack honesty simply shows you prefer to attack the messenger and not bolster your message. You simply want people to accept your WORD as being fact. Sorry son, it doesn't work that way.
So grow up.
Proves nothing!!
Rich

Bedford, NY

#1019 Nov 30, 2010
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Still can't figure out what you're trying to say can you son?
No surprise. You always attack the messenger and not the message when you're lost. And in this case, it's clearly your message you're having trouble with.
Try focusing a bit harder.
Rich

Bedford, NY

#1020 Nov 30, 2010
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>You lied son. Go back and read for a change...
http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/T9TUNP...
Yes, I'm trying to be as transparent so even someone like you can understand no matter how much you cry about your claims. And it's also a ploy to get you to see the facts and actual points.
And your claim that I lack honesty simply shows you prefer to attack the messenger and not bolster your message. You simply want people to accept your WORD as being fact. Sorry son, it doesn't work that way.
So grow up.
Accuse of attacking the messenger,what number is that in the playbook?
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1021 Nov 30, 2010
Rich wrote:
<quoted text> Proves nothing!!
Only if you can't read and deny facts would you be right.

And even if you can't read it still would be correct son. The fact that you have an opinion on the matter carries very little weight.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1022 Nov 30, 2010
Rich wrote:
<quoted text>
Try focusing a bit harder.
lol! Sorry son. If the messenger can't deliver the message, as of right now the problem IS you.

So again, if you don't know what you're saying, there' nothing I can do to help you. And then, only if you want help will it make a difference.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1023 Nov 30, 2010
Rich wrote:
<quoted text>
Accuse of attacking the messenger,what number is that in the playbook?
lol! I wouldn't know, son. You're the one implementing the playbook. I'm just telling you what I see.

Otherwise, you'd be addressing the point instead of attacking me, wouldn't you?
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1024 Nov 30, 2010
Rich wrote:
<quoted text> Proves nothing!!
lol! I knew facts prove nothing to you. Not unless they agreed with your agenda.
Rich

Bedford, NY

#1025 Nov 30, 2010
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Only if you can't read and deny facts would you be right.
And even if you can't read it still would be correct son. The fact that you have an opinion on the matter carries very little weight.
Believe what you need to believe,its of no consequense.
Rich

Bedford, NY

#1026 Nov 30, 2010
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Sorry son. If the messenger can't deliver the message, as of right now the problem IS you.
So again, if you don't know what you're saying, there' nothing I can do to help you. And then, only if you want help will it make a difference.
OK whatever you say.
Rich

Bedford, NY

#1027 Nov 30, 2010
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! I knew facts prove nothing to you. Not unless they agreed with your agenda.
I'm sure you do!
Rich

Bedford, NY

#1028 Nov 30, 2010
Since you have chosen to ignore post #1010,obviously because you have to avoid the central issue at all costs,I leave you to your ramblings. I realize you CANNOT leave it at that.So feel free to "have the last word.I realize you "NEED" to do it.Just remember when you do post a reply you will be confirming that NEED!
Ramble on boy.
MYKRO

Bedford, NY

#1029 Nov 30, 2010
All fake combat vets are invited to Hypoluxo Florida Sunday Dec 12 to march in the first annual Hypoluxo Fake Vets parade. MYKRO of Topix fame will be the very first Grand Marshal. Entertainment will be provided by any REAL combat vets who happen to wander by and kick the shit out the fakes getting a free ride on their blood and sacrifice. Don't miss it.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1030 Nov 30, 2010
Rich wrote:
Since you have chosen to ignore post #1010,obviously because you have to avoid the central issue at all costs,I leave you to your ramblings. I realize you CANNOT leave it at that.So feel free to "have the last word.I realize you "NEED" to do it.Just remember when you do post a reply you will be confirming that NEED!
Ramble on boy.
ROTFLMAO!!!
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1031 Nov 30, 2010
Rich wrote:
Answer this question YES or NO.
Did Chirac state he believed Iraq probably possessed wmds?
YES or NO.
No ramblings about ancillary issues required or wanted.No qualifiers.
If you are incapable of doing so,you will be exposing yourself as someone who places more value on ideology than intellectual integrity.
Anyone is capable of reading Chiraqs statemnt and reaching that conclusion.If you cannot,which I fully expect to be the case.
If you care to discuss the veracity of our assorted posts AFTER you give a simple YES or NO answer to the central issue.I will be happy to engage you.
If you cannot answer that question unencumbered,I will not waste anymore time .
Additionally,your use of the word "son" and phrases like "grow up" were extemely transparent in their use.Sorry to disappoint.
Son, unlike you I think. I don't need to be boxed into a position, I don't need to be told to "vote" yes or no on words you had no clue where they came from or originated (but I HAD to tell you, and you laughed at YOUR souce!) But here's the full quote. And this is a fact son. And if you note, Chirac is letting the inspectors determine if there are any WMD's. Anyone who can read with simple comprehension skills can understand....

"Why do you think fallout from a war would be so much graver than Tony Blair and George Bush seem to?

Chirac: I simply don't analyze the situation as they do. Among the negative fallout would be inevitably a strong reaction from Arab and Islamic public opinion. It may not be justified, and it may be, but it's a fact. A war of this kind cannot help giving a big lift to terrorism. It would create a large number of little bin Ladens. Muslims and Christians have a lot to say to one another, but war isn't going to facilitate that dialogue. I'm against the clash of civilizations; that plays into the hands of extremists. There is a problem—the probable possession of weapons of mass destruction by an uncontrollable country, Iraq. The international community is right to be disturbed by this situation, and it's right in having decided Iraq should be disarmed. The inspections began, and naturally it is a long and difficult job. We have to give the inspectors time to do it. And probably—and this is France's view—we have to reinforce their capacities, especially those of aerial surveillance. For the moment, nothing allows us to say inspections don't work....

What evidence would justify war?

Chirac: It's up to the inspectors to decide. We gave them our confidence. They were given a mission, and we trust them. If we have to give them greater means, we'll do so. It's up to them to come before the Security Council and say, "We won. It's over. There are no more weapons of mass destruction," or "It's impossible for us to fulfill our mission. We're coming up against Iraqi ill will and impediments." At that point, the Security Council would have to discuss this report and decide what to do. In that case, France would naturally exclude no option....."
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1032 Nov 30, 2010
Rich wrote:
Since you have chosen to ignore post #1010,obviously because you have to avoid the central issue at all costs,I leave you to your ramblings. I realize you CANNOT leave it at that.So feel free to "have the last word.I realize you "NEED" to do it.Just remember when you do post a reply you will be confirming that NEED!
Ramble on boy.
I NEED to put out the facts....

... you NEED to use your OPINIONS in place of FACTS.
Hector the Projector

Spring Hill, FL

#1033 Dec 1, 2010
Palin will whine, screech, and gaffe her way out of politics. She's on a fast track now.

Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

#1034 Dec 1, 2010
MYKRO wrote:
All fake combat vets are invited to Hypoluxo Florida Sunday Dec 12 to march in the first annual Hypoluxo Fake Vets parade. MYKRO of Topix fame will be the very first Grand Marshal. Entertainment will be provided by any REAL combat vets who happen to wander by and kick the shit out the fakes getting a free ride on their blood and sacrifice. Don't miss it.
Hi rich. I see you're back spewing your frightwing chickenhawk bullshit. I thought you were on your Alaska tundra vacation. You definitely ain't a vet, no less a combat vet. You're just like the rest of the teabaggin' sunshine patriots. Talk about patriotism till it's your turn to really defend the country. Then none of you can be found. Hypocritical douchebags is all you are.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Lisa Murkowski Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Oil prices ease as U.S. stockpiles seen rising Apr '15 barefoot2626 2
News Keystone pipeline wins Senate vote in victory f... Mar '15 Billy Ringo 56
News Democrats block Keystone bill in setback for Se... Feb '15 Le Jimbo 96
News Offshore drilling plan in Alaska may restrict p... Jan '15 TeaBagging for Am... 6
News Obama's Alaska move triggers fight Jan '15 Captain Yesterday 9
News Obama to propose protecting 1.4 million acres o... Jan '15 Captain Yesterday 8
News Obama to seek wilderness designation for Alaska... Jan '15 WeTheSheeple 24
More from around the web