Top military leader says no-fly zone in Syria could cost billion dollars a month

There are 4 comments on the The Washington Post story from Jul 22, 2013, titled Top military leader says no-fly zone in Syria could cost billion dollars a month. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

Establishing a no-fly zone to protect Syrian rebels would require hundreds of U.S. aircraft at a cost of upward of $1 billion per month and no assurance that it would change the momentum in the 2-year-old civil war, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said Monday.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

Bolshevism in America

Greenfield, MA

#1 Jul 22, 2013
No problem, just have Uncle Ben print more dough and bill the taxpayers. Of course the rationale here is a certain group of people here in America make up the proportion of our tax base anyways.

Pre WWII Germany all over again.
cbc

Hamilton, Canada

#2 Jul 22, 2013
Why not ask Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Dubai to pay up.
amcummer

Saint Paul, MN

#3 Jul 22, 2013
It cost billions to make war and it cost more to clean up the rubles and rebuild, all that just to change regime and what could a new regime possibly do to elevate the people's lives without anyone left unhappy and mad?
lolol

Albuquerque, NM

#4 Jul 22, 2013
going to cost a heck of a lot more when the russians manning/training on the SA300 missile sites take down a few. syria is a lost cause, a russian/iranian puppet state. even if we went in, threw assad out, put the rebels and al queda in all that would happen is another libya/egypt american hating country with their hands out for US taxpayer dollars.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

John McCain Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News A woman in the White House in 2017? It's likely. Mon Cordwainer Trout 2
News Ex-John McCain staffer: Seeing Sarah Palin give... Mon Tazo 5
News 3The top 10 Senate races of 2016, ranked May 2 Creole Joe 3
News Warren: Ted Cruz has no shot to be prez, but is... May 2 swedenforever 236
News Guess who the Tea Party wants to primary John M... Apr 30 Tazo 1
News Conservative Media Rallies to Scott Walker Afte... Apr 29 serfs up 17
News McCain, Graham fire back at Rand Paul Apr 25 barefoot2626 28
More from around the web