Senators Intro Tougher, Bipartisan Li...

Senators Intro Tougher, Bipartisan Libya Resolution

There are 5 comments on the Fox News story from Jun 8, 2011, titled Senators Intro Tougher, Bipartisan Libya Resolution. In it, Fox News reports that:

A bipartisan trio of senators introduced a joint resolution on Libya Wednesday that would require the Obama administration to seek congressional approval to continue military operations in the country.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Fox News.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#1 Jun 9, 2011
Why submit a resolution?? Congress should DEMAND that Obama seek authorisation to continue his ILLEGAL WAR. Else impeach him for breaking the law, War Powers Act. The LAW REQUIRES Obama seek Congressional approval.

“Pardon my nosiness ”

Since: May 07

London, England

#2 Jun 9, 2011
DavidH64 wrote:
Why submit a resolution?? Congress should DEMAND that Obama seek authorisation to continue his ILLEGAL WAR. Else impeach him for breaking the law, War Powers Act. The LAW REQUIRES Obama seek Congressional approval.
Oh you mean like the illegal war that Bush hoodwinked the Democrats into signing onto.
Btw I thought it's the other NATO members (UK and France) that are bombing Tripoli?
No US troops on the ground, no US troops in harm's way - yes I can see how this humanitarian action equates to the 4,000+ deaths and half million Iraqi deaths that GWB and Halliburton caused.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#3 Jun 9, 2011
reza june wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh you mean like the illegal war that Bush hoodwinked the Democrats into signing onto.
Btw I thought it's the other NATO members (UK and France) that are bombing Tripoli?
No US troops on the ground, no US troops in harm's way - yes I can see how this humanitarian action equates to the 4,000+ deaths and half million Iraqi deaths that GWB and Halliburton caused.
So using your logic Obama should ignore the laws and Constitution. Heck why not, he has been doing that since 21-JAN-2009

There does NOT have to be "boots on the ground". Members of our armed forces are flying planes and dropping bombs. NATO does NOT dictate to us our laws and the use of our military. I understand that you, like Obama, seek a singular world order. However until that time there is this thing called the US Constitution, US Code, and Acts approved by Congress, and signed by the POTUS. It means shit to you and Obama, we get it, but until such time USA and our Constitution no longer exist Obama MUST abide.

So Obama has never lied to get what he wants? Whatever! Besides Bush's war in Iraq, while I thoroughly disagree with the action, IS LEGAL, and was humanitarian, to remove a dictator unlike any seen since Hitler. Nothing "illegal" or "hoodwinked" about it. You can remain clueless and uber-liberal biased, but it does not change the FACTS.

As to the deaths, I can assume by your statement that Obama more than doubling, and responsible for more than half of all deaths in Afghan since 2001 is fine and acceptable. Got it!

LMAO!!! Haliburton. The same Haliburton that with Kennedy and LBJ brought us the Vietnam war. Oh wait, I forgot, it was a Democrat so it is acceptable.
Deng

Zhenjiang, China

#4 Jun 9, 2011
WHAT DOES IT SAY ABOUT THE UNITED STATES PEOPLE WHO "ELECT" OFFICIALS TO GOVERNMENT OFFICES WHO CANNOT SEEM TO SOLVE ANY OF THE BASIC PROBLEMS THERE WITHOUT EXPENSIVE WARS.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#5 Jun 10, 2011
Deng wrote:
WHAT DOES IT SAY ABOUT THE UNITED STATES PEOPLE WHO "ELECT" OFFICIALS TO GOVERNMENT OFFICES WHO CANNOT SEEM TO SOLVE ANY OF THE BASIC PROBLEMS THERE WITHOUT EXPENSIVE WARS.
Have to admit that is about the most sensible post I have ever read by you. Obama, Bush (part 1 and 2), Clinton .........

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jim Webb Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Only 19 Months Until Election Day, And Over 19 ... (Apr '15) Mar '16 Three Days 79
News Jim Webb: 'I would not vote for' Clinton (Mar '16) Mar '16 Harry 21
News Today in History (Feb '16) Feb '16 Billy Ringo 2
News Obama smears Iran deal critics and liberals las... (Aug '15) Jan '16 Ritual Habitual 3
News Distinguished pols of 2015 (Jan '16) Jan '16 Black Annie 4
News Chafee quits 2016 presidential race (Oct '15) Oct '15 Le Jimbo 5
News Jim Webb Abandons Bid For Democratic Party... (Oct '15) Oct '15 Cat74 8
More from around the web