Romney's Political Shifts Stir Criticism

Romney's Political Shifts Stir Criticism

There are 41 comments on the OfficialWire story from Nov 12, 2011, titled Romney's Political Shifts Stir Criticism. In it, OfficialWire reports that:

When he was running for Massachusetts governor in 2002, Mitt Romney's campaign courted voters at a Boston Gay Pride weekend by handing out fliers proclaiming "All citizens deserve equal rights, regardless of sexual preference." Just a year later, Romney emerged as a leading voice against gay marriage, opposing the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial ... (more)

Join the discussion below, or Read more at OfficialWire.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#1 Nov 12, 2011
Shifty Romney won't get the support of the far right christian teabaggers.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#2 Nov 12, 2011
Introducing a new campaign Romney shoe, actually not a shoe but an open toed foot apparel commonly known as a flip-flop.
radiofreeamerica

Tampa, FL

#3 Nov 12, 2011
Romney will get rid of obama.Thats all that counts.I dont care what he says.
Lance Winslow

Los Gatos, CA

#4 Nov 12, 2011
Stiff upper lip, wingnuts, he's still the best loser you've got!
Gdx

Gdynia, Poland

#5 Nov 12, 2011
this moron, populist, criminal in the style of bush want to grab the power and then he will begin new wars and he will ruin your country. No bushes or copycats of the same sort anymore.
If republican then only Ron Paul- he is the only normal candidate among all these republicans.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#6 Nov 12, 2011
How are "things" in Poland?

Since: May 11

Ballwin, MO

#7 Nov 12, 2011
It's interesting to see the left wing liberals jump all over threads like this.

Were ANY of you nut jobs thinking of voting republican in 2012?
HIGHLY doubtful.
So, why in the world would your opinion of Romney, Gingrich, Cain, etc. matter in the least?
Or is it that you all just feel the need to spew a little MORE partisan hatred?

Pretty pathetic.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#8 Nov 12, 2011
horacegreeley wrote:
It's interesting to see the left wing liberals jump all over threads like this.
Were ANY of you nut jobs thinking of voting republican in 2012?
HIGHLY doubtful.
So, why in the world would your opinion of Romney, Gingrich, Cain, etc. matter in the least?
Or is it that you all just feel the need to spew a little MORE partisan hatred?
Pretty pathetic.
With the Republican we have in office now isn't bad enough, now why would anyone want to make worse?
A teabagger.

Since: Apr 10

Chandler, AZ

#9 Nov 12, 2011
If Romney wins the GOP nomination and the election it will be without my help. He is little more than a big gov't RINO.

Since: May 11

Ballwin, MO

#10 Nov 12, 2011
Wall Street Government wrote:
<quoted text> With the Republican we have in office now isn't bad enough, now why would anyone want to make worse?
A teabagger.
Are you drunk?
What the hell is that supposed to mean?

That things were better when the democrats controlled congress AND the White House?

If that's what you're failing miserably trying to say, then.

Wow!
You ARE drunk!
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#11 Nov 12, 2011
horacegreeley wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you drunk?
What the hell is that supposed to mean?
That things were better when the democrats controlled congress AND the White House?
If that's what you're failing miserably trying to say, then.
Wow!
You ARE drunk!
WOW. No, that isn't what I said at all.
Better? The same or worse.
Know why? Because he/they were stupid enough to listen and implement the same idiotic teabagger ideas.
Reaganomics.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#12 Nov 12, 2011
For 32 years,wing nuts have insisted the square Reagannomic peg WILL fit into a economic round hole.
Mitt Romney

Orlando, FL

#13 Nov 12, 2011
radiofreeamerica wrote:
Romney will get rid of obama.Thats all that counts.I dont care what he says.
I like little boys.
McCarthy was right

United States

#14 Nov 12, 2011
WeTheSheeple wrote:
Shifty Romney won't get the support of the far right christian teabaggers.
He is shifty, and my very last choice of all the Republican candidates. But just as I will vote for him if I must, if conservative Christians are faced with the choice of four more years of America-destroying Hussein Obama or Mitt Romney, they will vote for Romney.

Since: May 11

Ballwin, MO

#15 Nov 12, 2011
Wall Street Government wrote:
<quoted text> WOW. No, that isn't what I said at all.
Better? The same or worse.
Know why? Because he/they were stupid enough to listen and implement the same idiotic teabagger ideas.
Reaganomics.
Really?
Did you go back and read the gibberish you wrote?

That aside, How ABOUT those horrible, horrible years of Reaganomics!
Things are so much better under Obamanomics, aren't they?

Okay. Now call me a teabagger! It makes your posts that much more credible.
LOL!
Taxed Enough Already

Lexington, SC

#16 Nov 12, 2011
WeTheSheeple wrote:
Shifty Romney won't get the support of the far right christian teabaggers.
Yes he will. There is nothing that can make them vote for Odumdum. Quit BS'ing.
Taxed Enough Already

Lexington, SC

#17 Nov 12, 2011
horacegreeley wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?
Did you go back and read the gibberish you wrote?
That aside, How ABOUT those horrible, horrible years of Reaganomics!
Things are so much better under Obamanomics, aren't they?
Okay. Now call me a teabagger! It makes your posts that much more credible.
LOL!
Just the fact that the Commies and Pervs use the word Tea Bagger when they know their p[arty does that, makes me want to vote against them. Tea Bag away Democrats and Pervs.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#18 Nov 12, 2011
horacegreeley wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?
Did you go back and read the gibberish you wrote?
That aside, How ABOUT those horrible, horrible years of Reaganomics!
Things are so much better under Obamanomics, aren't they?
Okay. Now call me a teabagger! It makes your posts that much more credible.
LOL!
Now it's "Obamininomics"?
Do tell, the difference?
The year? The century?
Explain the difference.

Since: May 11

Ballwin, MO

#19 Nov 12, 2011
Wall Street Government wrote:
<quoted text> Now it's "Obamininomics"?
Do tell, the difference?
The year? The century?
Explain the difference.
A trillion dollar stimulus package for one.
Or, did Reagan do that too? Maybe while I was napping?

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#20 Nov 12, 2011
McCarthy was right wrote:
<quoted text>
He is shifty, and my very last choice of all the Republican candidates. But just as I will vote for him if I must, if conservative Christians are faced with the choice of four more years of America-destroying Hussein Obama or Mitt Romney, they will vote for Romney.
That's what the liberals thought would work in 2004 when Kerry got the nomination against Bush. They weren't voting FOR Kerry, but rather AGAINST Bush. It didn't work then and won't work in 2012 either.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Edward Kennedy Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News McCain faces his greatest battle Thu Julia 2
News Sen. Warren to hold town hall in Pittsfield on ... Jul 4 Ozzie King Of Zyl... 22
News Katie Holmes, Matthew Perry take on 'The Kenned... Jun 27 slick willie expl... 8
News Elizabeth Warren: 'Fearless' foe against a char... Apr '17 Plump Donny 84
News "A former nude model who supports waterboarding... Apr '17 davy 10
News The GE-Alstom Block Island Wind Farm off Block ... Apr '17 Solarman 1
News Immigrants, advocates say old fears rising to t... Mar '17 Mikey 6
More from around the web