Senate Democrats introduce Paycheck F...

Senate Democrats introduce Paycheck Fairness Act

There are 1 comment on the Examiner.com story from May 26, 2012, titled Senate Democrats introduce Paycheck Fairness Act. In it, Examiner.com reports that:

Five Democratic Senators introduced legislation Thursday called the Paycheck Fairness Act .

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Examiner.com.

Male Matters

Livonia, MI

#1 May 28, 2012
The Paycheck Fairness Act is the belief that women earn 77 cents to men's dollar in the same jobs.

The statistic does NOT mean women are paid less than men in the same jobs. Nor does it mean that, even more incredibly in the vein of “men are stronger than women”(which means to many that every man is stronger than every woman), every woman earns 23% less than every man, perhaps leading some of the more benighted and the blinkered ideological to believe Diane Sawyer of ABC News earns less than the young man walking back and forth on the street wearing a “Pizzas $5” sign.

The figures are arrived at by comparing the sexes' median incomes: women's median is 77 percent of men's.

Median means 50% of workers earn above the figures and 50% below. That means that a lot of female workers in the higher ranges of women's median make more money than a lot of male workers in the lower ranges of men's median.

“Women's 77 cents to men's dollar” doesn't account for hours worked each week, experience, seniority, training, education or even the job description itself. It compares all women to all men, not people in the same job with the same experience. So the salary of a 60-year-old male computer engineer with 30 years' seniority is weighed against that of a young first-year female teacher. Also, men are much more likely than women to work two jobs; hence, more often than women, a man earning $50,000 from two jobs is weighed against a women earning $25,000 from one, so that he appears to be unfairly earning twice as much as she.

Strategically ignoring this over the decades has been less than productive:

No law yet has closed the gender wage gap — not the 1963 Equal Pay for Equal Work Act, not Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, not the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act, not the 1991 amendments to Title VII, not affirmative action (which has benefited mostly white women, the group most vocal about the wage gap - http://tinyurl.com/74cooen ), not diversity, not the countless state and local laws and regulations, not the horde of overseers at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and not the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.... Nor will a "paycheck fairness" law work.

That's because women's pay-equity advocates, who always insist one more law is needed, continue to overlook the effects of female AND male behavior:

Despite the 40-year-old demand for women's equal pay, millions of wives still choose to have no pay at all. In fact, according to Dr. Scott Haltzman, author of "The Secrets of Happily Married Women," stay-at-home wives, including the childless who represent an estimated 10 percent, constitute a growing niche. "In the past few years,” he says in a CNN report at http://tinyurl.com/6reowj ,“many women who are well educated and trained for career tracks have decided instead to stay at home.”(“Census Bureau data show that 5.6 million mothers stayed home with their children in 2005, about 1.2 million more than did so a decade earlier....” at http://tinyurl.com/qqkaka . If indeed more women are staying at home, perhaps it's because feminists and the media have told women for years that female workers are paid less than men in the same jobs — so why bother working if they're going to be penalized and humiliated for being a woman.)

As full-time mothers or homemakers, stay-at-home wives earn zero. How can they afford to do this while in many cases living in luxury? Because they're supported by their husband, an “employer” who pays them to stay at home.

If millions of wives are able to accept NO wages, millions of other wives are able to:

-accept low wages
-refuse overtime and promotions
-choose jobs based on interest first, wages second — the reverse of what men tend to do
-take more unpaid days off
-avoid uncomfortable wage-bargaining ( http://tinyurl.com/3a5nlay )
-work part-time instead of full-time

All of which LOWER WOMEN'S AVERAGE AND MEDIAN PAY.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbara Mikulski Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News 'Senator Barb' Mikulski nears retirement after ... (Dec '16) Dec '16 Michu Pichu 1
News FBI raids home of ex-College Board official in ... (Aug '16) Aug '16 Donald JW Trump 8
News Maryland's untested rape kits, Baltimore's sex ... (Aug '16) Aug '16 Phyllis Schlafly ... 2
News The Latest: Congress Members Outraged By Gambia... (Jul '16) Jul '16 BHM5267 6
News Attorney General Lynch meets Gray family in Bal... (May '15) Jul '16 True Judgement 5
News Obama wants $1.9B to fight Zika: Where does it ... (Apr '16) Apr '16 charlie foxtrot 4
News Democrats look for political advantage on Equal... (Apr '16) Apr '16 FancyButtPirate 59
More from around the web